Search (4280 results, page 1 of 214)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. (2013 ff.) 0.16 
    0.1631313 = product of:
  0.24469694 = sum of:
    0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02823696 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
    0.21645999 = sum of:
      0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10409857 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.112361416 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 65(2013) ff. Früher u.d.T.: Aslib proceedings, (bis 2012)
  2. Paul-Hus, A.; Desrochers, N.; Rijcke, S.de; Rushforth, A.D.: ¬The reward system of science (2017) 0.10 
    0.10195707 = product of:
  0.1529356 = sum of:
    0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017648099 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
    0.1352875 = sum of:
      0.06506161 = weight(_text_:management in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06506161 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07022589 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.478-485
  3. Ermert, A.: Terminologie - Bedeutung, Erarbeitung, professionelle Strukturierung und Management : Der 13. Deutsche Terminologietag vom 19. bis 21. April 2012 in Heidelberg (2012) 0.10 
    0.10195707 = product of:
  0.1529356 = sum of:
    0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017648099 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
    0.1352875 = sum of:
      0.06506161 = weight(_text_:management in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06506161 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
      0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07022589 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:37:29
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.203-205
  4. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.10 
    0.097007915 = product of:
  0.14551187 = sum of:
    0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017470727 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.12804113 = sum of:
      0.078883015 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.078883015 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04915812 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.363-374
    Theme
    Content Management System
  5. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.09 
    0.092095375 = product of:
  0.13814306 = sum of:
    0.02334624 = weight(_text_:information in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02334624 = score(doc=1003,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.256578 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
    0.11479682 = sum of:
      0.07968387 = weight(_text_:management in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07968387 = score(doc=1003,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035112944 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1590-1607
  6. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.09 
    0.08667028 = product of:
  0.13000542 = sum of:
    0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088240495 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.12118137 = sum of:
      0.08606842 = weight(_text_:management in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08606842 = score(doc=1632,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.49264365 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035112944 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.2, S.134-155
  7. Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015) 0.08 
    0.08329882 = product of:
  0.12494822 = sum of:
    0.03311077 = weight(_text_:information in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03311077 = score(doc=2596,freq=44.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.36389136 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
            44.0 = termFreq=44.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
    0.09183745 = sum of:
      0.0637471 = weight(_text_:management in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0637471 = score(doc=2596,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.3648795 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.028090354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028090354 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose In contrast to the interest of describing and managing the social processes of knowing, information science and information and knowledge management research have put less emphasis on discussing how particular information becomes usable and how it is used in different contexts and situations. The purpose of this paper is to address this major gap, and introduce and discuss the applicability of the notion of situational appropriation of information for shedding light on this particular process in the context of daily information work practices of professionals. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the analysis of 25 qualitative interviews of archives, library and museum professionals conducted in two Nordic countries. Findings The study presents examples of how individuals appropriate different tangible and intangible assets as information on the basis of the situation in hand. Research limitations/implications The study proposes a new conceptual tool for articulating and conducting research on the process how information becomes useful in the situation in hand. Practical implications The situational appropriation of information perspective redefines the role of information management to incorporate a comprehensive awareness of the situations when information is useful and is being used. A better understanding how information becomes useful in diverse situations helps to discern the active role of contextual and situational effects and to exploit and take them into account as a part of the management of information and knowledge processes. Originality/value In contrast to orthodoxies of information science and information and knowledge management research, the notion of situational appropriation of information represents an alternative approach to the conceptualisation of information utilisation. It helps to frame particular types of instances of information use that are not necessarily addressed within the objectivistic, information seeker or learning oriented paradigms of information and knowledge management.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.5, S.492-504
    Theme
    Information
  8. Leitfaden zum Forschungsdaten-Management : Handreichungen aus dem WissGrid-Projekt (2013) 0.08 
    0.0802256 = product of:
  0.1203384 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
    0.10974954 = sum of:
      0.06761401 = weight(_text_:management in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06761401 = score(doc=1029,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
      0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04213553 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Digitale Forschungsdaten sind eine unverzichtbare Grundlage moderner Wissenschaft. Mit ihnen sind aber eine Reihe von notwendigen Datenmanagement-Aufgaben verbunden, damit sie in der aktiven Forschung bestmöglich eingesetzt werden können und die gute wissenschaftliche Praxis eingehalten wird. Wie lange sollen die Daten aufbewahrt werden? Welche Kontextinformtionen müssen erfasst werden, um die Daten zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch sinnvol benutzen zu können? Wie viel kostet die Aufbewahrung? Dieses Buch kann diese Fragen nur aufwerfen, nicht beantworten. Denn ohne auf Details der jeweiligen Disziplin, Forschungsdaten und Projekte einzugehen, lassen sich diese Fragen nicht allegemeinverbindlich klären. Was dieses Buch jedoch mit einem Leitfaden und einer Checkliste bereitstellt, ist ein einfaches Instrument für fachwissenschatliche oder Infrastruktur-Einrichtungen, um die wichtigsten Aufgaben und Fragen im Forschungsdaten-Management strukturiert beantworten und effizient planen zu können.
    Date
    19.12.2015 11:57:22
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  9. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.08 
    0.07960573 = product of:
  0.119408585 = sum of:
    0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02470734 = score(doc=4227,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
    0.094701245 = sum of:
      0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045543127 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
      0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04915812 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    We present three fundamental, interrelated approaches to support multiple access paths to each terminal object in information hierarchies: faceted classification, faceted search, and web directories with embedded symbolic links. This survey aims to demonstrate how each approach supports users who seek information from multiple perspectives. We achieve this by exploring each approach, the relationships between these approaches, including tradeoffs, and how they can be used in concert, while focusing on a core set of hypermedia elements common to all. This approach provides a foundation from which to study, understand, and synthesize applications which employ these techniques. This survey does not aim to be comprehensive, but rather focuses on thematic issues.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  10. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.08 
    0.078184746 = product of:
  0.117277116 = sum of:
    0.02161442 = weight(_text_:information in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02161442 = score(doc=4888,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
    0.0956627 = sum of:
      0.046005506 = weight(_text_:management in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046005506 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.049657196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049657196 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  11. Petric, K.; Petric, T.; Krisper, M.; Rajkovic, V.: User profiling on a pilot digital library with the final result of a new adaptive knowledge management solution (2011) 0.08 
    0.07712172 = product of:
  0.11568258 = sum of:
    0.018340444 = weight(_text_:information in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018340444 = score(doc=4560,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
    0.09734213 = sum of:
      0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055206608 = score(doc=4560,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04213553 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In this article, several procedures (e.g., measurements, information retrieval analyses, power law, association rules, hierarchical clustering) are introduced which were made on a pilot digital library. Information retrievals of web users from 01/01/2003 to 01/01/2006 on the internal search engine of the pilot digital library have been analyzed. With the power law method of data processing, a constant information retrieval pattern has been established, stable over a longer period of time. After this, the data have been analyzed. On the basis of the accomplished measurements and analyses, a series of mental models of web users for global (educational) purposes have been developed (e.g., the metamodel of thought hierarchy of web users, the segmentation model of web users), and the users were profiled in four different groups (adventurers, observers, applicable, and know-alls). The article concludes with the construction of a new knowledge management solution called multidimensional rank thesaurus.
    Date
    13. 7.2011 14:47:22
  12. Kelechukwu Ibenne, S.; Simeonova, B.; Harrison, J.; Hepworth, M.: ¬An integrated model highlighting information literacy and knowledge formation in information behaviour (2017) 0.08 
    0.076090015 = product of:
  0.11413502 = sum of:
    0.03301657 = weight(_text_:information in 4050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03301657 = score(doc=4050,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.3628561 = fieldWeight in 4050, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4050)
    0.08111845 = sum of:
      0.046005506 = weight(_text_:management in 4050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046005506 = score(doc=4050,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 4050, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4050)
      0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035112944 = score(doc=4050,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4050, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4050)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review key models of people's information behaviour (IB) exploring the integration of the concepts of information literacy (IL) and knowledge in their designs. Scholarly perspectives portray IL as providing individuals with capacity for good information practices that result in generating new knowledge. It is surprising that this important perspective is not reflected in the reviewed IB models. This paper contributes to the literature base by proposing a new model highlighting IL and knowledge as important concepts within the IB discourse. Design/methodology/approach A discourse of the integration of IL and knowledge, which are integral factors, associated with IB, in selected IB models. Findings Identifying a need for information and understanding its context is an IL attribute. IL underpins IB in providing awareness of information sources; how to search and use information appropriately for solving information needs and leveraging generated new knowledge. The generation of new knowledge results from using information, in a process that combines with sense-making and adaption. Correspondingly, the knowledge that develops, increases capability for sense-making and adaptation of information to suit various contexts of need, iteratively. Originality/value A new model of IB; the causative and outcome factors of information behaviour (COFIB) is proposed. COFIB stresses that IL and knowledge are prominent factors within the general framework of people's IB. The model emphasises knowledge generation as the outcome of IB, applied in solving problems within specific contexts.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Footnote
    Teil eines Special Issue: Advances in information management
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.3, S.316-334
  13. Alqahtani, F.H.: ¬The acceptance of corporate wiki use for knowledge diffusion purposes (2017) 0.08 
    0.075102426 = product of:
  0.112653635 = sum of:
    0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01247909 = score(doc=4055,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
    0.100174546 = sum of:
      0.06506161 = weight(_text_:management in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06506161 = score(doc=4055,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
      0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035112944 = score(doc=4055,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose Scholars and practitioners alike view knowledge as a crucial organisational asset. Over the past decade, several knowledge management (KM) technologies have emerged, such as wikis. A wiki is a web-based hypertext application that supports a collaborative and conversational approach to KM. While wikis are generally simple to use, their adoption for managing organisational knowledge sometimes meets resistance from employees. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors affecting the user acceptance of organisational wikis as a means of knowledge creation and diffusion. Design/methodology/approach Building on the existing research on KM and information technology adoption, this study identified the following factors: the relevance of top management support for and complexity of enterprise wikis as well as technical support and knowledge-sharing self-efficacy. A cross-sectional survey was employed to examine the influence of these factors on employees' acceptance of corporate wikis. Overall, 102 employees participated in the online survey, and the data collected were analysed using the partial least squares method. Findings The research model developed demonstrates that top management support, technical support and knowledge-sharing self-efficacy have a positive significant effect on employees' willingness to use wikis for knowledge-creation purposes within organisations. Originality/value The findings of this study contribute to the existing literature on the implementation of wikis as a KM technology by developing a theoretical model explaining employees' acceptance of this technology. Organisations could use this model to guide and facilitate wiki initiatives.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.642-659
  14. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.07 
    0.07396427 = product of:
  0.1109464 = sum of:
    0.015283704 = weight(_text_:information in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015283704 = score(doc=2590,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
    0.0956627 = sum of:
      0.046005506 = weight(_text_:management in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046005506 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.049657196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049657196 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.27-54
  15. Bergman, O.; Whittaker, S.; Falk, N.: Shared files : the retrieval perspective (2014) 0.07 
    0.072737366 = product of:
  0.10910605 = sum of:
    0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017648099 = score(doc=1495,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
    0.09145795 = sum of:
      0.05634501 = weight(_text_:management in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05634501 = score(doc=1495,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
      0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035112944 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    People who are collaborating can share files in two main ways: performing Group Information Management (GIM) using a common repository or performing Personal Information Management (PIM) by distributing files as e-mail attachments and storing them in personal repositories. There is a trend toward using common repositories with many organizations encouraging workers to use GIM to avoid duplication of files and management. So far, PIM and GIM have been studied by different research communities, so their effectiveness for file retrieval has not yet been systematically compared. We compared PIM and GIM in a large-scale elicited personal information retrieval study. We asked 275 users to retrieve 860 of their own shared files, testing the effect of sharing method on success and efficiency of retrieval. Participants preferred PIM over GIM. More important, PIM retrieval was more successful: Participants using GIM failed to find 22% of their files compared with 13% failures using PIM. This may be because active organization aids retrieval: When using personally created folders, the failure percentage was 65% lower than when using default folders (e.g., My Documents), and more than 5 times lower than when using folders created by others for GIM. Theoretical reasons for this are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.1949-1963
  16. Savolainen, R.: Information need as trigger and driver of information seeking : a conceptual analysis (2017) 0.07 
    0.07268815 = product of:
  0.10903221 = sum of:
    0.041388463 = weight(_text_:information in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041388463 = score(doc=3713,freq=44.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.4548642 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
          6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
            44.0 = termFreq=44.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
    0.06764375 = sum of:
      0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032530803 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
      0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035112944 = score(doc=3713,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the picture of the motivators for information behaviour by examining the nature of information need as a trigger and driver of information seeking. Design/methodology/approach Conceptual analysis focusing on the ways in which the researchers have conceptualized information need in models for human information behaviour (HIB). The study draws on conceptual analysis of 26 key studies focusing on the above topic. Findings Researchers have employed two main approaches to conceptualize information needs in the HIB models. First, information need is approached as a root factor which motivates people to identify and access information sources. Second, information need is approached as a secondary trigger or driver determined by more fundamental factors, for example, the information requirements of task performance. The former approach conceptualizes information need as a trigger providing an initial impetus to information seeking, while the latter approach also depicts information need as a driver that keeps the information-seeking process in motion. The latter approach is particularly characteristic of models depicting information seeking as a cyclic process. Research limitations/implications As the study focuses on information need, no attention is devoted to related constructs such as anomalous state of knowledge and uncertainty. Originality/value The study pioneers by providing an in-depth analysis of the nature of information need as a trigger and driver of information seeking. The findings refine the picture of motivators for information behaviour.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.1, S.2-21
  17. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.07 
    0.07226537 = product of:
  0.10839805 = sum of:
    0.096044384 = product of:
      0.28813314 = sum of:
        0.28813314 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28813314 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43943653 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01235367 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Theme
    Information
  18. Chiaravalloti, M.T.; Pasceri, E.; Taverniti, M.: URT "Indexing and Classification Systems" Projects and biomedical knowledge standards (2012) 0.07 
    0.071954 = product of:
  0.107930996 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 4887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=4887,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4887, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4887)
    0.09734213 = sum of:
      0.055206608 = weight(_text_:management in 4887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055206608 = score(doc=4887,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 4887, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4887)
      0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04213553 = score(doc=4887,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4887, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4887)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper presents an overview of the activities of the "Unità di Ricerca presso Terzi" (URT) - "Indexing and classification systems" of the National Research Council (CNR), which deals with research in organization and document management systems, indexing, classification, knowledge, and content management. Particular attention will be focused on the project of the Electronic Health Record Technological Infrastructure (InFSE), in which the URT works on the definition of ontological models, and vocabularies supporting EHR with the aim to build an updated Italian version of a unified medical reporting language. Although current Italian legislation makes mandatory the use of internationally recognized classification systems to help interoperability and exchange of information, the current structure of those systems does not allow their full use in the Italian context. For all these reasons, it is necessary to make some adaptations in the International Classification of Disease 9th Revision terminology, used for diagnosis encoding, and in the Logical Observation Names and Codes, used for encoding laboratory observations.
    Date
    22. 1.2012 12:55:24
  19. Ortega, C.D.: Conceptual and procedural grounding of documentary systems (2012) 0.07 
    0.07172707 = product of:
  0.1075906 = sum of:
    0.026472148 = weight(_text_:information in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026472148 = score(doc=143,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
    0.08111845 = sum of:
      0.046005506 = weight(_text_:management in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046005506 = score(doc=143,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
      0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035112944 = score(doc=143,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 143, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=143)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Documentary activities are informational operations of selection and representation of objects made from their features and predictable use. In order to make them more dynamic, these activities are carried out systemically, according to institutionally limited (in the sense of social institution) information projects. This organic approach leads to the constitution of information systems, or, more specifically, systems of documentary information, inasmuch as they refer to actions about documents as objects from which information is produced. Thus, systems of documentary information are called documentary systems. This article aims to list and systematize elements with the potential to a generalizing and categorical approach of documentary systems. We approach the systems according to: elements of reference (the documents and their information, the users, and the institutional context); constitutive elements (collection and references); structural elements (constituent units and the relation among them); modes of production (pre or post representation of the document); management aspects (flow of documents and of their information); and, finally, typology (management systems and information retrieval systems). Thus, documentary systems can be considered products due to operations involving objects institutionally limited for the production of collections (virtual or not) and their references, whose objective is the appropriation of information by the user.
    Content
    Beitrag einer Section "Selected Papers from the 1ST Brazilian Conference on Knowledge Organization And Representation, Faculdade de Ciência da Informação, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro Brasília, DF Brasil, October 20-22, 2011" Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_3_h.pdf.
  20. Savolainen, R.: Modeling the interplay of information seeking and information sharing (2019) 0.07 
    0.07140407 = product of:
  0.1071061 = sum of:
    0.03946235 = weight(_text_:information in 5498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03946235 = score(doc=5498,freq=40.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 5498, product of:
          6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
            40.0 = termFreq=40.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5498)
    0.06764375 = sum of:
      0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 5498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032530803 = score(doc=5498,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5498, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5498)
      0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 5498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035112944 = score(doc=5498,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5498, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5498)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the creation of a holistic picture of information behavior by examining the connections between information seeking and sharing. Design/methodology/approach Conceptual analysis is used to focus on the ways in which the researchers have modeled the interplay of information seeking and sharing. The study draws on conceptual analysis of 27 key studies examining the above issue, with a focus on the scrutiny of six major models for information behavior. Findings Researchers have employed three main approaches to model the relationships between information seeking and sharing. The indirect approach conceptualizes information seeking and sharing as discrete activities connected by an intermediating factor, for example, information need. The sequential approach assumes that information seeking precedes information sharing. From the viewpoint of the interactive approach, information seeking and sharing appear as mutually related activities shaping each other iteratively or in a cyclical manner. The interactive approach provides the most sophisticated research perspective on the relationships of information seeking and sharing and contributes to holistic understanding of human information behavior. Research limitations/implications As the study focuses on information seeking and sharing, no attention is devoted to other activities constitutive of information behavior, for example, information use. Originality/value The study pioneers by providing an in-depth analysis of the connections of information seeking and information sharing.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.4, S.518-534

Authors

Languages

  • e 3580
  • d 664
  • i 3
  • a 2
  • f 2
  • es 1
  • hu 1
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 3857
  • m 266
  • el 261
  • s 85
  • x 56
  • r 17
  • b 7
  • n 5
  • i 3
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications