-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.16
0.1631313 = product of:
0.24469694 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.21645999 = sum of:
0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10409857 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112361416 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.07
0.06685467 = product of:
0.100282 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.09145795 = sum of:
0.05634501 = weight(_text_:management in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05634501 = score(doc=241,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- We address how individuals' (workers) knowledge needs influence the design of knowledge management systems (KMS), enabling knowledge creation and utilization. It is evident that KMS technologies and activities are indiscriminately deployed in most organizations with little regard to the actual context of their adoption. Moreover, it is apparent that the extant literature pertaining to knowledge management projects is frequently deficient in identifying the variety of factors indicative for successful KMS. This presents an obvious business practice and research gap that requires a critical analysis of the necessary intervention that will actually improve how workers can leverage and form organization-wide knowledge. This research involved an extensive review of the literature, a grounded theory methodological approach and rigorous data collection and synthesis through an empirical case analysis (Parsons Brinckerhoff and Samsung). The contribution of this study is the formulation of a model for designing KMS based upon the design science paradigm, which aspires to create artifacts that are interdependent of people and organizations. The essential proposition is that KMS design and implementation must be contextualized in relation to knowledge needs and that these will differ for various organizational settings. The findings present valuable insights and further understanding of the way in which KMS design efforts should be focused.
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.948-966
-
Witschel, H.F.: Global term weights in distributed environments (2008)
0.06
0.06409827 = product of:
0.0961474 = sum of:
0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014974909 = score(doc=2096,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.081172496 = sum of:
0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039036963 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the estimation of global term weights (such as IDF) in information retrieval scenarios where a global view on the collection is not available. In particular, the two options of either sampling documents or of using a reference corpus independent of the target retrieval collection are compared using standard IR test collections. In addition, the possibility of pruning term lists based on frequency is evaluated. The results show that very good retrieval performance can be reached when just the most frequent terms of a collection - an "extended stop word list" - are known and all terms which are not in that list are treated equally. However, the list cannot always be fully estimated from a general-purpose reference corpus, but some "domain-specific stop words" need to be added. A good solution for achieving this is to mix estimates from small samples of the target retrieval collection with ones derived from a reference corpus.
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 9:44:22
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.3, S.1049-1061
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.06
0.063111395 = product of:
0.094667085 = sum of:
0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01247909 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.082187995 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.049657196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049657196 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose In a system-based approach, replicating the web would require large test collections, and judging the relevancy of all documents per topic in creating relevance judgment through human assessors is infeasible. Due to the large amount of documents that requires judgment, there are possible errors introduced by human assessors because of disagreements. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study explores exponential variation and document ranking methods that generate a reliable set of relevance judgments (pseudo relevance judgments) to reduce human efforts. These methods overcome problems with large amounts of documents for judgment while avoiding human disagreement errors during the judgment process. This study utilizes two key factors: number of occurrences of each document per topic from all the system runs; and document rankings to generate the alternate methods. Findings The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated using the correlation coefficient of ranked systems using mean average precision scores between the original Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) relevance judgments and pseudo relevance judgments. The results suggest that the proposed document ranking method with a pool depth of 100 could be a reliable alternative to reduce human effort and disagreement errors involved in generating TREC-like relevance judgments. Originality/value Simple methods proposed in this study show improvement in the correlation coefficient in generating alternate relevance judgment without human assessors while contributing to information retrieval evaluation.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.700-714
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.05
0.054114997 = product of:
0.16234499 = sum of:
0.16234499 = sum of:
0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078073926 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.08427106 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08427106 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1985, Nürnberg, 1.-4.10.1985: Fachinformation: Methodik - Management - Markt; neue Entwicklungen, Berufe, Produkte. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Lee, J.H.: Combining the evidence of different relevance feedback methods for information retrieval (1998)
0.05
0.05365639 = product of:
0.080484584 = sum of:
0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 6469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034941453 = score(doc=6469,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 6469, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6469)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 6469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=6469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6469)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.681-691
-
Salton, G.: ¬A simple blueprint for automatic Boolean query processing (1988)
0.05
0.053524166 = product of:
0.08028625 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
0.052049287 = product of:
0.10409857 = sum of:
0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 6774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10409857 = score(doc=6774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 6774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6774)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 24(1988) no.3, S.269-280
-
Reddaway, S.: High speed text retrieval from large databases on a massively parallel processor (1991)
0.05
0.053524166 = product of:
0.08028625 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 7745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=7745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 7745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7745)
0.052049287 = product of:
0.10409857 = sum of:
0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 7745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10409857 = score(doc=7745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 7745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7745)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 27(1991), S.311-316
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995)
0.05
0.050978534 = product of:
0.0764678 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.06764375 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 13:14:10
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.4, S.605-620
-
Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval: diagnosing information need : Part I: the theoretical framework for developing an intelligent IR tool (1998)
0.05
0.05047857 = product of:
0.07571785 = sum of:
0.03668089 = weight(_text_:information in 6431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03668089 = score(doc=6431,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 6431, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6431)
0.039036963 = product of:
0.078073926 = sum of:
0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 6431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078073926 = score(doc=6431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.709-720
-
Cole, C.: Intelligent information retrieval: diagnosing information need : Part II: uncertainty expansion in a prototype of a diagnostic IR tool (1998)
0.05
0.05047857 = product of:
0.07571785 = sum of:
0.03668089 = weight(_text_:information in 6432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03668089 = score(doc=6432,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 6432, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6432)
0.039036963 = product of:
0.078073926 = sum of:
0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 6432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078073926 = score(doc=6432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6432)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.721-731
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.05
0.04924364 = product of:
0.07386546 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.04915812 = product of:
0.09831624 = sum of:
0.09831624 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09831624 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
- Source
- Library and information research news. 24(2000) no.77, S.30-34
-
Daniowicz, C.; Baliski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains (2001)
0.05
0.046833646 = product of:
0.07025047 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 5388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=5388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5388)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.4, S.623-637
-
Horng, J.T.; Yeh, C.C.: Applying genetic algorithms to query optimization in document retrieval (2000)
0.05
0.046833646 = product of:
0.07025047 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.5, S.737-759
-
Ciocca, G.; Schettini, R.: ¬A relevance feedback mechanism for content-based image retrieval (1999)
0.05
0.046833646 = product of:
0.07025047 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 6498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=6498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6498)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 6498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=6498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6498)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 35(1999) no.5, S.605-632
-
Niemi, T.; Junkkari, M.; Järvelin, K.; Viita, S.: Advanced query language for manipulating complex entities (2004)
0.05
0.046833646 = product of:
0.07025047 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 4218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=4218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.6, S.869-
-
Koyama, M.: ¬A fast retrieving algorithm of hierarchical relationships using tree structures (1998)
0.05
0.046833646 = product of:
0.07025047 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 6403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=6403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6403)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 6403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=6403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.6, S.761-763
-
Clarke, C.L.A.; Cormack, G.V.; Tudhope, E.A.: Relevance ranking for one to three term queries (2000)
0.05
0.046833646 = product of:
0.07025047 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.2, S.291-311
-
Chung, Y.M.; Lee, J.Y.: Optimization of some factors affecting the performance of query expansion (2004)
0.05
0.046833646 = product of:
0.07025047 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 2537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=2537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2537)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 2537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=2537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2537)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.6, S.891-
-
Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval (1988)
0.05
0.04599119 = product of:
0.06898678 = sum of:
0.029949818 = weight(_text_:information in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029949818 = score(doc=1938,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
0.039036963 = product of:
0.078073926 = sum of:
0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078073926 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.323-328.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 24(1988) no.5, S.513-523
