Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Jansen, B.J."
  1. Reddy, M.C.; Jansen, B.J.: ¬A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context : a study of two healthcare teams (2008) 0.04
    0.041249283 = product of:
      0.06187392 = sum of:
        0.04235544 = weight(_text_:information in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04235544 = score(doc=2033,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.46549138 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
        0.019518482 = product of:
          0.039036963 = sum of:
            0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039036963 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Collaborative information behavior is an essential aspect of organizational work; however, we have very limited understanding of this behavior. Most models of information behavior focus on the individual seeker of information. In this paper, we report the results from two empirical studies that investigate aspects of collaborative information behavior in organizational settings. From these studies, we found that collaborative information behavior differs from individual information behavior with respect to how individuals interact with each other, the complexity of the information need, and the role of information technology. There are specific triggers for transitioning from individual to collaborative information behavior, including lack of domain expertise. The information retrieval technologies used affect collaborative information behavior by acting as important supporting mechanisms. From these results and prior work, we develop a model of collaborative information behavior along the axes of participant behavior, situational elements, and contextual triggers. We also present characteristics of collaborative information system including search, chat, and sharing. We discuss implications for the design of collaborative information retrieval systems and directions for future work.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.256-273
  2. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Real life, real users and real needs : a study and analysis of users queries on the Web (2000) 0.04
    0.040143125 = product of:
      0.060214683 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
        0.039036963 = product of:
          0.078073926 = sum of:
            0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078073926 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.2, S.207-227
  3. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Smith, B.K.: Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching (2009) 0.03
    0.027482389 = product of:
      0.041223582 = sum of:
        0.02495818 = weight(_text_:information in 4223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02495818 = score(doc=4223,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4223, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4223)
        0.016265402 = product of:
          0.032530803 = sum of:
            0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 4223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032530803 = score(doc=4223,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4223, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4223)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this research, we investigated whether a learning process has unique information searching characteristics. The results of this research show that information searching is a learning process with unique searching characteristics specific to particular learning levels. In a laboratory experiment, we studied the searching characteristics of 72 participants engaged in 426 searching tasks. We classified the searching tasks according to Anderson and Krathwohl's taxonomy of the cognitive learning domain. Research results indicate that applying and analyzing, the middle two of the six categories, generally take the most searching effort in terms of queries per session, topics searched per session, and total time searching. Interestingly, the lowest two learning categories, remembering and understanding, exhibit searching characteristics similar to the highest order learning categories of evaluating and creating. Our results suggest the view of Web searchers having simple information needs may be incorrect. Instead, we discovered that users applied simple searching expressions to support their higher-level information needs. It appears that searchers rely primarily on their internal knowledge for evaluating and creating information needs, using search primarily for fact checking and verification. Overall, results indicate that a learning theory may better describe the information searching process than more commonly used paradigms of decision making or problem solving. The learning style of the searcher does have some moderating effect on exhibited searching characteristics. The implication of this research is that rather than solely addressing a searcher's expressed information need, searching systems can also address the underlying learning need of the user.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.6, S.643-663
  4. Spink, A.; Park, M.; Jansen, B.J.; Pedersen, J.: Elicitation and use of relevance feedback information (2006) 0.03
    0.026407761 = product of:
      0.03961164 = sum of:
        0.02334624 = weight(_text_:information in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02334624 = score(doc=967,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.256578 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
        0.016265402 = product of:
          0.032530803 = sum of:
            0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032530803 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A user's single session with a Web search engine or information retrieval (IR) system may consist of seeking information on single or multiple topics, and switch between tasks or multitasking information behavior. Most Web search sessions consist of two queries of approximately two words. However, some Web search sessions consist of three or more queries. We present findings from two studies. First, a study of two-query search sessions on the AltaVista Web search engine, and second, a study of three or more query search sessions on the AltaVista Web search engine. We examine the degree of multitasking search and information task switching during these two sets of AltaVista Web search sessions. A sample of two-query and three or more query sessions were filtered from AltaVista transaction logs from 2002 and qualitatively analyzed. Sessions ranged in duration from less than a minute to a few hours. Findings include: (1) 81% of two-query sessions included multiple topics, (2) 91.3% of three or more query sessions included multiple topics, (3) there are a broad variety of topics in multitasking search sessions, and (4) three or more query sessions sometimes contained frequent topic changes. Multitasking is found to be a growing element in Web searching. This paper proposes an approach to interactive information retrieval (IR) contextually within a multitasking framework. The implications of our findings for Web design and further research are discussed.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.1, S.264-275
  5. Jansen, B.J.: Seeking and implementing automated assistance during the search process (2005) 0.03
    0.025239285 = product of:
      0.037858926 = sum of:
        0.018340444 = weight(_text_:information in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018340444 = score(doc=1055,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
        0.019518482 = product of:
          0.039036963 = sum of:
            0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039036963 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Searchers seldom make use of the advanced searching features that could improve the quality of the search process because they do not know these features exist, do not understand how to use them, or do not believe they are effective or efficient. Information retrieval systems offering automated assistance could greatly improve search effectiveness by suggesting or implementing assistance automatically. A critical issue in designing such systems is determining when the system should intervene in the search process. In this paper, we report the results of an empirical study analyzing when during the search process users seek automated searching assistance from the system and when they implement the assistance. We designed a fully functional, automated assistance application and conducted a study with 30 subjects interacting with the system. The study used a 2G TREC document collection and TREC topics. Approximately 50% of the subjects sought assistance, and over 80% of those implemented that assistance. Results from the evaluation indicate that users are willing to accept automated assistance during the search process, especially after viewing results and locating relevant documents. We discuss implications for interactive information retrieval system design and directions for future research.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.4, S.909-928
  6. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: ¬An analysis of Web searching by European Allthe Web.com users (2005) 0.02
    0.02399772 = product of:
      0.03599658 = sum of:
        0.019731175 = weight(_text_:information in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019731175 = score(doc=1015,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
        0.016265402 = product of:
          0.032530803 = sum of:
            0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032530803 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Web has become a worldwide source of information and a mainstream business tool. It is changing the way people conduct the daily business of their lives. As these changes are occurring, we need to understand what Web searching trends are emerging within the various global regions. What are the regional differences and trends in Web searching, if any? What is the effectiveness of Web search engines as providers of information? As part of a body of research studying these questions, we have analyzed two data sets collected from queries by mainly European users submitted to AlltheWeb.com on 6 February 2001 and 28 May 2002. AlltheWeb.com is a major and highly rated European search engine. Each data set contains approximately a million queries submitted by over 200,000 users and spans a 24-h period. This longitudinal benchmark study shows that European Web searching is evolving in certain directions. There was some decline in query length, with extremely simple queries. European search topics are broadening, with a notable percentage decline in sexual and pornographic searching. The majority of Web searchers view fewer than five Web documents, spending only seconds on a Web document. Approximately 50% of the Web documents viewed by these European users were topically relevant. We discuss the implications for Web information systems and information content providers.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.361-382
  7. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.02
    0.021104416 = product of:
      0.031656623 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
        0.021067765 = product of:
          0.04213553 = sum of:
            0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04213553 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.557-570
  8. Jansen, B.J.; Molina, P.R.: ¬The effectiveness of Web search engines for retrieving relevant ecommerce links (2006) 0.02
    0.020071562 = product of:
      0.030107342 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
        0.019518482 = product of:
          0.039036963 = sum of:
            0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039036963 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.4, S.1075-1098
  9. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries (2008) 0.02
    0.020071562 = product of:
      0.030107342 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
        0.019518482 = product of:
          0.039036963 = sum of:
            0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039036963 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.3, S.1251-1266
  10. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: How are we searching the World Wide Web? : A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs (2006) 0.02
    0.019162996 = product of:
      0.028744493 = sum of:
        0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01247909 = score(doc=968,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
        0.016265402 = product of:
          0.032530803 = sum of:
            0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032530803 = score(doc=968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Web and especially major Web search engines are essential tools in the quest to locate online information for many people. This paper reports results from research that examines characteristics and changes in Web searching from nine studies of five Web search engines based in the US and Europe. We compare interactions occurring between users and Web search engines from the perspectives of session length, query length, query complexity, and content viewed among the Web search engines. The results of our research shows (1) users are viewing fewer result pages, (2) searchers on US-based Web search engines use more query operators than searchers on European-based search engines, (3) there are statistically significant differences in the use of Boolean operators and result pages viewed, and (4) one cannot necessary apply results from studies of one particular Web search engine to another Web search engine. The wide spread use of Web search engines, employment of simple queries, and decreased viewing of result pages may have resulted from algorithmic enhancements by Web search engine companies. We discuss the implications of the findings for the development of Web search engines and design of online content.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.1, S.248-263
  11. Ortiz-Cordova, A.; Yang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.: External to internal search : associating searching on search engines with searching on sites (2015) 0.02
    0.0167263 = product of:
      0.02508945 = sum of:
        0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 2675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0088240495 = score(doc=2675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2675)
        0.016265402 = product of:
          0.032530803 = sum of:
            0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 2675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032530803 = score(doc=2675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 51(2015) no.5, S.718-736
  12. Coughlin, D.M.; Jansen, B.J.: Modeling journal bibliometrics to predict downloads and inform purchase decisions at university research libraries (2016) 0.02
    0.0167263 = product of:
      0.02508945 = sum of:
        0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0088240495 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
        0.016265402 = product of:
          0.032530803 = sum of:
            0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032530803 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    University libraries provide access to thousands of online journals and other content, spending millions of dollars annually on these electronic resources. Providing access to these online resources is costly, and it is difficult both to analyze the value of this content to the institution and to discern those journals that comparatively provide more value. In this research, we examine 1,510 journals from a large research university library, representing more than 40% of the university's annual subscription cost for electronic resources at the time of the study. We utilize a web analytics approach for the creation of a linear regression model to predict usage among these journals. We categorize metrics into two classes: global (journal focused) and local (institution dependent). Using 275 journals for our training set, our analysis shows that a combination of global and local metrics creates the strongest model for predicting full-text downloads. Our linear regression model has an accuracy of more than 80% in predicting downloads for the 1,235 journals in our test set. The implications of the findings are that university libraries that use local metrics have better insight into the value of a journal and therefore more efficient cost content management.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.9, S.2263-2273
  13. Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Blakely, C.; Koshman, S.: ¬A study of results overlap and uniqueness among major Web search engines (2006) 0.01
    0.013381042 = product of:
      0.020071562 = sum of:
        0.00705924 = weight(_text_:information in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705924 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
        0.013012322 = product of:
          0.026024643 = sum of:
            0.026024643 = weight(_text_:management in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026024643 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.5, S.1379-1391
  14. Jansen, B.J.; Rieh, S.Y.: ¬The seventeen theoretical constructs of information searching and information retrieval (2010) 0.01
    0.012226963 = product of:
      0.03668089 = sum of:
        0.03668089 = weight(_text_:information in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03668089 = score(doc=3690,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we identify, compare, and contrast theoretical constructs for the fields of information searching and information retrieval to emphasize the uniqueness of and synergy between the fields. Theoretical constructs are the foundational elements that underpin a field's core theories, models, assumptions, methodologies, and evaluation metrics. We provide a framework to compare and contrast the theoretical constructs in the fields of information searching and information retrieval using intellectual perspective and theoretical orientation. The intellectual perspectives are information searching, information retrieval, and cross-cutting; and the theoretical orientations are information, people, and technology. Using this framework, we identify 17 significant constructs in these fields contrasting the differences and comparing the similarities. We discuss the impact of the interplay among these constructs for moving research forward within both fields. Although there is tension between the fields due to contradictory constructs, an examination shows a trend toward convergence. We discuss the implications for future research within the information searching and information retrieval fields.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.8, S.1517-1534
  15. Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: Web searching : public searching of the Web (2004) 0.01
    0.01199886 = product of:
      0.01799829 = sum of:
        0.009865588 = weight(_text_:information in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009865588 = score(doc=1443,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.10842399 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
        0.008132701 = product of:
          0.016265402 = sum of:
            0.016265402 = weight(_text_:management in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016265402 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.09310089 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 56(2004) H.1, S.61-62 (D. Lewandowski): "Die Autoren des vorliegenden Bandes haben sich in den letzten Jahren durch ihre zahlreichen Veröffentlichungen zum Verhalten von Suchmaschinen-Nutzern einen guten Namen gemacht. Das nun erschienene Buch bietet eine Zusammenfassung der verstreut publizierten Aufsätze und stellt deren Ergebnisse in den Kontext eines umfassenderen Forschungsansatzes. Spink und Jansen verwenden zur Analyse des Nutzungsverhaltens query logs von Suchmaschinen. In diesen werden vom Server Informationen protokolliert, die die Anfragen an diesen Server betreffen. Daten, die aus diesen Dateien gewonnen werden können, sind unter anderem die gestellten Suchanfragen, die Adresse des Rechners, von dem aus die Anfrage gestellt wurde, sowie die aus den Trefferlisten ausgewählten Dokumente. Der klare Vorteil der Analyse von Logfiles liegt in der Möglichkeit, große Datenmengen ohne hohen personellen Aufwand erheben zu können. Die Daten einer Vielzahl anonymer Nutzer können analysiert werden; ohne dass dabei die Datenerhebung das Nutzerverhalten beeinflusst. Dies ist bei Suchmaschinen von besonderer Bedeutung, weil sie im Gegensatz zu den meisten anderen professionellen Information-Retrieval-Systemen nicht nur im beruflichen Kontext, sondern auch (und vor allem) privat genutzt werden. Das Bild des Nutzungsverhaltens wird in Umfragen und Laboruntersuchungen verfälscht, weil Nutzer ihr Anfrageverhalten falsch einschätzen oder aber die Themen ihrer Anfragen nicht nennen möchten. Hier ist vor allem an Suchanfragen, die auf medizinische oder pornographische Inhalte gerichtet sind, zu denken. Die Analyse von Logfiles ist allerdings auch mit Problemen behaftet: So sind nicht alle gewünschten Daten überhaupt in den Logfiles enthalten (es fehlen alle Informationen über den einzelnen Nutzer), es werden keine qualitativen Informationen wie etwa der Grund einer Suche erfasst und die Logfiles sind aufgrund technischer Gegebenheiten teils unvollständig. Die Autoren schließen aus den genannten Vor- und Nachteilen, dass sich Logfiles gut für die Auswertung des Nutzerverhaltens eignen, bei der Auswertung jedoch die Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen, welche andere Methoden verwenden, berücksichtigt werden sollten.
    RSWK
    Internet / Information Retrieval (BVB)
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; 6
    Subject
    Internet / Information Retrieval (BVB)
  16. Wolfram, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Vox populi : the public searching of the Web (2001) 0.01
    0.0070592402 = product of:
      0.02117772 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1073-1074
  17. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Pedersen, J.: ¬A temporal comparison of AItaVista Web searching (2005) 0.01
    0.0070592402 = product of:
      0.02117772 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 3454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=3454,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3454, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3454)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Major Web search engines, such as AItaVista, are essential tools in the quest to locate online information. This article reports research that used transaction log analysis to examine the characteristics and changes in AItaVista Web searching that occurred from 1998 to 2002. The research questions we examined are (1) What are the changes in AItaVista Web searching from 1998 to 2002? (2) What are the current characteristics of AItaVista searching, including the duration and frequency of search sessions? (3) What changes in the information needs of AItaVista users occurred between 1998 and 2002? The results of our research show (1) a move toward more interactivity with increases in session and query length, (2) with 70% of session durations at 5 minutes or less, the frequency of interaction is increasing, but it is happening very quickly, and (3) a broadening range of Web searchers' information needs, with the most frequent terms accounting for less than 1% of total term usage. We discuss the implications of these findings for the development of Web search engines.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.6, S.559-570
  18. Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Pedersen , J.: Searching for people on Web search engines (2004) 0.01
    0.0065770587 = product of:
      0.019731175 = sum of:
        0.019731175 = weight(_text_:information in 4429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019731175 = score(doc=4429,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 4429, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4429)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Web is a communication and information technology that is often used for the distribution and retrieval of personal information. Many people and organizations mount Web sites containing large amounts of information on individuals, particularly about celebrities. However, limited studies have examined how people search for information on other people, using personal names, via Web search engines. Explores the nature of personal name searching on Web search engines. The specific research questions addressed in the study are: "Do personal names form a major part of queries to Web search engines?"; "What are the characteristics of personal name Web searching?"; and "How effective is personal name Web searching?". Random samples of queries from two Web search engines were analyzed. The findings show that: personal name searching is a common but not a major part of Web searching with few people seeking information on celebrities via Web search engines; few personal name queries include double quotations or additional identifying terms; and name searches on Alta Vista included more advanced search features relative to those on AlltheWeb.com. Discusses the implications of the findings for Web searching and search engines, and further research.
  19. Jansen, B.J.; Resnick, M.: ¬An examination of searcher's perceptions of nonsponsored and sponsored links during ecommerce Web searching (2006) 0.01
    0.0058827 = product of:
      0.017648099 = sum of:
        0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017648099 = score(doc=221,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 221, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=221)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we report results of an investigation into the effect of sponsored links on ecommerce information seeking on the Web. In this research, 56 participants each engaged in six ecommerce Web searching tasks. We extracted these tasks from the transaction log of a Web search engine, so they represent actual ecommerce searching information needs. Using 60 organic and 30 sponsored Web links, the quality of the Web search engine results was controlled by switching nonsponsored and sponsored links on half of the tasks for each participant. This allowed for investigating the bias toward sponsored links while controlling for quality of content. The study also investigated the relationship between searching self-efficacy, searching experience, types of ecommerce information needs, and the order of links on the viewing of sponsored links. Data included 2,453 interactions with links from result pages and 961 utterances evaluating these links. The results of the study indicate that there is a strong preference for nonsponsored links, with searchers viewing these results first more than 82% of the time. Searching self-efficacy and experience does not increase the likelihood of viewing sponsored links, and the order of the result listing does not appear to affect searcher evaluation of sponsored links. The implications for sponsored links as a long-term business model are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.14, S.1949-1961
  20. Liu, Z.; Jansen, B.J.: ASK: A taxonomy of accuracy, social, and knowledge information seeking posts in social question and answering (2017) 0.01
    0.0058827 = product of:
      0.017648099 = sum of:
        0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017648099 = score(doc=3345,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Many people turn to their social networks to find information through the practice of question and answering. We believe it is necessary to use different answering strategies based on the type of questions to accommodate the different information needs. In this research, we propose the ASK taxonomy that categorizes questions posted on social networking sites into three types according to the nature of the questioner's inquiry of accuracy, social, or knowledge. To automatically decide which answering strategy to use, we develop a predictive model based on ASK question types using question features from the perspectives of lexical, topical, contextual, and syntactic as well as answer features. By applying the classifier on an annotated data set, we present a comprehensive analysis to compare questions in terms of their word usage, topical interests, temporal and spatial restrictions, syntactic structure, and response characteristics. Our research results show that the three types of questions exhibited different characteristics in the way they are asked. Our automatic classification algorithm achieves an 83% correct labeling result, showing the value of the ASK taxonomy for the design of social question and answering systems.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.333-347