Search (4985 results, page 1 of 250)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Taylor, A.: Engaging with knowledge : emerging concepts in knowledge management (2003) 0.16
    0.1604512 = product of:
      0.2406768 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
        0.21949908 = sum of:
          0.13522802 = weight(_text_:management in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13522802 = score(doc=60,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.77402633 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
          0.08427106 = weight(_text_:22 in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08427106 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the knowledge management phenomenon and provides an overview of emerging concepts
    Date
    2. 2.2003 18:31:22
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  2. International yearbook of library and information management : 2001/2002 information services in an electronic environment (2001) 0.15
    0.14956263 = product of:
      0.22434394 = sum of:
        0.034941453 = weight(_text_:information in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034941453 = score(doc=1381,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
        0.18940249 = sum of:
          0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09108625 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
          0.09831624 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09831624 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2003 13:22:23
  3. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.14
    0.14273989 = product of:
      0.21410984 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
        0.18940249 = sum of:
          0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09108625 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.09831624 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09831624 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
  4. Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: In Memoriam Karen Sparck Jones (2007) 0.13
    0.12819654 = product of:
      0.1922948 = sum of:
        0.029949818 = weight(_text_:information in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029949818 = score(doc=2927,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
        0.16234499 = sum of:
          0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.078073926 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
          0.08427106 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08427106 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This note is also appearing in the Journal of the American Society for Information Systems and Technology.
    Date
    26.12.2007 14:22:47
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1441-1446
  5. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.12
    0.124901965 = sum of:
      0.08232375 = product of:
        0.24697125 = sum of:
          0.24697125 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24697125 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43943653 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.014974909 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.027603304 = product of:
        0.055206608 = sum of:
          0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055206608 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  6. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.12
    0.12479672 = product of:
      0.18719508 = sum of:
        0.02495818 = weight(_text_:information in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02495818 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
        0.1622369 = sum of:
          0.09201101 = weight(_text_:management in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09201101 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07022589 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 41(2000) no.?, S.294-306
    Theme
    Information
  7. Wu, I.-L.; Lin, H.-C.: ¬A strategy-based process for implementing knowledge management : an integrative view and empirical study (2009) 0.11
    0.10692836 = product of:
      0.16039254 = sum of:
        0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014974909 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
        0.14541763 = sum of:
          0.1032821 = weight(_text_:management in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1032821 = score(doc=2764,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
          0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04213553 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:08:51
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.789-802
  8. AI-Hawamdeh, S.: Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management (2005) 0.10
    0.10375499 = product of:
      0.15563248 = sum of:
        0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017648099 = score(doc=4236,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
        0.13798438 = sum of:
          0.10287144 = weight(_text_:management in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10287144 = score(doc=4236,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.58882177 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
          0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035112944 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management requires a good understanding of knowledge processes and the ability to differentiate between information management and knowledge management. Given the complexity of knowledge and the nature of its existence, there is a need for graduate programs to go beyond information management and include in the curriculum disciplines that deal with social, cultural, and economic issues such as communication, cognitive science, and business. An understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of knowledge management is necessary for a more balanced and practical approach to the development of a knowledge management curriculum. In this article, the design and development of an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore is reported. The initiation of the program was influenced by the strong demand from the public sector in Singapore for knowledge management professionals. It was developed in close association with the information studies program at Nanyang Technological University. In the first year, the program attracted 230 applicants, of which 45 were selected-22 students came from the public sector and 23 students came from the private sector.
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenschwerpunktes: Knowledge Management in Asia
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.11, S.1200-1206
  9. Nyseter, T.: Learning centres and knowledge management : based on common ideas? (2005) 0.10
    0.101832315 = product of:
      0.15274847 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=3014,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
        0.12804113 = sum of:
          0.078883015 = weight(_text_:management in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.078883015 = score(doc=3014,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
          0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04915812 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    New roles for libraries and librarians in the information and knowledge society are discussed worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to present the ideas behind the philosophy of Learning Centres (LC) and Knowledge Management (KM) respectively, and make a comparative study between the two approaches. The paper is based on KM theory and a case-study of the Learning Centres at Oslo University College (OUC), and was originally written as a theme paper in connection to the course "Information in Organizations and Knowledge Management" which is part of the Masters' programme in Library and Information science at OUC.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 11:55:29
    Source
    Librarianship in the information age: Proceedings of the 13th BOBCATSSS Symposium, 31 January - 2 February 2005 in Budapest, Hungary. Eds.: Marte Langeland u.a
  10. Moore, R.W.: Management of very large distributed shared collections (2009) 0.10
    0.10173203 = product of:
      0.15259804 = sum of:
        0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01235367 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
        0.14024436 = sum of:
          0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09108625 = score(doc=3845,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
          0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04915812 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Large scientific collections may be managed as data grids for sharing data, digital libraries for publishing data, persistent archives for preserving data, or as real-time data repositories for sensor data. Despite the multiple types of data management objectives, it is possible to build each system from generic software infrastructure. This entry examines the requirements driving the management of large data collections, the concepts on which current data management systems are based, and the current research initiatives for managing distributed data collections.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:57
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  11. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.09
    0.09334247 = product of:
      0.1400137 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
        0.12942484 = sum of:
          0.08728931 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08728931 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04213553 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  12. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.09
    0.0909736 = product of:
      0.1364604 = sum of:
        0.021397185 = weight(_text_:information in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021397185 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.115063205 = sum of:
          0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045543127 = score(doc=5295,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.06952008 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06952008 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
  13. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.09
    0.087198876 = product of:
      0.13079831 = sum of:
        0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01058886 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.120209455 = sum of:
          0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.078073926 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04213553 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
  14. Fensel, D.: Ontologies : a silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce (2004) 0.08
    0.0847986 = product of:
      0.12719789 = sum of:
        0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01247909 = score(doc=1949,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
        0.1147188 = sum of:
          0.06506161 = weight(_text_:management in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06506161 = score(doc=1949,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
          0.049657196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049657196 = score(doc=1949,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The author systematically introduces the notion of ontologies to the non-expert reader and demonstrates in detail how to apply this conceptual framework for improved intranet retrieval of corporate information and knowledge and for enhanced Internetbased electronic commerce. He also describes ontology languages (XML, RDF, and OWL) and ontology tools, and the application of ontologies. In addition to structural improvements, the second edition covers recent developments relating to the Semantic Web, and emerging web-based standard languages.
    Classification
    004.67/8 22
    DDC
    004.67/8 22
    LCSH
    Database management
    Subject
    Database management
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  15. Xia, J.: GIS in the management of library pick-up books (2004) 0.08
    0.08394633 = product of:
      0.12591949 = sum of:
        0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01235367 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
        0.113565825 = sum of:
          0.064407706 = weight(_text_:management in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064407706 = score(doc=2853,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
          0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04915812 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The management of library "pick-up books" - a phrase that refers to books pulled off the shelves by readers, discarded in the library after use, and picked up by library assistants for reshelving - is an issue for many collection managers. This research attempts to use geographic information system (GIS) software as a tool to monitor the use of such books so that their distributions by book shelf-ranges can be displayed visually. With GIS, library floor layouts are drawn as maps. This research produces some explanations of the habits of library patrons browsing shelved materials, and makes suggestions to librarians on the expansion of library collections and the rearrangement potential for library space.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.209-216
  16. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.08
    0.083149634 = product of:
      0.12472445 = sum of:
        0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014974909 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.10974954 = sum of:
          0.06761401 = weight(_text_:management in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06761401 = score(doc=2766,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04213553 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
  17. Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004) 0.08
    0.077398956 = product of:
      0.116098434 = sum of:
        0.021397185 = weight(_text_:information in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021397185 = score(doc=2538,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
        0.094701245 = sum of:
          0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045543127 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04915812 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Structured document interchange formats such as XML and SGML are ubiquitous, however, information retrieval systems supporting structured searching are not. Structured searching can result in increased precision. A search for the author "Smith" in an unstructured corpus of documents specializing in iron-working could have a lower precision than a structured search for "Smith as author" in the same corpus. Analysis of XML retrieval languages identifies additional functionality that must be supported including searching at, and broken across multiple nodes in the document tree. A data structure is developed to support structured document searching. Application of this structure to information retrieval is then demonstrated. Document ranking is examined and adapted specifically for structured searching.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 10:39:22
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.4, S.619-632
  18. Knowledge management in practice : connections and context. (2008) 0.08
    0.076547794 = product of:
      0.11482169 = sum of:
        0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01411848 = score(doc=2749,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
        0.10070321 = sum of:
          0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052049287 = score(doc=2749,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
          0.04865392 = weight(_text_:22 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04865392 = score(doc=2749,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.268053 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    BK
    85.20 / Betriebliche Information und Kommunikation
    Classification
    658.4/038 22
    85.20 / Betriebliche Information und Kommunikation
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:43:51
    DDC
    658.4/038 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 60(2006) no.3, S.642 (A.E. Prentice): "What is knowledge management (KM)? How do we define it? How do we use it and what are the benefits? KM is still an operational discipline that has yet to have an academic foundation. Its core has yet to solidify and concepts and practices remain fluid, making it difficult to discuss or even to identify the range of relevant elements. Being aware of this lack of a well-structured retrievable disciplinary literature, the editors made a practice of attending trade shows and conferences attended by KM professionals to look for presentations that would in some way expand knowledge of the field. They asked presenters to turn their paper into a book chapter, which is the major source of the material in this book. Although this is a somewhat chancy method of identifying authors and topics, several of the papers are excellent and a number add to an understanding of KM. Because of the fluidity of the area of study, the editors devised a three-dimensional topic expansion approach to the content so that the reader can follow themes in the papers that would not have been easy to do if one relied solely on the table of contents. The table of contents organizes the presentations into eight subject sections, each section with a foreword that introduces the topic and indicates briefly the contribution of each chapter to the overall section title. Following this, the Roadmap lists 18 topics or themes that appear in the book and relevant chapters where information on the theme can be found. Readers have the choice of following themes using the roadmap or of reading the book section by section. ..."
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    LCSH
    Knowledge management
    Subject
    Knowledge management
  19. Scammell, A.: Handbook of information management (2001) 0.08
    0.075694606 = product of:
      0.1135419 = sum of:
        0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03993309 = score(doc=3347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
        0.07360881 = product of:
          0.14721762 = sum of:
            0.14721762 = weight(_text_:management in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14721762 = score(doc=3347,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.8426531 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  20. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesauri, topics and other structures in knowledge management software (2000) 0.07
    0.07487803 = product of:
      0.11231704 = sum of:
        0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014974909 = score(doc=102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
        0.09734213 = sum of:
          0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055206608 = score(doc=102,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
          0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04213553 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0518325 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Different Knowledge Management Software (KMS) suites approach information retrieval in different ways. Some of them have in-built knowledge structures, and some of those structures may be called a "thesaurus". But they are not thesauri as defined by the standard ISO 2788. This paper describes the types of knowledge structure which are provided for in the Verity search engine, namely "Thesaurus" and "Topics". An examination of how they are constructed shows strengths and weaknesses, and their potential to be applied to automatic categorization of search results. Unfortunately it is difficult to quantify the performance benefits of any of these knowledge structures, or even compare them with the benefits of using the traditional techniques of vocabulary control. However, the problems of retrieving information on many intranets has led some practitioners to apply simple vocabulary control to complement the functionality of their chosen KMS
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:45

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 4339
  • m 425
  • el 298
  • s 169
  • b 37
  • i 17
  • r 16
  • x 16
  • n 14
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications