Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.20
    0.1996701 = product of:
      0.29950514 = sum of:
        0.074876286 = product of:
          0.22462885 = sum of:
            0.22462885 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22462885 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22462885 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22462885 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.06
    0.056522995 = product of:
      0.16956899 = sum of:
        0.16956899 = sum of:
          0.10569612 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10569612 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06387286 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  3. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.05
    0.045218393 = product of:
      0.13565518 = sum of:
        0.13565518 = sum of:
          0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08455689 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
          0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051098287 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
  4. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.03
    0.028261498 = product of:
      0.08478449 = sum of:
        0.08478449 = sum of:
          0.05284806 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05284806 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
          0.03193643 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03193643 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047143444 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  5. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.02
    0.017032763 = product of:
      0.051098287 = sum of:
        0.051098287 = product of:
          0.102196574 = sum of:
            0.102196574 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102196574 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  6. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.01
    0.014903667 = product of:
      0.044711 = sum of:
        0.044711 = product of:
          0.089422 = sum of:
            0.089422 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.089422 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  7. Batley, S.: ¬The I in information architecture : the challenge of content management (2007) 0.01
    0.014092816 = product of:
      0.042278446 = sum of:
        0.042278446 = product of:
          0.08455689 = sum of:
            0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08455689 = score(doc=809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of content management in the context of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted is a review of definitions of information architecture and an analysis of the importance of content and its management within information architecture. Findings - Concludes that reality will not necessarily match the vision of organisations investing in information architecture. Originality/value - The paper considers practical issues around content and records management.
  8. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.01
    0.012774572 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = product of:
          0.07664743 = sum of:
            0.07664743 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07664743 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  9. Savic, D.: Automatic classification of office documents : review of available methods and techniques (1995) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=2219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Classification of office documents is one of the administrative functions carried out by almost every organization and institution which sends and receives correspondence. Processing of this increasing amount of information coming and out going mail, in particular its classification, is time consuming and expensive. More and more organizations are seeking a solution for meeting this challenge by designing computer based systems for automatic classification. Examines the present status of available knowledge and methodology which can be used for automatic classification of office documents. Besides a review of classic methods and techniques, the focus id also placed on the application of artificial intelligence
  10. Froissart, C.; Lallich-Boidin, G.: Towards structuring of indexing vocabulary for large technical documents (1998) 0.01
    0.012331214 = product of:
      0.03699364 = sum of:
        0.03699364 = product of:
          0.07398728 = sum of:
            0.07398728 = weight(_text_:methodology in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07398728 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.348393 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper deals with indexing of large textual and structured documents. We limit our area to technical documents like maintenance and users manuals. This firstly implies, that the document describes a closed world, and then that they are used by experts in this area. We suggest a methodology to extract the indexing vocabulary from the text with linguistic and numeric tools and then to structure the vocabulary, as a thesaurus might. We aim at assisting the user in order that he retrieves quickly the only text passages he needs
  11. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.01
    0.010645477 = product of:
      0.03193643 = sum of:
        0.03193643 = product of:
          0.06387286 = sum of:
            0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06387286 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
  12. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.01
    0.010538485 = product of:
      0.031615455 = sum of:
        0.031615455 = product of:
          0.06323091 = sum of:
            0.06323091 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06323091 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
  13. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.01
    0.010538485 = product of:
      0.031615455 = sum of:
        0.031615455 = product of:
          0.06323091 = sum of:
            0.06323091 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06323091 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35
  14. Frohmann, B.: Revisiting "what is a document?" (2009) 0.01
    0.00880801 = product of:
      0.02642403 = sum of:
        0.02642403 = product of:
          0.05284806 = sum of:
            0.05284806 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05284806 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a reconsideration of Michael Buckland's important question, "What is a document?", analysing the point and purpose of definitions of "document" and "documentation". Design/methodology/approach - Two philosophical notions of the point of definitions are contrasted: John Stuart Mill's concept of a "real" definition, purporting to specify the nature of the definiendum; and a concept of definition based upon a foundationalist philosophy of language. Both conceptions assume that a general, philosophical justification for using words as we do is always in order. This assumption is criticized by deploying Hilary Putnam's arguments against the orthodox Wittgensteinian interpretation of criteria governing the use of language. The example of the cabinets of curiosities of the sixteenth-century English and European virtuosi is developed to show how one might productively think about what documents might be, but without a definition of a document. Findings - Other than for specific, instrumentalist purposes (often appropriate for specific case studies), there is no general philosophical reason for asking, what is a document? There are good reasons for pursuing studies of documentation without the impediments of definitions of "document" or "documentation". Originality/value - The paper makes an original contribution to the new interest in documentation studies by providing conceptual resources for multiplying, rather than restricting, the areas of application of the concepts of documents and documentation.
  15. Milne, C.: Developing information architecture through records management classification techniques (2010) 0.01
    0.00880801 = product of:
      0.02642403 = sum of:
        0.02642403 = product of:
          0.05284806 = sum of:
            0.05284806 = weight(_text_:methodology in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05284806 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This work aims to draw attention to information retrieval philosophies and techniques allied to the records management profession, advocating a wider professional consideration of a functional approach to information management, in this instance in the development of information architecture. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws from a hypothesis originally presented by the author that advocated a viewpoint whereby the application of records management techniques, traditionally applied to develop business classification schemes, was offered as an additional solution to organising information resources and services (within a university intranet), where earlier approaches, notably subject- and administrative-based arrangements, were found to be lacking. The hypothesis was tested via work-based action learning and is presented here as an extended case study. The paper also draws on evidence submitted to the Joint Information Systems Committee in support of the University of Abertay Dundee's application for consideration for the JISC award for innovation in records and information management. Findings - The original hypothesis has been tested in the workplace. Information retrieval techniques, allied to records management (functional classification), were the main influence in the development of pre- and post-coordinate information retrieval systems to support a wider information architecture, where the subject approach was found to be lacking. Their use within the workplace has since been extended. Originality/value - The paper advocates that the development of information retrieval as a discipline should include a wider consideration of functional classification, as this alternative to the subject approach is largely ignored in mainstream IR works.
  16. Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995) 0.01
    0.0085163815 = product of:
      0.025549144 = sum of:
        0.025549144 = product of:
          0.051098287 = sum of:
            0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051098287 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:30:18
  17. Boyle, J.: ¬A blueprint for managing documents (1997) 0.01
    0.0085163815 = product of:
      0.025549144 = sum of:
        0.025549144 = product of:
          0.051098287 = sum of:
            0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051098287 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Byte. 22(1997) no.5, S.75-76,78,80
  18. McLeod, J.; Hare, C.H.; Webster, B.: Records management today (1998) 0.01
    0.0085163815 = product of:
      0.025549144 = sum of:
        0.025549144 = product of:
          0.051098287 = sum of:
            0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051098287 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    15. 5.1999 20:22:49
  19. ¬Das papierlose Archiv : Abspecken mit digitaler Speicherverwaltung (1995) 0.01
    0.0074518337 = product of:
      0.0223555 = sum of:
        0.0223555 = product of:
          0.044711 = sum of:
            0.044711 = weight(_text_:22 in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044711 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Facts: Testmagazin für die Büro- & Kommunikationswelt. 1995, H.5, S.22-34
  20. Hare, C.E.; McLeaod, J.; King, L.A.: Continuing professional development for the information discipline of records management : pt.1: context and initial indications of current activities (1996) 0.01
    0.0074518337 = product of:
      0.0223555 = sum of:
        0.0223555 = product of:
          0.044711 = sum of:
            0.044711 = weight(_text_:22 in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044711 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047143444 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Librarian career development. 4(1996) no.2, S.22-27

Languages

Types

  • a 27
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…