-
Kruk, S.R.; McDaniel, B.: Conclusions: The future of semantic digital libraries (2009)
0.04
0.041433595 = product of:
0.08286719 = sum of:
0.08286719 = product of:
0.16573438 = sum of:
0.16573438 = weight(_text_:opinion in 3372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16573438 = score(doc=3372,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.50652874 = fieldWeight in 3372, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3372)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Through out this book we showed that Semantic Digital Libraries are no longer an abstract concept; we have presented both underlying technologies, examples of semantic digital libraries, and their applications. However, the bright future of this technology only begins, and we expect more and more genuine applications of semantic digital libraries to emerge. In this section we will spotlight on three of, in our opinion, the most promising of applications: semantic museums, eLearning 2.0, and semantic digital libraries in enterprises.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.04
0.039673496 = product of:
0.07934699 = sum of:
0.07934699 = product of:
0.23804097 = sum of:
0.23804097 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23804097 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42354685 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Sperber, W.; Ion, P.D.F.: Content analysis and classification in mathematics (2011)
0.04
0.035514507 = product of:
0.071029015 = sum of:
0.071029015 = product of:
0.14205803 = sum of:
0.14205803 = weight(_text_:opinion in 4818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14205803 = score(doc=4818,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 4818, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4818)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The number of publications in mathematics increases faster each year. Presently far more than 100,000 mathematically relevant journal articles and books are published annually. Efficient and high-quality content analysis of this material is important for mathematical bibliographic services such as ZBMath or MathSciNet. Content analysis has different facets and levels: classification, keywords, abstracts and reviews, and (in the future) formula analysis. It is the opinion of the authors that the different levels have to be enhanced and combined using the methods and technology of the Semantic Web. In the presentation, the problems and deficits of the existing methods and tools, the state of the art and current activities are discussed. As a first step, the Mathematical Subject Classification Scheme (MSC), has been encoded with Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) and Resource Description Framework (RDF) at its recent revision to MSC2010. The use of SKOS principally opens new possibilities for the enrichment and wider deployment of this classification scheme and for machine-based content analysis of mathematical publications.
-
Riss, U.V.: Knowledge and action between abstraction and concretion (2014)
0.03
0.029595422 = product of:
0.059190843 = sum of:
0.059190843 = product of:
0.11838169 = sum of:
0.11838169 = weight(_text_:opinion in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11838169 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.3618062 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The management of knowledge is considered to be one of the most important factors in economic growth today. However, the question of how to deal with knowledge in the most efficient way is still far from answered. We observe two fundamentally different approaches to the question of how we should deal with knowledge. One view sees knowledge as a kind of static object that can be gathered, compiled and distributed; the other view regards knowledge as a dynamic process. This disaccord finds a parallel in an objective-subjective distinction where the first position sees knowledge as independent of personal opinion whereas the second position regards it as interpretative. These discussions are not merely academic but crucially influence the way that knowledge management (KM) is realized, i.e. whether the focus is placed on knowledge artefacts such as documents or on subjective acts. The particular interest of the current essay concerns the question of how KM can be supported by information technology (IT) and which are the fundamental structures that must be regarded. Traditionally, IT-based approaches favour an object-oriented view of knowledge since knowledge artefacts are the objects that can be best processed by IT systems. This even leads to the view that knowledge artefacts represent the only form of knowledge. On the philosophical side this perspective is fostered by analytical investigations that emphasize the primacy of propositional knowledge that is closely related to knowledge artefacts.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.03
0.026448999 = product of:
0.052897997 = sum of:
0.052897997 = product of:
0.15869398 = sum of:
0.15869398 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15869398 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42354685 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.03
0.026448999 = product of:
0.052897997 = sum of:
0.052897997 = product of:
0.15869398 = sum of:
0.15869398 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15869398 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42354685 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Schwarz, K.: Domain model enhanced search : a comparison of taxonomy, thesaurus and ontology (2005)
0.02
0.023676338 = product of:
0.047352675 = sum of:
0.047352675 = product of:
0.09470535 = sum of:
0.09470535 = weight(_text_:opinion in 4569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09470535 = score(doc=4569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.28944498 = fieldWeight in 4569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4569)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The results of this thesis are intended to support the information architect in designing a solution for improved search in a corporate environment. Specifically we have examined the type of search problems that require a domain model to enhance the search process. There are several approaches to modeling a domain. We have considered 3 different types of domain modeling schemes; taxonomy, thesaurus and ontology. The intention is to support the information architect in making an informed choice between one or more of these schemes. In our opinion the main criteria for this choice are the modeling characteristics of a scheme and the suitability for application in the search process. The second chapter is a discussion of modeling characteristics of each scheme, followed by a comparison between them. This should give an information architect an idea of which aspects of a domain can be modeled with each scheme. What is missing here is an indication of the effort required to model a domain with each scheme. There are too many factors that influence the amount of required effort, ranging from measurable factors like domain size and resource characteristics to cultural matters such as the willingness to share knowledge and the existence of a project champion in the team to keep the project running. The third chapter shows what role domain models can play in each part of the search process. This gives an idea of the problems that domain models can solve. We have split the search process into individual parts to show that domain models can be applied very differently in the process. The fourth chapter makes recommendations about the suitability of each individualdomain modeling scheme for improving search. Each scheme has particular characteristics that make it especially suitable for a domain or a search problem. In the appendix each case study is described in detail. These descriptions are intended to serve as a benchmark. The current problem of the enterprise can be compared to those described to see which case study is most similar, which solution was chosen, which problems arose and how they were dealt with. An important issue that we have not touched upon in this thesis is that of maintenance. The real problems of a domain model are revealed when it is applied in a search system and its deficits and wrong assumptions become clear. Adaptation and maintenance are always required. Unfortunately we have not been able to glean sufficient information about maintenance issues from our case studies to draw any meaningful conclusions.
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.02
0.016921643 = product of:
0.033843286 = sum of:
0.033843286 = product of:
0.06768657 = sum of:
0.06768657 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06768657 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.11-22
-
Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017)
0.02
0.016921643 = product of:
0.033843286 = sum of:
0.033843286 = product of:
0.06768657 = sum of:
0.06768657 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06768657 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13.12.2017 14:17:22
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.016921643 = product of:
0.033843286 = sum of:
0.033843286 = product of:
0.06768657 = sum of:
0.06768657 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06768657 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002)
0.02
0.016921643 = product of:
0.033843286 = sum of:
0.033843286 = product of:
0.06768657 = sum of:
0.06768657 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06768657 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 5.2010 16:22:35
-
Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018)
0.02
0.016921643 = product of:
0.033843286 = sum of:
0.033843286 = product of:
0.06768657 = sum of:
0.06768657 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06768657 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
-
Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015)
0.01
0.014358492 = product of:
0.028716983 = sum of:
0.028716983 = product of:
0.057433967 = sum of:
0.057433967 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057433967 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56
-
Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009)
0.01
0.013537315 = product of:
0.02707463 = sum of:
0.02707463 = product of:
0.05414926 = sum of:
0.05414926 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05414926 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2010 16:58:22
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.01
0.013537315 = product of:
0.02707463 = sum of:
0.02707463 = product of:
0.05414926 = sum of:
0.05414926 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05414926 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997)
0.01
0.013537315 = product of:
0.02707463 = sum of:
0.02707463 = product of:
0.05414926 = sum of:
0.05414926 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05414926 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1.10.2018 14:13:22
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021)
0.01
0.013537315 = product of:
0.02707463 = sum of:
0.02707463 = product of:
0.05414926 = sum of:
0.05414926 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05414926 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.01
0.01184515 = product of:
0.0236903 = sum of:
0.0236903 = product of:
0.0473806 = sum of:
0.0473806 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0473806 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.01
0.01184515 = product of:
0.0236903 = sum of:
0.0236903 = product of:
0.0473806 = sum of:
0.0473806 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0473806 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
-
Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010)
0.01
0.01184515 = product of:
0.0236903 = sum of:
0.0236903 = product of:
0.0473806 = sum of:
0.0473806 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0473806 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04995828 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:41:16
