Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Smiraglia, R.P."
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985) 0.06
    0.060778193 = product of:
      0.12155639 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
        0.038312923 = product of:
          0.07662585 = sum of:
            0.07662585 = weight(_text_:access in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07662585 = score(doc=343,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
  2. Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliocentrism revisited : RDA and FRBRoo (2015) 0.06
    0.05939353 = product of:
      0.11878706 = sum of:
        0.10298707 = weight(_text_:description in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10298707 = score(doc=2364,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.4448666 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
        0.015799982 = product of:
          0.031599965 = sum of:
            0.031599965 = weight(_text_:access in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031599965 = score(doc=2364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliocentricity in the library catalog arose from the practice of resource description, which emerged from the simple listing of books as objects with little reference to their intellectual content. Combined with shifting cultural conceptions of authorship, this led to a complex system in which the implicit concept of "goodness" affected the efficacy of description of varying resources. Issues of domain-specificity, cultural origins or contexts of usage have been disregarded in deference to book-like considerations. RDA (Resource Description and Access provides for analytical descriptions using the knowledge-based FRBR conceptual model of entities based on the artifactual intersection of intellectual works and cultural information carriers. The more empirically- based FRBRoo, an object-oriented revision of the conceptual model, reflects the atemporality of instantiation. FRBRoo seems promising as a potential additional facet for expressing structural components of knowledge represented by traditionally conceptual KOSs. In this study two cases are analyzed from the point of view of both RDA and FRBRoo. Analysis shows how little synergy has been gained through RDA's implementation of the FRBR model. The cases analyzed using RDA and FRBRoo serve as artifacts of cultural discourse, by which the measure of objective violence reflects the degree to which individual works still cannot be disambiguated.
  3. Beak, J.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Contours of knowledge : core and granularity in the evolution of the DCMI domain (2014) 0.05
    0.04579494 = product of:
      0.09158988 = sum of:
        0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071351536 = score(doc=1415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
        0.020238347 = product of:
          0.040476695 = sum of:
            0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040476695 = score(doc=1415,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Domain analysis reveals the contours of knowledge in diverse discourse communities. The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) conferences represent the cutting edge of research in metadata for the digital age. Beak and Smiraglia (2013) discovered a shared epistemology revealed by co-citation perceptions of the domain, a common ontological base, social semantics, and a limited but focused intent. User groups did not emerge from that analysis, raising an interesting question about the content of core thematic extension versus a highly granular intension. We analyzed keywords from the titles by year to identify core and granular topics as they arose over time. The results showed that only 36 core keywords, e.g. "Dublin Core," "Metadata," "Linked Data," "Applications," etc. represents the domain's extension. However, there was much rich terminology among the granularity, e.g., "development," "description," "interoperability," "analysis," "applications," and "classification" and even "domain" pointed to the domain's intension.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Smiraglia, R.P.: Rethinking what we catalog : documents as cultural artifacts (2008) 0.03
    0.029729806 = product of:
      0.11891922 = sum of:
        0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11891922 = score(doc=789,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging is at its most interesting when it is comprehended as part of a larger, meaningful, objective. Resource description is a complex task; but the essence of librarianship is curatorship of a collection, and that sense of curatorial responsibility is one of the things that makes resource description into cataloging-that is, professional responsibility is the difference between the task of transcription and the satisfaction of professional decisions well-made. Part of the essential difference is comprehension of the cultural milieu from which specific resources arise, and the modes of scholarship that might be used to nudge them to reveal their secrets for the advancement of knowledge. In this paper I describe a course designed to lend excitement and professional judgment to the education of future catalogers and collection managers by conveying the notion that all documents are, in fact, cultural artifacts. Part of a knowledge-sensitive curriculum for knowledge organization, the purpose of this course is to go beyond the concept of documents as mere packets of information to demonstrate that each is a product of its time and circumstances. Bibliographic skill leads to greater comfort with the intellectual and cultural forces that impel the creation of documents. Students become comfortable with the curatorial side of cataloging - the placement of each document in its cultural milieu as the goal of resource description, rather than the act of description itself.
  5. Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999) 0.03
    0.02558517 = product of:
      0.05117034 = sum of:
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
        0.01686529 = product of:
          0.03373058 = sum of:
            0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373058 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    14.12.2006 10:06:26
  6. Graf, A.M.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Race & ethnicity in the Encyclopedia of Milwaukee : a case study in the use of domain analysis (2014) 0.03
    0.02558517 = product of:
      0.05117034 = sum of:
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
        0.01686529 = product of:
          0.03373058 = sum of:
            0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373058 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    4. 9.2014 19:26:51
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  7. Smiraglia, R.P.: Content metadata : an analysis of Etruscan artifacts in a museum of archeology (2005) 0.02
    0.017837884 = product of:
      0.071351536 = sum of:
        0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071351536 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata schemes target resources as information-packages, without attention to the distinction between content and carrier. Most schema are derived without empirical understanding of the concepts that need to be represented, the ways in which terms representing the central concepts might best be derived, and how metadata descriptions will be used for retrieval. Research is required to resolve this dilemma, and much research will be required if the plethora of schemes that already exist are to be made efficacious for resource description and retrieval. Here I report the results of a preliminary study, which was designed to see whether the bibliographic concept of "the work" could be of any relevance among artifacts held by a museum. I extend the "works metaphor" from the bibliographic to the artifactual domain, by altering the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. Case studies of Etruscan artifacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in non-documentary artifacts.
  8. Heuvel, C. van den; Smiraglia, R.P.: Concepts as particles : metaphors for the universe of knowledge (2010) 0.01
    0.010291515 = product of:
      0.04116606 = sum of:
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 3513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=3513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3513)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
  9. Smiraglia, R.P.: Universes, dimensions, domains, intensions and extensions : knowledge organization for the 21st century (2012) 0.01
    0.010291515 = product of:
      0.04116606 = sum of:
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2013 19:41:26
  10. Park, H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Enhancing data curation of cultural heritage for information sharing : a case study using open Government data (2014) 0.01
    0.010291515 = product of:
      0.04116606 = sum of:
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=1575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    19.12.2014 19:26:51
  11. Smiraglia, R.P.: Subject access to archival materials using LCSH (1990) 0.01
    0.009479989 = product of:
      0.037919957 = sum of:
        0.037919957 = product of:
          0.075839914 = sum of:
            0.075839914 = weight(_text_:access in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075839914 = score(doc=490,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper takes for granted that archival materials will be entered into a catalog in which Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) will be used to provide access. The purposes of subject access are discussed. The matter of selecting the appropriate extent of subject cataloging for archival entities is raised. Archival entities will generally require more detailed subject cataloging than published materials. A scheme for subject analysis of archival materials is presented. LCSH is described briefly, and several archival entities are analyzed and provided with LCSH access points to illustrate the methodology employed. The chief advantages of using LCSH for archival materials are its availability, and its ability to cause archival materials to collocate topically with published materials in integrated online systems.
  12. Smiraglia, R.P.: Keywords, indexing, text analysis : an editorial (2013) 0.01
    0.008576263 = product of:
      0.03430505 = sum of:
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 1390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=1390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 1390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1390)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26. 6.2015 19:17:39
  13. Smiraglia, R.P.: Keywords redux : an editorial (2015) 0.01
    0.008576263 = product of:
      0.03430505 = sum of:
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 2099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=2099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 2099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2099)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    26. 6.2015 19:17:06
  14. Smiraglia, R.P.: Curating and virtual shelves : an editorial (2006) 0.01
    0.0074324515 = product of:
      0.029729806 = sum of:
        0.029729806 = weight(_text_:description in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029729806 = score(doc=409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.12842192 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    An important aspect of what we do is facilitating the curatorial aspect of information retrieval or librarianship. What I mean is that our job is not merely to "mark and park," as generations of catalogers famously have said of both resource description and classification, or even to generate parking spaces (to press my metaphor), but rather our job is to place each entity in the best category, each artifact in the best environment, each resource on the best "shelf" to enhance its usability should it actually be sought for retrieval. Hope Olson (2002) has also written about the limits we create when we exercise the power to name. We must be aware of the consequences of our science. In librarianship in the United States at the moment there is a fair amount of hand-wringing about the future, and this anxiety has been fed by the report of Karen Calhoun on the changing nature of the catalog. Calhoun (2006) suggests that the library community should abandon many of its expensive knowledge organization practices - such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings - in favor of integration of search engines into library catalogs. As logical as this seems on the face of it (and as much as we might often have wished LCSH would go away!), purveyors of such notions have either forgotten or rejected the notion of the library as a social instrument, and therefore the order of things in libraries as an extension of that social role. We must also view knowledge organization then as a cultural enterprise, a social act that has consequences. The ontologies we use to devise categorical schemes imply certain realities. If we say there is no music other than Western Art, why, then there must be no point in paying any attention to music of any other sort, right? And if we say that UFOs are a kind of controversial knowledge, we join the community of non-believers who insist that UFOs do not exist. Surely if we thought they were viable phenomena we would create a concrete class for them (see DDC 001.942). Voila, now we know, UFOs do not exist - the DDC says so. And if a gay adolescent searches for literature to help understand and finds that it all falls under "perversion" then we have oppressed yet another youth (see Campbell 2001). Our actions have social consequences.
  15. Smiraglia, R.P.: About knowledge organization : an editorial (2005) 0.01
    0.00686101 = product of:
      0.02744404 = sum of:
        0.02744404 = weight(_text_:26 in 6087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02744404 = score(doc=6087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.15607277 = fieldWeight in 6087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6087)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13.10.2006 13:50:26
  16. Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 11's diverse bookshelf : an editorial (2011) 0.01
    0.006003384 = product of:
      0.024013536 = sum of:
        0.024013536 = weight(_text_:26 in 4555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024013536 = score(doc=4555,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.13656367 = fieldWeight in 4555, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4555)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    To take advantage of the wonderful Italian weather, ISKO's 2010 conference was moved from the usual August to February; the venue was the Sapienza University (officially Sapienza - Università di Roma) and the conference took place 23-26 February 2010. The conference was organized and hosted by ISKO Italy and the Faculty of Philosophy of Sapienza University. Each morning as attendees arrived, we were treated to the garden pictured in Figure 1, and especially interesting was the fountain and the statue of St. Francis. Of course, the mystery was the turtle at St. Francis' foot, which looks quite like part of the statue but turned out to be real. The peaceful gardens were just a hallmark of the contemplative nature of the conference. Officially the 11th International ISKO Conference, the theme was "Paradigms and Conceptual Systems in Knowledge Organization." The proceedings and the conference program together listed 65 presentations, of which 64 were actually presented and 61 had papers included in the proceedings (or, 4 papers were presented but not included in the proceedings, and 1 paper included in the proceedings was not presented). Although space is insufficient for a full analysis, following from my editorial following ISKO 10 (Smiraglia 2008), I will use this space to paint a brief bibliometric portrait of the domain at the core of this conference. Data for this analysis come from the PDF of the proceedings; all citations for all papers were pasted in an Excel spreadsheet, where the citations were variously delimited for the following analyses. The original file is available on my blog: http://lazykoblog.wordpress.com/.
  17. Smiraglia, R.P.: Classification interaction demonstrated empirically (2014) 0.01
    0.005059587 = product of:
      0.020238347 = sum of:
        0.020238347 = product of:
          0.040476695 = sum of:
            0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040476695 = score(doc=1420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. Thomas, D.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Beyond the score (1998) 0.00
    0.0047399946 = product of:
      0.018959979 = sum of:
        0.018959979 = product of:
          0.037919957 = sum of:
            0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 1761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037919957 = score(doc=1761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 1761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    For a long time music librarians have grappled with the problem of cataloguing music scores along with physical recordings, including videorecordings of musical performances, in such a way as to collocate als physical forms in an intelligible order. The critical problems are, how to identify the properties of musical bibliographic entities and then how to control each property in the bibliographic universe and in each of the subsets of that universe, such as the library OPAC. Examines the concept of the 'musical work' as it has been decribed by bibliographers, cataloguers and scholars of bibliographic control. Concludes that there is ample evidence that equality exists among the representations of a musical work regardless of their physical formats. An understanding of the concept of the musical work should obviate the need to reconsider forms of access under current cataloguing practice and lead the way to the next generation of bibliographic control for musical works
  19. Smiraglia, R.P.; Heuvel, C. van den; Dousa, T.M.: Interactions between elementary structures in universes of knowledge (2011) 0.00
    0.0047399946 = product of:
      0.018959979 = sum of:
        0.018959979 = product of:
          0.037919957 = sum of:
            0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 4812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037919957 = score(doc=4812,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 4812, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4812)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
  20. Smiraglia, R.P.: Shifting intension in knowledge organization : an editorial (2012) 0.00
    0.0042163227 = product of:
      0.01686529 = sum of:
        0.01686529 = product of:
          0.03373058 = sum of:
            0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03373058 = score(doc=630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:09:49