Search (2653 results, page 1 of 133)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.33
    0.32788184 = sum of:
      0.07563069 = product of:
        0.22689205 = sum of:
          0.22689205 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22689205 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22689205 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22689205 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.025359105 = product of:
        0.05071821 = sum of:
          0.05071821 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05071821 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.32
    0.32187766 = sum of:
      0.07563069 = product of:
        0.22689205 = sum of:
          0.22689205 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22689205 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22689205 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22689205 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.019354919 = product of:
        0.038709838 = sum of:
          0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038709838 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.27
    0.26890913 = product of:
      0.40336367 = sum of:
        0.10084092 = product of:
          0.30252275 = sum of:
            0.30252275 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30252275 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.30252275 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30252275 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  4. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.24
    0.2352955 = product of:
      0.35294324 = sum of:
        0.08823581 = product of:
          0.26470742 = sum of:
            0.26470742 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26470742 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.26470742 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26470742 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  5. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.17
    0.16806822 = product of:
      0.25210232 = sum of:
        0.06302558 = product of:
          0.18907672 = sum of:
            0.18907672 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18907672 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18907672 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18907672 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  6. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.13
    0.13445456 = product of:
      0.20168184 = sum of:
        0.05042046 = product of:
          0.15126137 = sum of:
            0.15126137 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15126137 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047618426 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15126137 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15126137 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  7. Kmuche, W.: Strategischer Erfolgsfaktor Wissen : Content Management: der Weg zum erfolgreichen Informationsmanagement (2000) 0.07
    0.06955515 = product of:
      0.20866545 = sum of:
        0.20866545 = sum of:
          0.11834249 = weight(_text_:management in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11834249 = score(doc=644,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
          0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09032296 = score(doc=644,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 644, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=644)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    19. 7.2002 22:05:14
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  8. Taylor, A.: Engaging with knowledge : emerging concepts in knowledge management (2003) 0.07
    0.06721781 = product of:
      0.20165342 = sum of:
        0.20165342 = sum of:
          0.124233745 = weight(_text_:management in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.124233745 = score(doc=60,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.77402633 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
          0.077419676 = weight(_text_:22 in 60) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.077419676 = score(doc=60,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 60, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=60)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the knowledge management phenomenon and provides an overview of emerging concepts
    Date
    2. 2.2003 18:31:22
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  9. International yearbook of library and information management : 2001/2002 information services in an electronic environment (2001) 0.06
    0.058001246 = product of:
      0.17400374 = sum of:
        0.17400374 = sum of:
          0.08368078 = weight(_text_:management in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08368078 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
          0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09032296 = score(doc=1381,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2003 13:22:23
  10. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.06
    0.058001246 = product of:
      0.17400374 = sum of:
        0.17400374 = sum of:
          0.08368078 = weight(_text_:management in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08368078 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09032296 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.1, S.3-36
  11. Domingue, J.; Motta, E.: PlanetOnto : from news publishing to integrated knowledge management support (2000) 0.06
    0.058001246 = product of:
      0.17400374 = sum of:
        0.17400374 = sum of:
          0.08368078 = weight(_text_:management in 6872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08368078 = score(doc=6872,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 6872, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6872)
          0.09032296 = weight(_text_:22 in 6872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09032296 = score(doc=6872,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6872, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6872)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2002 11:47:22
  12. Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: In Memoriam Karen Sparck Jones (2007) 0.05
    0.04971535 = product of:
      0.14914605 = sum of:
        0.14914605 = sum of:
          0.07172638 = weight(_text_:management in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07172638 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
          0.077419676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.077419676 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 14:22:47
    Source
    Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.6, S.1441-1446
  13. Eickhoff, A.: Wissensmanagement : für die Praxis nutzbar gemacht! (2001) 0.05
    0.04971535 = product of:
      0.14914605 = sum of:
        0.14914605 = sum of:
          0.07172638 = weight(_text_:management in 6878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07172638 = score(doc=6878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 6878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6878)
          0.077419676 = weight(_text_:22 in 6878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.077419676 = score(doc=6878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6878)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2001, Nr.70, S.21-22 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 54(2001) H.2/3]
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  14. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.05
    0.049682252 = product of:
      0.14904675 = sum of:
        0.14904675 = sum of:
          0.08453035 = weight(_text_:management in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08453035 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064516395 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
  15. Wu, I.-L.; Lin, H.-C.: ¬A strategy-based process for implementing knowledge management : an integrative view and empirical study (2009) 0.04
    0.04453164 = product of:
      0.13359492 = sum of:
        0.13359492 = sum of:
          0.09488508 = weight(_text_:management in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09488508 = score(doc=2764,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.59117234 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
          0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038709838 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:08:51
  16. Moore, R.W.: Management of very large distributed shared collections (2009) 0.04
    0.042947423 = product of:
      0.12884226 = sum of:
        0.12884226 = sum of:
          0.08368078 = weight(_text_:management in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08368078 = score(doc=3845,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.521365 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
          0.04516148 = weight(_text_:22 in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04516148 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Large scientific collections may be managed as data grids for sharing data, digital libraries for publishing data, persistent archives for preserving data, or as real-time data repositories for sensor data. Despite the multiple types of data management objectives, it is possible to build each system from generic software infrastructure. This entry examines the requirements driving the management of large data collections, the concepts on which current data management systems are based, and the current research initiatives for managing distributed data collections.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:57
  17. AI-Hawamdeh, S.: Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management (2005) 0.04
    0.042255335 = product of:
      0.126766 = sum of:
        0.126766 = sum of:
          0.094507806 = weight(_text_:management in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.094507806 = score(doc=4236,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.58882177 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
          0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.032258198 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Designing an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management requires a good understanding of knowledge processes and the ability to differentiate between information management and knowledge management. Given the complexity of knowledge and the nature of its existence, there is a need for graduate programs to go beyond information management and include in the curriculum disciplines that deal with social, cultural, and economic issues such as communication, cognitive science, and business. An understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of knowledge management is necessary for a more balanced and practical approach to the development of a knowledge management curriculum. In this article, the design and development of an interdisciplinary graduate program in knowledge management at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore is reported. The initiation of the program was influenced by the strong demand from the public sector in Singapore for knowledge management professionals. It was developed in close association with the information studies program at Nanyang Technological University. In the first year, the program attracted 230 applicants, of which 45 were selected-22 students came from the public sector and 23 students came from the private sector.
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenschwerpunktes: Knowledge Management in Asia
  18. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.04
    0.04142946 = product of:
      0.12428838 = sum of:
        0.12428838 = sum of:
          0.059771985 = weight(_text_:management in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059771985 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.064516395 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  19. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.04
    0.0397458 = product of:
      0.11923739 = sum of:
        0.11923739 = sum of:
          0.06762428 = weight(_text_:management in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06762428 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.42132655 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.05161312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05161312 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  20. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.04
    0.039634123 = product of:
      0.11890237 = sum of:
        0.11890237 = sum of:
          0.080192536 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.080192536 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038709838 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047618426 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152

Languages

Types

  • a 2156
  • m 388
  • s 132
  • el 113
  • b 29
  • x 27
  • i 12
  • n 6
  • r 5
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications