Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.11504287 = product of:
  0.1533905 = sum of:
    0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08324346 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
    0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048027072 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
    0.022119977 = product of:
      0.044239953 = sum of:
        0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044239953 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

Abstract

What follows are my memories of the events, starting almost five decades ago, that led to the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD)-still the most successful and widely used international cataloging standard in history. Many of the documents of the time were little more than ephemera (working papers and the like) and some are not now available to me. I have checked my recollections in all the documents to which I have access and apologize in advance for any errors of time or place. I also apologize for the, alas, unavoidable, given the nature of the essay, many repetitions of the words "I" and "me."

Date

30. 5.2015 17:59:26

0.026132219 = product of:
  0.104528874 = sum of:
    0.104528874 = sum of:
      0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050559945 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05396893 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations

Source

Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22

0.02058303 = product of:
  0.08233212 = sum of:
    0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 5814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08233212 = score(doc=5814,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 5814, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5814)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

26. 7.2002 11:34:04

0.017152525 = product of:
  0.0686101 = sum of:
    0.0686101 = weight(_text_:26 in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0686101 = score(doc=3762,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

8. 8.2005 14:45:26

0.013683186 = product of:
  0.054732744 = sum of:
    0.054732744 = product of:
      0.10946549 = sum of:
        0.10946549 = weight(_text_:access in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10946549 = score(doc=4458,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.6486226 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Supports the continuing value of subject access in libraries. Isolates factors that should be taken into account when evaluating the cost effectiveness and cost benefit of subject access systems: type of subject need, recall and relevance, specifity, expressed relationship, usability, time, authority control, and cost

0.0109465495 = product of:
  0.043786198 = sum of:
    0.043786198 = product of:
      0.087572396 = sum of:
        0.087572396 = weight(_text_:access in 6111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087572396 = score(doc=6111,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.51889807 = fieldWeight in 6111, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6111)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Rejects ideas that print will be replaced by electronic access to information. Librarianship should incorporate the useful aspects of electronic technology while maintaining what is useful and good about past and present services. Considers how to best adapt and enhance current structures to accomodate electronic documents and to use automation to improve access and delivery. Cataloguing and classification will remain central to information access. Examines the future of bibliographic standards in the future

0.006319993 = product of:
  0.025279973 = sum of:
    0.025279973 = product of:
      0.050559945 = sum of:
        0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050559945 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Explains Ranganathan's 5 Laws of Library Science which are: books are for use; every book its reader; every reader his book; save the time of the reader; and the library is a growing organism: offers 5 new laws of library science in the belief that they are more appropriate in the current context; libraries serve humanity; respect all forms by which knowledge is communicated; use technology intelligently to enhance service; protect free access to knowledge; and honour the past and create the future

0.005529994 = product of:
  0.022119977 = sum of:
    0.022119977 = product of:
      0.044239953 = sum of:
        0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044239953 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reviews the current economic and social situation, the negative effects on civilization of commercialized entertainment and computers, and concepts of society and discusses how regaining control in the areas of libraries and cataloguing can counter these negative influences. Focuses on the ability of cataloguers to continue to offer access to knowledge through integrated records of pan media collections and examines the questions of what should be recorded, standards and descriptive cataloguing. To maximize the abilities of computerized systems proposes an approach to subject indexing, classification, shelf arrangement and an overhaul of MARC