Search (385 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.11
    0.105206124 = product of:
      0.15780918 = sum of:
        0.032592144 = weight(_text_:information in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032592144 = score(doc=4866,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
        0.12521704 = sum of:
          0.07619818 = weight(_text_:services in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07619818 = score(doc=4866,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.40-45
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  2. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.09
    0.087784976 = product of:
      0.13167746 = sum of:
        0.014078482 = weight(_text_:information in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014078482 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.11759898 = sum of:
          0.061577436 = weight(_text_:services in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061577436 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.05602155 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602155 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.1, S.14-18
  3. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.08
    0.08021356 = product of:
      0.12032034 = sum of:
        0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017421233 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.10289911 = sum of:
          0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05388026 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.3, S.187-208
  4. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.08
    0.07681186 = product of:
      0.11521778 = sum of:
        0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012318673 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.10289911 = sum of:
          0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05388026 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.1, S.33-43
  5. Jizba, L.; Hillmann, D.I.: Insights from Ithaca : an interview with Diane Hillmann on metadata, Dublin Core, the National Science Digital Library, and more (2004/05) 0.08
    0.07681186 = product of:
      0.11521778 = sum of:
        0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012318673 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
        0.10289911 = sum of:
          0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05388026 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In an interview, Diane I. Hillmann, an expert in metadata for digital libraries and currently co-principal investigator for the National Science Digital Library Registry based at Cornell University, discusses her education and career, and provides overviews and insights on metadata initiatives, including standards and models such as the widely adopted Dublin Core schema. She shares her professional interests from the early part of her career with communications, cataloging, and database production services; highlights key issues; and provides ideas and resources for managing changes in metadata standards and digital projects.
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:35:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Profiles in digital information"
  6. Méndez, E.; López, L.M.; Siches, A.; Bravo, A.G.: DCMF: DC & Microformats, a good marriage (2008) 0.07
    0.06583873 = product of:
      0.098758094 = sum of:
        0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010558861 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
        0.088199235 = sum of:
          0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046183076 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
          0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04201616 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This report introduces the Dublin Core Microformats (DCMF) project, a new way to use the DC element set within X/HTML. The DC microformats encode explicit semantic expressions in an X/HTML webpage, by using a specific list of terms for values of the attributes "rev" and "rel" for <a> and <link> elements, and "class" and "id" of other elements. Microformats can be easily processed by user agents and software, enabling a high level of interoperability. These characteristics are crucial for the growing number of social applications allowing users to participate in the Web 2.0 environment as information creators and consumers. This report reviews the origins of microformats; illustrates the coding of DC microformats using the Dublin Core Metadata Gen tool, and a Firefox extension for extraction and visualization; and discusses the benefits of creating Web services utilizing DC microformats.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  7. Banush, D.; Kurth, M:; Pajerek, J.: Rehabilitating killer serials : an automated strategy for maintaining E-journal metadata (2005) 0.06
    0.057295404 = product of:
      0.0859431 = sum of:
        0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012443737 = score(doc=124,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
        0.07349937 = sum of:
          0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038485896 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Cornell University Library (CUL) has developed a largely automated method for providing title-level catalog access to electronic journals made available through aggregator packages. CUL's technique for automated e-journal record creation and maintenance relies largely on the conversion of externally supplied metadata into streamlined, abbreviated-level MARC records. Unlike the Cooperative Online Serials Cataloging Program's recently implemented aggregator-neutral approach to e-journal cataloging, CUL's method involves the creation of a separate bibliographic record for each version of an e-journal title in order to facilitate automated record maintenance. An indexed local field indicates the aggregation to which each title belongs and enables machine manipulation of all the records associated with a specific aggregation. Information encoded in another locally defined field facilitates the identification of all of the library's e-journal titles and allows for the automatic generation of a Web-based title list of e-journals. CUL's approach to providing title-level catalog access to its e-journal aggregations involves a number of tradeoffs in which some elements of traditional bibliographic description (such as subject headings and linking fields) are sacrificed in the interest of timeliness and affordability. URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) and holdings information are updated on a regular basis by use of automated methods that save on staff costs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 49(2005) no.3, S.190-203
  8. Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017) 0.06
    0.057295404 = product of:
      0.0859431 = sum of:
        0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012443737 = score(doc=3524,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
        0.07349937 = sum of:
          0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038485896 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Tags (keywords freely assigned by users to describe web content) have become highly popular on Web 2.0 applications, because of the strong stimuli and easiness for users to create and describe their own content. This increase in tag popularity has led to a vast literature on tag recommendation methods. These methods aim at assisting users in the tagging process, possibly increasing the quality of the generated tags and, consequently, improving the quality of the information retrieval (IR) services that rely on tags as data sources. Regardless of the numerous and diversified previous studies on tag recommendation, to our knowledge, no previous work has summarized and organized them into a single survey article. In this article, we propose a taxonomy for tag recommendation methods, classifying them according to the target of the recommendations, their objectives, exploited data sources, and underlying techniques. Moreover, we provide a critical overview of these methods, pointing out their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we describe the main open challenges related to the field, such as tag ambiguity, cold start, and evaluation issues.
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:30:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.4, S.830-844
  9. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.06
    0.055907547 = product of:
      0.08386132 = sum of:
        0.034842465 = weight(_text_:information in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034842465 = score(doc=4407,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
        0.049018852 = product of:
          0.098037705 = sum of:
            0.098037705 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098037705 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
    Source
    Government information quarterly. 18(2001) S.155-165
  10. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.05
    0.054865614 = product of:
      0.08229842 = sum of:
        0.008799051 = weight(_text_:information in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008799051 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
        0.07349937 = sum of:
          0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038485896 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 48(2004) no.1, S.59-68
  11. Heery, R.; Powell, A.; Day, M.: Metadata (1997) 0.04
    0.042301204 = product of:
      0.063451804 = sum of:
        0.01990998 = weight(_text_:information in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01990998 = score(doc=2883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
        0.043541823 = product of:
          0.087083645 = sum of:
            0.087083645 = weight(_text_:services in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087083645 = score(doc=2883,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines metadata within the context of network information management. Defines metadata, gives an overview of resource discovery service model in the context of the Web, and gives a simple typology of resource discovery metadata and the associated characteristics of metadata formats. Describes some of the projects and services, which are now using metadata for resource discovery in a networked environment. Covers: the Dublin Core, Web indexes, projects and services using metadata, associated technologies, and use of identifiers
    Source
    Library and information briefings. 1997, no.75, S.1-19
  12. McCue, J.A.: Why should a cataloging department hire a metadata specialist? : and, are there any out there? (1997) 0.04
    0.037013553 = product of:
      0.055520326 = sum of:
        0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017421233 = score(doc=2982,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
        0.03809909 = product of:
          0.07619818 = sum of:
            0.07619818 = weight(_text_:services in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07619818 = score(doc=2982,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the question of why a technical services department would hire a metadata specialist and whether a metadata specialist is really a cataloguer in disguise. Evidence suggests that cataoguing departments are recruiting and training staff for positions requiring broader computer experience and an awareness of larger metadata issues. Also explores whether students are attracted to these positions and whether library schools are preparing technical services staff for these challenges
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the USAIN/IAALD Joint Conference held in tuscon, Arizona, 3-5 April 1997, the theme of which was 'The information frontier: linking people and resources in a changing world'
    Source
    Quarterly bulletin of the International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists. 42(1997) nos.3/4, S.226-229
  13. Rusch-Feja, D.: Subject oriented collection of information resources from the Internet (1997) 0.04
    0.036512084 = product of:
      0.054768123 = sum of:
        0.031676583 = weight(_text_:information in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031676583 = score(doc=528,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
        0.023091538 = product of:
          0.046183076 = sum of:
            0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046183076 = score(doc=528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Subject oriented information sources on the Internet remain relativley unstructured despite attempts at indexing them and despite the use of search engines to index sources in a collective database and to retrieve relevant information sources. Describes the rationale for developing a means to capture and structure Internet resources for scientific research use in a clearinghouse, and methods for retrieval, information filtering, and structuring subject orientated information sources from the Internet for specific user groups. Discusses the issues of design, maintenance, implementation of metadata, and obtaining use feedback. Cooperation among several institutions involved in the German national subject special collections (SSG) library support programme of the DFG have led to recommendations to expand this programme to include coordination of collective Internet subject information sites. In addition to the compilation of subject oriented information sites on the Internet by library and information staff, connection to other value added services serve to make processes of information searching, retrieval, acquisition, and evaluation more effective for researchers
  14. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.04
    0.03507438 = product of:
      0.052611567 = sum of:
        0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017598102 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
        0.035013467 = product of:
          0.070026934 = sum of:
            0.070026934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070026934 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  15. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.04
    0.03507438 = product of:
      0.052611567 = sum of:
        0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017598102 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
        0.035013467 = product of:
          0.070026934 = sum of:
            0.070026934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070026934 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  16. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.04
    0.03507438 = product of:
      0.052611567 = sum of:
        0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017598102 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
        0.035013467 = product of:
          0.070026934 = sum of:
            0.070026934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070026934 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  17. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.03
    0.03493028 = product of:
      0.052395422 = sum of:
        0.024384648 = weight(_text_:information in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024384648 = score(doc=4867,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
        0.028010774 = product of:
          0.05602155 = sum of:
            0.05602155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05602155 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.35-39
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  18. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.03
    0.03493028 = product of:
      0.052395422 = sum of:
        0.024384648 = weight(_text_:information in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024384648 = score(doc=4869,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
        0.028010774 = product of:
          0.05602155 = sum of:
            0.05602155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05602155 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.46-48
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  19. Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998) 0.03
    0.03470321 = product of:
      0.052054815 = sum of:
        0.027545389 = weight(_text_:information in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027545389 = score(doc=5165,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
        0.024509426 = product of:
          0.049018852 = sum of:
            0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049018852 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
    Date
    9. 9.2000 17:22:23
  20. Madsen, M.S.; Fogg, I.; Ruggles, C.: Metadata systems : integrative information technologies (1994) 0.03
    0.034384985 = product of:
      0.051577475 = sum of:
        0.024637345 = weight(_text_:information in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024637345 = score(doc=1055,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
        0.02694013 = product of:
          0.05388026 = sum of:
            0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05388026 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata systems are concerned with the management of data which describes other data (datasets, catalogues, or actual database management systems) and are presently the subject of intensive research. Metadata systems can be used to store richly detailed forms of information, perform seamless wide ranging searches of information distributed across networks, and to integrate information stored in disparate repositories. Describes a model design and methods of implementation derived from the experience of the Leicester University Metadata Project. The approach utilizes the incorporation of semantic metadata in addition to resource metadata, resulting in a generally more powerful system than existing global directory services. Feature of the class of design is flexibility or implementation, with the ability to provide a coherent metadata system functioning above heterogeneous autonomous distributed databases

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 339
  • el 43
  • m 24
  • s 16
  • n 4
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects