Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. Semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.07
    0.06919926 = product of:
      0.10379888 = sum of:
        0.07895786 = weight(_text_:social in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07895786 = score(doc=3371,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.39405724 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
        0.024841016 = product of:
          0.049682032 = sum of:
            0.049682032 = weight(_text_:networks in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049682032 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23767339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.2090349 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries have always been an inspiration for the standards and technologies developed by semantic web activities. However, except for the Dublin Core specification, semantic web and social networking technologies have not been widely adopted and further developed by major digital library initiatives and projects. Yet semantic technologies offer a new level of flexibility, interoperability, and relationships for digital repositories. Kruk and McDaniel present semantic web-related aspects of current digital library activities, and introduce their functionality; they show examples ranging from general architectural descriptions to detailed usages of specific ontologies, and thus stimulate the awareness of researchers, engineers, and potential users of those technologies. Their presentation is completed by chapters on existing prototype systems such as JeromeDL, BRICKS, and Greenstone, as well as a look into the possible future of semantic digital libraries. This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students in areas like digital libraries, the semantic web, social networks, and information retrieval. This audience will benefit from detailed descriptions of both today's possibilities and also the shortcomings of applying semantic web technologies to large digital repositories of often unstructured data.
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction to Digital Libraries and Semantic Web: Introduction / Bill McDaniel and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Digital Libraries and Knowledge Organization / Dagobert Soergel - Semantic Web and Ontologies / Marcin Synak, Maciej Dabrowski and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Social Semantic Information Spaces / John G. Breslin A Vision of Semantic Digital Libraries: Goals of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel - Architecture of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Westerki and Ewelina Kruk - Long-time Preservation / Markus Reis Ontologies for Semantic Digital Libraries: Bibliographic Ontology / Maciej Dabrowski, Macin Synak and Sebastian Ryszard Kruk - Community-aware Ontologies / Slawomir Grzonkowski, Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Adam Gzella, Jakub Demczuk and Bill McDaniel Prototypes of Semantic Digital Libraries: JeromeDL: The Social Semantic Digital Library / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Mariusz Cygan, Adam Gzella, Tomasz Woroniecki and Maciej Dabrowski - The BRICKS Digital Library Infrastructure / Bernhard Haslhofer and Predrag Knezevié - Semantics in Greenstone / Annika Hinze, George Buchanan, David Bainbridge and Ian Witten Building the Future - Semantic Digital Libraries in Use: Hyperbooks / Gilles Falquet, Luka Nerima and Jean-Claude Ziswiler - Semantic Digital Libraries for Archiving / Bill McDaniel - Evaluation of Semantic and Social Technologies for Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk, Ewelina Kruk and Katarzyna Stankiewicz - Conclusions: The Future of Semantic Digital Libraries / Sebastian Ryszard Kruk and Bill McDaniel
  2. Zhang, J.; Zhai, S.; Liu, H.; Stevenson, J.A.: Social network analysis on a topic-based navigation guidance system in a public health portal (2016) 0.06
    0.062315296 = product of:
      0.09347294 = sum of:
        0.06242167 = weight(_text_:social in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06242167 = score(doc=2887,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.3115296 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
        0.03105127 = product of:
          0.06210254 = sum of:
            0.06210254 = weight(_text_:networks in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06210254 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23767339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We investigated a topic-based navigation guidance system in the World Health Organization portal, compared the link connection network and the semantic connection network derived from the guidance system, analyzed the characteristics of the 2 networks from the perspective of the node centrality (in_closeness, out_closeness, betweenness, in_degree, and out_degree), and provided the suggestions to optimize and enhance the topic-based navigation guidance system. A mixed research method that combines the social network analysis method, clustering analysis method, and inferential analysis methods was used. The clustering analysis results of the link connection network were quite different from those of the semantic connection network. There were significant differences between the link connection network and the semantic network in terms of density and centrality. Inferential analysis results show that there were no strong correlations between the centrality of a node and its topic information characteristics. Suggestions for enhancing the navigation guidance system are discussed in detail. Future research directions, such as application of the same research method presented in this study to other similar public health portals, are also included.
  3. Kruk, S.R.; McDaniel, B.: Goals of semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.06
    0.060152046 = product of:
      0.090228066 = sum of:
        0.05296654 = weight(_text_:social in 3378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05296654 = score(doc=3378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 3378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3378)
        0.037261523 = product of:
          0.07452305 = sum of:
            0.07452305 = weight(_text_:networks in 3378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07452305 = score(doc=3378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23767339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.31355235 = fieldWeight in 3378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Digital libraries have become commodity in the current world of Internet. More and more information is produced, and more and more non-digital information is being rendered available. The new, more user friendly, community-oriented technologies used throughout the Internet are raising the bar of expectations. Digital libraries cannot stand still with their technologies; if not for the sake of handling rapidly growing amount and diversity of information, they must provide for better user experience matching and overgrowing standards set by the industry. The next generation of digital libraries combine technological solutions, such as P2P, SOA, or Grid, with recent research on semantics and social networks. These solutions are put into practice to answer a variety of requirements imposed on digital libraries.
  4. Schaer, P.: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale (2010) 0.06
    0.05708161 = product of:
      0.085622415 = sum of:
        0.061794292 = weight(_text_:social in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061794292 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
        0.023828125 = product of:
          0.04765625 = sum of:
            0.04765625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04765625 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17596318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Open Access Repositorien sind Online-Archive für frei im Internet zugängliche Publikationen im Volltext. Open Access Materialien oder die Open Access Repositorien selbst sind allerdings nur unzureichend in zentrale Fachportale (z.B. virtuelle Fachbibliotheken) eingebunden. Der Beitrag stellt SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository, einen disziplinären Open Access Volltextserver für die Sozialwissenschaften vor und zeigt wie dieser in das sozialwissenschaftliche Fachportal Sowiport integriert wird.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  5. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.05
    0.05296117 = product of:
      0.079441756 = sum of:
        0.06242167 = weight(_text_:social in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06242167 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.3115296 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.01702009 = product of:
          0.03404018 = sum of:
            0.03404018 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03404018 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17596318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  6. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.05
    0.0489271 = product of:
      0.07339065 = sum of:
        0.05296654 = weight(_text_:social in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05296654 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.020424107 = product of:
          0.040848214 = sum of:
            0.040848214 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040848214 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17596318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  7. Xia, J.: Disciplinary repositories in the social sciences (2007) 0.04
    0.041196197 = product of:
      0.123588584 = sum of:
        0.123588584 = weight(_text_:social in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123588584 = score(doc=818,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.6167971 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the development of disciplinary repositories in the social sciences. Design/methodology/approach - The concentration of this article is on a discussion of the operational styles of existing repositories. Findings - The paper argues that appropriate operational styles of digital repositories will change the culture of information exchange in the social science disciplines. It finds that many successful repositories have employed the strategy of decentralization in their operations. This model can efficiently and effectively reach individual scholars in broad areas. Originality/value - Most existing repositories in the social sciences have not gained ground in attracting scholars. They could learn from successful repositories to improve their own operational plans.
  8. Place, E.: International collaboration on Internet subject gateways (2000) 0.04
    0.040772583 = product of:
      0.061158873 = sum of:
        0.04413878 = weight(_text_:social in 4584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04413878 = score(doc=4584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 4584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4584)
        0.01702009 = product of:
          0.03404018 = sum of:
            0.03404018 = weight(_text_:22 in 4584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03404018 = score(doc=4584,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17596318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4584, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:35
  9. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.04
    0.040772583 = product of:
      0.061158873 = sum of:
        0.04413878 = weight(_text_:social in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04413878 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
        0.01702009 = product of:
          0.03404018 = sum of:
            0.03404018 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03404018 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17596318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
    Theme
    Social tagging
  10. Kruk, S.R.; Cygan, M.; Gzella, A.; Woroniecki, T.; Dabrowski, M.: JeromeDL: the social semantic digital library (2009) 0.04
    0.03531103 = product of:
      0.10593308 = sum of:
        0.10593308 = weight(_text_:social in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10593308 = score(doc=3383,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.52868325 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The initial research on semantic digital libraries resulted in the design and implementation of JeromeDL; current research on online social networking and information discovery delivered new sets of features that were implemented in JeromeDL. Eventually, this digital library has been redesigned to follow the architecture of a social semantic digital library. JeromeDL describes each resource using three types of metadata: structure, bibliographic and community. It delivers services leveraging each of these information types. Annotations based on the structure and legacy metadata, and bibliographic ontology are rendered to the users in one, mixed, representation of library resources. Community annotations are managed by separate services, such as social semantic collaborative filtering or blogging component
  11. Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung von Internetquellen durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der Virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2009) 0.03
    0.029425856 = product of:
      0.08827756 = sum of:
        0.08827756 = weight(_text_:social in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08827756 = score(doc=2784,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.44056937 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    EconBiz, die Virtuelle Fachbibliothek Wirtschaftswissenschaften, wird gemeinsam von der Deutschen Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (ZBW) und der Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln angeboten. Ein zentraler Bestandteil von EconBiz ist der Fachinformationsführer für Internetquellen, der derzeit über 16.000 Datensätze umfasst. Der Fachinformationsführer dient der Recherche nach Internetquellen und frei verfügbaren Volltexten. Die Erschließung dieser Quellen erfolgt arbeitsteilig durch bibliothekarisches und wissenschaftliches Personal im LinkShare System, einem System für die kooperative Erschließung und Verwaltung digitaler Netzobjekte. Nutzerinnen und Nutzer von EconBiz haben die Möglichkeit, Quellen für die Aufnahme in den Fachinformationsführer vorzuschlagen. Eine Beteiligung an der inhaltlichen Erschließung der Quellen erfolgt nicht. In Social-Bookmarking-Portalen wie "deLicio.us", "Furl" oder "Mister Wong" haben Nutzerinnen und Nutzer die Möglichkeit, eigene Listen mit Lesezeichen, englisch "Bookmarks", zu verwalten. Dazu bieten die verschiedenen Anbieter dieser Dienste allerhand nützliche Funktionen, u. a. mit folgenden Merkmalen: - Vergabe von Kategorien oder Schlagworten, so genannten "Tags", - Anlegen privater oder öffentlicher Bookmarks, - Abspeichern einer Version der Quelle. Derzeit üben diese Dienste eine sehr hohe Anziehungskraft auf Nutzerinnen und Nutzer aus, zum einen für die Verwaltung der eigenen Lesezeichen, zum anderen als Instrument für die Recherche nach relevanten Quellen. Mehr über das Potential und die Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Social-Bookmarking-Diensten möchte die ZBW im Rahmen eines Projekts "Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer" erfahren. Dafür wurde über einen begrenzten Zeitraum eine Teilmenge der im EconBiz-Fachinformationsführer enthaltenen Internetquellen in Social-Bookmarking-Webseiten angeboten. Ziel ist es, Erkenntnisse darüber zu gewinnen, in welchem Umfang diese von den Nutzerinnen und Nutzern der Socaial-Bookmarking-Dienste nachgenutzt und um eigene Schlagworte ergänzt werden.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  12. Shiri, A.: Digital library research : current developments and trends (2003) 0.02
    0.023540687 = product of:
      0.07062206 = sum of:
        0.07062206 = weight(_text_:social in 1072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07062206 = score(doc=1072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 1072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1072)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This column gives an overview of current trends in digital library research under the following headings: digital library architecture, systems, tools and technologies; digital content and collections; metadata; interoperability; standards; knowledge organisation systems; users and usability; legal, organisational, economic, and social issues in digital libraries.
  13. Monopoli, M.; Nichols, D.: ¬A user-centred approach to the evaluation of subject based information gateways : case study SOSIG (2000) 0.02
    0.020598099 = product of:
      0.061794292 = sum of:
        0.061794292 = weight(_text_:social in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061794292 = score(doc=710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    There has been a massive increase in the amount of information available to people as a result of the Internet and information seekers are expected to be in the position to identify and evaluate this information according to their needs. As a response to this, Subject Based Information Gateways have been introduced providing people with an organised collection of digital information. An evaluation of the Social Science Information Gateway (SOSIG), conducted by an online questionnaire, examines such issues as who the SOSIG users are, how frequently they use the service and what their reasons for using the service are.
  14. Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2007) 0.02
    0.020598099 = product of:
      0.061794292 = sum of:
        0.061794292 = weight(_text_:social in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061794292 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    - ViFas können Social Bookmarking nutzen, um neue Quellen zu erschließen (Personalknappheit). - Der Erfolg ist allerdings davon abhängig, dass eine kritische Masse an Nutzerinnen und Nutzern erreicht wird. Bei den zu erwartenden fachlich spezialisierten Nutzerinnen und Nutzern einer ViFa kann diese sicherlich vergleichsweise niedriger sein. - Delicious erfährt derzeit bereits eine intensive Nutzung, so dass hier deutliche Überschneidungen mit den EconBiz Internetquellen erkennbar sind. Bei Mister Wong ist dies noch zu gering ausgeprägt. - Großes Potential ist vorhanden wenn viele Nutzerinnen und Nutzer viele Inhalte einbringen.
  15. Park, J.-r.; Li, G.; Burger, A.: Opening and closing rituals of the virtual reference service of the Internet Public Library (2010) 0.02
    0.020386834 = product of:
      0.061160497 = sum of:
        0.061160497 = weight(_text_:social in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061160497 = score(doc=4153,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.30523545 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the communicative rituals of opening and closing manifested in e-mail-based Internet Public Library's (IPL's) online reference interaction. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 400 transcripts comprising user queries and responses by IPL librarians are examined. The opening and closing elements are identified to examine the way in which IPL librarians and users construct social space; that is, communicate their interpersonal and affective stances during the course of seeking and offering information. Findings - The results of data analysis show regular patterns of verbal and structural politeness indicators of opening and closing e-mail discourse. Linguistic elements such as greetings and acknowledgement are included in all the sampled transcripts; i.e. a 100 percent occurrence. Closing rituals have a 95 percent occurrence of linguistic features such as acknowledgement and invitation for follow-up. In contrast, there is a low occurrence of personalized openings through greeting by user name (26 percent). This lack of personalization also occurs in closings: personalized farewell through use of librarian name appears in only 8 percent of closings. Research limitations/implications - The employment of the various politeness tactics in opening and closing reflects the librarian's attention and concern to user's information needs, interests and wants. Such communicative competence narrows social distance and brings forth close socio-interpersonal space for interaction; this may, in turn, improve the overall quality of reference service. Research findings also indicate that more use of personal names may decrease the social distance between the librarian and user, resulting in increased solidarity and proximity. Originality/value - The study provides new insights into linguistic politeness and the functions of address forms such as personal names with a view toward developing effective opening and closing rituals that contribute to the enhancement of virtual reference services.
  16. Ohly, H.P.: ¬The organization of Internet links in a social science clearing house (2004) 0.02
    0.017655514 = product of:
      0.05296654 = sum of:
        0.05296654 = weight(_text_:social in 2641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05296654 = score(doc=2641,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 2641, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2641)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  17. Neuroth, H.; Aschenbrenner, A.; Lohmeier, F.: e-Humanities - eine virtuelle Forschungsumgebung für die Geistes -, Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften (2007) 0.02
    0.017655514 = product of:
      0.05296654 = sum of:
        0.05296654 = weight(_text_:social in 4570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05296654 = score(doc=4570,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20037155 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050248925 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 4570, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4570)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Forschung und Lehre in den Humanities (Geistes-, Kultur und Sozialwissenschaften) macht zunehmend Gebrauch von digitalen Werkzeugen. Die technologische Unterstützung wird kontinuierlich ausgebaut und steht gerade heute vor einem weiteren großen Entwicklungsschritt. Ein enormes Potenzial liegt - gerade für die Humanities - in der Anwendung moderner Internet-Technologien, dem Einsatz von "Social Software" und der konsequenten Vernetzung von Informationen und Werkzeugen. Umfangreicher Zugriff auf wissenschaftliche Daten, generische Werkzeuge zur Analyse und zur Unterstützung der Arbeitsprozesse, verbesserte Zusammenarbeit zwischen Forschergruppen und über Disziplinen hinweg - diese Stichwörter zählen zu den Triebfedern auf dem Weg in die vernetzten "e-Humanities". Der Aufbau einer virtuellen Forschungsumgebung für die Humanities lässt sich in drei Schichten unterteilen: die Forschung, eine Forschungsinfrastruktur und die Basisinfrastruktur. Die Ausdifferenzierung dieser Bereiche und die Beschreibung möglicher Aufgaben einer Forschungsinfrastruktur für die "e-Humanities" sind Kernthemen dieses Artikels.
  18. Peters, C.; Picchi, E.: Across languages, across cultures : issues in multilinguality and digital libraries (1997) 0.02
    0.016560677 = product of:
      0.049682032 = sum of:
        0.049682032 = product of:
          0.099364065 = sum of:
            0.099364065 = weight(_text_:networks in 1233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099364065 = score(doc=1233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23767339 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.4180698 = fieldWeight in 1233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    With the recent rapid diffusion over the international computer networks of world-wide distributed document bases, the question of multilingual access and multilingual information retrieval is becoming increasingly relevant. We briefly discuss just some of the issues that must be addressed in order to implement a multilingual interface for a Digital Library system and describe our own approach to this problem.
  19. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.016046695 = product of:
      0.048140083 = sum of:
        0.048140083 = product of:
          0.096280165 = sum of:
            0.096280165 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096280165 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17596318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  20. Subject gateways (2000) 0.02
    0.015885416 = product of:
      0.04765625 = sum of:
        0.04765625 = product of:
          0.0953125 = sum of:
            0.0953125 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0953125 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17596318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050248925 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 23

Types

  • a 52
  • el 7
  • s 3
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…