Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Busch-Lauer, I.-A.: Abstracts in German medical journals : a linguistic analysis (1995) 0.03
    0.026464028 = product of:
      0.13232014 = sum of:
        0.13232014 = product of:
          0.26464027 = sum of:
            0.26464027 = weight(_text_:german in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26464027 = score(doc=3677,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                1.100287 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Compares formats and linguistic devices of German abstracts and their English equivalents, written by German medical scholars to English native speakers. The source is 20 abstracts taken from German medical journals representing different degrees of specialism. The analysis includes: the overall length of articles/abstracts; the representation/arrangement of sections; the linguistic devices. Results show no correlation between the length of articles and the length of abstracts. In contrast to native speaking author abstracts, 'background information' predominated in the structure of the studied German non-native speaker abstracts, whereas 'purpose of study' and 'conclusions' were not clearly stated. In linguistic terms, the German abstracts frequently contained lexical hegdes, complex and enumerating sentence structure; passive voice and post tense as well as various types of linking structures
  2. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.01
    0.005610709 = product of:
      0.028053544 = sum of:
        0.028053544 = product of:
          0.05610709 = sum of:
            0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05610709 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  3. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.00
    0.0044885674 = product of:
      0.022442836 = sum of:
        0.022442836 = product of:
          0.044885673 = sum of:
            0.044885673 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044885673 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  4. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0033664254 = product of:
      0.016832126 = sum of:
        0.016832126 = product of:
          0.033664253 = sum of:
            0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033664253 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  5. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0033664254 = product of:
      0.016832126 = sum of:
        0.016832126 = product of:
          0.033664253 = sum of:
            0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033664253 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  6. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    0.0033664254 = product of:
      0.016832126 = sum of:
        0.016832126 = product of:
          0.033664253 = sum of:
            0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033664253 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  7. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.0028053545 = product of:
      0.014026772 = sum of:
        0.014026772 = product of:
          0.028053544 = sum of:
            0.028053544 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028053544 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041411664 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356