-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.05
0.050978534 = product of:
0.0764678 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.06764375 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Hetzler, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships (2002)
0.04
0.035354502 = product of:
0.05303175 = sum of:
0.030260187 = weight(_text_:information in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030260187 = score(doc=1189,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Relationships can provide a rich and powerful set of information and can be used to accomplish application goals, such as information retrieval and natural language processing. A growing trend in the information science community is the use of information visualization-taking advantage of people's natural visual capabilities to perceive and understand complex information. This chapter explores how visualization and visual exploration can help users gain insight from known relationships and discover evidence of new relationships not previously anticipated.
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Gerbé, O.; Mineau, G.W.; Keller, R.K.: Conceptual graphs, metamodelling, and notation of concepts : fundamental issues (2000)
0.03
0.033083882 = product of:
0.04962582 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=5078,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
0.039036963 = product of:
0.078073926 = sum of:
0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078073926 = score(doc=5078,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management, in particular corporate knowledge management, is a challenge companies and researchers have to meet. The conceptual graph formalism is a good candidate for the representation of corporate knowledge, and for the development of knowledge management systems. But many of the issues concerning the use of conceptual graphs as a metalanguage have not been worked out in detail. By introducing a function that maps higher level to lower level, this paper clarifies the metalevel semantics, notation and manipulation of concepts in the conceptual graph formalism. In addition, this function allows metamodeling activities to take place using the CG notation
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Khoo, C.; Myaeng, S.H.: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction (2002)
0.03
0.03297887 = product of:
0.0494683 = sum of:
0.029949818 = weight(_text_:information in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029949818 = score(doc=1197,freq=16.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
0.019518482 = product of:
0.039036963 = sum of:
0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039036963 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Automatic identification of semantic relations in text is a difficult problem, but is important for many applications. It has been used for relation matching in information retrieval to retrieve documents that contain not only the concepts but also the relations between concepts specified in the user's query. It is an integral part of information extraction-extracting from natural language text, facts or pieces of information related to a particular event or topic. Other potential applications are in the construction of relational thesauri (semantic networks of related concepts) and other kinds of knowledge bases, and in natural language processing applications such as machine translation and computer comprehension of text. This chapter examines the main methods used for identifying semantic relations automatically and their application in information retrieval and information extraction.
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval (2002)
0.03
0.028797261 = product of:
0.043195892 = sum of:
0.02367741 = weight(_text_:information in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02367741 = score(doc=1201,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.019518482 = product of:
0.039036963 = sum of:
0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039036963 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Thesaural relations have long been used in information retrieval to enrich queries; they have sometimes been used to cluster documents as well. Sometimes the first query to an information retrieval system yields no results at all, or, what can be even more disconcerting, many thousands of hits. One solution is to rephrase the query, improving the choice of query terms by using related terms of different types. A collection of related terms is often called a thesaurus. This chapter describes the lexical-semantic relations that have been used in building thesauri and summarizes some of the effects of using these relational thesauri in information retrieval experiments
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
ISO/DIS 5127: Information and documentation - foundation and vocabulary (2013)
0.03
0.028491702 = product of:
0.04273755 = sum of:
0.026472148 = weight(_text_:information in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026472148 = score(doc=6070,freq=18.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This standard provides the basic terms and their definitions in the field of information and documentation for the purpose of promoting and facilitating knowledge sharing and information exchange. This International Standard presents terms and definitions of selected concepts relevant to the field of information and documentation. If a definition is from other standards, the priority of selection is TC46 technical standards, then technical standards in relevant field, and then terminology related standards. The scope of this International Standard corresponds to that of ISO/TC46, Standardization of practices relating to libraries, documentation and information centres, publishing, archives, records management, museum documentation, indexing and abstracting services, and information science. ISO 5127 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 46, Information and Documentation, WG4, Terminology of information and documentation. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 5127:2001), which has been technically revised to overcome problems in the practical application of ISO 5127:2001 and to take account of the new developments in the field of information and documentation.
-
Cruse, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties (2002)
0.03
0.026762083 = product of:
0.040143125 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 1186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=1186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1186)
0.026024643 = product of:
0.052049287 = sum of:
0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 1186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052049287 = score(doc=1186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Green, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics (2002)
0.03
0.026762083 = product of:
0.040143125 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
0.026024643 = product of:
0.052049287 = sum of:
0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052049287 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002)
0.02
0.02399772 = product of:
0.03599658 = sum of:
0.019731175 = weight(_text_:information in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019731175 = score(doc=1430,freq=10.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Work on relationships takes place in many communities, including, among others, data modeling, knowledge representation, natural language processing, linguistics, and information retrieval. Unfortunately, continued disciplinary splintering and specialization keeps any one person from being familiar with the full expanse of that work. By including contributions form experts in a variety of disciplines and backgrounds, this volume demonstrates both the parallels that inform work on relationships across a number of fields and the singular emphases that have yet to be fully embraced, The volume is organized into 3 parts: (1) Types of relationships (2) Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning (3) Applications of relationships
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Fellbaum, C.: On the semantics of troponymy (2002)
0.02
0.023416823 = product of:
0.035125233 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 1191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=1191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1191)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 1191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=1191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1191)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Guarino, N.; Welty, C.: Identity and subsumption (2002)
0.02
0.023416823 = product of:
0.035125233 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
McCray, A.T.; Bodenreider, O.: ¬A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain (2002)
0.02
0.022995595 = product of:
0.03449339 = sum of:
0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014974909 = score(doc=1207,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.019518482 = product of:
0.039036963 = sum of:
0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039036963 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Specialized domains often come with an extensive terminology, suitable for storing and exchanging information, but not necessarily for knowledge processing. Knowledge structures such as semantic networks, or ontologies, are required to explore the semantics of a domain. The UMLS project at the National Library of Medicine is a research effort to develop knowledge-based resources for the biomedical domain. The Metathesaurus is a large body of knowledge that defines and inter-relates 730,000 biomedical concepts, and the Semantic Network defines the semantic principles that apply to this domain. This chapter presents these two knowledge sources and illustrates through a research study how they can collaborate to further structure the domain. The limits of the approach are discussed.
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.02
0.021893453 = product of:
0.032840177 = sum of:
0.015283704 = weight(_text_:information in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015283704 = score(doc=5588,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.017556472 = product of:
0.035112944 = sum of:
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'Gender Issues in Information Needs and Services'.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
-
Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Niu, Y.: ¬The many facets of the cause-effect relation (2002)
0.02
0.020071562 = product of:
0.030107342 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.019518482 = product of:
0.039036963 = sum of:
0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039036963 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Pribbenow, S.: Meronymic relationships : from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations (2002)
0.02
0.020071562 = product of:
0.030107342 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.019518482 = product of:
0.039036963 = sum of:
0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039036963 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Hovy, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies (2002)
0.02
0.020071562 = product of:
0.030107342 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=2178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2178)
0.019518482 = product of:
0.039036963 = sum of:
0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 2178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039036963 = score(doc=2178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2178)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.02
0.016558193 = product of:
0.024837289 = sum of:
0.008735363 = weight(_text_:information in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008735363 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.0960027 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.016101927 = product of:
0.032203853 = sum of:
0.032203853 = weight(_text_:management in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032203853 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18433036 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.02
0.01638604 = product of:
0.04915812 = sum of:
0.04915812 = product of:
0.09831624 = sum of:
0.09831624 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09831624 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.01
0.014045177 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = product of:
0.08427106 = sum of:
0.08427106 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08427106 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
-
Bivins, K.T.: Concept formation : the evidence from experimental psychology and linguistics and its relationship to information science (1980)
0.01
0.012226963 = product of:
0.03668089 = sum of:
0.03668089 = weight(_text_:information in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03668089 = score(doc=1319,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
