Search (7528 results, page 2 of 377)

  1. Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012) 0.13
    0.12918285 = product of:
      0.19377425 = sum of:
        0.16630694 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16630694 = score(doc=4564,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.84286875 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
        0.02746731 = product of:
          0.05493462 = sum of:
            0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05493462 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships are one of the most active research areas in knowledge organization, especially in cataloguing. This study attempts to examine and map the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) bibliographic relationships with Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships, and to a ssess the congruence between them. The FRBR conceptual model provides a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships in chapter 5, illustrating them in 11 tables. This study shows that there is considerable congruence between these two taxonomies.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:13:52
  2. Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994) 0.13
    0.12843022 = product of:
      0.19264531 = sum of:
        0.16973633 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16973633 = score(doc=3033,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.86024934 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
        0.02290898 = product of:
          0.04581796 = sum of:
            0.04581796 = weight(_text_:searching in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04581796 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
  3. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.13
    0.12714912 = product of:
      0.19072367 = sum of:
        0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13578905 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
        0.05493462 = product of:
          0.10986924 = sum of:
            0.10986924 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10986924 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  4. Bellarby, L.: Personal bibliographic packages : a comparison of EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.13
    0.12564744 = product of:
      0.18847115 = sum of:
        0.15181679 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15181679 = score(doc=6029,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.7694304 = fieldWeight in 6029, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6029)
        0.036654368 = product of:
          0.073308736 = sum of:
            0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 6029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073308736 = score(doc=6029,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 6029, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6029)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a bried study evaluating personal bibliographic packages. Personal bibliographic software packages house bibliographic data for researchers to create a growing database of references for eventual citation. Assesses EndNote and Pro-Cite according to interface, capacity, indexing, searching, output formats, in-text citations and downloading. Offers advice on selecting personal bibliographic software packages
  5. Lee, C.: Cataloguing a small library collection with a bibliographic database management system (1996) 0.13
    0.12564744 = product of:
      0.18847115 = sum of:
        0.15181679 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15181679 = score(doc=6432,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.7694304 = fieldWeight in 6432, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6432)
        0.036654368 = product of:
          0.073308736 = sum of:
            0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 6432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073308736 = score(doc=6432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 6432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews Library Master, a bibliographic and textual database manager produced and distributed by Balboa Software, Willowdale, Ontario, Canada. Library Master runs on IBM PC compatible machines with 512 K of RAM and DOS 3.3 or hogher. It can be used either by single users or by multiple users from the network version. Discusses pricing; cataloguing bibliographic records; searching and retrieving and returning bibliographic records; editing and delieting bibliographic records; authority files; and printing bibliographies and catalogues
  6. Cochrane, P.A.: Redesign of catalogs and indexes for improved subject access : selected papers of Pauline A. Cochrane (1985) 0.13
    0.1250841 = product of:
      0.18762615 = sum of:
        0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13578905 = score(doc=124,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.05183711 = product of:
          0.10367422 = sum of:
            0.10367422 = weight(_text_:searching in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10367422 = score(doc=124,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.5056614 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    LCSH
    Machine / readable bibliographic data
    Online bibliographic searching
    Subject
    Machine / readable bibliographic data
    Online bibliographic searching
  7. Electronic Resources: Selection and Bibliographic Control : [Themenheft] (1996) 0.12
    0.12348467 = product of:
      0.185227 = sum of:
        0.14402604 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14402604 = score(doc=4206,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.7299458 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
        0.041200966 = product of:
          0.08240193 = sum of:
            0.08240193 = weight(_text_:22 in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08240193 = score(doc=4206,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Siehe auch unter: Electronic resources: selection and bibliographic control. Ed.: Pattie, L.-Y.W. u. B.J. Cox. New York: Haworth 1996.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.1-238
  8. Hollis, R.; Brunelle, B.S.: Developing a common user interface for information searching (1995) 0.12
    0.12321206 = product of:
      0.18481809 = sum of:
        0.1200217 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1200217 = score(doc=3364,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
        0.06479639 = product of:
          0.12959278 = sum of:
            0.12959278 = weight(_text_:searching in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12959278 = score(doc=3364,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.6320768 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the debate over a Common User Interface for databases, across various hardware platforms and operating systems, for both CD-ROM and online searching of bibliographic and full text databases. Discusses the implementation and further development of Z39.50 as an international standard for structured bibliographic data
  9. Markey, K.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: integration of a library schedule and index into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog (1985) 0.12
    0.121973716 = product of:
      0.18296057 = sum of:
        0.11881542 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11881542 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
        0.06414515 = product of:
          0.1282903 = sum of:
            0.1282903 = weight(_text_:searching in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1282903 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.6257241 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 14(1985), S.31-34
  10. Flood, E.: Subject searching in BIBSYS (1991) 0.12
    0.11865269 = product of:
      0.17797902 = sum of:
        0.09601736 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09601736 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
        0.08196166 = product of:
          0.16392332 = sum of:
            0.16392332 = weight(_text_:searching in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16392332 = score(doc=2651,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.7995209 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    BIBSYS is the centralised cataloguing facility for all university libraries in Norway. Describes 3 systems used to access the on-line catalogue (OPAC): PUBSOK (Public Searching); GENSOK (General Searching). A 3rd method of searching: BIBSOK (Bibliographic Searching); is for internal use only, the search criteria are mainly bibliographic data, and is not described here
  11. Chowdhury, G.G.: Record formats for integrated databases : a review and comparison (1996) 0.12
    0.1183941 = product of:
      0.17759115 = sum of:
        0.14551857 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14551857 = score(doc=7679,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.73751014 = fieldWeight in 7679, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7679)
        0.032072574 = product of:
          0.06414515 = sum of:
            0.06414515 = weight(_text_:searching in 7679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06414515 = score(doc=7679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 7679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the issues involved in the development of data formats for computerized information retrieval systems. Integrated databases capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information, in a single database structure, are more convenient for searching and retrieval by end users. Several bibliographic formats have been developed and are used for these bibliographic control puposes. Reviews features of 6 major bibliographic formats: USMARC, UKMARC, UNIMARC, CCF, MIBIS and ABNCD are reviewed. Only 2 formats: CCF and ABNCD are capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information and supporting the design of integrated databases. The comparison suggests that, while CCF makes more detailed provision for bibliographic information, ABNCD makes better provision for factual information such as profiles of institutions, information systems, projects and human experts
  12. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Bibliographic standards and the online catalogue user (1991) 0.11
    0.11496228 = product of:
      0.17244342 = sum of:
        0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13578905 = score(doc=7907,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 7907, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7907)
        0.036654368 = product of:
          0.073308736 = sum of:
            0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 7907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073308736 = score(doc=7907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 7907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7907)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Online catalogue studies indicate that users have difficulties in searching the bibliographic tool. Highlights bibliographic factors which influence the design and use of online catalogues. Shows how existing standards in the areas of cataloguing, subject authority and classification are influencing design of future systems
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  13. Haynes, K.J.M.; Saye, J.D.; Kaid, L.L.: Cataloging collection-level records for archival video and audio recordings (1993) 0.11
    0.11441377 = product of:
      0.17162065 = sum of:
        0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05940771 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.11221294 = sum of:
          0.06414515 = weight(_text_:searching in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06414515 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05068286 = queryNorm
              0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
          0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048067793 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05068286 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project to create a bibliographic control system for archival quality video and audio recordings of political commercials. The project objectives were: to design a local computer searchable database; prepare item level records for the local database; and prepare collection level records for the OCLC Online Union Catalog. The collection level records are intended to alert scholars, researchers, and other potential users to the existence of the archive and to direct them to it for more powerful item level searching in the local database. Some of the cataloguing problems discussed are: choice of cataloguing tools and MARC formats; organization of the collections around the political candidate, and name authority
    Date
    12. 1.2007 14:43:22
  14. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.11
    0.11125548 = product of:
      0.16688322 = sum of:
        0.11881542 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11881542 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
        0.048067793 = product of:
          0.09613559 = sum of:
            0.09613559 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09613559 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  15. Machovec, G.S.; Brunning, D.R.: ¬The online catalog as a shared resource : the impact of local databases and networking (1991) 0.11
    0.11055978 = product of:
      0.16583966 = sum of:
        0.1200217 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1200217 = score(doc=3096,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.6082881 = fieldWeight in 3096, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3096)
        0.04581796 = product of:
          0.09163592 = sum of:
            0.09163592 = weight(_text_:searching in 3096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09163592 = score(doc=3096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.44694576 = fieldWeight in 3096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the expansion of the traditional role of on-line catalogues OPACs in academic libraries to include: local loading of bibliographic and non-bibliographic data bases from magnetic tapes; formation of gateways to on-line data base searching, and networking via data networks such as Internet
  16. Buckland, M.K.; Lynch, C.A.: National and international implications of the linked systems protocol for online bibliographic systems (1988) 0.11
    0.10994151 = product of:
      0.16491227 = sum of:
        0.1328397 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1328397 = score(doc=413,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 413, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=413)
        0.032072574 = product of:
          0.06414515 = sum of:
            0.06414515 = weight(_text_:searching in 413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06414515 = score(doc=413,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 413, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    NISO draft standard Z39.50 (sometimes called the "Linked Systems Protocol") provides a standard for linking computers to permit the searching and retrieval of machine-readable bibliographic and authority records. The concept, context, status, and potential of the Linked Systems Protocol are reviewed in relation to the historical development of bibliographies and library catalogs. The functions of a fully developed bibliographic Linked Systems Protocol are summarized and shown to have extensive implications for scholarship, bibliographic access, and the notion of a national database. Effective international use of such a protocol would require the solution of several traditional problems.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as National and International Bibliographic Databases: Trends and Prospects
  17. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; the bibliographic utilities, an overview (1993) 0.11
    0.108837575 = product of:
      0.16325636 = sum of:
        0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13578905 = score(doc=3089,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
        0.02746731 = product of:
          0.05493462 = sum of:
            0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05493462 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Defines bibliographic utilities. The databases maintained by most bibliographic utilities are essentially online union catalogues. Describes 7 organisations that offer online, timeshared cataloguing support services in North America: OCLC; RLIN; the Western Library Network (WLN); Utlas; the AGILE 3 system; the Interactive Access System; and Open DRANET. Discusses equipment and communications; database characteristics; record retrieval; cataloguing support; output products; related products and services; and utilities versus CD-ROM
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  18. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.11
    0.108837575 = product of:
      0.16325636 = sum of:
        0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13578905 = score(doc=5286,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
        0.02746731 = product of:
          0.05493462 = sum of:
            0.05493462 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05493462 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes a new model for bibliographic access, the virtual catalogue, to serve the virtual library. Suggests the use of current software and networks to build links between bibliographic databases of all kinds, including full text, to enable the user to search a specified subset of databases. Suggests that local data be limited to holdings information linked to, but separate from, bibliographic databases both local and remote
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
  19. Smith, M.P.; Pollitt, A.S.: ¬The potential for incorporating document ranking in the MenUSE front-end search internemdiary system (1996) 0.11
    0.106094256 = product of:
      0.15914138 = sum of:
        0.06001085 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06001085 = score(doc=6980,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
        0.099130526 = sum of:
          0.06479639 = weight(_text_:searching in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06479639 = score(doc=6980,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05068286 = queryNorm
              0.3160384 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
          0.034334138 = weight(_text_:22 in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034334138 = score(doc=6980,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05068286 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews research which aims to improve the ways in which documents are presented to the user within the MenUSE (Menu based User Search Engine) search intermediary system. MenUSE is an advanced intermediary system for end user searching of bibliographic databases originating in CANSEARCH, a prototype intermediary system that used an expert systems approach to generate searches in cancer therapy related information retrieval from MEDLINE. In particular it investigates ways in which the order of presentation of documents can be made more effective. Discusses alternative schemes for document reordering, the main emphasis being on the provision of relevance ranking where the most relevant documents are presented to the user first. Examines the feasibility of incorporating such ranking techniques into MenUSE and compares 3 algorithms which simulate collection frequency ranking on a remote bibliographic database host using Boolean searching. Concludes that the CIRT algorithm offers the best performance. Proposes a design for an enhancement to the MenUSE system which will be the subject of user testing to verify the effectiveness of ranking in MenUSE
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  20. Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011) 0.10
    0.10458239 = product of:
      0.15687358 = sum of:
        0.1328397 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1328397 = score(doc=2592,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.6732516 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
        0.024033897 = product of:
          0.048067793 = sum of:
            0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048067793 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05068286 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 6422
  • m 586
  • el 363
  • s 269
  • r 61
  • b 46
  • x 44
  • i 32
  • p 31
  • n 12
  • ? 11
  • d 8
  • l 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications