Search (217 results, page 1 of 11)

0.051913112 = product of:
  0.25956556 = sum of:
    0.25956556 = sum of:
      0.23151202 = weight(_text_:german in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23151202 = score(doc=192,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041411664 = queryNorm
          0.9625506 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
      0.028053544 = weight(_text_:22 in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028053544 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041411664 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

German academic libraries acquire a large number of books from British and American publishers. The bibliographic records of the Library of Congress and the British National Bibliography are offered in most German library networks. Thus, projects REUSE and REUSE+ were undertaken when there was a demand for harmonization of Germany cataloging rules with AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules). Experts in the United States and Germany systematically analyzed bibliographic data and compared the codes on which the data were based. Major and minor differences in cataloging rules were identified. The REUSE group proposed German participation in international authority files and changes in RAK, the German cataloging rules. In REUSE+ the different types of hierarchical bibliographic structures in USMARC and MAB2 and other German formats were analyzed. The German project group made suggestions concerning both the German formats and the USMARC format. Steps toward rule alignment and harmonization of online requirements were made when the German Cataloging Rules Conference made decisions on resolutions prepared by the Working Groups on Descriptive Cataloging that dealt with titles, encoding of form titles and conference terms, prefixes in names, hierarchies, entries under persons and corporate bodies, and the conceptual basis of RAK2 in the context of harmonization. Although problems remain, German rule makers have made progress toward internationality.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.035033148 = product of:
  0.17516573 = sum of:
    0.17516573 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17516573 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041411664 = queryNorm
        0.6114497 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This bibliography contains selected cataloging tools an the Internet. It is divided into seven sections as follows: authority management and subject headings tools; cataloging tools by type of materials; dictionaries, encyclopedias, and place names; listservs and workshops; software and vendors; technical service professional organizations; and journals and newsletters. Resources are arranged in alphabetical order under each topic. Selected cataloging tools are annotated. There is some overlap since a given web site can cover many tools.

0.025253816 = product of:
  0.12626907 = sum of:
    0.12626907 = sum of:
      0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.092604816 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041411664 = queryNorm
          0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
      0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033664253 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041411664 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The appearance in OCLC and RLIN of minimal level catalog records from European book vendors for European language monographs and their effect on cataloging department workflows and cooperative cataloging efforts have been matters of concern expressed recently at ALA meetings and in the library literature. A study of 8,778 catalog records was undertaken to discover how many current European language monographs were being cataloged by the Library of Congress, by member libraries, and by vendors. It was found that vendor records accounted for 16. 7% of Spanish books, 18% of French books, 33.6% of German books, and 52.5% of those in Italian. The number of libraries enhancing vendor records in OCLC was found to be only approximately one-third the number of libraries contributing original records for European language books. Ongoing increases in European book publishing and the increasing globalization of cataloging databases mean that the results of this study have implications not only for local cataloging practice but for cooperative cataloging as a whole.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.021895718 = product of:
  0.109478585 = sum of:
    0.109478585 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109478585 = score(doc=93,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041411664 = queryNorm
        0.38215607 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The recognition of named entities in Spanish medieval texts presents great complexity, involving specific challenges: First, the complex morphosyntactic characteristics in proper-noun use in medieval texts. Second, the lack of strict orthographic standards. Finally, diachronic and geographical variations in Spanish from the 12th to 15th century. In this period, named entities usually appear as complex text structure. For example, it was frequent to add nicknames and information about the persons role in society and geographic origin. To tackle this complexity, named entity recognition and classification system has been implemented. The system uses contextual cues based on semantics to detect entities and assign a type. Given the occurrence of entities with attached attributes, entity contexts are also parsed to determine entity-type-specific dependencies for these attributes. Moreover, it uses a variant generator to handle the diachronic evolution of Spanish medieval terms from a phonetic and morphosyntactic viewpoint. The tool iteratively enriches its proper lexica, dictionaries, and gazetteers. The system was evaluated on a corpus of over 3,000 manually annotated entities of different types and periods, obtaining F1 scores between 0.74 and 0.87. Attribute annotation was evaluated for a person and role name attributes with an overall F1 of 0.75.

0.021827165 = product of:
  0.10913582 = sum of:
    0.10913582 = product of:
      0.21827164 = sum of:
        0.21827164 = weight(_text_:german in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21827164 = score(doc=3083,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.90750146 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Presents the German and Nordic reactions. Provides a background to the Northern European cataloguing tradition. Offers views from Denmark, Sweden and Norway

0.02160779 = product of:
  0.10803895 = sum of:
    0.10803895 = product of:
      0.2160779 = sum of:
        0.2160779 = weight(_text_:german in 4118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2160779 = score(doc=4118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.8983806 = fieldWeight in 4118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4118)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.02160779 = product of:
  0.10803895 = sum of:
    0.10803895 = product of:
      0.2160779 = sum of:
        0.2160779 = weight(_text_:german in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2160779 = score(doc=365,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.8983806 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Cataloguers of monographs are accustomed to finding a publication, copyright or at least a printing date in an imprint on the title page or in a colophon. If no date is found in the 'prescribed source of information', rule 1.4F7 of AACR2 instructs cataloguers to 'supply an approximate date of publication'. Examines efficient ways of doing this, using examples from German publishing. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, German publishers often omitted the year of publication from their imprints. Methods and examples presented are drawn from cataloguing experience at Texas A&M University since 1992, when the library purchased several thousand German books of this period

0.02160779 = product of:
  0.10803895 = sum of:
    0.10803895 = product of:
      0.2160779 = sum of:
        0.2160779 = weight(_text_:german in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2160779 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.8983806 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.02160779 = product of:
  0.10803895 = sum of:
    0.10803895 = product of:
      0.2160779 = sum of:
        0.2160779 = weight(_text_:german in 1989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2160779 = score(doc=1989,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.8983806 = fieldWeight in 1989, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1989)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The discussion on the internationalization of German library standards has a long tradition, and revived around the millennium change with the recognition that the standards used so far were no longer suitable for the current needs. Therefore, the Committee for Library Standards, a consortium consisting mainly of German regional library networks and large academic libraries, with Austrian and Swiss representatives, agreed on the changeover. The article will describe all relevant aspects of the transition to Resource Description and Access (RDA) within the German-speaking library community.

0.018520964 = product of:
  0.092604816 = sum of:
    0.092604816 = product of:
      0.18520963 = sum of:
        0.18520963 = weight(_text_:german in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18520963 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.7700405 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.018520964 = product of:
  0.092604816 = sum of:
    0.092604816 = product of:
      0.18520963 = sum of:
        0.18520963 = weight(_text_:german in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18520963 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.7700405 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.01746173 = product of:
  0.08730865 = sum of:
    0.08730865 = product of:
      0.1746173 = sum of:
        0.1746173 = weight(_text_:german in 3555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1746173 = score(doc=3555,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.72600114 = fieldWeight in 3555, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3555)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The author provides historical background useful in understanding the title pages of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century German dissertations. Images of title pages are included, with details of bibliographic description, and Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) coding, as well as links to examples of catalog records in the Yale Law Library catalog, MORRIS. This article also includes comments on Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) Rule 21.27 regarding the problem of authorship in early dissertations.

0.016039625 = product of:
  0.080198124 = sum of:
    0.080198124 = product of:
      0.16039625 = sum of:
        0.16039625 = weight(_text_:german in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16039625 = score(doc=2954,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.66687465 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The library community in Germany, Austria and German-speaking Switzerland achieved a common goal at the end of 2015. After more than two years of intensive preparation, the international standard RDA was implemented and the practical work has now started. The article describes the project in terms of the political and organizational situation in the three countries, and points out the objectives which have been achieved as well as the work which is still outstanding. An overview is given of the initial efforts to align special materials with RDA in the German-speaking countries, and the tasks associated with the specific requirements arising from the multilingual nature of Switzerland are described. Furthermore, the article reports on the current strategic developments in the international RDA committees like the RDA Steering Committee (RSC) and the European RDA Interest Group (EURIG).

0.012695585 = product of:
  0.063477926 = sum of:
    0.063477926 = product of:
      0.12695585 = sum of:
        0.12695585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12695585 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:22:27

0.012347308 = product of:
  0.06173654 = sum of:
    0.06173654 = product of:
      0.12347308 = sum of:
        0.12347308 = weight(_text_:german in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12347308 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5133603 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Describes 2 products released by OCLC. The 1.1 version of Dewey for Windows includes a function for assigning Cutter numbers, an online guide and several enhancements to the 1996 version. Project REUSE is a collaborative initiative of OCLC, the LoC and the SUB Göttingen in Germany to harmonize German cataloguing rules and AACR. the report is now available on the OCLC Web site and covers the participants, organization and methodology of the project and a review of its results

0.012347308 = product of:
  0.06173654 = sum of:
    0.06173654 = product of:
      0.12347308 = sum of:
        0.12347308 = weight(_text_:german in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12347308 = score(doc=3858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5133603 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.010803895 = product of:
  0.054019473 = sum of:
    0.054019473 = product of:
      0.10803895 = sum of:
        0.10803895 = weight(_text_:german in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10803895 = score(doc=5482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.4491903 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Discussion around the issue of cataloging codes has become heated in Germany since Germany's national committee on cataloging standardization announced in December 2001 that its goal would now be to pursue a migration to AACR2 and MARC. Like AACR2, Germany's current cataloging code, RAK, is based on the ISBD, but the two codes differ from each other in a number of significant ways. This paper compares German and Anglo-American cataloging practice, with particular regard to determining main entry, the treatment of corporate bodies and conferences, the treatment of personal name headings, and the treatment of multipart items.

0.010803895 = product of:
  0.054019473 = sum of:
    0.054019473 = product of:
      0.10803895 = sum of:
        0.10803895 = weight(_text_:german in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10803895 = score(doc=1981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.4491903 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The German National Library of Science and Technology (TIB) developed a Web-based platform for audiovisual media. The audiovisual portal optimizes access to scientific videos such as computer animations and lecture and conference recordings. TIB's AV-Portal combines traditional cataloging and automatic indexing of audiovisual media. The article describes metadata standards for audiovisual media and introduces the TIB's metadata schema in comparison to other metadata standards for non-textual materials. Additionally, we give an overview of multimedia retrieval technologies used for the Portal and present the AV-Portal in detail as well as the additional value for libraries and their users.

0.009260482 = product of:
  0.046302408 = sum of:
    0.046302408 = product of:
      0.092604816 = sum of:
        0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 5614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092604816 = score(doc=5614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5614)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Twenty-five years after IFLA tried an equalization of entries a new approach of harmonizing AACR2r and RAK-W4 is underway and hopefully will be concluded in the near future. Minor and major problems have been analyzed. Possible solutions are determined for name entries of persons and corporate bodies. An adaptation has to be made in German rules in order to reach the same amount of "entities" in an authority file (so far the RAK has no differentiation in personal names). Participation in international name authority files on the basis of "national" entry forms should be implemented as soon as possible. A harmonization in the title area, including codes for form titles, is in the stage of final adaptation by the new "Rule Conference" as well. Some major problems remain to be solved including hierarchies and romanization.

0.009260482 = product of:
  0.046302408 = sum of:
    0.046302408 = product of:
      0.092604816 = sum of:
        0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 5755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092604816 = score(doc=5755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5755)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This article discusses the training of catalog librarians in Germany and Austria. First, the various library careers and degrees are described; then the various types of library schools and the varying educational content of different degree programs are described, along with continuing education programs in both countries. Typical job categories in German and Austrian libraries are described in terms of the qualification levels required in each category. Since the question of whether to retain the current official cataloguing code is now a subject of intense debate (with a potentially significant impact on library education,) the main points of that debate are outlined here. Mention is made of the manuals and textbooks currently used in cataloguing courses.