-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.07
0.07253204 = product of:
0.108798064 = sum of:
0.08819758 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08819758 = score(doc=3601,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.020600483 = product of:
0.041200966 = sum of:
0.041200966 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200966 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.05
0.04768092 = product of:
0.07152138 = sum of:
0.050920896 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050920896 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.020600483 = product of:
0.041200966 = sum of:
0.041200966 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200966 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016)
0.04
0.039734103 = product of:
0.05960115 = sum of:
0.04243408 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243408 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
0.017167069 = product of:
0.034334138 = sum of:
0.034334138 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034334138 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study was to examine user tags that describe digitized archival collections in the field of humanities. A collection of 8,310 tags from a digital portal (Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship, NINES) was analyzed to find out what attributes of primary historical resources users described with tags. Tags were categorized to identify which tags describe the content of the resource, the resource itself, and subjective aspects (e.g., usage or emotion). The study's findings revealed that over half were content-related; tags representing opinion, usage context, or self-reference, however, reflected only a small percentage. The study further found that terms related to genre or physical format of a resource were frequently used in describing primary archival resources. It was also learned that nontextual resources had lower numbers of content-related tags and higher numbers of document-related tags than textual resources and bibliographic materials; moreover, textual resources tended to have more user-context-related tags than other resources. These findings help explain users' tagging behavior and resource interpretation in primary resources in the humanities. Such information provided through tags helps information professionals decide to what extent indexing archival and cultural resources should be done for resource description and discovery, and understand users' terminology.
- Date
- 21. 4.2016 11:23:22
-
Choi, Y.: ¬A Practical application of FRBR for organizing information in digital environments (2012)
0.03
0.028289389 = product of:
0.08486816 = sum of:
0.08486816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486816 = score(doc=319,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 319, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=319)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This study employs the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) conceptual model to provide in-depth investigation on the characteristics of social tags by analyzing the bibliographic attributes of tags that are not limited to subject properties. FRBR describes four different levels of entities (i.e., Work, Expression, Manifestation, and Item), which provide a distinguishing understanding of each entity in the bibliographic universe. In this research, since the scope of data analysis focuses on tags assigned to web documents, consideration on Manifestation and Item has been excluded. Accordingly, only the attributes of Work and Expression entity were investigated in order to map the attributes of tags to attributes defined in those entities. The content analysis on tag attributes was conducted on a total of 113 web documents regarding 11 attribute categories defined by FRBR. The findings identified essential bibliographic attributes of tags and tagging behaviors by subject. The findings showed that concerning specific subject areas, taggers exhibited different tagging behaviors representing distinctive features and tendencies. These results have led to the conclusion that there should be an increased awareness of diverse user needs by subject in terms of the practical implications of metadata generation.
-
Chan, L.M.: Social bookmarking and subject indexing (2011)
0.03
0.028289389 = product of:
0.08486816 = sum of:
0.08486816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486816 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42
-
Aagaard, H.: Social indexing at the Stockholm Public Library (2011)
0.03
0.028289389 = product of:
0.08486816 = sum of:
0.08486816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486816 = score(doc=1807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 1807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1807)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42
-
Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016)
0.02
0.02263151 = product of:
0.067894526 = sum of:
0.067894526 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067894526 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Abreu, A.: "Every bit informs another" : framework analysis for descriptive practice and linked information (2008)
0.02
0.01980257 = product of:
0.05940771 = sum of:
0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940771 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- The independent traditions of description in bibliographic and archival environments are rich and continually evolving. Recognizing this, how can Libraries, Archives and Museums seek convergence in describing materials on the web? In order to seek better description for materials and cross-institutional alignment, we can first reconceptualize where description may fit into work practices. I examine subject cataloging and archival practice alongside social tagging as a means of drawing conclusions for possible new paths in integration.
-
Chopin, K.: Finding communities : alternative viewpoints through weblogs and tagging (2008)
0.02
0.015272654 = product of:
0.04581796 = sum of:
0.04581796 = product of:
0.09163592 = sum of:
0.09163592 = weight(_text_:searching in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09163592 = score(doc=2341,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.44694576 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to discuss and test the claim that user-based tagging allows for access to a wider variety of viewpoints than is found using other forms of online searching. Design/methodology/approach - A general overview of the nature of weblogs and user-based tagging is given, along with other relevant concepts. A case is then analyzed where viewpoints towards a specific issue are searched for using both tag searching (Technorati) and general search engine searching (Google and Google Blog Search). Findings - The claim to greater accessibility through user-based tagging is not overtly supported with these experiments. Further results for both general and tag-specific searching goes against some common assumptions about the types of content found on weblogs as opposed to more general web sites. Research limitations/implications - User-based tagging is still not widespread enough to give conclusive data for analysis. As this changes, further research in this area, using a variety of search subjects, is warranted. Originality/value - Although proponents of user-based tagging attribute many qualities to the practice, these qualities have not been properly documented or demonstrated. This paper partially rectifies this gap by testing one of the claims made, that of accessibility to alternate views, thus adding to the discussion on tagging for both researchers and other interested parties.
-
Huang, H.; Jörgensen, C.: Characterizing user tagging and Co-occurring metadata in general and specialized metadata collections (2013)
0.01
0.014144694 = product of:
0.04243408 = sum of:
0.04243408 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243408 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.21506234 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This study aims to identify the categorical characteristics and usage patterns of the most popular image tags in Flickr. The "metadata usage ratio" is introduced as a means of assessing the usage of a popular tag as metadata. We also compare how popular tags are used as image tags or metadata in the Flickr general collection and the Library of Congress's photostream (LCP), also in Flickr. The Flickr popular tags in the list overall are categorically stable, and the changes that do appear reflect Flickr users' evolving technology-driven cultural experience. The popular tags in Flickr had a high number of generic objects and specific locations-related tags and were rarely at the abstract level. Conversely, the popular tags in the LCP describe more in the specific objects and time categories. Flickr users copied the Library of Congress-supplied metadata that related to specific objects or events and standard bibliographic information (e.g., author, format, time references) as popular tags in the LCP. Those popular tags related to generic objects and events showed a high metadata usage ratio, while those related to specific locations and objects showed a low image metadata usage ratio. Popular tags in Flickr appeared less frequently as image metadata when describing specific objects than specific times and locations for historical images in Flickr LCP collections. Understanding how people contribute image tags or image metadata in Flickr helps determine what users need to describe and query images, and could help improve image browsing and retrieval.
-
Kipp, M.E.I.; Campbell, D.G.: Searching with tags : do tags help users find things? (2010)
0.01
0.013226508 = product of:
0.039679524 = sum of:
0.039679524 = product of:
0.07935905 = sum of:
0.07935905 = weight(_text_:searching in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07935905 = score(doc=4064,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.38706642 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The question of whether tags can be useful in the process of information retrieval was examined in this pilot study. Many tags are subject related and could work well as index terms or entry vocabulary; however, folksonomies also include relationships that are traditionally not included in controlled vocabularies including affective or time and task related tags and the user name of the tagger. Participants searched a social bookmarking tool, specialising in academic articles (CiteULike), and an online journal database (Pubmed) for articles relevant to a given information request. Screen capture software was used to collect participant actions and a semi-structured interview asked them to describe their search process. Preliminary results showed that participants did use tags in their search process, as a guide to searching and as hyperlinks to potentially useful articles. However, participants also used controlled vocabularies in the journal database to locate useful search terms and links to related articles supplied by Pubmed. Additionally, participants reported using user names of taggers and group names to help select resources by relevance. The inclusion of subjective and social information from the taggers is very different from the traditional objectivity of indexing and was reported as an asset by a number of participants. This study suggests that while users value social and subjective factors when searching, they also find utility in objective factors such as subject headings. Most importantly, users are interested in the ability of systems to connect them with related articles whether via subject access or other means.
-
Kipp, M.E.I.: Searching with tags : do tags help users find things? (2008)
0.01
0.012959277 = product of:
0.03887783 = sum of:
0.03887783 = product of:
0.07775566 = sum of:
0.07775566 = weight(_text_:searching in 2278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07775566 = score(doc=2278,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.37924606 = fieldWeight in 2278, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2278)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- This study examines the question of whether tags can be useful in the process of information retrieval. Participants were asked to search a social bookmarking tool specialising in academic articles (CiteULike) and an online journal database (Pubmed) in order to determine if users found tags were useful in their search process. The actions of each participants were captured using screen capture software and they were asked to describe their search process. The preliminary study showed that users did indeed make use of tags in their search process, as a guide to searching and as hyperlinks to potentially useful articles. However, users also made use of controlled vocabularies in the journal database.
-
Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012)
0.01
0.010690859 = product of:
0.032072574 = sum of:
0.032072574 = product of:
0.06414515 = sum of:
0.06414515 = weight(_text_:searching in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06414515 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- There are close to a billion websites on the Internet with approximately 400 million users worldwide [www.internetworldstats.com]. People go to websites for a wide variety of different information tasks, from finding a restaurant to serious research. Many of the difficulties with searching the Web, as it is structured currently, can be attributed to increases to scale. The content of the Web is now so large that we only have a rough estimate of the number of sites and the range of information is extremely diverse, from blogs and photos to research articles and news videos.
-
Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009)
0.01
0.009163593 = product of:
0.027490778 = sum of:
0.027490778 = product of:
0.054981556 = sum of:
0.054981556 = weight(_text_:searching in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054981556 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Social tagging is one of the major phenomena transforming the World Wide Web from a static platform into an actively shared information space. This paper addresses various aspects of social tagging, including different views on the nature of social tagging, how to make use of social tags, and how to bridge social tagging with other Web functionalities; it discusses the use of facets to facilitate browsing and searching of tagging data; and it presents an analogy between bibliometrics and tagometrics, arguing that established bibliometric methodologies can be applied to analyze tagging behavior on the Web. Based on the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO), a Web crawler was built to harvest tag data from Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube in September 2007. In total, 1.8 million objects, including bookmarks, photos, and videos, 3.1 million taggers, and 12.1 million tags were collected and analyzed. Some tagging patterns and variations are identified and discussed.
-
Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010)
0.01
0.009163593 = product of:
0.027490778 = sum of:
0.027490778 = product of:
0.054981556 = sum of:
0.054981556 = weight(_text_:searching in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054981556 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Data integration and mediation have become central concerns of information technology over the past few decades. With the advent of the Web and the rapid increases in the amount of data and the number of Web documents and users, researchers have focused on enhancing the interoperability of data through the development of metadata schemes. Other researchers have looked to the wealth of metadata generated by bookmarking sites on the Social Web. While several existing ontologies have capitalized on the semantics of metadata created by tagging activities, the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO) emphasizes the structure of tagging activities to facilitate modeling of tagging data and the integration of data from different bookmarking sites as well as the alignment of tagging ontologies. UTO is described and its utility in modeling, harvesting, integrating, searching, and analyzing data is demonstrated with metadata harvested from three major social tagging systems (Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube).
-
Kipp, M.E.I.: Tagging of biomedical articles on CiteULike : a comparison of user, author and professional indexing (2011)
0.01
0.009163593 = product of:
0.027490778 = sum of:
0.027490778 = product of:
0.054981556 = sum of:
0.054981556 = weight(_text_:searching in 4557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054981556 = score(doc=4557,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 4557, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4557)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the context of online indexing from the viewpoint of three different groups: users, authors, and professional indexers. User tags, author keywords, and descriptors were collected from academic journal articles, which were both indexed in PubMed and tagged on CiteULike, and analysed. Descriptive statistics, informetric measures, and thesaural term comparison shows that there are important differences in the use of keywords among the three groups in addition to similarities, which can be used to enhance support for search and browse. While tags and author keywords were found that matched descriptors exactly, other terms which did not match but provided important expansion to the indexing lexicon were found. These additional terms could be used to enhance support for searching and browsing in article databases as well as to provide invaluable data for entry vocabulary and emergent terminology for regular updates to indexing systems. Additionally, the study suggests that tags support organisation by association to task, projects, and subject while making important connections to traditional systems which classify into subject categories.
-
Huang, S.-L.; Lin, S.-C.; Chan, Y.-C.: Investigating effectiveness and user acceptance of semantic social tagging for knowledge sharing (2012)
0.01
0.009163593 = product of:
0.027490778 = sum of:
0.027490778 = product of:
0.054981556 = sum of:
0.054981556 = weight(_text_:searching in 2732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054981556 = score(doc=2732,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 2732, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2732)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Social tagging systems enable users to assign arbitrary tags to various digital resources. However, they face vague-meaning problems when users retrieve or present resources with the keyword-based tags. In order to solve these problems, this study takes advantage of Semantic Web technology and the topological characteristics of knowledge maps to develop a system that comprises a semantic tagging mechanism and triple-pattern and visual searching mechanisms. A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and user acceptance of these mechanisms in a knowledge sharing context. The results show that the semantic social tagging system is more effective than a keyword-based system. The visualized knowledge map helps users capture an overview of the knowledge domain, reduce cognitive effort for the search, and obtain more enjoyment. Traditional keyword tagging with a keyword search still has the advantage of ease of use and the users had higher intention to use it. This study also proposes directions for future development of semantic social tagging systems.
-
Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008)
0.01
0.009155771 = product of:
0.02746731 = sum of:
0.02746731 = product of:
0.05493462 = sum of:
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.008092634 = product of:
0.024277903 = sum of:
0.024277903 = product of:
0.048555806 = sum of:
0.048555806 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048555806 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008)
0.01
0.008011299 = product of:
0.024033897 = sum of:
0.024033897 = product of:
0.048067793 = sum of:
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 12:22:44
