Search (1159 results, page 1 of 58)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.40 
    0.40336367 = product of:
  0.6050455 = sum of:
    0.15126137 = product of:
      0.4537841 = sum of:
        0.4537841 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4537841 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.4537841 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4537841 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.34 
    0.33613643 = product of:
  0.50420463 = sum of:
    0.12605116 = product of:
      0.37815344 = sum of:
        0.37815344 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37815344 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.37815344 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37815344 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.26 
    0.26433635 = product of:
  0.39650452 = sum of:
    0.07563069 = product of:
      0.22689205 = sum of:
        0.22689205 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22689205 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.32087383 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32087383 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.24 
    0.2352955 = product of:
  0.35294324 = sum of:
    0.08823581 = product of:
      0.26470742 = sum of:
        0.26470742 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26470742 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.26470742 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26470742 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.20 
    0.20168184 = product of:
  0.30252275 = sum of:
    0.07563069 = product of:
      0.22689205 = sum of:
        0.22689205 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22689205 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22689205 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22689205 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  6. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.18 
    0.17622423 = product of:
  0.26433635 = sum of:
    0.05042046 = product of:
      0.15126137 = sum of:
        0.15126137 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15126137 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21391588 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21391588 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  7. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.17 
    0.16806822 = product of:
  0.25210232 = sum of:
    0.06302558 = product of:
      0.18907672 = sum of:
        0.18907672 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18907672 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18907672 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18907672 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  8. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.17 
    0.16806822 = product of:
  0.25210232 = sum of:
    0.06302558 = product of:
      0.18907672 = sum of:
        0.18907672 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18907672 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18907672 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18907672 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  9. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.17 
    0.16806822 = product of:
  0.25210232 = sum of:
    0.06302558 = product of:
      0.18907672 = sum of:
        0.18907672 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18907672 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18907672 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18907672 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  10. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.16 
    0.16416466 = product of:
  0.24624698 = sum of:
    0.22689205 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22689205 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.019354919 = product of:
      0.038709838 = sum of:
        0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038709838 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047618426 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  11. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.10 
    0.10084092 = product of:
  0.30252275 = sum of:
    0.30252275 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30252275 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40370956 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047618426 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  12. (2013 ff.) 0.07 
    0.066287145 = product of:
  0.19886142 = sum of:
    0.19886142 = sum of:
      0.095635176 = weight(_text_:management in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.095635176 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.10322624 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10322624 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 65(2013) ff. Früher u.d.T.: Aslib proceedings, (bis 2012)
  13. Paul-Hus, A.; Desrochers, N.; Rijcke, S.de; Rushforth, A.D.: ¬The reward system of science (2017) 0.04 
    0.04142946 = product of:
  0.12428838 = sum of:
    0.12428838 = sum of:
      0.059771985 = weight(_text_:management in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059771985 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064516395 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.478-485
  14. Ermert, A.: Terminologie - Bedeutung, Erarbeitung, professionelle Strukturierung und Management : Der 13. Deutsche Terminologietag vom 19. bis 21. April 2012 in Heidelberg (2012) 0.04 
    0.04142946 = product of:
  0.12428838 = sum of:
    0.12428838 = sum of:
      0.059771985 = weight(_text_:management in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059771985 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
      0.064516395 = weight(_text_:22 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064516395 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:37:29
  15. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.04 
    0.03921039 = product of:
  0.11763117 = sum of:
    0.11763117 = sum of:
      0.07246969 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07246969 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.04516148 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04516148 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Theme
    Content Management System
  16. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.04 
    0.037109703 = product of:
  0.11132911 = sum of:
    0.11132911 = sum of:
      0.07907091 = weight(_text_:management in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07907091 = score(doc=1632,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.49264365 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032258198 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.2, S.134-155
  17. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.04 
    0.035154544 = product of:
  0.10546363 = sum of:
    0.10546363 = sum of:
      0.073205434 = weight(_text_:management in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.073205434 = score(doc=1003,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032258198 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  18. Vlaeminck, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern im Bereich der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Zur Rolle von Forschungsdatenzentren beim Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten (2014) 0.03 
    0.034777574 = product of:
  0.10433272 = sum of:
    0.10433272 = sum of:
      0.059171245 = weight(_text_:management in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059171245 = score(doc=2543,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
      0.04516148 = weight(_text_:22 in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04516148 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Analyse zusammengefasst, in der untersucht wurde, ob, und wenn ja welche Services für das Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten gegenwärtig bei wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften bestehen. Die Analyse wurde Mithilfe von Desktop-Research sowie einer Online-Befragung, an der sich 22 von 46 angeschriebenen Institutionen beteiligten, durchgeführt. Untersucht wurden vor allem deutsche und europäische Forschungsdatenzentren, Bibliotheken und Archive. Insbesondere wurde untersucht, ob diese Organisationen extern erzeugte Forschungsdaten, den dazugehörigen Berechnungscode (Syntax) und ggf. genutzte (selbstgeschriebene) Software grundsätzlich speichern und hosten. Weitere Themenfelder waren Metadatenstandards, Persistente Identifikatoren, Verfügbarkeit von Schnittstellen (APIs) und Unterstützung von semantischen Technologien.
  19. Leitfaden zum Forschungsdaten-Management : Handreichungen aus dem WissGrid-Projekt (2013) 0.03 
    0.033608906 = product of:
  0.10082671 = sum of:
    0.10082671 = sum of:
      0.062116873 = weight(_text_:management in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062116873 = score(doc=1029,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
      0.038709838 = weight(_text_:22 in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038709838 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Digitale Forschungsdaten sind eine unverzichtbare Grundlage moderner Wissenschaft. Mit ihnen sind aber eine Reihe von notwendigen Datenmanagement-Aufgaben verbunden, damit sie in der aktiven Forschung bestmöglich eingesetzt werden können und die gute wissenschaftliche Praxis eingehalten wird. Wie lange sollen die Daten aufbewahrt werden? Welche Kontextinformtionen müssen erfasst werden, um die Daten zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch sinnvol benutzen zu können? Wie viel kostet die Aufbewahrung? Dieses Buch kann diese Fragen nur aufwerfen, nicht beantworten. Denn ohne auf Details der jeweiligen Disziplin, Forschungsdaten und Projekte einzugehen, lassen sich diese Fragen nicht allegemeinverbindlich klären. Was dieses Buch jedoch mit einem Leitfaden und einer Checkliste bereitstellt, ist ein einfaches Instrument für fachwissenschatliche oder Infrastruktur-Einrichtungen, um die wichtigsten Aufgaben und Fragen im Forschungsdaten-Management strukturiert beantworten und effizient planen zu können.
    Date
    19.12.2015 11:57:22
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  20. Alqahtani, F.H.: ¬The acceptance of corporate wiki use for knowledge diffusion purposes (2017) 0.03 
    0.030676728 = product of:
  0.09203018 = sum of:
    0.09203018 = sum of:
      0.059771985 = weight(_text_:management in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059771985 = score(doc=4055,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.16050325 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
      0.032258198 = weight(_text_:22 in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032258198 = score(doc=4055,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16675162 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047618426 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose Scholars and practitioners alike view knowledge as a crucial organisational asset. Over the past decade, several knowledge management (KM) technologies have emerged, such as wikis. A wiki is a web-based hypertext application that supports a collaborative and conversational approach to KM. While wikis are generally simple to use, their adoption for managing organisational knowledge sometimes meets resistance from employees. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors affecting the user acceptance of organisational wikis as a means of knowledge creation and diffusion. Design/methodology/approach Building on the existing research on KM and information technology adoption, this study identified the following factors: the relevance of top management support for and complexity of enterprise wikis as well as technical support and knowledge-sharing self-efficacy. A cross-sectional survey was employed to examine the influence of these factors on employees' acceptance of corporate wikis. Overall, 102 employees participated in the online survey, and the data collected were analysed using the partial least squares method. Findings The research model developed demonstrates that top management support, technical support and knowledge-sharing self-efficacy have a positive significant effect on employees' willingness to use wikis for knowledge-creation purposes within organisations. Originality/value The findings of this study contribute to the existing literature on the implementation of wikis as a KM technology by developing a theoretical model explaining employees' acceptance of this technology. Organisations could use this model to guide and facilitate wiki initiatives.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.642-659

Authors

Languages

  • e 909
  • d 239
  • a 1
  • es 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 991
  • m 101
  • el 96
  • s 39
  • x 21
  • r 9
  • b 6
  • i 2
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications