Search (1012 results, page 1 of 51)

0.3993402 = product of:
  0.5990103 = sum of:
    0.14975257 = product of:
      0.4492577 = sum of:
        0.4492577 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4492577 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.4492577 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4492577 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.33278352 = product of:
  0.49917528 = sum of:
    0.12479382 = product of:
      0.37438145 = sum of:
        0.37438145 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37438145 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.37438145 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37438145 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.26169965 = product of:
  0.39254946 = sum of:
    0.074876286 = product of:
      0.22462885 = sum of:
        0.22462885 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22462885 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.31767318 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31767318 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.23294847 = product of:
  0.3494227 = sum of:
    0.08735567 = product of:
      0.26206702 = sum of:
        0.26206702 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26206702 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.26206702 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26206702 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.1996701 = product of:
  0.29950514 = sum of:
    0.074876286 = product of:
      0.22462885 = sum of:
        0.22462885 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22462885 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22462885 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22462885 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.17446643 = product of:
  0.26169965 = sum of:
    0.049917527 = product of:
      0.14975257 = sum of:
        0.14975257 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14975257 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21178211 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21178211 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.16639176 = product of:
  0.24958764 = sum of:
    0.06239691 = product of:
      0.18719073 = sum of:
        0.18719073 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18719073 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18719073 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18719073 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.16639176 = product of:
  0.24958764 = sum of:
    0.06239691 = product of:
      0.18719073 = sum of:
        0.18719073 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18719073 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18719073 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18719073 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.16639176 = product of:
  0.24958764 = sum of:
    0.06239691 = product of:
      0.18719073 = sum of:
        0.18719073 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18719073 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18719073 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18719073 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.16252714 = product of:
  0.24379072 = sum of:
    0.22462885 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22462885 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.019161858 = product of:
      0.038323715 = sum of:
        0.038323715 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038323715 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.

Date

10. 1.2013 19:22:47

0.09983505 = product of:
  0.29950514 = sum of:
    0.29950514 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29950514 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.

0.061662585 = product of:
  0.18498775 = sum of:
    0.18498775 = sum of:
      0.13982283 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13982283 = score(doc=1629,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.6584009 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
      0.04516493 = weight(_text_:22 in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04516493 = score(doc=1629,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - In today's knowledge-based economy, knowledge networks (KN) increasingly are becoming vital channels for pursuing strategic objectives in project-based organizations (PBO), in which the project is the basic organizational element in its operation. KN initiatives often are started with the selection of a creation methodology, which involves complex decisions for successful implementation. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to address this critical selection of methodology and proposes a holistic framework for selecting an appropriate methodology in this kind of flatter, speedier, and more flexible organizational form. Design/methodology/approach - In the first step, the study established a theoretical background addressing the problem of KN creation in PBO. The second step defined selection criteria based on extensive literature review. In the third step, a holistic framework was constructed based on different characteristics of existing methodologies categorized according to the selected criteria. Finally, the suggested framework was empirically tested in a project-based firm and the case study and the results are discussed. Findings - A holistic framework was determined by including different aspects of a KN such as network perspectives, tools and techniques, objectives, characteristics, capabilities, and approaches. The proposed framework consisted of ten existing KN methodologies that consider qualitative and quantitative dimensions with micro and macro approaches. Originality/value - The development of the theory of KN creation methodology is the main contribution of this research. The selection framework, which was theoretically and empirically grounded, has attempted to offer a more rational and less ambiguous solution to the KN methodology selection problem in PBO forms.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 16:27:22

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper seeks to organize the extensive field and to compile the complete list of information limits. Design/methodology/approach - A thorough analysis of literature from the field beginning with the 1960s up to the present has been performed. Findings - A universal typology of information limits has been proposed. A list of barriers mentioned in the literature of the subject has been compiled. Research limitations/implications - The term "information limits" is not commonly used. Originality/value - The complete list of information limits with bibliographical hints (helpful for future research) is presented.

Date

12. 7.2011 18:22:52

0.036702015 = product of:
  0.110106036 = sum of:
    0.110106036 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=1634,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.025549144 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.025549144 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - Ontologies are prone to wide semantic variability due to subjective points of view of their composers. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new approach for maximal unification of diverse ontologies for controversial domains by their relations. Design/methodology/approach - Effective matching or unification of multiple ontologies for a specific domain is crucial for the success of many semantic web applications, such as semantic information retrieval and organization, document tagging, summarization and search. To this end, numerous automatic and semi-automatic techniques were proposed in the past decade that attempt to identify similar entities, mostly classes, in diverse ontologies for similar domains. Apparently, matching individual entities cannot result in full integration of ontologies' semantics without matching their inter-relations with all other-related classes (and instances). However, semantic matching of ontological relations still constitutes a major research challenge. Therefore, in this paper the authors propose a new paradigm for assessment of maximal possible matching and unification of ontological relations. To this end, several unification rules for ontological relations were devised based on ontological reference rules, and lexical and textual entailment. These rules were semi-automatically implemented to extend a given ontology with semantically matching relations from another ontology for a similar domain. Then, the ontologies were unified through these similar pairs of relations. The authors observe that these rules can be also facilitated to reveal the contradictory relations in different ontologies. Findings - To assess the feasibility of the approach two experiments were conducted with different sets of multiple personal ontologies on controversial domains constructed by trained subjects. The results for about 50 distinct ontology pairs demonstrate a good potential of the methodology for increasing inter-ontology agreement. Furthermore, the authors show that the presented methodology can lead to a complete unification of multiple semantically heterogeneous ontologies. Research limitations/implications - This is a conceptual study that presents a new approach for semantic unification of ontologies by a devised set of rules along with the initial experimental evidence of its feasibility and effectiveness. However, this methodology has to be fully automatically implemented and tested on a larger dataset in future research. Practical implications - This result has implication for semantic search, since a richer ontology, comprised of multiple aspects and viewpoints of the domain of knowledge, enhances discoverability and improves search results. Originality/value - To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study to examine and assess the maximal level of semantic relation-based ontology unification.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.03555829 = product of:
  0.10667487 = sum of:
    0.10667487 = sum of:
      0.07473844 = weight(_text_:methodology in 3167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07473844 = score(doc=3167,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.35193008 = fieldWeight in 3167, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3167)
      0.03193643 = weight(_text_:22 in 3167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03193643 = score(doc=3167,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3167, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3167)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - With an increase in the amount of multilingual content on the World Wide Web, users are often striving to access information provided in a language of which they are non-native speakers. The purpose of this paper is to present a comprehensive study of user profile representation techniques and investigate their use in personalized cross-language information retrieval (CLIR) systems through the means of personalized query expansion. Design/methodology/approach - The user profiles consist of weighted terms computed by using frequency-based methods such as tf-idf and BM25, as well as various latent semantic models trained on monolingual documents and cross-lingual comparable documents. This paper also proposes an automatic evaluation method for comparing various user profile generation techniques and query expansion methods. Findings - Experimental results suggest that latent semantic-weighted user profile representation techniques are superior to frequency-based methods, and are particularly suitable for users with a sufficient amount of historical data. The study also confirmed that user profiles represented by latent semantic models trained on a cross-lingual level gained better performance than the models trained on a monolingual level. Originality/value - Previous studies on personalized information retrieval systems have primarily investigated user profiles and personalization strategies on a monolingual level. The effect of utilizing such monolingual profiles for personalized CLIR remains unclear. The current study fills the gap by a comprehensive study of user profile representation for personalized CLIR and a novel personalized CLIR evaluation methodology to ensure repeatable and controlled experiments can be conducted.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.033913795 = product of:
  0.10174138 = sum of:
    0.10174138 = sum of:
      0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.063417666 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
      0.038323715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038323715 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.033913795 = product of:
  0.10174138 = sum of:
    0.10174138 = sum of:
      0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.063417666 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
      0.038323715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038323715 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper considers the need to relate users need(s) as requirement for WeSEs in a dynamic context. User-centred evaluative methodology was used to propose a First-order Measurement Model (FoMM) with baseline characteristics using factor analysis. Results obtained showed that FoMM demonstrated reasonable model fit. The assumption is that criteria (or factors) encapsulate users' needs; hence they were translated into users' requirement for WeSEs using the qualitative evaluative approach. We therefore infer that WeSE's success in the delivery of assistance to users, particularly in a dynamic context must be based, not only on the progress of technology, but also on users' requirements.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.033913795 = product of:
  0.10174138 = sum of:
    0.10174138 = sum of:
      0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.063417666 = score(doc=2586,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
      0.038323715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038323715 = score(doc=2586,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to attempt to provide a review of the growing literature on co-authorship networks and the research gaps that may be investigated for future studies in this field. Design/methodology/approach - The existing literature on co-authorship networks was identified, evaluated and interpreted. Narrative review style was followed. Findings - Co-authorship, a proxy of research collaboration, is a key mechanism that links different sets of talent to produce a research output. Co-authorship could also be seen from the perspective of social networks. An in-depth analysis of such knowledge networks provides an opportunity to investigate its structure. Patterns of these relationships could reveal, for example, the mechanism that shapes our scientific community. The study provides a review of the expanding literature on co-authorship networks. Originality/value - This is one of the first comprehensive reviews of network-based studies on co-authorship. The field is fast evolving, opening new gaps for potential research. The study identifies some of these gaps.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.033913795 = product of:
  0.10174138 = sum of:
    0.10174138 = sum of:
      0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.063417666 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
      0.038323715 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038323715 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.

0.033913795 = product of:
  0.10174138 = sum of:
    0.10174138 = sum of:
      0.063417666 = weight(_text_:methodology in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.063417666 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
      0.038323715 = weight(_text_:22 in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038323715 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - In recent years, a large number of data repositories have been built and used. However, the extent to which scientific data are re-used in academic publications is still unknown. The purpose of this paper is to explore the functions of re-used scientific data in scholarly publication in different fields. Design/methodology/approach - To address these questions, the authors identified 827 publications citing resources in the Dryad Digital Repository indexed by Scopus from 2010 to 2015. Findings - The results show that: the number of citations to scientific data increases sharply over the years, but mainly from data-intensive disciplines, such as agricultural, biology science, environment science and medicine; the majority of citations are from the originating articles; and researchers tend to reuse data produced by their own research groups. Research limitations/implications - Dryad data may be re-used without being formally cited. Originality/value - The conservatism in data sharing suggests that more should be done to encourage researchers to re-use other's data.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22