Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Joint, N.: Bemused by bibliometrics : using citation analysis to evaluate research quality (2008) 0.03
    0.029595422 = product of:
      0.059190843 = sum of:
        0.059190843 = product of:
          0.11838169 = sum of:
            0.11838169 = weight(_text_:opinion in 1900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11838169 = score(doc=1900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 1900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the way in which library and information science (LIS) issues have been handled in the formulation of recent UK Higher Education policy concerned with research quality evaluation. Design/methodology/approach - A chronological review of decision making about digital rights arrangements for the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), and of recent announcements about the new shape of metrics-based assessment in the Research Excellence Framework, which supersedes the RAE. Against this chronological framework, the likely nature of LIS practitioner reactions to the flow of decision making is suggested. Findings - It was found that a weak grasp of LIS issues by decision makers undermines the process whereby effective research evaluation models are created. LIS professional opinion should be sampled before key decisions are made. Research limitations/implications - This paper makes no sophisticated comments on the complex research issues underlying advanced bibliometric research evaluation models. It does point out that sophisticated and expensive bibliometric consultancies arrive at many conclusions about metrics-based research assessment that are common knowledge amongst LIS practitioners. Practical implications - Practical difficulties arise when one announces a decision to move to a new and specific type of research evaluation indicator before one has worked out anything very specific about that indicator. Originality/value - In this paper, the importance of information management issues to the mainstream issues of government and public administration is underlined. The most valuable conclusion of this paper is that, because LIS issues are now at the heart of democratic decision making, LIS practitioners and professionals should be given some sort of role in advising on such matters.
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.02707463 = product of:
      0.05414926 = sum of:
        0.05414926 = product of:
          0.10829852 = sum of:
            0.10829852 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10829852 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  3. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.03
    0.02707463 = product of:
      0.05414926 = sum of:
        0.05414926 = product of:
          0.10829852 = sum of:
            0.10829852 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10829852 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.023930816 = product of:
      0.047861632 = sum of:
        0.047861632 = product of:
          0.095723264 = sum of:
            0.095723264 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095723264 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.014358492 = product of:
      0.028716983 = sum of:
        0.028716983 = product of:
          0.057433967 = sum of:
            0.057433967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057433967 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  6. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.013537315 = product of:
      0.02707463 = sum of:
        0.02707463 = product of:
          0.05414926 = sum of:
            0.05414926 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05414926 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  7. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01
    0.01184515 = product of:
      0.0236903 = sum of:
        0.0236903 = product of:
          0.0473806 = sum of:
            0.0473806 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0473806 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01
    0.01184515 = product of:
      0.0236903 = sum of:
        0.0236903 = product of:
          0.0473806 = sum of:
            0.0473806 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0473806 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  9. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.01184515 = product of:
      0.0236903 = sum of:
        0.0236903 = product of:
          0.0473806 = sum of:
            0.0473806 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0473806 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  10. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01
    0.010152985 = product of:
      0.02030597 = sum of:
        0.02030597 = product of:
          0.04061194 = sum of:
            0.04061194 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04061194 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  11. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01
    0.010152985 = product of:
      0.02030597 = sum of:
        0.02030597 = product of:
          0.04061194 = sum of:
            0.04061194 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04061194 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  12. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.010152985 = product of:
      0.02030597 = sum of:
        0.02030597 = product of:
          0.04061194 = sum of:
            0.04061194 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04061194 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  13. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.010152985 = product of:
      0.02030597 = sum of:
        0.02030597 = product of:
          0.04061194 = sum of:
            0.04061194 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04061194 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  14. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.010152985 = product of:
      0.02030597 = sum of:
        0.02030597 = product of:
          0.04061194 = sum of:
            0.04061194 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04061194 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  15. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01
    0.010152985 = product of:
      0.02030597 = sum of:
        0.02030597 = product of:
          0.04061194 = sum of:
            0.04061194 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04061194 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  16. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.0067686574 = product of:
      0.013537315 = sum of:
        0.013537315 = product of:
          0.02707463 = sum of:
            0.02707463 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02707463 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35