Search (4830 results, page 2 of 242)

0.13311341 = product of:
  0.1996701 = sum of:
    0.049917527 = product of:
      0.14975257 = sum of:
        0.14975257 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14975257 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14975257 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14975257 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.12353957 = product of:
  0.3706187 = sum of:
    0.3706187 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3706187 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.

0.105891064 = product of:
  0.31767318 = sum of:
    0.31767318 = weight(_text_:2f in 4032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31767318 = score(doc=4032,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 4032, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4032)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Online unter: https://hwph.ch/ bzw. https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27hwph_productpage%27%5D__1515856966402.

0.09983505 = product of:
  0.29950514 = sum of:
    0.29950514 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29950514 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047143444 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.

0.061662585 = product of:
  0.18498775 = sum of:
    0.18498775 = sum of:
      0.13982283 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13982283 = score(doc=1629,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.6584009 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
      0.04516493 = weight(_text_:22 in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04516493 = score(doc=1629,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - In today's knowledge-based economy, knowledge networks (KN) increasingly are becoming vital channels for pursuing strategic objectives in project-based organizations (PBO), in which the project is the basic organizational element in its operation. KN initiatives often are started with the selection of a creation methodology, which involves complex decisions for successful implementation. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to address this critical selection of methodology and proposes a holistic framework for selecting an appropriate methodology in this kind of flatter, speedier, and more flexible organizational form. Design/methodology/approach - In the first step, the study established a theoretical background addressing the problem of KN creation in PBO. The second step defined selection criteria based on extensive literature review. In the third step, a holistic framework was constructed based on different characteristics of existing methodologies categorized according to the selected criteria. Finally, the suggested framework was empirically tested in a project-based firm and the case study and the results are discussed. Findings - A holistic framework was determined by including different aspects of a KN such as network perspectives, tools and techniques, objectives, characteristics, capabilities, and approaches. The proposed framework consisted of ten existing KN methodologies that consider qualitative and quantitative dimensions with micro and macro approaches. Originality/value - The development of the theory of KN creation methodology is the main contribution of this research. The selection framework, which was theoretically and empirically grounded, has attempted to offer a more rational and less ambiguous solution to the KN methodology selection problem in PBO forms.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 16:27:22

0.05689327 = product of:
  0.17067981 = sum of:
    0.17067981 = sum of:
      0.11958151 = weight(_text_:methodology in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11958151 = score(doc=8477,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.5630881 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Analyses the OPAC at the Australian Catholic University in New South Wales, Castle Hill Campus using an object oriented model following Rumbaugh's methodology, as described in 'Object oriented modelling and design, 1991'. The process of analysis, although difficult, is one of the most effective ways of determining each function of a system of this kind. The methodology is especially useful as the data structure, behavioural and functional aspects of the system are displayed in separate diagrams. This is an advantage for those analysing systems, who can display many factors without confusing different aspects involved in the analysis process

Source

LASIE. 28(1997) no.4, S.22-34

0.05689327 = product of:
  0.17067981 = sum of:
    0.17067981 = sum of:
      0.11958151 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11958151 = score(doc=2227,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.5630881 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

- Introduction to the Thesaurus Interoperability problem - Analysis of the thesauri for the project case study - Overview of Schema/Ontology Mapping methodologies - The proposed approach for thesaurus mapping - Standards for implementing the proposed methodology

Date

7.11.2008 10:40:22

0.056522995 = product of:
  0.16956899 = sum of:
    0.16956899 = sum of:
      0.10569612 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10569612 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.06387286 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06387286 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset

Source

Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122

0.05224342 = product of:
  0.078365125 = sum of:
    0.06239691 = product of:
      0.18719073 = sum of:
        0.18719073 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18719073 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39968264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.015968215 = product of:
      0.03193643 = sum of:
        0.03193643 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03193643 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047143444 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.045877516 = product of:
  0.13763255 = sum of:
    0.13763255 = sum of:
      0.10569612 = weight(_text_:methodology in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10569612 = score(doc=5286,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
      0.03193643 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03193643 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

An evaluation methodology based on fuzzy computing with words aimed at measuring the information quality of Web sites containing documents is presented. This methodology is qualitative and user oriented because it generates linguistic recommendations on the information quality of the content-based Web sites based on users' perceptions. It is composed of two main components, an evaluation scheme to analyze the information quality of Web sites and a measurement method to generate the linguistic recommendations. The evaluation scheme is based on both technical criteria related to the Web site structure and criteria related to the content of information on the Web sites. It is user driven because the chosen criteria are easily understandable by the users, in such a way that Web visitors can assess them by means of linguistic evaluation judgments. The measurement method is user centered because it generates linguistic recommendations of the Web sites based on the visitors' linguistic evaluation judgments. To combine the linguistic evaluation judgments we introduce two new majority guided linguistic aggregation operators, the Majority guided Linguistic Induced Ordered Weighted Averaging (MLIOWA) and weighted MLIOWA operators, which generate the linguistic recommendations according to the majority of the evaluation judgments provided by different visitors. The use of this methodology could improve tasks such as information filtering and evaluation on the World Wide Web.

Date

22. 7.2006 17:05:46

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Discusses Ranganathan's holistic integrative approach and applications of analytico-methodology. Deals with databases that art mostly object-oriented, factual information bases. Defines data entity, data model and subject. Covers the organization of ides in specialized databases; a generalized subject structure model; designing specialized databases; indexes and searches and user interaction with the system

Source

International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.3, S.46-50

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Review of film directories databases available online, on CD-ROM and diskette. Examines the content of these databases. Explains the methodology used in the study and analyzes: size and composition, database coverage, and record content looking at bibliographic identification data, cast and credit information, classification information, and evaluative information

Source

Database. 18(1995) no.1, S.22-32 (pt.1); no.2, S.29-39 (pt.2)

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff

Date

17.10.1995 18:22:54

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=2518,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2518, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2518)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=2518,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2518, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2518)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Discusses the books and articles written to commemmorate the centenary of the birth of S.R. Ranganathan in 1992. 9 books were published for the occasion and 6 special issues of journals; in addition articles about Ranganathan appeared in at least 10 other periodicals. Topics covered included Ranganathan's biography, his research methodology, his influence on classification and library science, and evaluations of his work

Date

5. 1.1999 16:27:22

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The successful implementation of Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) requires a previous design based on a methodology that includes key steps as follows: capture of critical information and analysis of the current document situation: functional and/or technical options that involve the treatment of the document fonds considered; document management applications design (data, text, images, audio, video) under a functional, technical and economic focus; global and modular project defined as a strategic EDMS plan

Date

11. 2.1999 21:02:22

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 2998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=2998,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2998, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2998)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 2998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=2998,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2998, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2998)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Humboldt University invited experts to Berlin recently to offer advice about its library science program. While the education of librarians for the twenty-first century needs to include practical training, those who plan to work in a research environment, or who want a research degree like a PhD, need to acquire a methodology that grounds their work in an established scholarly context.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.4, S.337-339

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 3529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=3529,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 3529, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3529)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 3529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=3529,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3529, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3529)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The decision to provide access to the Internet for members of the public raises some issues, in particular how a service is to be funded. Gives examples of current practice and draws broad conclusions from a sample of opinions voiced by members of the public. It puts forward s SWOT methodology as one possible approach to assist in identifying the crucial factors in the implementation of an Internet public access service emphasising what factors must be obtained to result in a cost effective service

Date

8. 5.1999 19:48:22

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.045218393 = product of:
  0.13565518 = sum of:
    0.13565518 = sum of:
      0.08455689 = weight(_text_:methodology in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08455689 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
      0.051098287 = weight(_text_:22 in 300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051098287 = score(doc=300,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 300, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=300)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper seeks to organize the extensive field and to compile the complete list of information limits. Design/methodology/approach - A thorough analysis of literature from the field beginning with the 1960s up to the present has been performed. Findings - A universal typology of information limits has been proposed. A list of barriers mentioned in the literature of the subject has been compiled. Research limitations/implications - The term "information limits" is not commonly used. Originality/value - The complete list of information limits with bibliographical hints (helpful for future research) is presented.

Date

12. 7.2011 18:22:52

0.04266995 = product of:
  0.12800984 = sum of:
    0.12800984 = sum of:
      0.089686126 = weight(_text_:methodology in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.089686126 = score(doc=201,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21236731 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.42231607 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.038323715 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038323715 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16508831 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047143444 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.

Date

3. 1.2007 17:22:03