-
Summarizing text : [Themenheft] (1995)
0.05
0.053524166 = product of:
0.08028625 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 3872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=3872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3872)
0.052049287 = product of:
0.10409857 = sum of:
0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 3872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10409857 = score(doc=3872,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 3872, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3872)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-784
-
Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996)
0.04
0.0361744 = product of:
0.054261602 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=1007,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.026024643 = product of:
0.052049287 = sum of:
0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052049287 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- 1st ed.: Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information 1982
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 36(1996) no.5, S.1050 (V.K. Raman); Information processing and management 33(1997) no.4, S.573 (H.R. Tibbo)
- Imprint
- Arlington, VA : Information resources Press
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.04
0.035174027 = product of:
0.05276104 = sum of:
0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017648099 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.035112944 = product of:
0.07022589 = sum of:
0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022589 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
- Source
- Journal of education for library and information science. 36(1995) no.2, S.170-173
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003)
0.03
0.031689316 = product of:
0.04753397 = sum of:
0.028015489 = weight(_text_:information in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028015489 = score(doc=4913,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
0.019518482 = product of:
0.039036963 = sum of:
0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039036963 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Covers: indexing principles and practice; precoordinate indexes; consistency and quality of indexing; types and functions of abstracts; writing an abstract; evaluation theory and practice; approaches used in indexing and abstracting services; indexing enhancement; natural language in information retrieval; indexing and abstracting of imaginative works; databases of images and sound; automatic indexing and abstracting; the future of indexing and abstracting services
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 57(2006) no.1, S.144-145 (H. Saggion): "... This volume is a very valuable source of information for not only students and professionals in library and information science but also for individuals and institutions involved in knowledge management and organization activities. Because of its broad coverage of the information science topic, teachers will find the contents of this book useful for courses in the areas of information technology, digital as well as traditional libraries, and information science in general."
- Imprint
- Champaign, IL : Graduate School of Library and Information Science
-
Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995)
0.03
0.026828196 = product of:
0.040242292 = sum of:
0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017470727 = score(doc=3677,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Compares formats and linguistic devices of German abstracts and their English equivalents, written by German medical scholars to English native speakers. The source is 20 abstracts taken from German medical journals representing different degrees of specialism. The analysis includes: the overall length of articles/abstracts; the representation/arrangement of sections; the linguistic devices. Results show no correlation between the length of articles and the length of abstracts. In contrast to native speaking author abstracts, 'background information' predominated in the structure of the studied German non-native speaker abstracts, whereas 'purpose of study' and 'conclusions' were not clearly stated. In linguistic terms, the German abstracts frequently contained lexical hegdes, complex and enumerating sentence structure; passive voice and post tense as well as various types of linking structures
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.769-776
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995)
0.02
0.023416823 = product of:
0.035125233 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674
-
Rothkegel, A.: Abstracting from the perspective of text production (1995)
0.02
0.023416823 = product of:
0.035125233 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.777-784
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.02
0.021104416 = product of:
0.031656623 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.02
0.021104416 = product of:
0.031656623 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.4, S.217-225
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.02
0.02002371 = product of:
0.030035563 = sum of:
0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01247909 = score(doc=7673,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.017556472 = product of:
0.035112944 = sum of:
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
DIN 1426: Inhaltsangaben in Information und Dokumentation (1973)
0.01
0.0117654 = product of:
0.035296198 = sum of:
0.035296198 = weight(_text_:information in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035296198 = score(doc=688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Fraenkel, A.S.; Klein, S.T.: Information retrieval from annotated texts (1999)
0.01
0.011647152 = product of:
0.034941453 = sum of:
0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034941453 = score(doc=4308,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.10, S.845-854
-
Koltay, T.: Abstracting: information literacy on a professional level (2009)
0.01
0.010894912 = product of:
0.032684736 = sum of:
0.032684736 = weight(_text_:information in 3610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032684736 = score(doc=3610,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 3610, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3610)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to argue for a conception of information literacy (IL) that goes beyond the abilities of finding information as it includes communication skills. An important issue in this is that abstractors exercise IL on a professional level. Design/methodology/approach - By stressing the importance of the fact that information literacy extends towards verbal communication the paper takes an interdisciplinary approach, the main component of which is linguistics. Findings - It is found that verbal communication and especially analytic-synthetic writing activities play an important role in information literacy at the level of everyday language use, semi-professional and professional summarising of information. The latter level characterises abstracting. Originality/value - The paper adds to the body of knowledge about information literacy in general and in connection with communication and abstracting.
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.01
0.009363452 = product of:
0.028090354 = sum of:
0.028090354 = product of:
0.056180708 = sum of:
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
McIntosh, N.: Structured abstracts and information transfer (1994)
0.01
0.009338496 = product of:
0.028015489 = sum of:
0.028015489 = weight(_text_:information in 728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028015489 = score(doc=728,freq=14.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 728, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=728)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study, conducted by the European Society of Paediatric Research (ESPR), to determine whether the information content of structured medical abstracts is greater than abstracts with traditional format and whether the efficacy of peer review is improved by the use of structured medical abstracts. The sample studied comprised the abstracts of papers submitted for the ESPR annual meeting and each abstract was assessed by a research worker by a research worker for information content by referring to a list of criteria. The words in each abstract were counted to obtain the information density of each and the abstracts were evaluated according to whether they were in an unstructured format, a semistructured format, or a more fully structured format. Although there was no significant difference in the scientific score of the scientific information density of the different formats there was significantly more information in the fully structured format. When the abstracts were resubmitted in structured format, there was always a highly significant increase in the information content
-
Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996)
0.01
0.008319394 = product of:
0.02495818 = sum of:
0.02495818 = weight(_text_:information in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02495818 = score(doc=282,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- 1st ed.: Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information 1982
- Imprint
- Arlington, VA : Information resources Press
-
Kuhlen, R.: Abstracts, abstracting : intellektuelle und maschinelle Verfahren (1990)
0.01
0.0082357805 = product of:
0.02470734 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=2333,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
-
Sen, B.K.: Research articles in LISA Plus : problems of identification (1997)
0.01
0.0082357805 = product of:
0.02470734 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=430,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to determine how easy and quickly research articles in library and information science could be retrieved from the LISA Plus CD-ROM database. Results show that the search with the descriptor 'research' retrieves all types of articles and it is necessary to read through every abstract to locate the research articles. The introductory sentence of a substantial number of abstracts hinder the process of identification since the sentence provides such information as the conference where the paper was presented, the special issue or the section of a periodical where the article is located; or obvious background information. Suggests measures whereby research articles can be identified easily and rapidly
- Source
- Malaysian journal of library and information science. 2(1997) no.1, S.97-106
-
Hartley, J.: Do structured abstracts take more space? : And does it matter? (2002)
0.01
0.0082357805 = product of:
0.02470734 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.5, S.417-422
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991)
0.01
0.0082357805 = product of:
0.02470734 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=752,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Enthält folgende Kapitel: Pre-coordinate indexes; consistency of indexing: quality of indexing; abstracts: types and functions, writing the abstract, natural language in information retrieval, automatic indexing. There are exercises in both indexing and abstracting procedures
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library and information science resaerch 14(1992) no.1, S.117-118 (C. Tenopir); International classification 19(1992) no.4, S.227-228 (R. Fugmann); Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(1992) no.6, S.456 (B.R. Boyce); Cataloging & classification quarterly 15(1992) no.1, S.245-247 (E.M. Rasmussen) Journal of academic librarianship 18(1992) no.1, S.39 (G.A. Crawford) // Winner of the 1992 ASIS best information science book award
