-
Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994)
0.16
0.16044417 = product of:
0.24066626 = sum of:
0.02495818 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02495818 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.21570808 = sum of:
0.14548218 = weight(_text_:management in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14548218 = score(doc=1000,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.83271974 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022589 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
- Source
- Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
-
Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998)
0.13
0.12588556 = product of:
0.18882833 = sum of:
0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017470727 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
0.1713576 = sum of:
0.10183753 = weight(_text_:management in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10183753 = score(doc=2430,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
0.06952008 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06952008 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Records management has appeared lately in France to designate the management of organizational documents and electronic data an enterprise must retain as proof of its activities and transactions. An international standard is under discussion to address issues concerned with retention. At the same time, some information professionals are finding themselves increasingly involved with active company records, since the role of records manager requires skills found in the professions of archivists, information scientist and quality controller. Presents examples which pose the question, is records management in fact a new profession or simply a new form of a familiar job?
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
31.12.1998 15:32:22
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Records management: new concept or old practice?
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.12
0.124901965 = sum of:
0.08232375 = product of:
0.24697125 = sum of:
0.24697125 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24697125 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43943653 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014974909 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.027603304 = product of:
0.055206608 = sum of:
0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055206608 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Hare, C.E.; McLeaod, J.; King, L.A.: Continuing professional development for the information discipline of records management : pt.1: context and initial indications of current activities (1996)
0.12
0.12245359 = product of:
0.18368039 = sum of:
0.032684736 = weight(_text_:information in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032684736 = score(doc=5049,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
0.15099564 = sum of:
0.10183753 = weight(_text_:management in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10183753 = score(doc=5049,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5829038 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Explores the newly emerging information discipline of records management, focusing on its current status in the UK where it is represented by a range of sector specific and general organizations for information professionals. While records management involves some skills and knowledge which are different from those already mastered by library and information professionals, there are significant overlaps in terms of cataloguing, classification, indexing, identifying and meeting user needs and the challenge of dealing with information in electronic form. Concludes that, in the changing and sometimes shrinking market of of some of the more traditional library sectors, records management may offer the opportunity for information professionals to develop or shift their career path while remaining within the discipline of information management
- Source
- Librarian career development. 4(1996) no.2, S.22-27
-
Taylor, P.: Perception and change in records management : rethinking the fundamentals (1997)
0.12
0.115379475 = product of:
0.17306921 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
0.16071554 = sum of:
0.11155742 = weight(_text_:management in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11155742 = score(doc=2787,freq=12.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.6385391 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2787)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Identifies some of the fundamental issues for the future records management, and assesses their relevance for the future. Considers traditional records management and suggests a new record keeping approach which impacts directly upon the organization by ensuring records are properly created according to the organization's needs. Stresses the importance of making better use of new technologies. Important issues are: the myth of the information manager, implementation of records management standards, replacing the life cycle approach with one of a records continuum, new relationships between the archival and records management community, and development of competency based standards
- Date
- 24. 1.1999 12:22:46
- Source
- Records management bulletin. 1997, no.82, S.11-15,18
-
Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995)
0.11
0.10696747 = product of:
0.1604512 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.14633273 = sum of:
0.09015202 = weight(_text_:management in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09015202 = score(doc=3355,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the problems associated with electronic archiving and draws attention to work by the University of Pittsburgh on developing a standard for archiving electronic documents. Examines elements of effective archival and records management and considers the problems associated with archives such as backlogs and time taken to search for information. The basis of good records management lies in making responsible choices
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 9:30:18
-
Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997)
0.11
0.10696747 = product of:
0.1604512 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
0.14633273 = sum of:
0.09015202 = weight(_text_:management in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09015202 = score(doc=2923,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
- Date
- 11. 2.1999 21:02:22
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Analysis and design of electronic document management systems in large enterprises
-
McLeod, J.; Hare, C.H.; Webster, B.: Records management today (1998)
0.10
0.09983738 = product of:
0.14975606 = sum of:
0.019966545 = weight(_text_:information in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019966545 = score(doc=3627,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
0.12978952 = sum of:
0.07360881 = weight(_text_:management in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07360881 = score(doc=3627,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.42132655 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the challenges associated with records management in an electronic environment. These include: the impact of professionalization; the explosion of information created and disseminated in electronic form; increased personal responsibility and the creation of ethical codes regulating the coduct of records managers; commitment to and recognition by society at large; and the need to redefine the skills and knowledge required to fulfil the new role of records manager
- Date
- 15. 5.1999 20:22:49
- Source
- Managing information. 5(1998) no.7, S.23,25-26
-
Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009)
0.09
0.09063201 = product of:
0.135948 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
0.12712395 = sum of:
0.09201101 = weight(_text_:management in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09201101 = score(doc=3220,freq=16.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Die September/Oktober-Ausgabe 2009 der IWP ist eine Schwerpunktausgabe zum Records Management. Es ist interessant, dass einmal aus fachlich ganz anderer Perspektive auf diese Management- Disziplin geschaut wird. Viele Aspekte werden angesprochen: Terminologie, Rolle des Archivwesens, Interdisziplinarität, Langzeitaufbewahrung und Standardisierung. Im Artikel "Wissensorganisation und Records Management. Was ist der 'state of the art'?" steht die Wissensorganisation als Schwachstelle des Records Management zentral. Dies zu Recht: Das logische Datenmodell von DOMEA - das Gleiche gilt für GEVER und ELAK - entspricht beispielsweise nicht in allen Hinsichten der Geschäftsrealität. Daraus entstehen für die Mitarbeitenden im Arbeitsalltag öfters mehr Verständnisprobleme als sie bewältigen können oder wollen. Die systemische Unterstützung der eingesetzten EDRMS (nicht alle Produkte verdienen übrigens diesen Namen) wird dadurch geschwächt. Die Wissensorganisation genügt in vielen Fällen (noch) nicht. Das Problem liegt allerdings weniger bei der Klassifikation (Aktenplan), wie Ulrike Spree meint. Auch hier kommen Anomalien vor. Ein Ordnungssystem im Records Management umfasst mehr als nur die Klassifikation. Zudem dürfen die prinzipiellen, inhärenten Unterschiede zwischen Records Management einerseits und Wissens- und Informationsmanagement andererseits nicht vergessen gehen. Nicht die Klassifikation ist beim Records Management das zentrale Werkzeug der Informationsrepräsentation und -organisation, sondern die saubere Dossierbildung und die stringente, strukturstabile Umsetzung davon im Datenmodell. Hierauf geht die Autorin nicht ein. Ich werde aus dieser Sicht auf ihren Beitrag in der Schwerpunktausgabe reagieren.
- Date
- 6.12.2009 17:22:17
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.8, S.443-446
-
Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997)
0.09
0.08997534 = product of:
0.134963 = sum of:
0.021397185 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021397185 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
0.113565825 = sum of:
0.064407706 = weight(_text_:management in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064407706 = score(doc=758,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Imprint
- Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
-
Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014)
0.09
0.08667028 = product of:
0.13000542 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.12118137 = sum of:
0.08606842 = weight(_text_:management in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08606842 = score(doc=1632,freq=14.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.49264365 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.2, S.134-155
-
Port, S.: Document management : a guuide for business users (1994)
0.09
0.08619817 = product of:
0.12929726 = sum of:
0.04322884 = weight(_text_:information in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04322884 = score(doc=1306,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.47509015 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
0.08606842 = product of:
0.17213684 = sum of:
0.17213684 = weight(_text_:management in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17213684 = score(doc=1306,freq=14.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.9852873 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- COMPASS
- Business / Information / Management
- Footnote
- Rez. in International journal of information management 15(1995) no.2, S.158-159 (B. Wiggins)
- LCSH
- Management information systems
- Subject
- Management information systems
Business / Information / Management
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Pemberton, J.M.: Who put the 'management' in records management? (1995)
0.09
0.085219756 = product of:
0.12782963 = sum of:
0.02495818 = weight(_text_:information in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02495818 = score(doc=4560,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
0.10287144 = product of:
0.20574288 = sum of:
0.20574288 = weight(_text_:management in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20574288 = score(doc=4560,freq=20.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
1.1776435 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- There is confusion about the conceptual origins of records management. It is often wrongly associated with archival management. Records management however should be associated with management as its core paradigm is that of information management. Traces the rise of management and the emergence of management information, prior to the 2nd World War
- Source
- Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.68-73
-
Vijlenbroek, J.J.M.: Potential workflow applications : information management impact (1995)
0.07
0.0669052 = product of:
0.1003578 = sum of:
0.035296198 = weight(_text_:information in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035296198 = score(doc=3401,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3401)
0.06506161 = product of:
0.13012321 = sum of:
0.13012321 = weight(_text_:management in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13012321 = score(doc=3401,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.7448071 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3401)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Defines and describes workflow management, examines workflow management from an organizational and a technological perspective, and discusses its relationship with documentary information systems. Considers the consequences of the introduction of workflow management and documentary information systems on the documentary information function within organization
-
Buckland, M.: On the nature of records management theory (1995)
0.07
0.06513285 = product of:
0.09769927 = sum of:
0.02495818 = weight(_text_:information in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02495818 = score(doc=2270,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.07274109 = product of:
0.14548218 = sum of:
0.14548218 = weight(_text_:management in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14548218 = score(doc=2270,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.83271974 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the nature of records management theory, including information retrieval, record life cycle, and information policy. Concludes that records management theory should not be seen in isolation and need not be unique to records management. Outlines functional, professional, and educational contexts of records management theory, with examples
-
Batley, S.: ¬The I in information architecture : the challenge of content management (2007)
0.06
0.06185063 = product of:
0.09277594 = sum of:
0.03458307 = weight(_text_:information in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03458307 = score(doc=809,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
0.058192875 = product of:
0.11638575 = sum of:
0.11638575 = weight(_text_:management in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11638575 = score(doc=809,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.6661758 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of content management in the context of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted is a review of definitions of information architecture and an analysis of the importance of content and its management within information architecture. Findings - Concludes that reality will not necessarily match the vision of organisations investing in information architecture. Originality/value - The paper considers practical issues around content and records management.
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Electronic systems and records management in the information ages (1997)
0.06
0.061321586 = product of:
0.09198238 = sum of:
0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03993309 = score(doc=1382,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
0.052049287 = product of:
0.10409857 = sum of:
0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 1382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10409857 = score(doc=1382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 1382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1382)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.7-29
-
Robek, M.F.; Brown, G.F.; Stephens, D.O.: Information and records management (1995)
0.06
0.059410032 = product of:
0.089115046 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 4237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=4237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4237)
0.064407706 = product of:
0.12881541 = sum of:
0.12881541 = weight(_text_:management in 4237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12881541 = score(doc=4237,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 4237, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4237)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.64-65 (A.L. Dmytrenko)
-
Hare, C.E.; McLeod, J.: Developing a records management programme (1997)
0.06
0.059194487 = product of:
0.08879173 = sum of:
0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 5824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02117772 = score(doc=5824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5824)
0.06761401 = product of:
0.13522802 = sum of:
0.13522802 = weight(_text_:management in 5824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13522802 = score(doc=5824,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.77402633 = fieldWeight in 5824, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Managing information 4(1997) no.7, S.44, (J. Wilson)
- LCSH
- Records / Management
- Subject
- Records / Management
-
Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995)
0.06
0.05848486 = product of:
0.087727286 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.07360881 = product of:
0.14721762 = sum of:
0.14721762 = weight(_text_:management in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14721762 = score(doc=2054,freq=16.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.8426531 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
- Source
- Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
