Search (1382 results, page 1 of 70)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Lavine, H.: ¬A cognitive-social theory of public opinion : dynamic social impact and cognitive structure (1996) 0.08
    0.08201725 = product of:
      0.1640345 = sum of:
        0.1640345 = product of:
          0.328069 = sum of:
            0.328069 = weight(_text_:opinion in 7358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.328069 = score(doc=7358,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                1.002667 = fieldWeight in 7358, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes 2 theories to explain the development and structural organization of public opinion. They integrate dynamic social impact theory (DSIT), work on interattitudinal structure, and parallel constraint satisfaction processes in connectionist models of cognition. Sketches a dynamic theory of cognitive impact, and reviews DSIT. Presents an integrated cognitive social model of the processes through which public opinion develops and dynamically changes over time
  2. Wiench, P.: Internet in Poland : conflict of interests between users and providers (1996) 0.05
    0.047352675 = product of:
      0.09470535 = sum of:
        0.09470535 = product of:
          0.1894107 = sum of:
            0.1894107 = weight(_text_:opinion in 6270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1894107 = score(doc=6270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.57888997 = fieldWeight in 6270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the process of development of the Internet in Poland and formation of the community of Internet users. A short case study of the conflict between Internet users and providers shows the potential role of the Internet in mobilizing public opinion
  3. Simpson, A.E.: Information-finding and the education of scholars : reaching electronic access in disciplinary context (1998) 0.05
    0.047352675 = product of:
      0.09470535 = sum of:
        0.09470535 = product of:
          0.1894107 = sum of:
            0.1894107 = weight(_text_:opinion in 3273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1894107 = score(doc=3273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.57888997 = fieldWeight in 3273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Supports the current opinion and practice concerning extending bibliographic instruction (BI) in academic libraries to larger forms of electronic access. However, the BI model of offering isolated classes is inappropriate - it ignores the fact that information finding is best taught as part of the broader scholarly process and the reality that exposure to systems like the WWW is increasingly initiated in academic courses. Presents an argument for a team-teaching model of information finding instruction, stressing the needs of doctoral students
  4. Westin, A.F.; Finger, A.L.: Using the public library in the computer age : present patterns, future possibilities (1991) 0.05
    0.047352675 = product of:
      0.09470535 = sum of:
        0.09470535 = product of:
          0.1894107 = sum of:
            0.1894107 = weight(_text_:opinion in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1894107 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.57888997 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    A National public opinion survey report by the Reference Point Foundation, in cooperation with the American Library Association. Based on data from a 1990 national survey by Louis Harris and Associates, Consumers in the Information Age, sponsored by Equifax Inc.
  5. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing standards : Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother? (1993) 0.04
    0.041433595 = product of:
      0.08286719 = sum of:
        0.08286719 = product of:
          0.16573438 = sum of:
            0.16573438 = weight(_text_:opinion in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16573438 = score(doc=8087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.50652874 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibility and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. Describes the current draft of the NISO American Standard Guidelines for indexes in information retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of 3 fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management and comprehensive planning and design. Concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
  6. Anderson, J.D.: Standards for indexing : revising the American National Standard guidelines Z39.4 (1994) 0.04
    0.041433595 = product of:
      0.08286719 = sum of:
        0.08286719 = product of:
          0.16573438 = sum of:
            0.16573438 = weight(_text_:opinion in 8266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16573438 = score(doc=8266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.50652874 = fieldWeight in 8266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibiliy and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. it describes the current draft of the NISO American Standards Guidelines for Indexes in Information Retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of three fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management, and comprehensive planning and design. The article concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
  7. Bourne, R.: Standards: who needs them? (1994) 0.04
    0.041433595 = product of:
      0.08286719 = sum of:
        0.08286719 = product of:
          0.16573438 = sum of:
            0.16573438 = weight(_text_:opinion in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16573438 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.50652874 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the role of the British Standards Institution (BSI) in formulating bibliographic standards. Outline how library stanbdards have developed and why librarians need to standardize. The democratic aspect of BSI's work has been adversely affected by its 1990 decision to move its IT related activities to a new body; Delivery Information Solutions to Customers through International Standars (Disc), which operates on the basis of standards being formulated only by those prepared to pay a separate subscription. Questions whether BSI is the most appropriate body to serve the interest of the library and information services community. Proposes an alternative standards umbrella that would be better informed and more representative on LIS matters, and canvasses opinion as th whether the UK Library Association could handle standards work on behalf of BSI
  8. Galvin, T.J.: Convergence or divergence in education for the information professions : an opinion paper (1995) 0.04
    0.041433595 = product of:
      0.08286719 = sum of:
        0.08286719 = product of:
          0.16573438 = sum of:
            0.16573438 = weight(_text_:opinion in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16573438 = score(doc=2097,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.50652874 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Wiberley, S.E.; Daugherty, R.A.; Danowski, J.A.: User persistence in displaying online catalog postings : LUIS (1995) 0.04
    0.041433595 = product of:
      0.08286719 = sum of:
        0.08286719 = product of:
          0.16573438 = sum of:
            0.16573438 = weight(_text_:opinion in 3695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16573438 = score(doc=3695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.50652874 = fieldWeight in 3695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    User persistence in displaying postings is a significant human factor in the design of computer driven information systems, including online catalogs. Expert opinion and a study of users of a first generation online catalogue have suggested that users normally display no more than 30 to 35 postings. A follow up study on a second generation system with a larger database found that a greater proportion of users reported overload, but 100 postings (rather than 15) were considered 'too many'. Partially persistent users typically displayed 28 postings, but overloaded uses did not outnumber totally persistent users until postings retrieved exceeded 200. The findings suggest that, given sufficient resources, designers should still consider 30 to 35 postings typical persistence, but also justify treating 100 or 200 postings as a common threshold of overload
  10. Bainbrifge, D.I.: Copyright in relation to electronic publishing in the humanities (1995) 0.04
    0.041433595 = product of:
      0.08286719 = sum of:
        0.08286719 = product of:
          0.16573438 = sum of:
            0.16573438 = weight(_text_:opinion in 6669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16573438 = score(doc=6669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.50652874 = fieldWeight in 6669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the basic principles of copyright law with particular reference to electronic media or any materials that are transmitted electronically. Considers the European Community (EC) directives and proposals affecting electronic publishing. Discusses copyright problems relating to electronic works and the legal liability of facilitators. Comments on the opinion, held by some commentators, that the mass transposition of all manner of published works to electronic storage will create insuperable problems for intellectual property rights and that copyright law will collapse
  11. Uyttendaele, C.; Moens, M.-F.; Dumortier, J.: SALOMON: automatic abstracting of legal cases for effective access to court decisions (1998) 0.04
    0.041433595 = product of:
      0.08286719 = sum of:
        0.08286719 = product of:
          0.16573438 = sum of:
            0.16573438 = weight(_text_:opinion in 495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16573438 = score(doc=495,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.50652874 = fieldWeight in 495, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The SALOMON project summarises Belgian criminal cases in order to improve access to the large number of existing and future cases. A double methodology was used when developing SALOMON: the cases are processed by employing additional knowledge to interpret structural patterns and features on the one hand and by way of occurrence statistics of index terms on the other. SALOMON performs an initial categorisation and structuring of the cases and subsequently extracts the most relevant text units of the alleged offences and of the opinion of the court. The SALOMON techniques do not themselves solve any legal questions, but they do guide the use effectively towards relevant texts
  12. Jascó, P.: Searching for images by similarity online (1998) 0.04
    0.03828931 = product of:
      0.07657862 = sum of:
        0.07657862 = product of:
          0.15315723 = sum of:
            0.15315723 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15315723 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29.11.2004 13:03:22
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.99-102
  13. Lutz, H.: Back to business : was CompuServe Unternehmen bietet (1997) 0.04
    0.03828931 = product of:
      0.07657862 = sum of:
        0.07657862 = product of:
          0.15315723 = sum of:
            0.15315723 = weight(_text_:22 in 6569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15315723 = score(doc=6569,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 6569, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6569)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:50:29
    Source
    Cogito. 1997, H.1, S.22-23
  14. Klauß, H.: SISIS : 10. Anwenderforum Berlin-Brandenburg (1999) 0.04
    0.03828931 = product of:
      0.07657862 = sum of:
        0.07657862 = product of:
          0.15315723 = sum of:
            0.15315723 = weight(_text_:22 in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15315723 = score(doc=463,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 10:22:52
  15. fwt: Wie das Gehirn Bilder 'liest' (1999) 0.04
    0.03828931 = product of:
      0.07657862 = sum of:
        0.07657862 = product of:
          0.15315723 = sum of:
            0.15315723 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15315723 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:01:22
  16. Winterhoff-Spurk, P.: Auf dem Weg in die mediale Klassengesellschaft : Psychologische Beiträge zur Wissenskluft-Forschung (1999) 0.04
    0.03828931 = product of:
      0.07657862 = sum of:
        0.07657862 = product of:
          0.15315723 = sum of:
            0.15315723 = weight(_text_:22 in 4130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15315723 = score(doc=4130,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4130, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.11.1999 19:22:39
    Source
    Medien praktisch. 1999, H.3, S.17-22
  17. Amac, T.: Linguistic context analysis : a new approach to communication evaluation (1997) 0.04
    0.035514507 = product of:
      0.071029015 = sum of:
        0.071029015 = product of:
          0.14205803 = sum of:
            0.14205803 = weight(_text_:opinion in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14205803 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3271964 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.43416747 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.5493927 = idf(docFreq=171, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that the integration of computational psycholinguistics can improve corporate communication, and thus become a new strategic tool. An electronic dictionary was created of basic, neutral and negative connotations for nouns, verbs and adjectives appearing in press releases and other communication media, which can be updated with client specific words. The focus on negative messages has the objective of detecting who, why and how publics are criticized, to learn from the vocabulary of opinion leaders and to improve issues management proactively. Suggests a new form of analysis called 'computational linguistic context analysis' (CLCA) by analyzing nominal groups of negative words, rather than monitoring content analysis in the traditional way. Concludes that CLCA can be used to analyze large quantities of press cuttings about a company and could, theoretically, be used to analyze the structure, language and style of a particular journalist to whom it is planned to send a press release or article
  18. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.03
    0.033843286 = product of:
      0.06768657 = sum of:
        0.06768657 = product of:
          0.13537315 = sum of:
            0.13537315 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13537315 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  19. Serial cataloguing : modern perspectives and international developments (1992) 0.03
    0.033843286 = product of:
      0.06768657 = sum of:
        0.06768657 = product of:
          0.13537315 = sum of:
            0.13537315 = weight(_text_:22 in 3704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13537315 = score(doc=3704,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3704, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992), nos.3/4
  20. Smith, G.: Newspapers on CD-ROM (1992) 0.03
    0.033843286 = product of:
      0.06768657 = sum of:
        0.06768657 = product of:
          0.13537315 = sum of:
            0.13537315 = weight(_text_:22 in 6396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13537315 = score(doc=6396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17494538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04995828 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Serials. 5(1992) no.3, S.17-22

Languages

Types

  • a 1162
  • m 126
  • s 68
  • el 18
  • i 13
  • b 7
  • r 7
  • x 6
  • ? 5
  • d 3
  • p 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications