-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.02
0.018065974 = product of:
0.054197922 = sum of:
0.054197922 = product of:
0.108395845 = sum of:
0.108395845 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108395845 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Tillett, B.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : theoretical and practical foundations (1995)
0.02
0.01761602 = product of:
0.05284806 = sum of:
0.05284806 = product of:
0.10569612 = sum of:
0.10569612 = weight(_text_:methodology in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10569612 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The study covers the full range of functions for the bibliographic record in its widest sense. Discusses theoretical and practical aspects, methodology and the future
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.017032763 = product of:
0.051098287 = sum of:
0.051098287 = product of:
0.102196574 = sum of:
0.102196574 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102196574 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.014903667 = product of:
0.044711 = sum of:
0.044711 = product of:
0.089422 = sum of:
0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089422 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000)
0.01
0.014903667 = product of:
0.044711 = sum of:
0.044711 = product of:
0.089422 = sum of:
0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089422 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26. 8.2000 19:22:35
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.01
0.014903667 = product of:
0.044711 = sum of:
0.044711 = product of:
0.089422 = sum of:
0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089422 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.01
0.014903667 = product of:
0.044711 = sum of:
0.044711 = product of:
0.089422 = sum of:
0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089422 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998)
0.01
0.012774572 = product of:
0.038323715 = sum of:
0.038323715 = product of:
0.07664743 = sum of:
0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07664743 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 2. 8.2001 16:22:33
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.01
0.012043982 = product of:
0.036131945 = sum of:
0.036131945 = product of:
0.07226389 = sum of:
0.07226389 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07226389 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.012043982 = product of:
0.036131945 = sum of:
0.036131945 = product of:
0.07226389 = sum of:
0.07226389 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07226389 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996)
0.01
0.010645477 = product of:
0.03193643 = sum of:
0.03193643 = product of:
0.06387286 = sum of:
0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06387286 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 9.1996 18:58:22
-
Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003)
0.01
0.010645477 = product of:
0.03193643 = sum of:
0.03193643 = product of:
0.06387286 = sum of:
0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06387286 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2016 12:15:46
-
Kushwoh, S.S.; Gautam, J.N.; Singh, R.: Migration from CDS / ISIS to KOHA : a case study of data conversion from CCF to MARC 21 (2009)
0.01
0.010569612 = product of:
0.031708833 = sum of:
0.031708833 = product of:
0.063417666 = sum of:
0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063417666 = score(doc=2279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Standards are important for quality and interoperability in any system. Bibliographic record creation standards such as MARC 21 (Machine Readable Catalogue), CCF (Common Communication Format), UNIMARC (Universal MARC) and their local variations, are in practice all across the library community. ILMS (Integrated Library Management Systems) are using these standards for the design of databases and the creation of bibliographic records. Their use is important for uniformity of the system and bibliographic data, but there are problems when a library wants to switch over from one system to another using different standards. This paper discusses migration from one record standard to another, mapping of data and related issues. Data exported from CDS/ISIS CCF based records to KOHA MARC 21 based records are discussed as a case study. This methodology, with few modifications, can be applied for migration of data in other bibliographicformats too. Freeware tools can be utilized for migration.
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.01
0.010538485 = product of:
0.031615455 = sum of:
0.031615455 = product of:
0.06323091 = sum of:
0.06323091 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06323091 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994)
0.01
0.00880801 = product of:
0.02642403 = sum of:
0.02642403 = product of:
0.05284806 = sum of:
0.05284806 = weight(_text_:methodology in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05284806 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
-
Aalberg, T.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of MARC data, or, challenges of frbrisation (2013)
0.01
0.00880801 = product of:
0.02642403 = sum of:
0.02642403 = product of:
0.05284806 = sum of:
0.05284806 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05284806 = score(doc=1769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Bibliographic records should now be used in innovative end-user applications that enable users to learn about, discover and exploit available content, and this information should be interpreted and reused also beyond the library domain. New conceptual models such as FRBR offer the foundation for such developments. The main motivation for this research is to contribute to the adoption of the FRBR model in future bibliographic standards and systems, by analysing limitations in existing bibliographic information and looking for short- and long-term solutions that can improve the data quality in terms of expressing the FRBR model. Design/methodology/approach - MARC records in three collections (BIBSYS catalogue, Slovenian National Bibliography and BTJ catalogue) were first analysed by looking at statistics of field and subfield usage to determine common patterns that express FRBR. Based on this, different rules for interpreting the information were developed. Finally typical problems/errors found in MARC records were analysed. Findings - Different types of FRBR entity-relationship structures that typically can be found in bibliographic records are identified. Problems related to interpreting these from bibliographic records are analyzed. Frbrisation of consistent and complete MARC records is relatively successful, particularly if all entities are systematically described and relationships among them are clearly indicated. Research limitations/implications - Advanced matching was not used for clustering of identical entities. Practical implications - Cataloguing guidelines are proposed to enable better frbrisation of MARC records in the interim period, before new formats are developed and implemented. Originality/value - This is the first in depth analysis of manifestations embodying several expressions and of works and agents as subjects.
-
Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989)
0.01
0.0085163815 = product of:
0.025549144 = sum of:
0.025549144 = product of:
0.051098287 = sum of:
0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051098287 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:40:20
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.01
0.0085163815 = product of:
0.025549144 = sum of:
0.025549144 = product of:
0.051098287 = sum of:
0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051098287 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.0085163815 = product of:
0.025549144 = sum of:
0.025549144 = product of:
0.051098287 = sum of:
0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051098287 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997)
0.01
0.0085163815 = product of:
0.025549144 = sum of:
0.025549144 = product of:
0.051098287 = sum of:
0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051098287 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047143444 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
