-
Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Modeling the relationship between scientific and bibliographic classification for music (2019)
0.04
0.037423342 = product of:
0.11227002 = sum of:
0.11227002 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11227002 = score(doc=4988,freq=14.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.56900144 = fieldWeight in 4988, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4988)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Scientific classification is an important topic in contemporary knowledge organization discourse, yet the nature of the relationships between scientific and bibliographic classifications has not been fully studied. This article considers the connections between scientific and bibliographic classifications for music, taking general discourse about scientific classification and domain analysis as its starting point. Three relationship characteristics are posited: similarity, causation, and time. In discussions about similarity, "accords" and "discords" are analyzed. Further, the idea of a scale of accord is introduced, and issues with assuming a univocal scientific or bibliographic classification of music are discussed. Causation and the idea of influence between scientific and bibliographic classifications for music are unpicked. The connections between accordance and influence are explored, and the concept of differing purposes for different classification approaches is analyzed. A temporal dimension is considered, and the dynamic nature of connections between music scientific and bibliographic classifications is established. The idea of bifurcation is introduced-a change of accordance over time-which is prominent for musical instrument classification. The concluding model visualizes similarity, causation and temporal aspects as three dimensions, showing how scientific and bibliographic classifications for music are connected through a set of interconnected and complex relationships.
-
Hall, J.L.; Bawden, D.: Online retrieval history : how it all began (2011)
0.02
0.021162411 = product of:
0.06348723 = sum of:
0.06348723 = product of:
0.12697446 = sum of:
0.12697446 = weight(_text_:searching in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12697446 = score(doc=4539,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.61930627 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to discuss the history of online searching through the views of one of its pioneers. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents, and comments on, the recollections of Jim Hall, one of the earliest UK-based operators of, and writers on, online retrieval systems. Findings - The paper gives an account of the development of online searching in the UK during the 1960s and 1970s. Originality/value - The paper presents the perspective of one of the pioneers of online searching.
-
Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008)
0.02
0.016022598 = product of:
0.048067793 = sum of:
0.048067793 = product of:
0.09613559 = sum of:
0.09613559 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09613559 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 6.2008 16:22:20
-
Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Orthogonality, dependency, and music : an exploration of the relationships between music facets (2021)
0.01
0.014144694 = product of:
0.04243408 = sum of:
0.04243408 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243408 = score(doc=212,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 212, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=212)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The classification of Western art music is a complex area of knowledge organization, yet the reasons for those complexities have not been fully studied. This research dissects the concept of orthogonality, in particular regard to music classification. Orthogonality (antonym: dependency) means that one facet acts independently from another facet. Although orthogonality is an assumed quality of facets, it has attracted relatively little attention in knowledge organization discourse. This research utilizes bibliographic classification schemes, musicological writings, and musical works to analyze orthogonality in music classification. The relationships between the medium, form/genre, and function facets are unpicked and a strong dependency is found between these facets. Whether this orthogonality exists as a construct of faceted classification or stems from the domain knowledge is explored. Furthermore, the analysis initiates new thinking about the general concept of orthogonality. The idea of a spectrum of dependency is proposed. In addition, novel, orthogonality-derived phenomena are discussed-"dynamic facets" and "meta-dependency"-where the boundary between what is and is not a facet is blurred. The concluding model visualizes the chain of dependencies between music facets, ultimately showing how the lack of orthogonality plays a key role in the complexity and issues found in music classification.
-
Bawden, D.: Browsing : theory and practice (1993)
0.01
0.009163593 = product of:
0.027490778 = sum of:
0.027490778 = product of:
0.054981556 = sum of:
0.054981556 = weight(_text_:searching in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054981556 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a selective literature review covering the process of browsing as a means of searching for information. References are selected in order to illustrate the major themes and to bring out points which have not been emphasised before. The main points covered in the review include: consideration of browsing as an important, but under rated and little understood, form of information access; the ability in browsing to find analogies, connections, and new lines of thought; the potential of browsings as an ideal technique for accasional or non expert users; the ability to apply browsing to both paper based and computerized information retrieval; and the ability to search for information in a semi-random fashion leading to serendipitous linkage. Concludes that, despite the acknowledges importance of browsing, the increased effort being expended in making computerized systems browsable and the many references to the concept in the computer literature, there is still a lack of real understanding of the basic concepts of the process
-
Bawden, D.: Information policy or knowledge policy? (1997)
0.01
0.008011299 = product of:
0.024033897 = sum of:
0.024033897 = product of:
0.048067793 = sum of:
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands
-
Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999)
0.01
0.008011299 = product of:
0.024033897 = sum of:
0.024033897 = product of:
0.048067793 = sum of:
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21. 1.2007 12:03:22
-
Bawden, D.: Encountering on the road to serendip? : Browsing in new information environments (2011)
0.01
0.008011299 = product of:
0.024033897 = sum of:
0.024033897 = product of:
0.048067793 = sum of:
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.1-22
