-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.06
0.05611901 = product of:
0.084178515 = sum of:
0.028156964 = weight(_text_:information in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028156964 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.05602155 = product of:
0.1120431 = sum of:
0.1120431 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1120431 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.04
0.044743083 = product of:
0.06711462 = sum of:
0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017598102 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.04951652 = product of:
0.09903304 = sum of:
0.09903304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09903304 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Source
- Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
-
Rosenberg, V.: ¬An assessment of ISI's new Web of Science : ISI's services brings citiation indexing to new and advanced researchers (1998)
0.04
0.037389334 = product of:
0.056084 = sum of:
0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 1885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017598102 = score(doc=1885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1885)
0.038485896 = product of:
0.07697179 = sum of:
0.07697179 = weight(_text_:services in 1885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07697179 = score(doc=1885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.405633 = fieldWeight in 1885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1885)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information today. 15(1998) no.3, S.21,61
-
Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996)
0.03
0.033611845 = product of:
0.050417766 = sum of:
0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012318673 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.03809909 = product of:
0.07619818 = sum of:
0.07619818 = weight(_text_:services in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07619818 = score(doc=3044,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports recent experiences with the publishing, via the Internet and WWW of ISI's biweekly newspaper, The Scientist; which was originally mounted on the NSFnet. Compares the use of the Internet for SDI by comparing Web searches via AltaVista with similar searches on CD-ROM. Predicts that future current awareness services and SDI services will be linked to electronic periodicals in electronic libraries. Concludes with a note on cited reference searching, a variation on the theme of hypertext searching, with particular reference to SCI and Web crawlers
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.03
0.032629468 = product of:
0.0489442 = sum of:
0.027936121 = weight(_text_:information in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027936121 = score(doc=201,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.03
0.027953774 = product of:
0.04193066 = sum of:
0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017421233 = score(doc=6920,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.024509426 = product of:
0.049018852 = sum of:
0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049018852 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.03
0.02684585 = product of:
0.040268775 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.029709915 = product of:
0.05941983 = sum of:
0.05941983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05941983 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.02
0.024552068 = product of:
0.0368281 = sum of:
0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012318673 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.024509426 = product of:
0.049018852 = sum of:
0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049018852 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.330-341
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D.: Web citation data for impact assessment : a comparison of four science disciplines (2005)
0.02
0.021124458 = product of:
0.031686686 = sum of:
0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012443737 = score(doc=3880,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.019242948 = product of:
0.038485896 = sum of:
0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038485896 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The number and type of Web citations to journal articles in four areas of science are examined: biology, genetics, medicine, and multidisciplinary sciences. For a sample of 5,972 articles published in 114 journals, the median Web citation counts per journal article range from 6.2 in medicine to 10.4 in genetics. About 30% of Web citations in each area indicate intellectual impact (citations from articles or class readings, in contrast to citations from bibliographic services or the author's or journal's home page). Journals receiving more Web citations also have higher percentages of citations indicating intellectual impact. There is significant correlation between the number of citations reported in the databases from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, now Thomson Scientific) and the number of citations retrieved using the Google search engine (Web citations). The correlation is much weaker for journals published outside the United Kingdom or United States and for multidisciplinary journals. Web citation numbers are higher than ISI citation counts, suggesting that Web searches might be conducted for an earlier or a more fine-grained assessment of an article's impact. The Web-evident impact of non-UK/USA publications might provide a balance to the geographic or cultural biases observed in ISI's data, although the stability of Web citation counts is debatable.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.10, S.1075-1087
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003)
0.02
0.021124458 = product of:
0.031686686 = sum of:
0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012443737 = score(doc=5176,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.019242948 = product of:
0.038485896 = sum of:
0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038485896 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Vaughn, and Shaw look at the relationship between traditional citation and Web citation (not hyperlinks but rather textual mentions of published papers). Using English language research journals in ISI's 2000 Journal Citation Report - Information and Library Science category - 1209 full length papers published in 1997 in 46 journals were identified. Each was searched in Social Science Citation Index and on the Web using Google phrase search by entering the title in quotation marks, and followed for distinction where necessary with sub-titles, author's names, and journal title words. After removing obvious false drops, the number of web sites was recorded for comparison with the SSCI counts. A second sample from 1992 was also collected for examination. There were a total of 16,371 web citations to the selected papers. The top and bottom ranked four journals were then examined and every third citation to every third paper was selected and classified as to source type, domain, and country of origin. Web counts are much higher than ISI citation counts. Of the 46 journals from 1997, 26 demonstrated a significant correlation between Web and traditional citation counts, and 11 of the 15 in the 1992 sample also showed significant correlation. Journal impact factor in 1998 and 1999 correlated significantly with average Web citations per journal in the 1997 data, but at a low level. Thirty percent of web citations come from other papers posted on the web, and 30percent from listings of web based bibliographic services, while twelve percent come from class reading lists. High web citation journals often have web accessible tables of content.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.14, S.1313-1324
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.02
0.021044627 = product of:
0.03156694 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.302-310
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.02
0.021044627 = product of:
0.03156694 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.431-435
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.02
0.021044627 = product of:
0.03156694 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.021044627 = product of:
0.03156694 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.02
0.021044627 = product of:
0.03156694 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.02
0.021044627 = product of:
0.03156694 = sum of:
0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010558861 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.02100808 = product of:
0.04201616 = sum of:
0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04201616 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1820-1833
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.02
0.01867385 = product of:
0.05602155 = sum of:
0.05602155 = product of:
0.1120431 = sum of:
0.1120431 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1120431 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science (1985)
0.02
0.016899567 = product of:
0.025349349 = sum of:
0.00995499 = weight(_text_:information in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00995499 = score(doc=3632,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
0.015394359 = product of:
0.030788718 = sum of:
0.030788718 = weight(_text_:services in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030788718 = score(doc=3632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Indexes in general seek to provide a "key" to a body of literature intending to help the user in identifying, verifying, and/or locating individual or related items. The most common devices for collocation in indexes are authors' names and subjects. A different approach to collocating related items in an index is provided by a method called "citation indexing." Citation indexes attempt to link items through citations or references, in other works, by bringing together items cited in a particular work and the works citing a particular item. Citation indexing is based an the concept that there is a significant intellectual link between a document and each bibliographic item cited in it and that this link is useful to the scholar because an author's references to earlier writings identify relevant information to the subject of his current work. One of the major differences between the citation index and the traditional subject index is that the former, while listing current literature, also provides a retrospec tive view of past literature. While each issue of a traditional index is normally concerned only with the current literature, the citation index brings back retrospective literature in the form of cited references, thereby linking current scholarly works with earlier works. The advantages of the citation index have been considered to be its value as a tool for tracing the history of ideas or discoveries, for associating ideas between current and past work, and for evaluating works of individual authors or library collections. The concept of citation indexing is not new. It has been applied to legal literature since 1873 in a legal reference tool called Shepard's Citations. In the 1950s Eugene Garfield, a documentation consultant and founder and President of the Institute for Scientific Information (Philadelphia), developed the technique of citation indexing for scientific literature. This new application was facilitated by the availability of computer technology, resulting in a series of services: Science Citation Index (1955- ), Social Sciences Citation Index (1966- ), and the Arts & Humanities Index (1976- ). All three appear in printed versions and as machine-readable databases. In the following essay, the first in a series of articles and books elucidating the citation indexing system, Garfield traces the origin and beginning of this idea, its advantages, and the methods of preparing such indexes.
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.02
0.015973587 = product of:
0.023960378 = sum of:
0.00995499 = weight(_text_:information in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00995499 = score(doc=5171,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.014005387 = product of:
0.028010774 = sum of:
0.028010774 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028010774 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.011671156 = product of:
0.035013467 = sum of:
0.035013467 = product of:
0.070026934 = sum of:
0.070026934 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070026934 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05168566 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
