Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Mandel, C.: Enriching the library catalog record for subject access (1985) 0.07 
    0.069699265 = product of:
  0.104548894 = sum of:
    0.067894526 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.067894526 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
    0.036654368 = product of:
      0.073308736 = sum of:
        0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073308736 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information
  2. Dillon, M.: Enhanced bibliographic record retrieval experiments (1989) 0.05 
    0.04526302 = product of:
  0.13578905 = sum of:
    0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13578905 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  3. Markey, K.: ¬The process of subject searching in the online catalog : final report of the Subject Access Project (1983) 0.02 
    0.024436247 = product of:
  0.073308736 = sum of:
    0.073308736 = product of:
      0.14661747 = sum of:
        0.14661747 = weight(_text_:searching in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14661747 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  4. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.02 
    0.016022598 = product of:
  0.048067793 = sum of:
    0.048067793 = product of:
      0.09613559 = sum of:
        0.09613559 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09613559 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  5. Pienaar, R.E.: Enhancement of subject access in online public access catalogues (OPACs) (1989) 0.02 
    0.015871808 = product of:
  0.047615424 = sum of:
    0.047615424 = product of:
      0.09523085 = sum of:
        0.09523085 = weight(_text_:searching in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09523085 = score(doc=2863,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.46447968 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Subject access plays an important part when plans are made for an on-line public access catalogue (OPAC). Therefore, current subject searching facilities in OPACs should be accessed carefully. These facilities include, amongst other things, phrase searching, keyword searching and class number retrieval. Users reaction have been instrumental in identifying certain shortcomings in subject access to OPACs. Points out certain shortcomings in subject access, as shown by a number of research projects undertaken during the past decade. Highlights aspects which could, in future, improve subject access in OPACs. This could be achieved by either enhancing content representation in the records within the OPAC data base or by enhancing the searchability and browsability of the OPAC. Considers whether the on-line catalogue will ever be a finished, perfect product, or achieve the universal, familiar uniformity experienced by users of the 20th century card catalogue.

Authors

Types