Search (35 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.10 
    0.097291134 = product of:
  0.19458227 = sum of:
    0.19458227 = product of:
      0.38916454 = sum of:
        0.38916454 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38916454 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.0269369 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Object
    Autonomy
  2. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.08 
    0.081075944 = product of:
  0.16215189 = sum of:
    0.16215189 = product of:
      0.32430378 = sum of:
        0.32430378 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32430378 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.8557808 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Object
    Autonomy
  3. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03 
    0.026514716 = product of:
  0.053029433 = sum of:
    0.053029433 = product of:
      0.106058866 = sum of:
        0.106058866 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106058866 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  4. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02 
    0.023200378 = product of:
  0.046400756 = sum of:
    0.046400756 = product of:
      0.09280151 = sum of:
        0.09280151 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09280151 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  5. Hlava, M.M.K.: Automatic indexing : comparing rule-based and statistics-based indexing systems (2005) 0.02 
    0.023200378 = product of:
  0.046400756 = sum of:
    0.046400756 = product of:
      0.09280151 = sum of:
        0.09280151 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09280151 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23
  6. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02 
    0.019886037 = product of:
  0.039772075 = sum of:
    0.039772075 = product of:
      0.07954415 = sum of:
        0.07954415 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07954415 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  7. Hauer, M.: Automatische Indexierung (2000) 0.02 
    0.019886037 = product of:
  0.039772075 = sum of:
    0.039772075 = product of:
      0.07954415 = sum of:
        0.07954415 = weight(_text_:22 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07954415 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Wissen in Aktion: Wege des Knowledge Managements. 22. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 2.-4.5.2000. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  8. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02 
    0.019886037 = product of:
  0.039772075 = sum of:
    0.039772075 = product of:
      0.07954415 = sum of:
        0.07954415 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07954415 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  9. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.02 
    0.019886037 = product of:
  0.039772075 = sum of:
    0.039772075 = product of:
      0.07954415 = sum of:
        0.07954415 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07954415 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  10. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.02 
    0.016571699 = product of:
  0.033143397 = sum of:
    0.033143397 = product of:
      0.066286795 = sum of:
        0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066286795 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
  11. Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998) 0.02 
    0.016571699 = product of:
  0.033143397 = sum of:
    0.033143397 = product of:
      0.066286795 = sum of:
        0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066286795 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  12. Tsareva, P.V.: Algoritmy dlya raspoznavaniya pozitivnykh i negativnykh vkhozdenii deskriptorov v tekst i protsedura avtomaticheskoi klassifikatsii tekstov (1999) 0.02 
    0.016571699 = product of:
  0.033143397 = sum of:
    0.033143397 = product of:
      0.066286795 = sum of:
        0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066286795 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 4.2002 10:22:41
  13. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.02 
    0.016571699 = product of:
  0.033143397 = sum of:
    0.033143397 = product of:
      0.066286795 = sum of:
        0.066286795 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066286795 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  14. Tsujii, J.-I.: Automatic acquisition of semantic collocation from corpora (1995) 0.01 
    0.013257358 = product of:
  0.026514716 = sum of:
    0.026514716 = product of:
      0.053029433 = sum of:
        0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053029433 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  15. Riloff, E.: ¬An empirical study of automated dictionary construction for information extraction in three domains (1996) 0.01 
    0.013257358 = product of:
  0.026514716 = sum of:
    0.026514716 = product of:
      0.053029433 = sum of:
        0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 6752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053029433 = score(doc=6752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  16. Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006) 0.01 
    0.013257358 = product of:
  0.026514716 = sum of:
    0.026514716 = product of:
      0.053029433 = sum of:
        0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053029433 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    24. 3.2006 12:22:02
  17. Probst, M.; Mittelbach, J.: Maschinelle Indexierung in der Sacherschließung wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken (2006) 0.01 
    0.013257358 = product of:
  0.026514716 = sum of:
    0.026514716 = product of:
      0.053029433 = sum of:
        0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053029433 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:35:19
  18. Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012) 0.01 
    0.013257358 = product of:
  0.026514716 = sum of:
    0.026514716 = product of:
      0.053029433 = sum of:
        0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053029433 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 9.2012 19:43:22
  19. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.01 
    0.011600189 = product of:
  0.023200378 = sum of:
    0.023200378 = product of:
      0.046400756 = sum of:
        0.046400756 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046400756 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21
  20. Bordoni, L.; Pazienza, M.T.: Documents automatic indexing in an environmental domain (1997) 0.01 
    0.011600189 = product of:
  0.023200378 = sum of:
    0.023200378 = product of:
      0.046400756 = sum of:
        0.046400756 = weight(_text_:22 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046400756 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.17-28

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 32
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes