Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.03
    0.029000623 = product of:
      0.08700187 = sum of:
        0.08700187 = sum of:
          0.04184039 = weight(_text_:management in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04184039 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.04516148 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04516148 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Survey on the activities going to develop the UDC into a fully faceted classification system according to the Recommendations of the UDC Management Board. A Master Reference File (MRF) has been created from which any publisher or insitution may develop its own versions according to the requests of its clientele. The UDC Technical Director at the FID Headquarters in The Hague maintains the file. An Editorial Board and an Editor in Chief was appointed. Extensions and Corrections are being published. Examples are given on ongoing revision work in the classes for Astronomy, Linguistics and Philology as well as in Medicine. Cooperation with the Editors of the Bliss Classification and the DDC exists
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
  2. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.008602187 = product of:
      0.02580656 = sum of:
        0.02580656 = product of:
          0.05161312 = sum of:
            0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05161312 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  3. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997) 0.01
    0.007044196 = product of:
      0.021132588 = sum of:
        0.021132588 = product of:
          0.042265177 = sum of:
            0.042265177 = weight(_text_:management in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042265177 = score(doc=141,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the bibliographic enterprise envisaged by Otlet and LaFontaine, which resulted in the UDC being developed in 1895, and the subsequent history of the scheme. Relationship with DDC from which it was derived deteriorated in the early 20th century and changes in funding, location, and editorship of Duyvis from 1929-59 had a profound effect on the scheme's development and management. Lloyd, Duyvis successor, reformed the revision structure, and further management changes from 1975 to the present day, culminated in the formation of the UDC Consortium in 1992. Notes the subsequent creation of a machine-readable Master Reference File and speedier revision procedures. Examines the scheme's structure, development, and influence on classification theory, problems caused by longevity and lack of standrad procedures, and highlights proposals for their reform to improve the scheme's suitability for an automated world. Explores research projects in 1960s which foreshadowed possibilities today, such as a complementary thesaurus and individualisation of single concepts notationally. Emphasizes the value of classification in a multilingual environment and outlines the future developments