Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=2998,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2998, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2998)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=2998,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2998, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2998)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Humboldt University invited experts to Berlin recently to offer advice about its library science program. While the education of librarians for the twenty-first century needs to include practical training, those who plan to work in a research environment, or who want a research degree like a PhD, need to acquire a methodology that grounds their work in an established scholarly context.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.4, S.337-339

0.04115732 = product of:
  0.12347196 = sum of:
    0.12347196 = sum of:
      0.09153553 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09153553 = score(doc=1126,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.43102458 = fieldWeight in 1126, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1126)
      0.03193643 = weight(_text_:22 in 1126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03193643 = score(doc=1126,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1126, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1126)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Domains represent concepts which belong to specific parts of the world. The particularized meaning of words linguistically encoding such domain concepts are provided by domain specific resources. The explicit meaning of such words are increasingly captured computationally using domain-specific ontologies, which, even for the same reference domain, are most often than not semantically incompatible. As information systems that rely on domain ontologies expand, there is a growing need to not only design domain ontologies and domain ontology-grounded Knowl­edge Graphs (KGs) but also to align them to general standards and conventions for interoperability. This often presents an insurmountable challenge to domain experts who have to additionally learn the construction of domain ontologies and KGs. Until now, several research methodologies have been proposed by different research groups using different technical approaches and based on scenarios of different domains of application. However, no methodology has been proposed which not only facilitates designing conceptually well-founded ontologies, but is also, equally, grounded in the general pedagogical principles of knowl­edge organization and, thereby, flexible enough to teach, and reproduce vis-à-vis domain experts. The purpose of this paper is to provide such a general, pedagogically flexible semantic knowl­edge modelling methodology. We exemplify the methodology by examples and illustrations from a professional-level digital healthcare course, and conclude with an evaluation grounded in technological parameters as well as user experience design principles.

Date

20.11.2023 17:19:22

0.039566096 = product of:
  0.118698284 = sum of:
    0.118698284 = sum of:
      0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07398728 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.348393 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
      0.044711 = weight(_text_:22 in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044711 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - Reflects on a paper extolling teaching cataloguing and indexing at library school written for Library Review in 1980. Design/methodology/approach - Reflective debate on the content of the original paper. Findings - The sentiments of the original paper were supported, with the added proviso that nowadays the ability to organise information is a basic skill everyone needs. Practical implications - May be of interest to practitioners and library educators interested in this long standing debate. Originality/value - Paper carries a response by the original author to the reflections on his paper.

Date

23.12.2007 18:40:22

0.028261498 = product of:
  0.08478449 = sum of:
    0.08478449 = sum of:
      0.05284806 = weight(_text_:methodology in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05284806 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
      0.03193643 = weight(_text_:22 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03193643 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose This paper investigates how school teachers look for informational texts for their classrooms. Access to current, varied and authentic informational texts improves learning outcomes for K-12 students, but many teachers lack resources to expand and update readings. The Web offers freely available resources, but finding suitable ones is time-consuming. This research lays the groundwork for building tools to ease that burden. Design/methodology/approach This paper reports qualitative findings from a study in two stages: (1) a set of semistructured interviews, based on the critical incident technique, eliciting teachers' information-seeking practices and challenges; and (2) observations of teachers using a prototype teaching-oriented news search tool under a think-aloud protocol. Findings Teachers articulated different objectives and ways of using readings in their classrooms, goals and self-reported practices varied by experience level. Teachers struggled to formulate queries that are likely to return readings on specific course topics, instead searching directly for abstract topics. Experience differences did not translate into observable differences in search skill or success in the lab study. Originality/value There is limited work on teachers' information-seeking practices, particularly on how teachers look for texts for classroom use. This paper describes how teachers look for information in this context, setting the stage for future development and research on how to support this use case. Understanding and supporting teachers looking for information is a rich area for future research, due to the complexity of the information need and the fact that teachers are not looking for information for themselves.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.019930253 = product of:
  0.059790757 = sum of:
    0.059790757 = product of:
      0.11958151 = sum of:
        0.11958151 = weight(_text_:methodology in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11958151 = score(doc=5434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.5630881 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Proposes a methodology for teaching knowledge organization that overcomes the barriers of space and time and the intrinsic determinism of classification structures. Establishes the foundations of the main system and discusses existing tools for classfying documents from a critical, open and creative perspective

Footnote

Übers. des Titels: Methodology for knowledge representation systems education

0.017032763 = product of:
  0.051098287 = sum of:
    0.051098287 = product of:
      0.102196574 = sum of:
        0.102196574 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102196574 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27

0.014092816 = product of:
  0.042278446 = sum of:
    0.042278446 = product of:
      0.08455689 = sum of:
        0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08455689 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Describes a teaching methodology for training information science students in the techniques of management of documentary languages. Discusses the need for applying the principles and methods of terminology. Considers teaching aims, theoretical content and practical exercises for knowledge acquisition

0.014092816 = product of:
  0.042278446 = sum of:
    0.042278446 = product of:
      0.08455689 = sum of:
        0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08455689 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Reports the methodology of a training seminar in which comparative analysis of pre-coordinated and post-coordinated procedures was examined. Evaluates training seminars as teaching activities which allow teachers to overcome the problem of a high number of students in a class

0.014092816 = product of:
  0.042278446 = sum of:
    0.042278446 = product of:
      0.08455689 = sum of:
        0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 5436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08455689 = score(doc=5436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 5436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5436)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Übers. des Titels: A methodology for teaching UDC to undergraduate students in library and information science

0.014092816 = product of:
  0.042278446 = sum of:
    0.042278446 = product of:
      0.08455689 = sum of:
        0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 5437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08455689 = score(doc=5437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 5437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5437)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Presents an analysis of the internal and external factors that affect UDC instruction and its methodology

0.014092816 = product of:
  0.042278446 = sum of:
    0.042278446 = product of:
      0.08455689 = sum of:
        0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08455689 = score(doc=2864,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - To discuss the mission statement for the Institute of Library and Information Sciences at Humboldt University in Berlin. Design/methodology/approach - The article examines other i-school mission statements to find the key common elements. Findings - Connections between people, technology, and information represent common themes of i-school missions. Originality/value - The Institute's mission statement is still being discussed. This analysis offers one viewpoint for the final conception.

0.012456408 = product of:
  0.03736922 = sum of:
    0.03736922 = product of:
      0.07473844 = sum of:
        0.07473844 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07473844 = score(doc=2874,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.35193008 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.

0.012331214 = product of:
  0.03699364 = sum of:
    0.03699364 = product of:
      0.07398728 = sum of:
        0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07398728 = score(doc=866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - To reflect on the importance of information storage and retrieval in the library curriculum in the 1980s. Design/methodology/approach - The article provides a reflective viewpoint. Findings - That cataloguing and classification was a vital skill for librarians to have, and that any moves to reduce it from the library school curriculum should be avoided. Practical implications - Should be of interest to anyone interested in the historical competencies of librarianship and how they have been debated. Originality/value - Offers an interesting insight into historical discussions relating to an aspect of library education.

0.010645477 = product of:
  0.03193643 = sum of:
    0.03193643 = product of:
      0.06387286 = sum of:
        0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387286 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Die theoretische Ausbildung der Bibliotheksreferendare. Die Umsetzung der Empfehlungen für die Ausbildung des Höheren Bibliotheksdienstes an den Ausbildungseinrichtungen. Referate und Diskussionsergebnisse ... 22. und 23.11.1990 in Frankfurt/M. Hrsg.: J. Tehnzen

0.010645477 = product of:
  0.03193643 = sum of:
    0.03193643 = product of:
      0.06387286 = sum of:
        0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387286 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill

0.010645477 = product of:
  0.03193643 = sum of:
    0.03193643 = product of:
      0.06387286 = sum of:
        0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387286 = score(doc=6492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 3.2016 12:14:11

0.010645477 = product of:
  0.03193643 = sum of:
    0.03193643 = product of:
      0.06387286 = sum of:
        0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387286 = score(doc=117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=117)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 8.2009 19:51:28

0.010569612 = product of:
  0.031708833 = sum of:
    0.031708833 = product of:
      0.063417666 = sum of:
        0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063417666 = score(doc=2979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2979)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

To prepare future information professionals for the rapidly changing environment in which they will work, LIS educators have an obligation to ensure that their graduates enderstand, conceptually and pragmatically, the major methodological paradigms of research. Most LIS programmes offer only a single course in research methods. Within that constraint, an important question is whether or not both qualitative and quantitative methods can be taught adequately. Suggests that, by integrating the teaching of both quantitative and qualitative methods through 'between methods' triangulation, an adequate learning experience can be achieved. Such an approach allows students to explore research problems from multiple perspectives and to evaluate critically the strengths and weaknesses of each methodology. discusses the need for such an integrated approach and suggests a scenario for applying it within the realm of a single semester course

0.010569612 = product of:
  0.031708833 = sum of:
    0.031708833 = product of:
      0.063417666 = sum of:
        0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063417666 = score(doc=4895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this research is to report on research undertaken into the use made of library and information science (LIS) journals in dissertations written by students undertaking the Master's course in Information and Library Studies at the University of Wales Aberystwyth. Design/methodology/approach - Analysis of the citations of 100 (post 2000) dissertations submitted gives an indication of the range of material used in dissertations. In addition, responses to questionnaires from students provide information about how relevant papers are found from LIS journals. Findings - Journals with a practical bias were cited more than research-oriented journals. Lists of the most "popular" journal titles are included. Originality/value - The research provides a "snapshot" of the use made of LIS journals by Master's students in their dissertations.

0.010569612 = product of:
  0.031708833 = sum of:
    0.031708833 = product of:
      0.063417666 = sum of:
        0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063417666 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Since Library Science Education started in Nigeria about half a century ago, cataloguing has been regarded as a core subject in the curriculum. With the diversification of subjects, some core subjects were made electives. This did not affect cataloguing. Nigerian Libraries have not gone far in electronic data processing in their storage of data and information and as a result, libraries are still manual-oriented. Even though some libraries in Cross River State of Nigeria have taken their first steps towards automation, the library schools still find it necessary to continue to drill students in traditional cataloguing. The question of the relevance of cataloguing in an automated library system arises and this researcher investigates the hypothesis that cataloguing is still relevant in the library school curriculum using the descriptive survey methodology. The finding is that the manual system will continue to be used for a long time and so cataloguing will continue to be relevant even with the computer-produced catalogue.