-
Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995)
0.06
0.05848486 = product of:
0.087727286 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.07360881 = product of:
0.14721762 = sum of:
0.14721762 = weight(_text_:management in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14721762 = score(doc=2054,freq=16.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.8426531 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
- Source
- Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.1, S.28-32
-
Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990)
0.05
0.05365639 = product of:
0.080484584 = sum of:
0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034941453 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
0.045543127 = product of:
0.09108625 = sum of:
0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09108625 = score(doc=1916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
- Series
- New directions in information management; 21
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.04
0.035029523 = product of:
0.05254428 = sum of:
0.024453925 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024453925 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.028090354 = product of:
0.056180708 = sum of:
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
-
Shewale, N.G.: Information delivery of full-text databases in academic and research libraries using hypermedia (1998)
0.03
0.031652603 = product of:
0.047478903 = sum of:
0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02470734 = score(doc=3566,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=3566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the introduction of hypermedia in information delivery and its advantages. Describes the special features in the design of full text databases and steps in developing in-house hypermedia databases. It may not be the job of the library professionals to design and develop the hypermedia system for information retrieval, but their ideas and experience will play an important role
- Source
- Information management in academic and research libraries: Proceedings of the 5th National convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), Bhubaneswar, India, 4-5 March 1998. Ed. by M. Mahapatra et al
-
Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: Full-text information retrieval : further analysis and clarification (1990)
0.03
0.030660793 = product of:
0.04599119 = sum of:
0.019966545 = weight(_text_:information in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019966545 = score(doc=2046,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
0.026024643 = product of:
0.052049287 = sum of:
0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052049287 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 26(1990), S.437-447
-
Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989)
0.03
0.028163657 = product of:
0.042245485 = sum of:
0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02117772 = score(doc=3564,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
- Date
- 9. 1.1996 10:22:31
- Imprint
- Medford, New Jersey : Learned Information
- Source
- ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
-
Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001)
0.03
0.028139224 = product of:
0.042208835 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.028090354 = product of:
0.056180708 = sum of:
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 14. 6.2001 12:22:31
-
Molto, M.: Improving full text search performance through textual analysis (1993)
0.03
0.026762083 = product of:
0.040143125 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.026024643 = product of:
0.052049287 = sum of:
0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052049287 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.614-632
-
Kristensen, J.: Expanding end-users' query statements for free text searching with a search-aid thesaurus (1993)
0.03
0.026762083 = product of:
0.040143125 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=6621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
0.026024643 = product of:
0.052049287 = sum of:
0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 6621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052049287 = score(doc=6621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 6621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.6, S.733-744
-
Turtle, H.; Flood, J.: Query evaluation : strategies and optimizations (1995)
0.03
0.026762083 = product of:
0.040143125 = sum of:
0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01411848 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
0.026024643 = product of:
0.052049287 = sum of:
0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 4087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052049287 = score(doc=4087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.6, S.831-850
-
Melucci, M.: Passage retrieval : a probabilistic technique (1998)
0.02
0.023416823 = product of:
0.035125233 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 1150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=1150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 34(1998) no.1, S.43-68
-
Pirkola, A.; Jarvelin, K.: ¬The effect of anaphor and ellipsis resolution on proximity searching in a text database (1995)
0.02
0.021032736 = product of:
0.031549104 = sum of:
0.015283704 = weight(_text_:information in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015283704 = score(doc=4088,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- So far, methods for ellipsis and anaphor resolution have been developed and the effects of anaphor resolution have been analyzed in the context of statistical information retrieval of scientific abstracts. No significant improvements has been observed. Analyzes the effects of ellipsis and anaphor resolution on proximity searching in a full text database. Anaphora and ellipsis are classified on the basis of the type of their correlates / antecedents rather than, as traditional, on the basis of their own linguistic type. The classification differentiates proper names and common nouns of basic words, compound words, and phrases. The study was carried out in a newspaper article database containing 55.000 full text articles. A set of 154 keyword pairs in different categories was created. Human resolution of keyword ellipsis and anaphora was performed to identify sentences and paragraphs which would match proximity searches after resolution. Findings indicate that ellipsis and anaphor resolution is most relevant for proper name phrases and only marginal in the other keyword categories. Therefore the recall effect of restricted resolution of proper name phrases only was analyzed for keyword pairs containing at least 1 proper name phrase. Findings indicate a recall increase of 38.2% in sentence searches, and 28.8% in paragraph searches when proper name ellipsis were resolved. The recall increase was 17.6% sentence searches, and 19.8% in paragraph searches when proper name anaphora were resolved. Some simple and computationally justifiable resolution method might be developed only for proper name phrases to support keyword based full text information retrieval. Discusses elements of such a method
- Source
- Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.2, S.199-216
-
Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982)
0.01
0.011647152 = product of:
0.034941453 = sum of:
0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034941453 = score(doc=1351,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Sormunen, E.: Free-text searching in full-text databases : probing system limits (1993)
0.01
0.011647152 = product of:
0.034941453 = sum of:
0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 7120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034941453 = score(doc=7120,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7120, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7120)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
-
Full-text retrieval (1996)
0.01
0.011647152 = product of:
0.034941453 = sum of:
0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 3320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034941453 = score(doc=3320,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3320, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3320)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A special section devoted to full text information retrieval
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-330
-
Sievert, M.E.C.: Full-text information retrieval : an introduction (1996)
0.01
0.011647152 = product of:
0.034941453 = sum of:
0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 4206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034941453 = score(doc=4206,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 4206, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4206)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-262
-
Sievert, M.C.: Full-text information retrieval : introduction (1996)
0.01
0.0101891365 = product of:
0.030567408 = sum of:
0.030567408 = weight(_text_:information in 4719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030567408 = score(doc=4719,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 4719, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4719)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Introduces a special section devoted to full text information retrieval. Gives an overview of full text databases and research into them. There is a lack of a single definition of full text. Articles in the library related literature about full text have appeared with increasing frequnecy
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.261-262
-
Tenopir, C.: Full text databases (1984)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 19(1984), S.215-246
-
Frederick, S.C.: SIRE: full-text retrieval with augmented search (1985)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information today. 2(1985), S.7-25
-
Maag, D.: Leistungsmerkmale von Volltextretrievalsystemen : Anforderungen an die künftige Weiterentwicklung (1989)
0.01
0.00941232 = product of:
0.02823696 = sum of:
0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02823696 = score(doc=2747,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Imprint
- Darmstadt : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Information und Dokumentation
