-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.20
0.20168184 = product of:
0.30252275 = sum of:
0.07563069 = product of:
0.22689205 = sum of:
0.22689205 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22689205 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.22689205 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22689205 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.18
0.17622423 = product of:
0.26433635 = sum of:
0.05042046 = product of:
0.15126137 = sum of:
0.15126137 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15126137 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.21391588 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21391588 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.13
0.13445456 = product of:
0.20168184 = sum of:
0.05042046 = product of:
0.15126137 = sum of:
0.15126137 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15126137 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.15126137 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15126137 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Deokattey, S.; Neelameghan, A.; Kumar, V.: ¬A method for developing a domain ontology : a case study for a multidisciplinary subject (2010)
0.03
0.029000623 = product of:
0.08700187 = sum of:
0.08700187 = sum of:
0.04184039 = weight(_text_:management in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04184039 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.04516148 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04516148 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A method to develop a prototype domain ontology has been described. The domain selected for the study is Accelerator Driven Systems. This is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary subject comprising Nuclear Physics, Nuclear and Reactor Engineering, Reactor Fuels and Radioactive Waste Management. Since Accelerator Driven Systems is a vast topic, select areas in it were singled out for the study. Both qualitative and quantitative methods such as Content analysis, Facet analysis and Clustering were used, to develop the web-based model.
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:41:16
-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.02
0.024857676 = product of:
0.074573025 = sum of:
0.074573025 = sum of:
0.03586319 = weight(_text_:management in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03586319 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038709838 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
-
Kiren, T.; Shoaib, M.: ¬A novel ontology matching approach using key concepts (2016)
0.02
0.02071473 = product of:
0.06214419 = sum of:
0.06214419 = sum of:
0.029885992 = weight(_text_:management in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029885992 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 2589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032258198 = score(doc=2589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2589)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 68(2016) no.1, S.99-111
-
Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014)
0.02
0.016571786 = product of:
0.049715355 = sum of:
0.049715355 = sum of:
0.023908794 = weight(_text_:management in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023908794 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.02580656 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02580656 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.5, S.494-518
-
Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020)
0.02
0.016571786 = product of:
0.049715355 = sum of:
0.049715355 = sum of:
0.023908794 = weight(_text_:management in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023908794 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.02580656 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02580656 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.4, S.671-685
-
Davies, J.; Fensel, D.; Harmelen, F. van: Conclusions: ontology-driven knowledge management : towards the Semantic Web? (2004)
0.02
0.015939197 = product of:
0.047817588 = sum of:
0.047817588 = product of:
0.095635176 = sum of:
0.095635176 = weight(_text_:management in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095635176 = score(doc=4407,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The global economy is rapidly becoming more and more knowledge intensive. Knowledge is now widely recognized as the fourth production factor, on an equal footing with the traditional production factors of labour, capital and materials. Managing knowledge is as important as the traditional management of labour, capital and materials. In this book, we have shown how Semantic Web technology can make an important contribution to knowledge management.
- Source
- Towards the semantic Web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Eds.: J. Davies, u.a
-
Thenmalar, S.; Geetha, T.V.: Enhanced ontology-based indexing and searching (2014)
0.01
0.014500312 = product of:
0.043500934 = sum of:
0.043500934 = sum of:
0.020920195 = weight(_text_:management in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020920195 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.13034125 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.02258074 = weight(_text_:22 in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02258074 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.6, S.678-696
-
Fensel, D.; Staab, S.; Studer, R.; Harmelen, F. van; Davies, J.: ¬A future perspective : exploiting peer-to-peer and the Semantic Web for knowledge management (2004)
0.01
0.013946797 = product of:
0.04184039 = sum of:
0.04184039 = product of:
0.08368078 = sum of:
0.08368078 = weight(_text_:management in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08368078 = score(doc=2262,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Over the past few years, we have seen a growing interest in the potential of both peer-to-peer (P2P) computing and the use of more formal approaches to knowledge management, involving the development of ontologies. This penultimate chapter discusses possibilities that both approaches may offer for more effective and efficient knowledge management. In particular, we investigate how the two paradigms may be combined. In this chapter, we describe our vision in terms of a set of future steps that need to be taken to bring the results described in earlier chapters to their full potential.
- Source
- Towards the semantic Web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Eds.: J. Davies, u.a
-
Semantic applications (2018)
0.01
0.012200906 = product of:
0.036602717 = sum of:
0.036602717 = product of:
0.073205434 = sum of:
0.073205434 = weight(_text_:management in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073205434 = score(doc=5204,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Introduction.- Ontology Development.- Compliance using Metadata.- Variety Management for Big Data.- Text Mining in Economics.- Generation of Natural Language Texts.- Sentiment Analysis.- Building Concise Text Corpora from Web Contents.- Ontology-Based Modelling of Web Content.- Personalized Clinical Decision Support for Cancer Care.- Applications of Temporal Conceptual Semantic Systems.- Context-Aware Documentation in the Smart Factory.- Knowledge-Based Production Planning for Industry 4.0.- Information Exchange in Jurisdiction.- Supporting Automated License Clearing.- Managing cultural assets: Implementing typical cultural heritage archive's usage scenarios via Semantic Web technologies.- Semantic Applications for Process Management.- Domain-Specific Semantic Search Applications.
- LCSH
- Management information systems
Management of Computing and Information Systems
- Subject
- Management information systems
Management of Computing and Information Systems
-
Kiryakov, A.; Simov, K.; Ognyanov, D.: Ontology middleware and reasoning (2004)
0.01
0.011954397 = product of:
0.03586319 = sum of:
0.03586319 = product of:
0.07172638 = sum of:
0.07172638 = weight(_text_:management in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07172638 = score(doc=4410,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The ontology middleware discussed in this chapter can be seen as 'administrative' software infrastructure that makes the rest of the modules in a knowledge management toolset easier to integrate into real-world applications. The central issue is to make the methodology and modules available to society as a self-sufficient platform with mature support for development, management, maintenance, and use of middle-size and large knowledge bases. This chapter starts with an explanation of the required features of ontology middleware in the context of our knowledge management architecture and the terminology used In Section 11.2 the problem of versioning and tracking change is discussed. Section 11.3 presents the versioning model and its implementation that is developed in the project, and Section 11.4 describes the functionality of the instance reasoning module.
- Source
- Towards the semantic Web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Eds.: J. Davies, u.a
-
Semantic technologies in content management systems : trends, applications and evaluations (2012)
0.01
0.011270713 = product of:
0.03381214 = sum of:
0.03381214 = product of:
0.06762428 = sum of:
0.06762428 = weight(_text_:management in 4893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06762428 = score(doc=4893,freq=16.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.42132655 = fieldWeight in 4893, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4893)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Content Management Systems (CMSs) are used in almost every industry by millions of end-user organizations. In contrast to the 90s, they are no longer used as isolated applications in one organization but they support critical core operations in business ecosystems. Content management today is more interactive and more integrative: interactive because end-users are increasingly content creators themselves and integrative because content elements can be embedded into various other applications. The authors of this book investigate how Semantic Technologies can increase interactivity and integration capabilities of CMSs and discuss their business value to millions of end-user organizations. This book has therefore the objective, to reflect existing applications as well as to discuss and present new applications for CMSs that use Semantic Technologies. An evaluation of 27 CMSs concludes this book and provides a basis for IT executives that plan to adopt or replace a CMS in the near future.
- Content
- On the Changing Market for Content Management Systems: Status and Outlook - Wolfgang Maass Empowering the Distributed Editorial Workforce - Steve McNally The Rise of Semantic-aware Applications - Stéphane Croisier Simplified Semantic Enhancement of JCR-based Content Applications -Bertrand Delacretaz and Michael Marth Dynamic Semantic Publishing - Jem Rayfield Semantics in the Domain of eGovernment - Luis Alvarez Sabucedo and Luis Anido Rifón The Interactive Knowledge Stack (IKS): A Vision for the Future of CMS - Wernher Behrendt Essential Requirements for Semantic CMS - Valentina Presutti Evaluation of Content Management Systems - Tobias Kowatsch and Wolfgang Maass CMS with No Particular Industry Focus (versch. Beiträge)
- LCSH
- Management information systems
- Subject
- Management information systems
- Theme
- Content Management System
-
Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996)
0.01
0.010752733 = product of:
0.032258198 = sum of:
0.032258198 = product of:
0.064516395 = sum of:
0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064516395 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.11-22
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.01
0.010752733 = product of:
0.032258198 = sum of:
0.032258198 = product of:
0.064516395 = sum of:
0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064516395 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Sure, Y.; Studer, R.: ¬A methodology for ontology-based knowledge management (2004)
0.01
0.010352813 = product of:
0.031058436 = sum of:
0.031058436 = product of:
0.062116873 = sum of:
0.062116873 = weight(_text_:management in 4400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062116873 = score(doc=4400,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 4400, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Ontologies are a core element of the knowledge management architecture described in Chapter 1. In this chapter we describe a methodology for application driven ontology development, covering the whole project lifecycle from the kick off phase to the maintenance phase. Existing methodologies and practical ontology development experiences have in common that they start from the identification of the purpose of the ontology and the need for domain knowledge acquisition. They differ in their foci and following steps to be taken. In our approach of the ontology development process, we integrate aspects from existing methodologies and lessons learned from practical experience (as described in the Section 3.7). We put ontology development into a wider organizational context by performing an a priori feasibility study. The feasibility study is based on CommonKADS. We modified certain aspects of CommonKADS for a tight integration of the feasibility study into our methodology.
- Source
- Towards the semantic Web: ontology-driven knowledge management. Eds.: J. Davies, u.a
-
Uren, V.; Cimiano, P.; Iria, J.; Handschuh, S.; Vargas-Vera, M.; Motta, E.; Ciravegnac, F.: Semantic annotation for knowledge management : requirements and a survey of the state of the art (2006)
0.01
0.010352813 = product of:
0.031058436 = sum of:
0.031058436 = product of:
0.062116873 = sum of:
0.062116873 = weight(_text_:management in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062116873 = score(doc=229,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- While much of a company's knowledge can be found in text repositories, current content management systems have limited capabilities for structuring and interpreting documents. In the emerging Semantic Web, search, interpretation and aggregation can be addressed by ontology-based semantic mark-up. In this paper, we examine semantic annotation, identify a number of requirements, and review the current generation of semantic annotation systems. This analysis shows that, while there is still some way to go before semantic annotation tools will be able to address fully all the knowledge management needs, research in the area is active and making good progress.
-
Pepper, S.: ¬The TAO of topic maps : finding the way in the age of infoglut (2002)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 4724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=4724,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 4724, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4724)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Topic maps are a new ISO standard for describing knowledge structures and associating them with information resources. As such they constitute an enabling technology for knowledge management. Dubbed "the GPS of the information universe", topic maps are also destined to provide powerful new ways of navigating large and interconnected corpora. While it is possible to represent immensely complex structures using topic maps, the basic concepts of the model - Topics, Associations, and Occurrences (TAO) - are easily grasped. This paper provides a non-technical introduction to these and other concepts (the IFS and BUTS of topic maps), relating them to things that are familiar to all of us from the realms of publishing and information management, and attempting to convey some idea of the uses to which topic maps will be put in the future.
-
Information and communication technologies : international conference; proceedings / ICT 2010, Kochi, Kerala, India, September 7 - 9, 2010 (2010)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 4784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=4784,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 4784, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4784)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- LCSH
- Database management
- Subject
- Database management
