-
Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997)
0.18
0.17963108 = product of:
0.2694466 = sum of:
0.067894526 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067894526 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
0.2015521 = sum of:
0.14661747 = weight(_text_:searching in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14661747 = score(doc=1628,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
- Date
- 29. 7.1998 10:57:22
-
Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987)
0.17
0.16975081 = product of:
0.2546262 = sum of:
0.09601736 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09601736 = score(doc=336,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
0.15860884 = sum of:
0.10367422 = weight(_text_:searching in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10367422 = score(doc=336,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5056614 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The growing interest in end user or direct patron access to on-line bibliographic databases is reviewed with references to online catalogues, databases, and CD-ROMs. The literature of end user searching is surveyed with notes on: user training, software search aids, end user services in libraries: characterisation of end user searches; the role of librarians; and CD-ROMs as end user media
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
-
Cao, L.; Leong, M.-K.; Low, H.-B.: Searching heterogeneous multilingual bibliographic sources (1998)
0.17
0.16975081 = product of:
0.2546262 = sum of:
0.09601736 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09601736 = score(doc=3564,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.15860884 = sum of:
0.10367422 = weight(_text_:searching in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10367422 = score(doc=3564,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.5056614 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Propopses a Web-based architecture for searching distributed heterogeneous multi-asian language bibliographic sources, and describes a successful pilot implementation of the system at the Chinese Library (CLib) system developed in Singapore and tested at 2 university libraries and a public library
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Brandt, D.S.: Ovid searching software (1996)
0.17
0.16653574 = product of:
0.2498036 = sum of:
0.067894526 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067894526 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
0.18190908 = sum of:
0.12697446 = weight(_text_:searching in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12697446 = score(doc=6754,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.61930627 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews Ovid searching software, a system for searching and manipulating output from bibliographic databases. It allows fields of indexes to be searched, or for terms of a controlled vocabulary to be mapped, provides a variety of display options and permits customisation of system features. Output may be directed to e-mail. Ovid interface with over 80 commercial databases to exploit the features of each. Covers vendor and user profiles; operating environment; user interface, search strategies; display and manipulation of documents; and documentation
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Hearn, S.: Bibliographic control in the electronic age (1996)
0.15
0.14950715 = product of:
0.22426072 = sum of:
0.09601736 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09601736 = score(doc=6424,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
0.12824336 = sum of:
0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073308736 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Librarians responsible for organizing access to library collections have an obligation to plan for the future. Developments in the world of information which will inevitably have an impact on how they do their jobs include new forms of media, new cataloguing tools and standards, and new methods of creating, acquiring, and searching for data. Equally if not more important, new models are needed for the range of services which bibliographic control units are working to provide, and for the roles which these units will play in the larger organization
- Source
- Journal of library administration. 22(1996) nos.2/3, S.123-132
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.15
0.14950715 = product of:
0.22426072 = sum of:
0.09601736 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09601736 = score(doc=6095,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.12824336 = sum of:
0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073308736 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002)
0.15
0.14571878 = product of:
0.21857816 = sum of:
0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940771 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.15917045 = sum of:
0.11110266 = weight(_text_:searching in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11110266 = score(doc=156,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.541893 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Fenichel, C.: ¬The process of searching online bibliographic databases : a review of research (1980)
0.14
0.13939853 = product of:
0.20909779 = sum of:
0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13578905 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
0.073308736 = product of:
0.14661747 = sum of:
0.14661747 = weight(_text_:searching in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14661747 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Penhale, S.J.; Taylor, N.: Integrating end-user searching into a bibliographic instruction program (1986)
0.14
0.13939853 = product of:
0.20909779 = sum of:
0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13578905 = score(doc=5256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 5256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5256)
0.073308736 = product of:
0.14661747 = sum of:
0.14661747 = weight(_text_:searching in 5256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14661747 = score(doc=5256,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 5256, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5256)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Bayer, A.E.; Jahoda, G.: Effects of online bibliographic searching on scientists' information style (1981)
0.14
0.13939853 = product of:
0.20909779 = sum of:
0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13578905 = score(doc=5574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.073308736 = product of:
0.14661747 = sum of:
0.14661747 = weight(_text_:searching in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14661747 = score(doc=5574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Dezelar-Tiedman, C.; Genereux, C.; Hearn, S.: Utilizing Z39.50 to obtain bibliographic copy : a cost-containment study (2006)
0.14
0.13896322 = product of:
0.20844483 = sum of:
0.07201302 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07201302 = score(doc=113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.13643181 = sum of:
0.09523085 = weight(_text_:searching in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09523085 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.46447968 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.041200966 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041200966 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at one approach to controlling costs when seeking cataloging copy. A small task group in the University of Minnesota Libraries Technical Services Department conducted a study to devise the most cost-effective strategy for searching for and importing bibliographic copy, by compiling costs and benefits of importing records from the OCLC Online Computer Library Center database, the Research Libraries Group Union Catalog (RLIN), and the Library of Congress (LC) catalog. Results of the study indicated that, although the LC database is smaller than the other two utilities, a sufficient portion of needed records were available from LC to more than offset the cost of re-searching in the other databases for records not found. In addition, due to differences in pricing structure, searching RLIN second was found to be more cost effective than going next to OCLC, even though a slightly larger proportion of items were found in OCLC than RLIN. This study may prove useful either as a research method or in terms of its findings for other libraries wishing to compare sources of cataloging copy.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Lazinger, S.S.: To merge or not to merge : Israel's Union List of Monographs in the context of merging algorithms (1994)
0.13
0.13212697 = product of:
0.19819045 = sum of:
0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940771 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
0.13878274 = sum of:
0.09071494 = weight(_text_:searching in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09071494 = score(doc=3100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.44245374 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=3100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3100)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- ALEPH, Israel's research library network, was implemented as a highly decentralized network consisting of nearly 30 different files and no union catalogue. To solve the problem of searching these separate files, the Union List of Monographs was implemented in 1991. In reality, neither a union list nor confined to monographs, the Union List of Monographs is, in effect, a union index for locating bibliographic items by author or title, in order to ascertain where they can be found without searching each library's file separately. Reviews the literature of merging files and records, and describes the development of an algorithm for producing the Union List of Monographs
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 13:00:54
-
Piccotti, P.: ¬Les nouvelles technologies et la recherche documentaire (1998)
0.13
0.13212697 = product of:
0.19819045 = sum of:
0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940771 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
0.13878274 = sum of:
0.09071494 = weight(_text_:searching in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09071494 = score(doc=2226,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.44245374 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Venice University Institute of Architecture has developed Easyweb, a software package to integrate its heterogeneous non-compatible bibliographic and multimedia databases, standardise access and create internal links, by transferring all existing OPAC applications to the Web. Features include importation of UNIMARC data, multiple window searching, multibase searching and special applications, e.g. circulation management. Easyweb is notable user friendly and has become the point of reference for OPACs in Italy
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.178, S.20-22
-
Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006)
0.13
0.13212697 = product of:
0.19819045 = sum of:
0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940771 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.13878274 = sum of:
0.09071494 = weight(_text_:searching in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09071494 = score(doc=5302,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.44245374 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:30:09
-
Grivel, L.; Mutschke, P.; Polanco, X.: Thematic mapping on bibliographic databases by cluster analysis : a description of the SDOC environment with SOLIS (1995)
0.13
0.13081875 = product of:
0.19622813 = sum of:
0.08401519 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08401519 = score(doc=1900,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
0.11221294 = sum of:
0.06414515 = weight(_text_:searching in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06414515 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048067793 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The paper presents a coword-analysis-based system called SDOC which is able to pupport the intellectual work of an end-user who is searching for information in a bibliographic database. This is done by presenting its thematical structure as a map of keyword clusters (themes) on a graphical user interface. These mapping facilities are demonstrated on the basis of the research field Social History given by a set of documents from the social science literature database SOLIS. Besides the traditional way of analysing a coword map as a strategic diagram, the notion of cluster relationships analysis is introduced which provides an adequate interpretation of links between themes
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.70-77
-
Liu, Y.: Precision One MediaSource : film/video locator on CD-ROM (1995)
0.13
0.13075858 = product of:
0.19613788 = sum of:
0.067894526 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067894526 = score(doc=7744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 7744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7744)
0.12824336 = sum of:
0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 7744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073308736 = score(doc=7744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 7744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7744)
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 7744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=7744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7744)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Precision One MediaSource First Edition is the first film and video listing on CD-ROM containing bibliographic records and information about renatl sources. It was co-produced by the Brodart Co., Pennsylvania, and the Consortium of College and University Media Centres (CCUMC) and requires an IBM/campatible with hard disk, CD-ROM drive and DOS 3.3 or higher. MediaSource is intended for educational and business users and is of particular interest to public, school and academic libraries. Discusses installation, the interface and searching, data quality and documentation
- Date
- 22. 6.1997 16:34:51
-
Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998)
0.13
0.13075858 = product of:
0.19613788 = sum of:
0.067894526 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067894526 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.12824336 = sum of:
0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073308736 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012)
0.13
0.12918285 = product of:
0.19377425 = sum of:
0.16630694 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16630694 = score(doc=4564,freq=12.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.84286875 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.02746731 = product of:
0.05493462 = sum of:
0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05493462 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic relationships are one of the most active research areas in knowledge organization, especially in cataloguing. This study attempts to examine and map the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) bibliographic relationships with Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships, and to a ssess the congruence between them. The FRBR conceptual model provides a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships in chapter 5, illustrating them in 11 tables. This study shows that there is considerable congruence between these two taxonomies.
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:13:52
-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994)
0.13
0.12843022 = product of:
0.19264531 = sum of:
0.16973633 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16973633 = score(doc=3033,freq=32.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.86024934 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.02290898 = product of:
0.04581796 = sum of:
0.04581796 = weight(_text_:searching in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04581796 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
-
Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997)
0.13
0.12714912 = product of:
0.19072367 = sum of:
0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13578905 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
0.05493462 = product of:
0.10986924 = sum of:
0.10986924 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10986924 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05068286 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
