Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schlögl, C."
  1. Dreisiebner, S.; Schlögl, C.: Assessing disciplinary differences in information literacy teaching materials (2019) 0.02
    0.02071473 = product of:
      0.06214419 = sum of:
        0.06214419 = sum of:
          0.029885992 = weight(_text_:management in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029885992 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
          0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032258198 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.3, S.392-414
  2. Schlögl, C.: Datenmanagement in österreichischen Unternehmen : ein Branchenvergleich (1996) 0.01
    0.009961998 = product of:
      0.029885992 = sum of:
        0.029885992 = product of:
          0.059771985 = sum of:
            0.059771985 = weight(_text_:management in 6272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059771985 = score(doc=6272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 6272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  3. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.01
    0.007526913 = product of:
      0.02258074 = sum of:
        0.02258074 = product of:
          0.04516148 = sum of:
            0.04516148 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04516148 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  4. Schlögl, C.: Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft : Gegenstandsbereich und Perspektiven (2014) 0.01
    0.007526913 = product of:
      0.02258074 = sum of:
        0.02258074 = product of:
          0.04516148 = sum of:
            0.04516148 = weight(_text_:22 in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04516148 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2017 18:04:28
  5. Schlögl, C.: Informationskompetenz am Beispiel einer szientometrischen Untersuchung zum Informationsmanagement (2000) 0.01
    0.0069733984 = product of:
      0.020920195 = sum of:
        0.020920195 = product of:
          0.04184039 = sum of:
            0.04184039 = weight(_text_:management in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04184039 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  6. Schlögl, C.: Perspektiven auf das Informationsmanagement : Eine empirische Untersuchung in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2003) 0.01
    0.0069733984 = product of:
      0.020920195 = sum of:
        0.020920195 = product of:
          0.04184039 = sum of:
            0.04184039 = weight(_text_:management in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04184039 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  7. Schlögl, C.; List, R,: Vergleiche von Zitaten, Downloads und Lesehäufigkeiten : am Beispiel von zwei Volkswirtschaftslehre-Zeitschriften (2018) 0.01
    0.0059771985 = product of:
      0.017931595 = sum of:
        0.017931595 = product of:
          0.03586319 = sum of:
            0.03586319 = weight(_text_:management in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03586319 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag untersuchen wir die Beziehung zwischen Zitaten, Downloads und sog. Lesehäufigkeiten des sozialen Literaturverwaltungssystems "Mendeley" anhand der beiden Volkswirtschaftslehre-Zeitschriften "Journal of Environ­mental Economics and Management" und "Journal of Financial Economics". Trotz Ähnlichkeiten bei den Häufig­keitsverteilungen, konnten wir großteils nur mittlere (Rang)Korrelationen zwischen den drei Zeitschriftenindikatoren berechnen. In den drei Top-10 Rankings kam es zur Überschneidung von nur drei Publikationen. Deutliche Unterschiede gibt es bei den Alters- und Nutzerstrukturen. Während der Großteil der Mendeley-Nutzer Studierende sind, ist der Anteil der Professoren relativ gering. Durch die Mendeley-Profile kann ermittelt werden, aus welchen Disziplinen die Leser einer Zeitschrift kommen. Dies lässt vor allem bei interdisziplinären Zeitschriften wie "Journal of Financial Economics" interessante Rückschlüsse zu. Ähnlich wie bei Zitaten, gibt es auch bei Downloads und Lesehäufigkeiten disziplinspezifische Unterschiede.

Languages

Types