Search (91 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Vorndran, A.; Grund, S.: Metadata sharing : how to transfer metadata information among work cluster members (2021) 0.02 
    0.016039625 = product of:
  0.080198124 = sum of:
    0.080198124 = product of:
      0.16039625 = sum of:
        0.16039625 = weight(_text_:german in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16039625 = score(doc=721,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.66687465 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The German National Library (DNB) is using a clustering technique to aggregate works from the database Culturegraph. Culturegraph collects bibliographic metadata records from all German Regional Library Networks, the Austrian Library Network, and DNB. This stock of about 180 million records serves as the basis for work clustering-the attempt to assemble all manifestations of a work in one cluster. The results of this work clustering are not employed in the display of search results, as other similar approaches successfully do, but for transferring metadata elements among the cluster members. In this paper the transfer of content-descriptive metadata elements such as controlled and uncontrolled index terms and classifications and links to name records in the German Integrated Authority File (GND) are described. In this way, standardization and cross linking can be improved and the richness of metadata description can be enhanced.
  2. Heery, R.; Wagner, H.: ¬A metadata registry for the Semantic Web (2002) 0.02 
    0.015327002 = product of:
  0.07663501 = sum of:
    0.07663501 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 1210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07663501 = score(doc=1210,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041411664 = queryNorm
        0.26750925 = fieldWeight in 1210, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1210)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The Semantic Web activity is a W3C project whose goal is to enable a 'cooperative' Web where machines and humans can exchange electronic content that has clear-cut, unambiguous meaning. This vision is based on the automated sharing of metadata terms across Web applications. The declaration of schemas in metadata registries advance this vision by providing a common approach for the discovery, understanding, and exchange of semantics. However, many of the issues regarding registries are not clear, and ideas vary regarding their scope and purpose. Additionally, registry issues are often difficult to describe and comprehend without a working example. This article will explore the role of metadata registries and will describe three prototypes, written by the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. The article will outline how the prototypes are being used to demonstrate and evaluate application scope, functional requirements, and technology solutions for metadata registries. Metadata schema registries are, in effect, databases of schemas that can trace an historical line back to shared data dictionaries and the registration process encouraged by the ISO/IEC 11179 community. New impetus for the development of registries has come with the development activities surrounding creation of the Semantic Web. The motivation for establishing registries arises from domain and standardization communities, and from the knowledge management community. Examples of current registry activity include:
  3. Ruhl, M.: Do we need metadata? : an on-line survey in German archives (2012) 0.01 
    0.013096297 = product of:
  0.065481484 = sum of:
    0.065481484 = product of:
      0.13096297 = sum of:
        0.13096297 = weight(_text_:german in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13096297 = score(doc=471,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5445008 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper summarizes the results of an on-line survey which was executed 2010 in german archives of all branches. The survey focused on metadata and used metadata standards for the annotation of audiovisual media like pictures, audio and video files (analog and digital). The findings motivate the question whether archives are able to collaborate in projects like europeana if they do not use accepted standards for their orientation. Archives need more resources and archival staff need more training to execute more complex tasks in an digital and semantic surrounding.
  4. Grün, S.; Poley, C: Statistische Analysen von Semantic Entities aus Metadaten- und Volltextbeständen von German Medical Science (2017) 0.01 
    0.013096297 = product of:
  0.065481484 = sum of:
    0.065481484 = product of:
      0.13096297 = sum of:
        0.13096297 = weight(_text_:german in 5032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13096297 = score(doc=5032,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5445008 = fieldWeight in 5032, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5032)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes the information content of metadata and full texts in German Medical Science (GMS) articles in English language. The object of the study is to compare semantic entities that are used to enrich GMS metadata (titles and abstracts) and GMS full texts. The aim of the study is to test whether using full texts increases the value added information. The comparison and evaluation of semantic entities was done statistically. Measures of descriptive statistics were gathered for this purpose. In addition to the ratio of central tendencies and scatterings, we computed the overlaps and complements of the values. The results show a distinct increase of information when full texts are added. On average, metadata contain 25 different entities and full texts 215. 89% of the concepts in the metadata are also represented in the full texts. Hence, 11% of the metadata concepts are found in the metadata only. In summary, the results show that the addition of full texts increases the informational value, e.g. for information retrieval processes.
  5. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.009521689 = product of:
  0.047608446 = sum of:
    0.047608446 = product of:
      0.09521689 = sum of:
        0.09521689 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09521689 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  6. Rusch-Feja, D.: Subject oriented collection of information resources from the Internet (1997) 0.01 
    0.009260482 = product of:
  0.046302408 = sum of:
    0.046302408 = product of:
      0.092604816 = sum of:
        0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.092604816 = score(doc=528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=528)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Subject oriented information sources on the Internet remain relativley unstructured despite attempts at indexing them and despite the use of search engines to index sources in a collective database and to retrieve relevant information sources. Describes the rationale for developing a means to capture and structure Internet resources for scientific research use in a clearinghouse, and methods for retrieval, information filtering, and structuring subject orientated information sources from the Internet for specific user groups. Discusses the issues of design, maintenance, implementation of metadata, and obtaining use feedback. Cooperation among several institutions involved in the German national subject special collections (SSG) library support programme of the DFG have led to recommendations to expand this programme to include coordination of collective Internet subject information sites. In addition to the compilation of subject oriented information sites on the Internet by library and information staff, connection to other value added services serve to make processes of information searching, retrieval, acquisition, and evaluation more effective for researchers
  7. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.01 
    0.008977135 = product of:
  0.044885673 = sum of:
    0.044885673 = product of:
      0.089771345 = sum of:
        0.089771345 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089771345 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.008977135 = product of:
  0.044885673 = sum of:
    0.044885673 = product of:
      0.089771345 = sum of:
        0.089771345 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089771345 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  9. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.01 
    0.0078549925 = product of:
  0.03927496 = sum of:
    0.03927496 = product of:
      0.07854992 = sum of:
        0.07854992 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07854992 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  10. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0078549925 = product of:
  0.03927496 = sum of:
    0.03927496 = product of:
      0.07854992 = sum of:
        0.07854992 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07854992 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  11. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.01 
    0.0078549925 = product of:
  0.03927496 = sum of:
    0.03927496 = product of:
      0.07854992 = sum of:
        0.07854992 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07854992 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  12. Strobel, S.; Marín-Arraiza, P.: Metadata for scientific audiovisual media : current practices and perspectives of the TIB / AV-portal (2015) 0.01 
    0.007717067 = product of:
  0.038585335 = sum of:
    0.038585335 = product of:
      0.07717067 = sum of:
        0.07717067 = weight(_text_:german in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07717067 = score(doc=3667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Descriptive metadata play a key role in finding relevant search results in large amounts of unstructured data. However, current scientific audiovisual media are provided with little metadata, which makes them hard to find, let alone individual sequences. In this paper, the TIB / AV-Portal is presented as a use case where methods concerning the automatic generation of metadata, a semantic search and cross-lingual retrieval (German/English) have already been applied. These methods result in a better discoverability of the scientific audiovisual media hosted in the portal. Text, speech, and image content of the video are automatically indexed by specialised GND (Gemeinsame Normdatei) subject headings. A semantic search is established based on properties of the GND ontology. The cross-lingual retrieval uses English 'translations' that were derived by an ontology mapping (DBpedia i. a.). Further ways of increasing the discoverability and reuse of the metadata are publishing them as Linked Open Data and interlinking them with other data sets.
  13. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.01 
    0.006732851 = product of:
  0.033664253 = sum of:
    0.033664253 = product of:
      0.067328505 = sum of:
        0.067328505 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067328505 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  14. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01 
    0.0063477927 = product of:
  0.031738963 = sum of:
    0.031738963 = product of:
      0.063477926 = sum of:
        0.063477926 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063477926 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  15. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01 
    0.0063477927 = product of:
  0.031738963 = sum of:
    0.031738963 = product of:
      0.063477926 = sum of:
        0.063477926 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063477926 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  16. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.01 
    0.005610709 = product of:
  0.028053544 = sum of:
    0.028053544 = product of:
      0.05610709 = sum of:
        0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05610709 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
  17. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.01 
    0.005610709 = product of:
  0.028053544 = sum of:
    0.028053544 = product of:
      0.05610709 = sum of:
        0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05610709 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  18. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.01 
    0.005610709 = product of:
  0.028053544 = sum of:
    0.028053544 = product of:
      0.05610709 = sum of:
        0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05610709 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  19. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.01 
    0.005610709 = product of:
  0.028053544 = sum of:
    0.028053544 = product of:
      0.05610709 = sum of:
        0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05610709 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  20. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.01 
    0.005610709 = product of:
  0.028053544 = sum of:
    0.028053544 = product of:
      0.05610709 = sum of:
        0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05610709 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041411664 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 79
  • d 10
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 83
  • el 7
  • s 6
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications