-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.23
0.23020446 = product of:
0.3836741 = sum of:
0.054810584 = product of:
0.16443175 = sum of:
0.16443175 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16443175 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35108855 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16443175 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16443175 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35108855 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.16443175 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16443175 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35108855 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Buchan, R.L.: Intertwining thesauri and dictionaries (1989)
0.07
0.070066296 = product of:
0.35033146 = sum of:
0.35033146 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35033146 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
1.2228994 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Evens, M.: Computer-readable dictionaries (1989)
0.07
0.070066296 = product of:
0.35033146 = sum of:
0.35033146 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 2184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35033146 = score(doc=2184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
1.2228994 = fieldWeight in 2184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2184)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Lesk, M.: Can machine readable dictionaries replace a thesaurus for searches in an online catalog? (1987)
0.05
0.05254972 = product of:
0.2627486 = sum of:
0.2627486 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2627486 = score(doc=3883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.9171746 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Crumb, L.N.: ¬The classification of biographical dictionaries in reference collections using the Library of Congress Classification System (1983)
0.05
0.04954435 = product of:
0.24772175 = sum of:
0.24772175 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24772175 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.86472046 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress classification system distributes biographical works throughout the collection, a result of questionable desirability for reference collections. A practical method for bringing biographical dictionaries together in one section of the reference shelves is the use of alternative class numbers printed in the CT schedule. The application of this method by the Library of the University of WisconsinParkside is discussed as a case study.
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.03
0.0345815 = product of:
0.08645375 = sum of:
0.07663501 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07663501 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.26750925 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.00981874 = product of:
0.01963748 = sum of:
0.01963748 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01963748 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
-
Scharmann, U.: Anwendung der Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK) in öffentlichen Bibliotheken. Abschlußbericht zum dbi-Projekt 11.35 (1989)
0.03
0.032925446 = product of:
0.16462722 = sum of:
0.16462722 = sum of:
0.13096297 = weight(_text_:german in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13096297 = score(doc=203,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.5445008 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664253 = score(doc=203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 5.2007 12:07:51
- LCSH
- Subject headings, German
- Subject
- Subject headings, German
-
Grogan, D.: Grogan's case studies in reference work : Vol.1-6 (1987)
0.03
0.030654004 = product of:
0.15327002 = sum of:
0.15327002 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15327002 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.5350185 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Vol.1: Enquiries and the reference process. 96 S. - Vol.2: Encyclopedias, yearbooks, directories and statistical sources. 184 S. - Vol.3: Bibliographies of books. 104 S. - Vol.4: Periodicals and their guides. 136 S. - Vol.5: Dictionaries and phrase books. 160 S. - Vol.6: Biographical source. 160 S.
-
Miller, J.: From subject headings for audiovisual media (1988)
0.03
0.025253816 = product of:
0.12626907 = sum of:
0.12626907 = sum of:
0.092604816 = weight(_text_:german in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092604816 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38502026 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664253 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In subject cataloging of audiovisual materials generic terms like 'documentary' or 'absolute film' facilitate the work of users and librarians. On the concrete level the study shows 4 ways to make a list of generic terms for the application in general libraries. The heuristic function of the study is to offer methods towards the solution of problems in the field of subject cataloguing of non-book materials. (1) The formal subject heading in library science corresponds to generic terms; Anglo-American and German rules for subject cataloging, however, provide no list that is directly applicable. (2) The terminology of institutions administering many audiovisual documents has been examined; general libraries have to find a common denominator with medium depth of classification and balanced representation of fiction and nonfiction terms. (3) From encyclopedic definitions of generic terms 8 dimensions have been extracted characterizing the terms in question individually. (4) The contribution of communication science has been discussed explaining a research project
- Source
- Inspel. 22(1988), S.121-145
-
Pflug, G.: Classification in the libraries of the German Federal Republic (1982)
0.02
0.024694616 = product of:
0.12347308 = sum of:
0.12347308 = product of:
0.24694616 = sum of:
0.24694616 = weight(_text_:german in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24694616 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
1.0267206 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Cullars, J.: Citation characteristics of French and German literary monographs (1989)
0.02
0.024694616 = product of:
0.12347308 = sum of:
0.12347308 = product of:
0.24694616 = sum of:
0.24694616 = weight(_text_:german in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24694616 = score(doc=2985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
1.0267206 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Nohr, H.: Subject access in german-language OPACs : a survey (1989)
0.02
0.024694616 = product of:
0.12347308 = sum of:
0.12347308 = product of:
0.24694616 = sum of:
0.24694616 = weight(_text_:german in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24694616 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
1.0267206 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Buchbinder, R.: Bibliographical databases in German-speaking countries (1988)
0.02
0.024158245 = product of:
0.12079122 = sum of:
0.12079122 = product of:
0.24158244 = sum of:
0.24158244 = weight(_text_:german in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24158244 = score(doc=410,freq=10.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
1.00442 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This article contains a discussion of the bibliographical databases of the Federal Republic of Germany, the German Democratic Republic, Austria and German-speaking Switzerland. Along with the national bibliographies are included catalogs, union catalogs and centralized services insofar as they have national significance for each country. German-language book production is reported on in many bibliographical databases, at the moment predominantly in printed form. However, an increasing readiness for the production and use of databases in electronic form is noticeable. It is to be wished that the necessity of better and more economical use of bibliographical resources will lead to increasing coordination and cooperation in the German-speaking countries.
-
Böhle, K.; Riehm, U.: German fulltexts in working contexts : empirical findings on how end-users make use of fulltext databases (1989)
0.02
0.01746173 = product of:
0.08730865 = sum of:
0.08730865 = product of:
0.1746173 = sum of:
0.1746173 = weight(_text_:german in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1746173 = score(doc=2877,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.72600114 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Reports the result of a brief review of West German full text data bases and a user survey of over 40 users in the fields of medicine, law and economics. Questions common assumptions about the advantages and disadvantages of full text data bases.
-
Schmidmaier, D.: Transition from school to technological university-what assistance may be offered by a librarian : experiences in the GDR (1989)
0.01
0.012347308 = product of:
0.06173654 = sum of:
0.06173654 = product of:
0.12347308 = sum of:
0.12347308 = weight(_text_:german in 1509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12347308 = score(doc=1509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.5133603 = fieldWeight in 1509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Contribution to an issue on technological university libraries in East europe. Discusses an approach adopted by technological university libraries in East Germany towards new students. Discusses the following aspects of this approach: the library atmosphere and guidance systems, quality of service offered; motivation of new students; organisation of leisure time; and seeking a closer relationship with the student in a specific subject area. Lists 3 tendencies in the work of East German technological university libraries.
-
Hoffmann, G.; Thüringer, P.: Kontroll- und Prüfverfahren beim Aufbau der Datenbank "Systematischer Katalog-Musikalien" (1988)
0.01
0.012347308 = product of:
0.06173654 = sum of:
0.06173654 = product of:
0.12347308 = sum of:
0.12347308 = weight(_text_:german in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12347308 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.5133603 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- It is important to ensure data integrity, consistency and safety in a new data bank. The Systematischer Katalog-Musikalien (The Classified Catalogue of Musical Scores) in the music department of the Deutsche Staatsbibliothek (East German national library) was first produced in computerised form over a year ago. The programme permits many automated checks and controls concerning the correctness and completeness of stored data. Other checking procedures are performed by staff at the keyboard. At present the data bank contains over 3.000 entries for composers, titles and subjects.
-
Poetzsch, E.: Vorstellungen zum Aufbau des Auskunftsdienstes "Informationen zur Biotechnologie" (1988)
0.01
0.012347308 = product of:
0.06173654 = sum of:
0.06173654 = product of:
0.12347308 = sum of:
0.12347308 = weight(_text_:german in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12347308 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24051933 = queryWeight, product of:
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.5133603 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Examines the development of a pilot programme for a biotechnology information service, covering the impor-tance of biotechnology as a key technology, and the responsibility of the East German Academy of Sciences for coordinating activities in the information field. Looks at a model that is also useful for the development of information services in other areas.
-
Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981)
0.01
0.011221418 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = product of:
0.11221418 = sum of:
0.11221418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11221418 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
-
Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988)
0.01
0.011221418 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = product of:
0.11221418 = sum of:
0.11221418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11221418 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
-
Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983)
0.01
0.011221418 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = product of:
0.11221418 = sum of:
0.11221418 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11221418 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
