-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.08
0.078184746 = product of:
0.117277116 = sum of:
0.02161442 = weight(_text_:information in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02161442 = score(doc=4888,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.0956627 = sum of:
0.046005506 = weight(_text_:management in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046005506 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.049657196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049657196 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.04
0.04004742 = product of:
0.060071126 = sum of:
0.02495818 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02495818 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.035112944 = product of:
0.07022589 = sum of:
0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022589 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Morehead, D.R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Rouse, W.B.: ¬The value of information and computer-aided information seeking : problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval (1984)
0.04
0.035354502 = product of:
0.05303175 = sum of:
0.030260187 = weight(_text_:information in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030260187 = score(doc=5828,freq=12.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 5828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=5828,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5828, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5828)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Issues concerning the formulation and application of a model of how humans value information are examined. Formulation of a value function is based on research from modelling, value assessment, human information seeking behavior, and human decision making. The proposed function is incorporated into a computer-based fiction retrieval system and evaluated using data from nine searches. Evaluation is based on the ability of an individual's value function to discriminate among novels selected, rejected, and not considered. The results are discussed in terms of both formulation and utilization of a value function as well as the implications for extending the proposed formulation to other information seeking environments
- Source
- Information processing and management. 20(1984), S.583-601
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.03
0.028139224 = product of:
0.042208835 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.028090354 = product of:
0.056180708 = sum of:
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Rowe, N.C.: Inferring depictions in natural-language captions for efficient access to picture data (1994)
0.02
0.023416823 = product of:
0.035125233 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 7296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=7296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7296)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 7296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=7296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 7296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.3, S.379-388
-
Mai, J.-E.: Analysis in indexing : document and domain centered approaches (2005)
0.02
0.023416823 = product of:
0.035125233 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 1024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=1024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1024)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.3, S.599-611
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.02
0.021104416 = product of:
0.031656623 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.02
0.021104416 = product of:
0.031656623 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Rorissa, A.: User-generated descriptions of individual images versus labels of groups of images : a comparison using basic level theory (2008)
0.02
0.019162996 = product of:
0.028744493 = sum of:
0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 2122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01247909 = score(doc=2122,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2122, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2122)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 2122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=2122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Although images are visual information sources with little or no text associated with them, users still tend to use text to describe images and formulate queries. This is because digital libraries and search engines provide mostly text query options and rely on text annotations for representation and retrieval of the semantic content of images. While the main focus of image research is on indexing and retrieval of individual images, the general topic of image browsing and indexing, and retrieval of groups of images has not been adequately investigated. Comparisons of descriptions of individual images as well as labels of groups of images supplied by users using cognitive models are scarce. This work fills this gap. Using the basic level theory as a framework, a comparison of the descriptions of individual images and labels assigned to groups of images by 180 participants in three studies found a marked difference in their level of abstraction. Results confirm assertions by previous researchers in LIS and other fields that groups of images are labeled using more superordinate level terms while individual image descriptions are mainly at the basic level. Implications for design of image browsing interfaces, taxonomies, thesauri, and similar tools are discussed.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.5, S.1741-1753
-
Bertola, F.; Patti, V.: Ontology-based affective models to organize artworks in the social semantic web (2016)
0.02
0.019162996 = product of:
0.028744493 = sum of:
0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01247909 = score(doc=2669,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=2669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we focus on applying sentiment analysis to resources from online art collections, by exploiting, as information source, tags intended as textual traces that visitors leave to comment artworks on social platforms. We present a framework where methods and tools from a set of disciplines, ranging from Semantic and Social Web to Natural Language Processing, provide us the building blocks for creating a semantic social space to organize artworks according to an ontology of emotions. The ontology is inspired by the Plutchik's circumplex model, a well-founded psychological model of human emotions. Users can be involved in the creation of the emotional space, through a graphical interactive interface. The development of such semantic space enables new ways of accessing and exploring art collections. The affective categorization model and the emotion detection output are encoded into W3C ontology languages. This gives us the twofold advantage to enable tractable reasoning on detected emotions and related artworks, and to foster the interoperability and integration of tools developed in the Semantic Web and Linked Data community. The proposal has been evaluated against a real-word case study, a dataset of tagged multimedia artworks from the ArsMeteo Italian online collection, and validated through a user study.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.139-162
-
Xie, H.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Lau, R.Y.K.; Wong, T.-L.; Chen, L.; Wang, F.L.; Li, Q.: Incorporating sentiment into tag-based user profiles and resource profiles for personalized search in folksonomy (2016)
0.02
0.0180872 = product of:
0.027130801 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=2671,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
0.013012322 = product of:
0.026024643 = sum of:
0.026024643 = weight(_text_:management in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026024643 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been a rapid growth of user-generated data in collaborative tagging (a.k.a. folksonomy-based) systems due to the prevailing of Web 2.0 communities. To effectively assist users to find their desired resources, it is critical to understand user behaviors and preferences. Tag-based profile techniques, which model users and resources by a vector of relevant tags, are widely employed in folksonomy-based systems. This is mainly because that personalized search and recommendations can be facilitated by measuring relevance between user profiles and resource profiles. However, conventional measurements neglect the sentiment aspect of user-generated tags. In fact, tags can be very emotional and subjective, as users usually express their perceptions and feelings about the resources by tags. Therefore, it is necessary to take sentiment relevance into account into measurements. In this paper, we present a novel generic framework SenticRank to incorporate various sentiment information to various sentiment-based information for personalized search by user profiles and resource profiles. In this framework, content-based sentiment ranking and collaborative sentiment ranking methods are proposed to obtain sentiment-based personalized ranking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work of integrating sentiment information to address the problem of the personalized tag-based search in collaborative tagging systems. Moreover, we compare the proposed sentiment-based personalized search with baselines in the experiments, the results of which have verified the effectiveness of the proposed framework. In addition, we study the influences by popular sentiment dictionaries, and SenticNet is the most prominent knowledge base to boost the performance of personalized search in folksonomy.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.61-72
-
Saif, H.; He, Y.; Fernandez, M.; Alani, H.: Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter (2016)
0.02
0.0167263 = product of:
0.02508945 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.5-19
-
Allen, B.; Reser, D.: Content analysis in library and information science research (1990)
0.01
0.01331103 = product of:
0.03993309 = sum of:
0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 7510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03993309 = score(doc=7510,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 7510, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7510)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 12(1990) no.3, S.251-262
-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980)
0.01
0.012226963 = product of:
0.03668089 = sum of:
0.03668089 = weight(_text_:information in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03668089 = score(doc=1329,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
-
Schlapfer, K.: ¬The information content of images (1995)
0.01
0.012226963 = product of:
0.03668089 = sum of:
0.03668089 = weight(_text_:information in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03668089 = score(doc=521,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the methods of calculating the information content of images, with particular reference to the information content of printed and photographic images; and printed and television images
-
Renouf, A.: Making sense of text : automated approaches to meaning extraction (1993)
0.01
0.011647152 = product of:
0.034941453 = sum of:
0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 7111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034941453 = score(doc=7111,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7111, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7111)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
-
Farrow, J.: Indexing as a cognitive process (1994)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
-
Kremer-Marietti, A.: Thematic analysis (1986)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.41, [=Suppl.6]
-
Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 1(1966), S.71-106
-
Sharp, J.R.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1967)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 2(1967), S.87-122
