Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"ja"
  1. Fukuda, M.; Kageura, K.: Research into 'see also' references in the dictionary of terminology : using semantic relations between entries (1993) 0.06
    0.060679194 = product of:
      0.30339596 = sum of:
        0.30339596 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30339596 = score(doc=1050,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            1.059062 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a study to clarify the nature and functions of 'see also' references in the dictionaly of terminology by surveying 3 such dictionaries, using semantic relations between referring entries and referred entries as a key. The following points were clarified: major types of semantic relations between referring and referred entries and their quantitative tendencies; correlations between the general nature of dictionaries and overall tendencies of 'see also' references; some tendencies concerning the directions of references under some semantic relations; and correlations between the nature of dictionaries and the directions of 'see also' references
  2. Matsubayashi, M.: ¬The German cataloging rules (RAK) : an introduction and annotated bibliography (1996) 0.02
    0.01746173 = product of:
      0.08730865 = sum of:
        0.08730865 = product of:
          0.1746173 = sum of:
            0.1746173 = weight(_text_:german in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1746173 = score(doc=497,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.72600114 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Provides an explpanation of the German cataloguing rules (RAK) focusing on conceptual rules and describes their current situation and the likely nature of future revisions. The special characteristics of RAK are the clearly defined 'basic bibliographic concepts (Grundbegriffe)' as literary units and the related concepts of item (Vorlage), edition (Ausgabe) and work (Werk). RAK will be revised in the near future as RAK2 with a conceptual framework based on AACR2, clearly defined bibliographical concepts on literary units and compatibility with RAK-WB
  3. Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994) 0.00
    0.0044885674 = product of:
      0.022442836 = sum of:
        0.022442836 = product of:
          0.044885673 = sum of:
            0.044885673 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044885673 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem