Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  1. Dhawan, S.M.; Yerkey, A.N.: Trends in subject heading assignment in cataloging records during 1974-1978 (1983) 0.05
    0.046833646 = product of:
      0.07025047 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=5271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
        0.045543127 = product of:
          0.09108625 = sum of:
            0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09108625 = score(doc=5271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 19(1983), S.213-222
  2. Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009) 0.02
    0.02485843 = product of:
      0.037287645 = sum of:
        0.019731175 = weight(_text_:information in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019731175 = score(doc=3611,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
        0.017556472 = product of:
          0.035112944 = sum of:
            0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035112944 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to discuss some long-standing issues of the development of a subject heading language as pre- or postcoordinated. Design/methodology/approach - In a review of literature on pre- and postcoordination and user behaviour, 20 criteria originally discussed by Svenonius are considered. Findings - The advantages and disadvantages of pre- and postcoordinated systems are on a very similar level. Most subject heading languages developed recently are precoordinated. They all require investments in highly skilled intellectual work, and are therefore expensive and difficult to maintain. Postcoordinated systems seem to have more advantages for information providers, but less for users. However, most of these disadvantages could be overcome by known information retrieval models and techniques. Research limitations/implications - The criteria originally discussed by Svenonius are difficult to evaluate in an exact manner. Some of them are also irrelevant because of changes in information retrieval systems. Practical implications - It was found that the decision on whether to use a pre- or postcoordinated system cannot be taken independent of consideration of the subject authority file and the functions of an information retrieval system, which should support users on one hand and information providers and indexers on the other. Originality/value - This literature review brings together some findings that have not been considered together previously.
    Date
    20. 6.2010 14:22:43
  3. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.02
    0.021104416 = product of:
      0.031656623 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
        0.021067765 = product of:
          0.04213553 = sum of:
            0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04213553 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  4. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.02
    0.021104416 = product of:
      0.031656623 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.021067765 = product of:
          0.04213553 = sum of:
            0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04213553 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  5. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.02
    0.021104416 = product of:
      0.031656623 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
        0.021067765 = product of:
          0.04213553 = sum of:
            0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04213553 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  6. Liu, Y.-H.; Wacholder, N.: Evaluating the impact of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms on different types of searchers (2017) 0.02
    0.020071562 = product of:
      0.030107342 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=5096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
        0.019518482 = product of:
          0.039036963 = sum of:
            0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039036963 = score(doc=5096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 53(2017) no.4, S.851-870
  7. Broughton, V.: Essential Library of Congress Subject Headings (2009) 0.02
    0.019162996 = product of:
      0.028744493 = sum of:
        0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01247909 = score(doc=395,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
        0.016265402 = product of:
          0.032530803 = sum of:
            0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032530803 = score(doc=395,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    LCSH are increasingly seen as 'the' English language controlled vocabulary, despite their lack of a theoretical foundation, and their evident US bias. In mapping exercises between national subject heading lists, and in exercises in digital resource organization and management, LCSH are often chosen because of the lack of any other widely accepted English language standard for subject cataloguing. It is therefore important that the basic nature of LCSH, their advantages, and their limitations, are well understood both by LIS practitioners and those in the wider information community. Information professionals who attended library school before 1995 - and many more recent library school graduates - are unlikely to have had a formal introduction to LCSH. Paraprofessionals who undertake cataloguing are similarly unlikely to have enjoyed an induction to the broad principles of LCSH. There is currently no compact guide to LCSH written from a UK viewpoint, and this eminently practical text fills that gap. It features topics including: background and history of LCSH; subject heading lists; structure and display in LCSH; form of entry; application of LCSH; document analysis; main headings; topical, geographical and free-floating sub-divisions; building compound headings; name headings; headings for literature, art, music, history and law; and, LCSH in the online environment. There is a strong emphasis throughout on worked examples and practical exercises in the application of the scheme, and a full glossary of terms is supplied. No prior knowledge or experience of subject cataloguing is assumed. This is an indispensable guide to LCSH for practitioners and students alike from a well-known and popular author.
  8. Viti, E.: My first ten years : nuovo soggettario growing, development and integration with other knowledge organization systems (2017) 0.02
    0.017587014 = product of:
      0.02638052 = sum of:
        0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0088240495 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
        0.017556472 = product of:
          0.035112944 = sum of:
            0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035112944 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Nuovo Soggettario is a subject indexing system edited by the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze. It was presented to librarians from across Italy on 8 February 2007 in Florence as a new edition of the Soggettario (1956), and it has become the official Italian subject indexing tool. This system is made up of two individual and interactive components: the general thesaurus, accessible on the web since 2007 and the rules of a conventional syntax for the construction of subject strings. The Nuovo soggettario thesaurus has grown significantly in terms of terminology and connections with other knowledge organization tools (e.g., encyclopedias, dictionaries, resources of archives and museums, and other information data sets), offering the users the possibility to browse through documents, books, objects, photographs, etc. The conversion of the Nuovo soggettario thesaurus into formats suitable for the semantic web and linked data world improves its function as an interlinking hub for direct searching and for organizing content by different professional communities. Thanks to structured data and the SKOS format, the Nuovo soggettario thesaurus is published on the Data Hub platform, thus giving broad visibility to the BNCF and its precious patrimony.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  9. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995) 0.01
    0.014045177 = product of:
      0.04213553 = sum of:
        0.04213553 = product of:
          0.08427106 = sum of:
            0.08427106 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08427106 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:37:22
  10. Koblitz, J.: Schlagwortgebung in der Information und Dokumentation (1973) 0.01
    0.01331103 = product of:
      0.03993309 = sum of:
        0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03993309 = score(doc=1362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Series
    Einführung in die Information und Dokumentation; 2
  11. Kascus, M.A.: Indexing, in theory and practice (1996) 0.01
    0.013012322 = product of:
      0.039036963 = sum of:
        0.039036963 = product of:
          0.078073926 = sum of:
            0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078073926 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
  12. Craven, T.C.: Changing technologies: impact on information: the case of string indexing (1985) 0.01
    0.00941232 = product of:
      0.02823696 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  13. Craven, T.C.: NEPHIS: a nested phrase indexing system (1977) 0.01
    0.0082357805 = product of:
      0.02470734 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 28(1977), S.107-114
  14. Ho, J.: ¬An analysis of the structure of a subject heading list (1993) 0.01
    0.0082357805 = product of:
      0.02470734 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 6856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=6856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6856)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 19(1993) no.2, S.32-54
  15. Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002) 0.01
    0.0082357805 = product of:
      0.02470734 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=1395,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article deals with the meaningful processing of information in relation to two systems of Information processing: pre-coordination and post-coordination. The different approaches are discussed, with emphasis an the need for a controlled vocabulary in information retrieval. Assigned indexing, which employs a controlled vocabulary, is described in detail. Types of indexing language can be divided into two broad groups - those using pre-coordinated terms and those depending an post-coordination. They represent two different basic approaches in processing and Information retrieval. The historical development of these two approaches is described, as well as the two tools that apply to these approaches: thesauri and subject headings.
  16. (Sears') List of Subject Headings (1994) 0.01
    0.00819302 = product of:
      0.02457906 = sum of:
        0.02457906 = product of:
          0.04915812 = sum of:
            0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04915812 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
  17. Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985) 0.01
    0.00819302 = product of:
      0.02457906 = sum of:
        0.02457906 = product of:
          0.04915812 = sum of:
            0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04915812 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:01
  18. Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009) 0.01
    0.00819302 = product of:
      0.02457906 = sum of:
        0.02457906 = product of:
          0.04915812 = sum of:
            0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04915812 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Dewar, M.: Restructuring the Library of Congress Subject Headings : Subject access and bibliographic instruction: two sides of the OPAC problem (1988) 0.01
    0.0070592402 = product of:
      0.02117772 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 2778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=2778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2778)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Halifax, N.S. : Dalhousie University, School of Library and Information Studies
  20. Marshall, F.: COMPASS at the British Museum : tailoring cocntent for particular audiences (2001) 0.01
    0.0070592402 = product of:
      0.02117772 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=1650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Multimedia information and technology. 27(2001) no.1, S.56-63

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 3
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 33
  • m 14
  • i 4
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…