-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.04
0.039634123 = product of:
0.11890237 = sum of:
0.11890237 = sum of:
0.080192536 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080192536 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038709838 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Hooland, S. van; Bontemps, Y.; Kaufman, S.: Answering the call for more accountability : applying data profiling to museum metadata (2008)
0.02
0.024857676 = product of:
0.074573025 = sum of:
0.074573025 = sum of:
0.03586319 = weight(_text_:management in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03586319 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038709838 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although the issue of metadata quality is recognized as an important topic within the metadata research community, the cultural heritage sector has been slow to develop methodologies, guidelines and tools for addressing this topic in practice. This paper concentrates on metadata quality specifically within the museum sector and describes the potential of data-profiling techniques for metadata quality evaluation. A case study illustrates the application of a generalpurpose data-profiling tool on a large collection of metadata records from an ethnographic collection. After an analysis of the results of the case-study the paper reviews further steps in our research and presents the implementation of a metadata quality tool within an open-source collection management software.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008)
0.02
0.02071473 = product of:
0.06214419 = sum of:
0.06214419 = sum of:
0.029885992 = weight(_text_:management in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029885992 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032258198 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999)
0.02
0.019723749 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = product of:
0.11834249 = sum of:
0.11834249 = weight(_text_:management in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11834249 = score(doc=1915,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information management report. 1999, Dec., S.16-18
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.02
0.017204374 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = product of:
0.10322624 = sum of:
0.10322624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10322624 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.017204374 = product of:
0.05161312 = sum of:
0.05161312 = product of:
0.10322624 = sum of:
0.10322624 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10322624 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Philips, J.T.: Metadata - information about electronic records (1995)
0.02
0.015939197 = product of:
0.047817588 = sum of:
0.047817588 = product of:
0.095635176 = sum of:
0.095635176 = weight(_text_:management in 4556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095635176 = score(doc=4556,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4556, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4556)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata is a term to describe the information required to documents the characteristics of information contained within databases. Describes the elements that make up metadata. A number of software tools exist to help apply document management principles to electronic records but they have, so far, been inadequately applied. Describes 2 initiative currently under way to develop software to automate many records management functions. Understanding document management principles as applied to electronic records are vital to records managers
- Source
- Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.53-55
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.015053826 = product of:
0.04516148 = sum of:
0.04516148 = product of:
0.09032296 = sum of:
0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09032296 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.015053826 = product of:
0.04516148 = sum of:
0.04516148 = product of:
0.09032296 = sum of:
0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09032296 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.015053826 = product of:
0.04516148 = sum of:
0.04516148 = product of:
0.09032296 = sum of:
0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09032296 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Chivers, A.; Feather, J.: ¬The management of digital data : a metadata approach (1998)
0.01
0.014088392 = product of:
0.042265177 = sum of:
0.042265177 = product of:
0.08453035 = sum of:
0.08453035 = weight(_text_:management in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453035 = score(doc=2363,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reports on a research study, conducted at the Department of Information and Library Studies, Loughborough University, to investigate the potential of metadata for universal data management and explore the attitudes of UK information professionals to these issues
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.01
0.01290328 = product of:
0.038709838 = sum of:
0.038709838 = product of:
0.077419676 = sum of:
0.077419676 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077419676 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.01
0.012165329 = product of:
0.036495987 = sum of:
0.036495987 = product of:
0.072991975 = sum of:
0.072991975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072991975 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.012165329 = product of:
0.036495987 = sum of:
0.036495987 = product of:
0.072991975 = sum of:
0.072991975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072991975 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.01
0.010752733 = product of:
0.032258198 = sum of:
0.032258198 = product of:
0.064516395 = sum of:
0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064516395 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.01
0.010752733 = product of:
0.032258198 = sum of:
0.032258198 = product of:
0.064516395 = sum of:
0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064516395 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016)
0.01
0.010752733 = product of:
0.032258198 = sum of:
0.032258198 = product of:
0.064516395 = sum of:
0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064516395 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Integrating multiple overlapping metadata standards (1999)
0.01
0.009961998 = product of:
0.029885992 = sum of:
0.029885992 = product of:
0.059771985 = sum of:
0.059771985 = weight(_text_:management in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059771985 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This special issue of JASIS addresses different applications of metadata standards in geospatial collections, education, historical costume collection, data management, and information retrieval, end explores the future thinking of metadata standards for digital libraries
-
Madsen, M.S.; Fogg, I.; Ruggles, C.: Metadata systems : integrative information technologies (1994)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=1055,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata systems are concerned with the management of data which describes other data (datasets, catalogues, or actual database management systems) and are presently the subject of intensive research. Metadata systems can be used to store richly detailed forms of information, perform seamless wide ranging searches of information distributed across networks, and to integrate information stored in disparate repositories. Describes a model design and methods of implementation derived from the experience of the Leicester University Metadata Project. The approach utilizes the incorporation of semantic metadata in addition to resource metadata, resulting in a generally more powerful system than existing global directory services. Feature of the class of design is flexibility or implementation, with the ability to provide a coherent metadata system functioning above heterogeneous autonomous distributed databases
-
Reed, B.: Metadata: core record or core business? (1997)
0.01
0.009861874 = product of:
0.029585622 = sum of:
0.029585622 = product of:
0.059171245 = sum of:
0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059171245 = score(doc=1764,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.047618426 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Raises critical questions about the way archivists should be managing the metadata associated with records management and recordkeeping processes in order to maintain records in their context through time in complex and rapidly changing environments. Explores some current models for specifying record metadata, drawing on the outcomes of research projects and standards activities. Speculates on the potential value of defining a core set of record metadata. The mapping of the overlap between the metadata specified in the Pittsburgh University and British Columbia University projects, and the Australian Records Management Standards, reveals a possible core set of record metadada, analysis of which has shown that it would essentially enable the descriptions of the records as passive objects
