Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Marinai, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Report on execution and results of the interoperability tests (2008) 0.10
    0.09587076 = product of:
      0.19174153 = sum of:
        0.19174153 = sum of:
          0.13673347 = weight(_text_:assessment in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13673347 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050750602 = queryNorm
              0.4879938 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
          0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05500805 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050750602 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    - Formal characterization given to the thesaurus mapping problem - Interopearbility workflow - - Thesauri SKOS Core transformation - - Thesaurus Mapping algorithms implementation - The "gold standard" data set and the THALEN application - Thesaurus interoperability assessment measures - Experimental results
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  2. Dobrev, P.; Kalaydjiev, O.; Angelova, G.: From conceptual structures to semantic interoperability of content (2007) 0.06
    0.059919223 = product of:
      0.11983845 = sum of:
        0.11983845 = sum of:
          0.08545842 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08545842 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050750602 = queryNorm
              0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
          0.03438003 = weight(_text_:22 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03438003 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050750602 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Smart applications behave intelligently because they understand at least partially the context where they operate. To do this, they need not only a formal domain model but also formal descriptions of the data they process and their own operational behaviour. Interoperability of smart applications is based on formalised definitions of all their data and processes. This paper studies the semantic interoperability of data in the case of eLearning and describes an experiment and its assessment. New content is imported into a knowledge-based learning environment without real updates of the original domain model, which is encoded as a knowledge base of conceptual graphs. A component called mediator enables the import by assigning dummy metadata annotations for the imported items. However, some functionality of the original system is lost, when processing the imported content, due to the lack of proper metadata annotation which cannot be associated fully automatically. So the paper presents an interoperability scenario when appropriate content items are viewed from the perspective of the original world and can be (partially) reused there.
    Source
    Conceptual structures: knowledge architectures for smart applications: 15th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK, July 22 - 27, 2007 ; proceedings. Eds.: U. Priss u.a
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05
    0.047019824 = product of:
      0.09403965 = sum of:
        0.09403965 = product of:
          0.28211895 = sum of:
            0.28211895 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28211895 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43026417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.03
    0.03358559 = product of:
      0.06717118 = sum of:
        0.06717118 = product of:
          0.20151353 = sum of:
            0.20151353 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20151353 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43026417 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  5. Metadata and semantics research : 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings (2014) 0.03
    0.030214114 = product of:
      0.06042823 = sum of:
        0.06042823 = product of:
          0.12085646 = sum of:
            0.12085646 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12085646 = score(doc=2192,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.43132967 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 8th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2014, held in Karlsruhe, Germany, in November 2014. The 23 full papers and 9 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 57 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks. They cover the following topics: metadata and linked data: tools and models; (meta) data quality assessment and curation; semantic interoperability, ontology-based data access and representation; big data and digital libraries in health, science and technology; metadata and semantics for open repositories, research information systems and data infrastructure; metadata and semantics for cultural collections and applications; semantics for agriculture, food and environment.
    Content
    Metadata and linked data.- Tools and models.- (Meta)data quality assessment and curation.- Semantic interoperability, ontology-based data access and representation.- Big data and digital libraries in health, science and technology.- Metadata and semantics for open repositories, research information systems and data infrastructure.- Metadata and semantics for cultural collections and applications.- Semantics for agriculture, food and environment.
  6. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.02
    0.024066022 = product of:
      0.048132043 = sum of:
        0.048132043 = product of:
          0.09626409 = sum of:
            0.09626409 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09626409 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  7. Krause, J.: Shell Model, Semantic Web and Web Information Retrieval (2006) 0.02
    0.021364605 = product of:
      0.04272921 = sum of:
        0.04272921 = product of:
          0.08545842 = sum of:
            0.08545842 = weight(_text_:assessment in 6061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08545842 = score(doc=6061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 6061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The middle of the 1990s are coined by the increased enthusiasm for the possibilities of the WWW, which has only recently deviated - at least in relation to scientific information - for the differentiated measuring of its advantages and disadvantages. Web Information Retrieval originated as a specialized discipline with great commercial significance (for an overview see Lewandowski 2005). Besides the new technological structure that enables the indexing and searching (in seconds) of unimaginable amounts of data worldwide, new assessment processes for the ranking of search results are being developed, which use the link structures of the Web. They are the main innovation with respect to the traditional "mother discipline" of Information Retrieval. From the beginning, link structures of Web pages are applied to commercial search engines in a wide array of variations. From the perspective of scientific information, link topology based approaches were in essence trying to solve a self-created problem: on the one hand, it quickly became clear that the openness of the Web led to an up-tonow unknown increase in available information, but this also caused the quality of the Web pages searched to become a problem - and with it the relevance of the results. The gatekeeper function of traditional information providers, which narrows down every user query to focus on high-quality sources was lacking. Therefore, the recognition of the "authoritativeness" of the Web pages by general search engines such as Google was one of the most important factors for their success.
  8. Park, J.-r.: Semantic interoperability and metadata quality : an analysis of metadata item records of digital image collections (2006) 0.02
    0.021364605 = product of:
      0.04272921 = sum of:
        0.04272921 = product of:
          0.08545842 = sum of:
            0.08545842 = weight(_text_:assessment in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08545842 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is a current assessment of the status of metadata creation and mapping between catalogerdefined field names and Dublin Core (DC) metadata elements across three digital image collections. The metadata elements that evince the most frequently inaccurate, inconsistent and incomplete DC metadata application are identified. As well, the most frequently occurring locally added metadata elements and associated pattern development are examined. For this, a randomly collected sample of 659 metadata item records from three digital image collections is analyzed. Implications and issues drawn from the evaluation of the current status of metadata creation and mapping are also discussed in relation to the issue of semantic interoperability of concept representation across digital image collections. The findings of the study suggest that conceptual ambiguities and semantic overlaps inherent among some DC metadata elements hinder semantic interoperability. The DC metadata scheme needs to be refined in order to disambiguate semantic relations of certain DC metadata elements that present semantic overlaps and conceptual ambiguities between element names and their corresponding definitions. The findings of the study also suggest that the development of mediation mechanisms such as concept networks that facilitate the metadata creation and mapping process are critically needed for enhancing metadata quality.
  9. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.02
    0.020628018 = product of:
      0.041256037 = sum of:
        0.041256037 = product of:
          0.08251207 = sum of:
            0.08251207 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08251207 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  10. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.02
    0.020628018 = product of:
      0.041256037 = sum of:
        0.041256037 = product of:
          0.08251207 = sum of:
            0.08251207 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08251207 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  11. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.02
    0.017190015 = product of:
      0.03438003 = sum of:
        0.03438003 = product of:
          0.06876006 = sum of:
            0.06876006 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06876006 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  12. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.02
    0.017190015 = product of:
      0.03438003 = sum of:
        0.03438003 = product of:
          0.06876006 = sum of:
            0.06876006 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06876006 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  13. Balakrishnan, U.; Voß, J.: ¬The Cocoda mapping tool (2015) 0.01
    0.014955224 = product of:
      0.029910447 = sum of:
        0.029910447 = product of:
          0.059820894 = sum of:
            0.059820894 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059820894 = score(doc=4205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.2134973 = fieldWeight in 4205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since the 90s, we have seen an explosion of information and with it there is an increase in the need for data and information aggregation systems that store and manage information. However, most of the information sources apply different Knowledge Organizations Systems (KOS) to describe the content of stored data. This heterogeneous mix of KOS in different systems complicate access and seamless sharing of information and knowledge. Concordances also known as cross-concordances or terminology mappings map different (KOS) to each other for improvement of information retrieval in such heterogeneous mix of systems. (Mayr 2010, Keil 2012). Also for coherent indexing with different terminologies, mappings are considered to be a valuable and essential working tool. However, despite efforts at standardization (e.g. SKOS, ISO 25964-2, Keil 2012, Soergel 2011); there is a significant scarcity of concordances that has led an inability to establish uniform exchange formats as well as methods and tools for maintaining mappings and making them easily accessible. This is particularly true in the field of library classification schemes. In essence, there is a lack of infrastructure for provision/exchange of concordances, their management and quality assessment as well as tools that would enable semi-automatic generation of mappings. The project "coli-conc" therefore aims to address this gap by creating the necessary infrastructure. This includes the specification of a data format for exchange of concordances (JSKOS), specification and implementation of web APIs to query concordance databases (JSKOS-API), and a modular web application to enable uniform access to knowledge organization systems, concordances and concordance assessments (Cocoda).
  14. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.014586212 = product of:
      0.029172424 = sum of:
        0.029172424 = product of:
          0.05834485 = sum of:
            0.05834485 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05834485 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  15. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01
    0.014586212 = product of:
      0.029172424 = sum of:
        0.029172424 = product of:
          0.05834485 = sum of:
            0.05834485 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05834485 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  16. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  17. Hubrich, J.: CrissCross: SWD-DDC-Mapping (2008) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 10:35:21
  18. Faro, S.; Francesconi, E.; Sandrucci, V.: Thesauri KOS analysis and selected thesaurus mapping methodology on the project case-study (2007) 0.01
    0.0137520125 = product of:
      0.027504025 = sum of:
        0.027504025 = product of:
          0.05500805 = sum of:
            0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05500805 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7.11.2008 10:40:22
  19. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.01
    0.012155176 = product of:
      0.024310352 = sum of:
        0.024310352 = product of:
          0.048620705 = sum of:
            0.048620705 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048620705 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  20. Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007) 0.01
    0.012033011 = product of:
      0.024066022 = sum of:
        0.024066022 = product of:
          0.048132043 = sum of:
            0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048132043 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050750602 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:27

Languages

  • e 35
  • d 11

Types

  • a 30
  • el 13
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • x 2
  • More… Less…