Search (197 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Haslhofer, B.: Uniform SPARQL access to interlinked (digital library) sources (2007) 0.10 
    0.10478912 = product of:
  0.15718368 = sum of:
    0.014078482 = weight(_text_:information in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014078482 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
    0.1431052 = sum of:
      0.087083645 = weight(_text_:services in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.087083645 = score(doc=541,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.05602155 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05602155 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In this presentation, we therefore focus on a solution for providing uniform access to Digital Libraries and other online services. In order to enable uniform query access to heterogeneous sources, we must provide metadata interoperability in a way that a query language - in this case SPARQL - can cope with the incompatibility of the metadata in various sources without changing their already existing information models.
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:46
  2. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.10 
    0.10138532 = product of:
  0.15207797 = sum of:
    0.015240406 = weight(_text_:information in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015240406 = score(doc=4066,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
    0.13683757 = sum of:
      0.10182411 = weight(_text_:services in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10182411 = score(doc=4066,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.536602 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035013467 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The focus of this paper is the provision of terminology- and classification-based terminologies interoperability data via web services, initially using interoperability data based on the use of a Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) spine, but with an aim to explore other possibilities in time, including the use of other spines. The High-Level Thesaurus Project (HILT) Phase IV developed pilot web services based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS to deliver machine-readable terminology and crossterminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to enhance their subject search or browse services. It also developed an associated toolkit to help information services technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality within service interfaces. Several UK information services have created illustrative user interface enhancements using HILT functionality and these will demonstrate what is possible. HILT currently has the following subject schemes mounted and available: DDC, CAB, GCMD, HASSET, IPSV, LCSH, MeSH, NMR, SCAS, UNESCO, and AAT. It also has high level mappings between some of these schemes and DDC and some deeper pilot mappings available.
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.08 
    0.081808284 = product of:
  0.122712426 = sum of:
    0.095772296 = product of:
      0.2873169 = sum of:
        0.2873169 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2873169 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43819162 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.02694013 = product of:
      0.05388026 = sum of:
        0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05388026 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.08 
    0.081507586 = product of:
  0.122261375 = sum of:
    0.014932485 = weight(_text_:information in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014932485 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
    0.10732889 = sum of:
      0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.065312736 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.344191 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04201616 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1901-1916
  5. Nicholson, D.: Help us make HILT's terminology services useful in your information service (2008) 0.06 
    0.06062308 = product of:
  0.09093462 = sum of:
    0.021553185 = weight(_text_:information in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021553185 = score(doc=3654,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
    0.06938143 = product of:
      0.13876286 = sum of:
        0.13876286 = weight(_text_:services in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13876286 = score(doc=3654,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.73126525 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The JISC-funded HILT project is looking to make contact with staff in information services or projects interested in helping it test and refine its developing terminology services. The project is currently working to create pilot web services that will deliver machine-readable terminology and cross-terminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to extend or enhance the efficacy of their subject search or browse services. Based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS, the HILT facilities, when fully operational, will permit such services to improve their own subject search and browse mechanisms by using HILT data in a fashion transparent to their users. On request, HILT will serve up machine-processable data on individual subject schemes (broader terms, narrower terms, hierarchy information, preferred and non-preferred terms, and so on) and interoperability data (usually intellectual or automated mappings between schemes, but the architecture allows for the use of other methods) - data that can be used to enhance user services. The project is also developing an associated toolkit that will help service technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality into their services. The primary aim is to serve JISC funded information services or services at JISC institutions, but information services outside the JISC domain may also find the proposed services useful and wish to participate in the test and refine process.
  6. Dunsire, G.: Enhancing information services using machine-to-machine terminology services (2011) 0.06 
    0.059132077 = product of:
  0.08869811 = sum of:
    0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 1805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017421233 = score(doc=1805,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1805, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1805)
    0.07127688 = product of:
      0.14255376 = sum of:
        0.14255376 = weight(_text_:services in 1805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14255376 = score(doc=1805,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.7512428 = fieldWeight in 1805, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1805)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the basic concepts of terminology services and their role in information retrieval interfaces. Terminology services are consumed by other software applications using machine-to-machine protocols, rather than directly by end-users. An example of a terminology service is the pilot developed by the High Level Thesaurus (HILT) project which has successfully demonstrated its potential for enhancing subject retrieval in operational services. Examples of enhancements in three such services are given. The paper discusses the future development of terminology services in relation to the Semantic Web.
  7. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.05 
    0.05390168 = product of:
  0.080852516 = sum of:
    0.06840878 = product of:
      0.20522633 = sum of:
        0.20522633 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20522633 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43819162 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012443737 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
    Imprint
    Wien / Library and Information Studies : Universität
  8. Euzenat, J.; Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching (2010) 0.05 
    0.047327876 = product of:
  0.070991814 = sum of:
    0.012192324 = weight(_text_:information in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012192324 = score(doc=168,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
    0.05879949 = sum of:
      0.030788718 = weight(_text_:services in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030788718 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.1622532 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.028010774 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028010774 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Ontologies are viewed as the silver bullet for many applications, but in open or evolving systems, different parties can adopt different ontologies. This increases heterogeneity problems rather than reducing heterogeneity. This book proposes ontology matching as a solution to the problem of semantic heterogeneity, offering researchers and practitioners a uniform framework of reference to currently available work. The techniques presented apply to database schema matching, catalog integration, XML schema matching and more. Ontologies tend to be found everywhere. They are viewed as the silver bullet for many applications, such as database integration, peer-to-peer systems, e-commerce, semantic web services, or social networks. However, in open or evolving systems, such as the semantic web, different parties would, in general, adopt different ontologies. Thus, merely using ontologies, like using XML, does not reduce heterogeneity: it just raises heterogeneity problems to a higher level. Euzenat and Shvaiko's book is devoted to ontology matching as a solution to the semantic heterogeneity problem faced by computer systems. Ontology matching aims at finding correspondences between semantically related entities of different ontologies. These correspondences may stand for equivalence as well as other relations, such as consequence, subsumption, or disjointness, between ontology entities. Many different matching solutions have been proposed so far from various viewpoints, e.g., databases, information systems, artificial intelligence. With Ontology Matching, researchers and practitioners will find a reference book which presents currently available work in a uniform framework. In particular, the work and the techniques presented in this book can equally be applied to database schema matching, catalog integration, XML schema matching and other related problems. The objectives of the book include presenting (i) the state of the art and (ii) the latest research results in ontology matching by providing a detailed account of matching techniques and matching systems in a systematic way from theoretical, practical and application perspectives.
    Date
    20. 6.2012 19:08:22
    LCSH
    Ontologies (Information retrieval)
    Subject
    Ontologies (Information retrieval)
  9. Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011) 0.04 
    0.041462075 = product of:
  0.06219311 = sum of:
    0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010558861 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
    0.05163425 = product of:
      0.1032685 = sum of:
        0.1032685 = weight(_text_:services in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1032685 = score(doc=649,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.5442138 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
  10. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Houghton, A.; Childress, E.: Web services for controlled vocabularies (2006) 0.04 
    0.039807405 = product of:
  0.059711106 = sum of:
    0.008799051 = weight(_text_:information in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008799051 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
    0.050912056 = product of:
      0.10182411 = sum of:
        0.10182411 = weight(_text_:services in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10182411 = score(doc=1171,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.536602 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Amid the debates about whether folksonomies will supplant controlled vocabularies and whether the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system have outlived their usefulness, libraries, museums and other organizations continue to require efficient, effective access to controlled vocabularies for creating consistent metadata for their collections . In this article, we present an approach for using Web services to interact with controlled vocabularies. Services are implemented within a service-oriented architecture (SOA) framework. SOA is an approach to distributed computing where services are loosely coupled and discoverable on the network. A set of experimental services for controlled vocabularies is provided through the Microsoft Office (MS) Research task pane (a small window or sidebar that opens up next to Internet Explorer (IE) and other Microsoft Office applications). The research task pane is a built-in feature of IE when MS Office 2003 is loaded. The research pane enables a user to take advantage of a number of research and reference services accessible over the Internet. Web browsers, such as Mozilla Firefox and Opera, also provide sidebars which could be used to deliver similar, loosely-coupled Web services.
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 33(2006) no.5, S.xx-xx
  11. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.04 
    0.03507438 = product of:
  0.052611567 = sum of:
    0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017598102 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
    0.035013467 = product of:
      0.070026934 = sum of:
        0.070026934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070026934 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  12. Si, L.: Encoding formats and consideration of requirements for mapping (2007) 0.03 
    0.034299705 = product of:
  0.10289911 = sum of:
    0.10289911 = sum of:
      0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05388026 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
      0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049018852 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05168566 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:27
  13. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Hickey, C.; Houghton, A.; Thompson, R.: Vocabulary mapping for terminology services (2004) 0.03 
    0.031725906 = product of:
  0.047588855 = sum of:
    0.014932485 = weight(_text_:information in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014932485 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.032656368 = product of:
      0.065312736 = sum of:
        0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065312736 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.344191 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The paper describes a project to add value to controlled vocabularies by making inter-vocabulary associations. A methodology for mapping terms from one vocabulary to another is presented in the form of a case study applying the approach to the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) Thesaurus and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). Our approach to mapping involves encoding vocabularies according to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards, machine matching of vocabulary terms, and categorizing candidate mappings by likelihood of valid mapping. Mapping data is then stored as machine links. Vocabularies with associations to other schemes will be a key component of Web-based terminology services. The paper briefly describes how the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) is used to provide access to a vocabulary with mappings.
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes von: Journal of digital information. 4(2004) no.4.
  14. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Convergence of internet services in the cultural heritage sector : the long way to common vocabularies, metadata formats, ontologies (2008) 0.03 
    0.031134581 = product of:
  0.04670187 = sum of:
    0.023610333 = weight(_text_:information in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023610333 = score(doc=1686,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
    0.023091538 = product of:
      0.046183076 = sum of:
        0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046183076 = score(doc=1686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Since several years it has been observed that information offered by different knowledge producing institutions on the internet is more and more interlinked. This tendency will increase, because the fragmented information offers on the internet make the retrieval of information difficult as even impossible. At the same time the quantity of information offered on the internet grows exponentially in Europe - and elsewhere - due to many digitization projects. Insofar as funding institutions base the acceptance of projects on the observation of certain documentation standards the knowledge created will be retrievable and will remain so for a longer time. Otherwise the retrieval of information will become a matter of chance due to the limits of fragmented, knowledge producing social groups.
  15. Wake, S.; Nicholson, D.: HILT: High-Level Thesaurus Project : building consensus for interoperable subject access across communities (2001) 0.03 
    0.031076772 = product of:
  0.046615157 = sum of:
    0.012192324 = weight(_text_:information in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012192324 = score(doc=1224,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
    0.034422833 = product of:
      0.06884567 = sum of:
        0.06884567 = weight(_text_:services in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06884567 = score(doc=1224,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.36280918 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article provides an overview of the work carried out by the HILT Project <http://hilt.cdlr.strath.ac.uk> in making recommendations towards interoperable subject access, or cross-searching and browsing distributed services amongst the archives, libraries, museums and electronic services sectors. The article details consensus achieved at the 19 June 2001 HILT Workshop and discusses the HILT Stakeholder Survey. In 1999 Péter Jascó wrote that "savvy searchers" are asking for direction. Three years later the scenario he describes, that of searchers cross-searching databases where the subject vocabulary used in each case is different, still rings true. Jascó states that, in many cases, databases do not offer the necessary aids required to use the "preferred terms of the subject-controlled vocabulary". The databases to which Jascó refers are Dialog and DataStar. However, the situation he describes applies as well to the area that HILT is researching: that of cross-searching and browsing by subject across databases and catalogues in archives, libraries, museums and online information services. So how does a user access information on a particular subject when it is indexed across a multitude of services under different, but quite often similar, subject terms? Also, if experienced searchers are having problems, what about novice searchers? As information professionals, it is our role to investigate such problems and recommend solutions. Although there is no hard empirical evidence one way or another, HILT participants agree that the problem for users attempting to search across databases is real. There is a strong likelihood that users are disadvantaged by the use of different subject terminology combined with a multitude of different practices taking place within the archive, library, museums and online communities. Arguably, failure to address this problem of interoperability undermines the value of cross-searching and browsing facilities, and wastes public money because relevant resources are 'hidden' from searchers. HILT is charged with analysing this broad problem through qualitative methods, with the main aim of presenting a set of recommendations on how to make it easier to cross-search and browse distributed services. Because this is a very large problem composed of many strands, HILT recognizes that any proposed solutions must address a host of issues. Recommended solutions must be affordable, sustainable, politically acceptable, useful, future-proof and international in scope. It also became clear to the HILT team that progress toward finding solutions to the interoperability problem could only be achieved through direct dialogue with other parties keen to solve this problem, and that the problem was as much about consensus building as it was about finding a solution. This article describes how HILT approached the cross-searching problem; how it investigated the nature of the problem, detailing results from the HILT Stakeholder Survey; and how it achieved consensus through the recent HILT Workshop.
  16. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.03 
    0.030563995 = product of:
  0.045845993 = sum of:
    0.021336567 = weight(_text_:information in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021336567 = score(doc=3283,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
    0.024509426 = product of:
      0.049018852 = sum of:
        0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049018852 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2016, held in Göttingen, Germany, in November 2016. The 26 full papers and 6 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 67 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks: Digital Libraries, Information Retrieval, Linked and Social Data, Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures, Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment, Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications, European and National Projects.
    Series
    Communications in computer and information science; 672
  17. Nicholson, D.; Wake, S.: HILT: subject retrieval in a distributed environment (2003) 0.03 
    0.028810155 = product of:
  0.04321523 = sum of:
    0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 3810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010558861 = score(doc=3810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3810)
    0.032656368 = product of:
      0.065312736 = sum of:
        0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 3810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065312736 = score(doc=3810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.344191 = fieldWeight in 3810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The HILT High Level Thesaurus Project aims to study and report an the problern of cross-searching and browsing by subject across a range of communities, services, and service or resource types in the UK given the wide range of subject schemes and associated practices in place in the communities in question (Libraries, Museums, Archives, and Internet Services) and taking the international context into consideration. The paper reports an progess to date, focusing particularly an the inter-community consensus reached at a recent Stakeholder Workshop.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  18. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.03 
    0.028083868 = product of:
  0.042125802 = sum of:
    0.021117723 = weight(_text_:information in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021117723 = score(doc=4820,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
    0.02100808 = product of:
      0.04201616 = sum of:
        0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04201616 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  19. Coen, G.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Toward better interoperability of the NARCIS classification (2019) 0.03 
    0.02719742 = product of:
  0.04079613 = sum of:
    0.021553185 = weight(_text_:information in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021553185 = score(doc=5399,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
    0.019242948 = product of:
      0.038485896 = sum of:
        0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038485896 = score(doc=5399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Research information can be useful to science stake-holders for discovering, evaluating and planning research activities. In the Netherlands, the institute tasked with the stewardship of national research information is DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services). DANS is the home of NARCIS, the national portal for research information, which uses a similarly named national research classification. The NARCIS Classification assigns symbols to represent the knowledge bases of contributing scholars. A recent research stream in knowledge organization known as comparative classification uses two or more classifications experimentally to generate empirical evidence about coverage of conceptual content, population of the classes, and economy of classification. This paper builds on that research in order to further understand the comparative impact of the NARCIS Classification alongside a classification designed specifically for information resources. Our six cases come from the DANS project Knowledge Organization System Observatory (KOSo), which itself is classified using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) created in 1982 by Ingetraut Dahlberg. ICC is considered to have the merits of universality, faceting, and a top-down approach. Results are exploratory, indicating that both classifications provide fairly precise coverage. The inflexibility of the NARCIS Classification makes it difficult to express complex concepts. The meta-ontological, epistemic stance of the ICC is apparent in all aspects of this study. Using the two together in the DANS KOS Observatory will provide users with both clarity of scientific positioning and ontological relativity.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: Research Information Systems and Science Classifications; including papers from "Trajectories for Research: Fathoming the Promise of the NARCIS Classification," 27-28 September 2018, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  20. Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Lange, C.: Towards a standard for heterogeneous ontology integration and interoperability (2011) 0.03 
    0.026172534 = product of:
  0.0392588 = sum of:
    0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012318673 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05168566 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
    0.02694013 = product of:
      0.05388026 = sum of:
        0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05388026 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable interoperability in information-rich endeavours, there is currently no united framework for ontology interoperability itself. Surprisingly little of the state of the art in modularity and structuring, e.g. in software engineering, has been applied to ontology engineering so far. However, application areas like Ambient Assisted Living (AAL), which require synchronization and orchestration of interoperable services, are in dire need of safe and secure ontology interoperability. OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new international standard proposed in ISO/TC 37/SC 3, aims at filling this gap.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 160
  • d 35

Types

  • a 136
  • el 53
  • m 14
  • x 8
  • s 7
  • n 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications