Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: DIN 32705: the German standard on classification systems : a critical appraisal (1992) 0.01
    0.013096297 = product of:
      0.065481484 = sum of:
        0.065481484 = product of:
          0.13096297 = sum of:
            0.13096297 = weight(_text_:german in 2669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13096297 = score(doc=2669,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.5445008 = fieldWeight in 2669, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The German standard on the construction and further development of classification systems is introduced with its background. The contents of its 8 chapters is described. A critical appraisal considers (1) the fact that the standard does not openly deal with the optimal form of CS, viz. faceted CS, but treats them as one possibility among others, although the authors seem to have had this kind in mind when recommending the section on steps of CS development and other sections of the standard; (2) that the standard does not give any recommendation on the computerization of the necessary activities in establishing CS; and (3) that a convergence of CS and thesauri in the form of faceted CS and faceted thesauri has not been taken into consideration. - Concludingly some doubts are raised whether a standard would be the best medium to provide recommendations or guidelines for the construction of such systems. More adequate ways for this should be explored
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.01
    0.011221418 = product of:
      0.05610709 = sum of:
        0.05610709 = product of:
          0.11221418 = sum of:
            0.11221418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11221418 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.01
    0.011221418 = product of:
      0.05610709 = sum of:
        0.05610709 = product of:
          0.11221418 = sum of:
            0.11221418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11221418 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.01
    0.011221418 = product of:
      0.05610709 = sum of:
        0.05610709 = product of:
          0.11221418 = sum of:
            0.11221418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11221418 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  5. Dahlberg, I.: ¬A faceted classification of general concepts (2011) 0.01
    0.0109135825 = product of:
      0.05456791 = sum of:
        0.05456791 = product of:
          0.10913582 = sum of:
            0.10913582 = weight(_text_:german in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10913582 = score(doc=4824,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.45375073 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    General concepts are all those form-categorial concepts which - attached to a specific concept of a classification system or thesaurus - can help to widen, sometimes even in a syntactical sense, the understanding of a case. In some existing universal classification systems such concepts have been named "auxiliaries" or "common isolates" as in the Colon Classification (CC). However, by such auxiliaries, different kinds of such concepts are listed, e.g. concepts of space and time, concepts of races and languages and concepts of kinds of documents, next to them also concepts of kinds of general activities, properties, persons, and institutions. Such latter kinds form part of the nine aspects ruling the facets in the Information Coding Classification (ICC) through the principle of using a Systematiser for the subdivision of subject groups and fields. Based on this principle and using and extending existing systems of such concepts, e.g. which A. Diemer had presented to the German Thesaurus Committee as well as those found in the UDC, in CC and attached to the Subject Heading System of the German National Library, a faceted classification is proposed for critical assessment, necessary improvement and possible later use in classification systems and thesauri.
  6. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.01
    0.009260482 = product of:
      0.046302408 = sum of:
        0.046302408 = product of:
          0.092604816 = sum of:
            0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092604816 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
  7. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.01
    0.0078549925 = product of:
      0.03927496 = sum of:
        0.03927496 = product of:
          0.07854992 = sum of:
            0.07854992 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07854992 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  8. Dahlberg, I.: Kompatibilität und Integration : Probleme und Lösungen in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.01
    0.007717067 = product of:
      0.038585335 = sum of:
        0.038585335 = product of:
          0.07717067 = sum of:
            0.07717067 = weight(_text_:german in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07717067 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
  9. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (2015) 0.01
    0.007717067 = product of:
      0.038585335 = sum of:
        0.038585335 = product of:
          0.07717067 = sum of:
            0.07717067 = weight(_text_:german in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07717067 = score(doc=2104,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields.
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.01
    0.005610709 = product of:
      0.028053544 = sum of:
        0.028053544 = product of:
          0.05610709 = sum of:
            0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05610709 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.00
    0.0044885674 = product of:
      0.022442836 = sum of:
        0.022442836 = product of:
          0.044885673 = sum of:
            0.044885673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044885673 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  12. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.00
    0.0039673704 = product of:
      0.019836852 = sum of:
        0.019836852 = product of:
          0.039673705 = sum of:
            0.039673705 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039673705 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  13. Dahlberg, I.: How to improve ISKO's standing : ten desiderata for knowledge organization (2011) 0.00
    0.0038585335 = product of:
      0.019292668 = sum of:
        0.019292668 = product of:
          0.038585335 = sum of:
            0.038585335 = weight(_text_:german in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038585335 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.1604251 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Slightly revised translation into English of a contribution given at the 11th German ISKO Conference, Bonn, 19-21 Oct.2009. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_38_2011_1g.pdf.
  14. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.00
    0.0033664254 = product of:
      0.016832126 = sum of:
        0.016832126 = product of:
          0.033664253 = sum of:
            0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033664253 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13