Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Performance measures for government sponsored basic research (1996) 0.04
    0.04272921 = product of:
      0.08545842 = sum of:
        0.08545842 = product of:
          0.17091684 = sum of:
            0.17091684 = weight(_text_:assessment in 6695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17091684 = score(doc=6695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.60999227 = fieldWeight in 6695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Special issue devoted to the examination of the diverse quantitative measures used for the evaluation of basic research, the assessment of its impact, and to the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the various classes of measures
  2. Martin, B.R.: ¬The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research (1996) 0.04
    0.04272921 = product of:
      0.08545842 = sum of:
        0.08545842 = product of:
          0.17091684 = sum of:
            0.17091684 = weight(_text_:assessment in 6696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17091684 = score(doc=6696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.60999227 = fieldWeight in 6696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Oppenheim, C.: Do citations count? : Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (1996) 0.03
    0.034183368 = product of:
      0.068366736 = sum of:
        0.068366736 = product of:
          0.13673347 = sum of:
            0.13673347 = weight(_text_:assessment in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13673347 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.4879938 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Pillai, C.V.R.; Girijakumari, S.: Widening horizons of informetrics (1996) 0.03
    0.034183368 = product of:
      0.068366736 = sum of:
        0.068366736 = product of:
          0.13673347 = sum of:
            0.13673347 = weight(_text_:assessment in 7172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13673347 = score(doc=7172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.4879938 = fieldWeight in 7172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Traces the origin and development of informetrics in the field of library and information science. 'Informatrics' is seen as a generic term to denote studies in which quantitative methods are applied. Discusses various applications of informetrics including citation analysis; impact factor; absolescence and ageing studies; bibliographic coupling; co-citation; and measurement of information such as retrieval performance assessment. Outlines recent developments in informetrics and calls for attention to be paid to the quality of future research in the field to ensure its reliability
  5. Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993) 0.03
    0.029910447 = product of:
      0.059820894 = sum of:
        0.059820894 = product of:
          0.11964179 = sum of:
            0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11964179 = score(doc=7827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
  6. Buchholz, K.: Criteria for the analysis of scientific quality (1995) 0.03
    0.029910447 = product of:
      0.059820894 = sum of:
        0.059820894 = product of:
          0.11964179 = sum of:
            0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11964179 = score(doc=2450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 2450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2450)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the problem of evaluation of research work both by objective characterization, accessible to proof, and by adequate characterization, referring to the content and cognitive level of the work under investigation. A short discussion of established methods by science indicators as well as by peer review compiles merits and shortcomings of these methods. A short review refers to a few approaches towards the development of criteria for an improved assessment and characterization of research work and their shortcomings are discussed. Notably for the evaluation of medium or low range quality no reliable method is available. Therefore a systematic compilation of criteria which covers the full range of excellence to failure with respect to scientific quality is developed and a comprehensive list of criteris is presented which should provide a basis for objective and adequate characterization of publications
  7. Moed, H.F.; Bruin, R.E.D.; Leeuwen, T.N.V.: New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance : database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995) 0.03
    0.025637524 = product of:
      0.05127505 = sum of:
        0.05127505 = product of:
          0.1025501 = sum of:
            0.1025501 = weight(_text_:assessment in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1025501 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Noyons, E.C.M.; Moed, H.F.; Luwel, M.: Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes : a bibliometric study (1999) 0.03
    0.025637524 = product of:
      0.05127505 = sum of:
        0.05127505 = product of:
          0.1025501 = sum of:
            0.1025501 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1025501 = score(doc=2941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 2941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The general aim of the article is to demonstrate how the results both of a structural analysis, and of a research performance assessment of a research field, can be enriched by combining elements of both into one integrated analysis. In addition, a procedure is discussed to select and analyse candidate benchmark institutes to assess the position of a particular resrach institute, in terms of both its cognitive orientation and its scientific production and impact at the international research front. The combined method is applied in an evaluation of the research scope and performance of the Interuniversity Centre for Micro-Electronics (IMEC) in Leuven, Belgium. On the basis of the comments of an international panel of experts in micro-electronics, the method was discussed in detail. We concluded that the method provides a detailed and useful picture of the position of the institute from an international perspective. Moreover, we found that the results of each of the 2 parts are an added value to the other
  9. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.024310352 = product of:
      0.048620705 = sum of:
        0.048620705 = product of:
          0.09724141 = sum of:
            0.09724141 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09724141 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  10. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.024066022 = product of:
      0.048132043 = sum of:
        0.048132043 = product of:
          0.09626409 = sum of:
            0.09626409 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09626409 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  11. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.024066022 = product of:
      0.048132043 = sum of:
        0.048132043 = product of:
          0.09626409 = sum of:
            0.09626409 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09626409 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  12. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.024066022 = product of:
      0.048132043 = sum of:
        0.048132043 = product of:
          0.09626409 = sum of:
            0.09626409 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09626409 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  13. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  14. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  15. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  16. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  17. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  18. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.012155176 = product of:
      0.024310352 = sum of:
        0.024310352 = product of:
          0.048620705 = sum of:
            0.048620705 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048620705 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  19. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.012033011 = product of:
      0.024066022 = sum of:
        0.024066022 = product of:
          0.048132043 = sum of:
            0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048132043 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  20. Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997) 0.01
    0.012033011 = product of:
      0.024066022 = sum of:
        0.024066022 = product of:
          0.048132043 = sum of:
            0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048132043 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44