-
Buchan, R.L.: Intertwining thesauri and dictionaries (1989)
0.07
0.070066296 = product of:
0.35033146 = sum of:
0.35033146 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35033146 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
1.2228994 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.03
0.0345815 = product of:
0.08645375 = sum of:
0.07663501 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07663501 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.26750925 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.00981874 = product of:
0.01963748 = sum of:
0.01963748 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01963748 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999)
0.03
0.025253816 = product of:
0.12626907 = sum of:
0.12626907 = sum of:
0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092604816 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664253 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a proposal for a new approach to thesaurus design and construction that could have significant implicantions for change in the way multilingual thesauri are handled and integrated with each other. The formula presented here has its origin in the work of the German Thesaurus Committee and has had input from a number of scientists and practitioners int he field. The emphasis is on the various types of relationships found among concepts, notiions and universals in languages. These relationships are analysed and refined beyond the approach taken in existing thesauri. This proposal is very much at the discussion stage and the author invites the assistance of interested readers through criticisms, discussion and dialogue. Applications of the proposed thesaurus are included and the major goal of this proposal is to provide the basis for improved desing and integration of multilingual thesauri
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
-
Amirhosseini, M.; Avidan, G.: ¬A dialectic perspective on the evolution of thesauri and ontologies (2021)
0.02
0.021895718 = product of:
0.109478585 = sum of:
0.109478585 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109478585 = score(doc=592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38215607 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowledge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowledge organization systems to increase information and knowledge storage and retrieval performance.
-
Siebenkäs, A.; Markscheffel, B.: Conception of a workflow for the semi-automatic construction of a thesaurus for the German printing industry (2015)
0.02
0.015279015 = product of:
0.07639507 = sum of:
0.07639507 = product of:
0.15279014 = sum of:
0.15279014 = weight(_text_:german in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15279014 = score(doc=2091,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.635251 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- During the BMWI granted project "Print-IT", the need of a thesaurus based uniform and consistent language for the German printing industry became evident. In this paper we introduce a semi-automatic construction approach for such a thesaurus and present a workflow which supports users to generate thesaurus typical information structures from relevant digitalized resources with the help of common IT-tools.
-
Neelameghan, A.: Lateral relations and links in multicultural, multimedia databases in the spritual and religious domains : some observations (1999)
0.01
0.009260482 = product of:
0.046302408 = sum of:
0.046302408 = product of:
0.092604816 = sum of:
0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 4467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092604816 = score(doc=4467,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 4467, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4467)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This paper describes a proposal for a new approach to thesaurus design and construction that could have significant implications for change in the way multilingual thesauri are handled and integrated with each other. The formula presented here has its origin in the work of the German Thesaurus Committee and has had input from a number of scientists and practitioners in the field. The emphasis is on the various types of relationships found among concepts, notions and universals in languages. These relationships are analysed and refined beyond the approach taken in existing thesauri. This proposal is very much at the discussion stage and the author invites the assistance of interested readers through criticisms, discussion and dialogue. Applications of the proposed thesaurus are included and the major goal of this proposal is to provide the basis for improved design and integration of multilingual thesauri
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008)
0.01
0.009260482 = product of:
0.046302408 = sum of:
0.046302408 = product of:
0.092604816 = sum of:
0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092604816 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access : the linking approach of MACS (2004)
0.01
0.009260482 = product of:
0.046302408 = sum of:
0.046302408 = product of:
0.092604816 = sum of:
0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 5009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092604816 = score(doc=5009,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 5009, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5009)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The MACS (Multilingual access to subjects) project is one of the many projects that are currently exploring solutions to multilingual subject access to online catalogs. Its strategy is to develop a Web based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages: SWD/RSWK (Schlagwortnormdatei/Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog) for German, RAMEAU (Repertoire d'Autorite-Matière Encyclopedique et Alphabetique Unifie) for French and LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) for English can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. Factors that have lead to this approach will be examined and the MACS linking strategy will be explained. The trend to using mapping or linking strategies between different controlled vocabularies to create multilingual access challenges the traditional view of the multilingual thesaurus.
-
Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989)
0.01
0.0078549925 = product of:
0.03927496 = sum of:
0.03927496 = product of:
0.07854992 = sum of:
0.07854992 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07854992 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
-
Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999)
0.01
0.006732851 = product of:
0.033664253 = sum of:
0.033664253 = product of:
0.067328505 = sum of:
0.067328505 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067328505 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 15. 3.2000 10:22:37
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.01
0.006732851 = product of:
0.033664253 = sum of:
0.033664253 = product of:
0.067328505 = sum of:
0.067328505 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067328505 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.01
0.006732851 = product of:
0.033664253 = sum of:
0.033664253 = product of:
0.067328505 = sum of:
0.067328505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067328505 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001)
0.01
0.006732851 = product of:
0.033664253 = sum of:
0.033664253 = product of:
0.067328505 = sum of:
0.067328505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067328505 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 24. 8.2005 19:20:22
-
Riege, U.: Thesaurus und Klassifikation Sozialwissenschaften : Entwicklung der elektronischen Versionen (1998)
0.01
0.005610709 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05610709 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Alkämper, H.: ¬Die Neugestaltung des Parlamentsthesaurus PARTHES (1998)
0.01
0.005610709 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05610709 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Schenkel, M.: Vom Leitkartenthesaurus zum Online-Bibliotheksthesaurus : Die Revision des Dokumentationssystems der Bibliothek des Deutschen Bundestages (1949-1998) (1998)
0.01
0.005610709 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05610709 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Velasco, M.: Algoritmo de filtrado multitermino para la obtencion de relaciones jerarquicas en la construction automatica de un tesauro de descriptores (1999)
0.01
0.005610709 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05610709 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.01
0.005610709 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05610709 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997)
0.00
0.0044885674 = product of:
0.022442836 = sum of:
0.022442836 = product of:
0.044885673 = sum of:
0.044885673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044885673 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
-
Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995)
0.00
0.0044885674 = product of:
0.022442836 = sum of:
0.022442836 = product of:
0.044885673 = sum of:
0.044885673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044885673 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
