Search (122 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.21 
    0.21047266 = product of:
  0.52618164 = sum of:
    0.26309082 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26309082 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.35108855 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041411664 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.26309082 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26309082 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.35108855 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041411664 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.03 
    0.029462783 = product of:
  0.14731391 = sum of:
    0.14731391 = sum of:
      0.10803895 = weight(_text_:german in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10803895 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041411664 = queryNorm
          0.4491903 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.03927496 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03927496 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041411664 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Eine englische Version dieses Beitrags erscheint unter dem Titel "International visibility of European and in particular German language publications in library and information science" im Tagungsband des 13. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013). Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0001/iwp-2013-0001.xml?format=INT.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  3. Lewandowski, D.; Haustein, S.: What does the German-language information science community cite? (2015) 0.02 
    0.015434134 = product of:
  0.07717067 = sum of:
    0.07717067 = product of:
      0.15434134 = sum of:
        0.15434134 = weight(_text_:german in 2987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15434134 = score(doc=2987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.6417004 = fieldWeight in 2987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  4. Schloegl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Impact and relevance of LIS journals : a scientometric analysis of international and German-language LIS journals - Citation analysis versus reader survey (2004) 0.01 
    0.0106930835 = product of:
  0.05346542 = sum of:
    0.05346542 = product of:
      0.10693084 = sum of:
        0.10693084 = weight(_text_:german in 5249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10693084 = score(doc=5249,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.44458312 = fieldWeight in 5249, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The goal of the scientometric analysis presented in this article was to investigate international and regional (i.e., German-language) periodicals in the field of library and information science (LIS). This was done by means of a citation analysis and a reader survey. For the citation analysis, impact factor, citing half-life, number of references per article, and the rate of self-references of a periodical were used as indicators. In addition, the leading LIS periodicals were mapped. For the 40 international periodicals, data were collected from ISI's Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports (JCR); the citations of the 10 German-language journals were counted manually (overall 1,494 source articles with 10,520 citations). Altogether, the empirical base of the citation analysis consisted of nearly 90,000 citations in 6,203 source articles that were published between 1997 and 2000. The expert survey investigated reading frequency, applicability of the journals to the job of the reader, publication frequency, and publication preference both for all respondents and for different groups among them (practitioners vs. scientists, librarians vs. documentalists vs. LIS scholars, public sector vs. information industry vs. other private company employees). The study was conducted in spring 2002. A total of 257 questionnaires were returned by information specialists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Having both citation and readership data, we performed a comparative analysis of these two data sets. This enabled us to identify answers to questions like: Does reading behavior correlate with the journal impact factor? Do readers prefer journals with a short or a long half-life, or with a low or a high number of references? Is there any difference in this matter among librarians, documentalists, and LIS scholars?
  5. Amez, L.: Citation measures at the micro level : influence of publication age, field, and uncitedness (2012) 0.01 
    0.009260482 = product of:
  0.046302408 = sum of:
    0.046302408 = product of:
      0.092604816 = sum of:
        0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092604816 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The application of micro-level citation indicators is not without controversy. The procedure requires the availability of both adequate data sets and trusted metrics. Few indicators have been developed to deal specifically with individual assessment. The h-type indices are the most popular category; however, the dependence of h-type metrics on publication age and field makes their application often unjustified. This article studies the effects that publication age and field normalization have on h-type citation values of German Leibniz Prize winners. This data set is exclusive in that it is highly scrutinized for homonyms. Results are compared with other field-normalized citation rates, contributing to the debate on using demarcation versus average citation approaches to evaluate top researchers.
  6. Pislyakov, V.; Shukshina, E.: Measuring excellence in Russia : highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration (2014) 0.01 
    0.009260482 = product of:
  0.046302408 = sum of:
    0.046302408 = product of:
      0.092604816 = sum of:
        0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 1533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092604816 = score(doc=1533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 1533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1533)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In this study, we discover Russian "centers of excellence" and explore patterns of their collaboration with each other and with foreign partners. Highly cited papers serve as a proxy for "excellence" and coauthored papers as a measure of collaborative efforts. We find that currently research institutes (of the Russian Academy of Sciences as well as others) remain the key players despite recent government initiatives to stimulate university science. The contribution of the commercial sector to high-impact research is negligible. More than 90% of Russian highly cited papers involve international collaboration, and Russian institutions often do not play a dominant role. Partnership with U.S., German, U.K., and French scientists increases markedly the probability of a Russian paper becoming highly cited. Patterns of national ("intranational") collaboration in world-class research differ significantly across different types of organizations; the strongest ties are between three nuclear/particle physics centers. Finally, we draw a coauthorship map to visualize collaboration between Russian centers of excellence.
  7. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.01 
    0.008977135 = product of:
  0.044885673 = sum of:
    0.044885673 = product of:
      0.089771345 = sum of:
        0.089771345 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089771345 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.008977135 = product of:
  0.044885673 = sum of:
    0.044885673 = product of:
      0.089771345 = sum of:
        0.089771345 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089771345 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  9. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.01 
    0.008977135 = product of:
  0.044885673 = sum of:
    0.044885673 = product of:
      0.089771345 = sum of:
        0.089771345 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089771345 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  10. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.01 
    0.007934741 = product of:
  0.039673705 = sum of:
    0.039673705 = product of:
      0.07934741 = sum of:
        0.07934741 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07934741 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  11. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.007934741 = product of:
  0.039673705 = sum of:
    0.039673705 = product of:
      0.07934741 = sum of:
        0.07934741 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07934741 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  12. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.01 
    0.0078549925 = product of:
  0.03927496 = sum of:
    0.03927496 = product of:
      0.07854992 = sum of:
        0.07854992 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07854992 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  13. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.01 
    0.0078549925 = product of:
  0.03927496 = sum of:
    0.03927496 = product of:
      0.07854992 = sum of:
        0.07854992 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07854992 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  14. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.01 
    0.0078549925 = product of:
  0.03927496 = sum of:
    0.03927496 = product of:
      0.07854992 = sum of:
        0.07854992 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07854992 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  15. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.01 
    0.006732851 = product of:
  0.033664253 = sum of:
    0.033664253 = product of:
      0.067328505 = sum of:
        0.067328505 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067328505 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  16. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.01 
    0.006732851 = product of:
  0.033664253 = sum of:
    0.033664253 = product of:
      0.067328505 = sum of:
        0.067328505 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067328505 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  17. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.00 
    0.0047608446 = product of:
  0.023804223 = sum of:
    0.023804223 = product of:
      0.047608446 = sum of:
        0.047608446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047608446 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  18. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.0047608446 = product of:
  0.023804223 = sum of:
    0.023804223 = product of:
      0.047608446 = sum of:
        0.047608446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047608446 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  19. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.00 
    0.0044885674 = product of:
  0.022442836 = sum of:
    0.022442836 = product of:
      0.044885673 = sum of:
        0.044885673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044885673 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  20. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.00 
    0.0044885674 = product of:
  0.022442836 = sum of:
    0.022442836 = product of:
      0.044885673 = sum of:
        0.044885673 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044885673 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 112
  • d 9
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 120
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications