-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.02
0.02211583 = product of:
0.08846332 = sum of:
0.08846332 = sum of:
0.054732744 = weight(_text_:access in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054732744 = score(doc=586,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3243113 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373058 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Thelwall, M.; Levitt, J.M.: National scientific performance evolution patterns : retrenchment, successful expansion, or overextension (2018)
0.01
0.012128668 = product of:
0.04851467 = sum of:
0.04851467 = weight(_text_:26 in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04851467 = score(doc=4225,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.2759003 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- National governments would like to preside over an expanding and increasingly high-impact science system but are these two goals largely independent or closely linked? This article investigates the relationship between changes in the share of the world's scientific output and changes in relative citation impact for 2.6 million articles from 26 fields in the 25 countries with the most Scopus-indexed journal articles from 1996 to 2015. There is a negative correlation between expansion and relative citation impact, but their relationship varies. China, Spain, Australia, and Poland were successful overall across the 26 fields, expanding both their share of the world's output and its relative citation impact, whereas Japan, France, Sweden, and Israel had decreased shares and relative citation impact. In contrast, the USA, UK, Germany, Italy, Russia, The Netherlands, Switzerland, Finland, and Denmark all enjoyed increased relative citation impact despite a declining share of publications. Finally, India, South Korea, Brazil, Taiwan, and Turkey all experienced sustained expansion but a recent fall in relative citation impact. These results may partly reflect changes in the coverage of Scopus and the selection of fields.
-
Thelwall, M.: Text characteristics of English language university Web sites (2005)
0.01
0.010291515 = product of:
0.04116606 = sum of:
0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 3463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04116606 = score(doc=3463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3463)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The nature of the contents of academic Web sites is of direct relevance to the new field of scientific Web intelligence, and for search engine and topic-specific crawler designers. We analyze word frequencies in national academic Webs using the Web sites of three Englishspeaking nations: Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Strong regularities were found in page size and word frequency distributions, but with significant anomalies. At least 26% of pages contain no words. High frequency words include university names and acronyms, Internet terminology, and computing product names: not always words in common usage away from the Web. A minority of low frequency words are spelling mistakes, with other common types including nonwords, proper names, foreign language terms or computer science variable names. Based upon these findings, recommendations for data cleansing and filtering are made, particularly for clustering applications.
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.: Topic-based sentiment analysis for the social web : the role of mood and issue-related words (2013)
0.01
0.010291515 = product of:
0.04116606 = sum of:
0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04116606 = score(doc=1004,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 7.2013 13:04:26
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? (2015)
0.01
0.010291515 = product of:
0.04116606 = sum of:
0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04116606 = score(doc=1813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:29:49
-
Thelwall, M.; Li, X.; Barjak, F.; Robinson, S.: Assessing the international web connectivity of research groups (2008)
0.01
0.008576263 = product of:
0.03430505 = sum of:
0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03430505 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 12. 2.2008 14:26:04
-
Thelwall, M.: ¬A comparison of link and URL citation counting (2011)
0.01
0.008576263 = product of:
0.03430505 = sum of:
0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 4533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03430505 = score(doc=4533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 4533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4533)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 12. 7.2011 18:26:17
-
Wilkinson, D.; Thelwall, M.: Trending Twitter topics in English : an international comparison (2012)
0.01
0.008576263 = product of:
0.03430505 = sum of:
0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03430505 = score(doc=375,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 8.2012 13:57:23
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: ¬The role of online videos in research communication : a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications (2012)
0.01
0.008576263 = product of:
0.03430505 = sum of:
0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03430505 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 8.2012 14:21:19
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Are scholarly articles disproportionately read in their own country? : An analysis of mendeley readers (2015)
0.01
0.008576263 = product of:
0.03430505 = sum of:
0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 1850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03430505 = score(doc=1850,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 1850, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1850)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 15. 5.2015 13:26:24
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.006746116 = product of:
0.026984464 = sum of:
0.026984464 = product of:
0.05396893 = sum of:
0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05396893 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.0059627807 = product of:
0.023851123 = sum of:
0.023851123 = product of:
0.047702245 = sum of:
0.047702245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047702245 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.01
0.005059587 = product of:
0.020238347 = sum of:
0.020238347 = product of:
0.040476695 = sum of:
0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040476695 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.01
0.005059587 = product of:
0.020238347 = sum of:
0.020238347 = product of:
0.040476695 = sum of:
0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040476695 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.01
0.005059587 = product of:
0.020238347 = sum of:
0.020238347 = product of:
0.040476695 = sum of:
0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040476695 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.005059587 = product of:
0.020238347 = sum of:
0.020238347 = product of:
0.040476695 = sum of:
0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040476695 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Search engine coverage bias : evidence and possible causes (2004)
0.00
0.0047399946 = product of:
0.018959979 = sum of:
0.018959979 = product of:
0.037919957 = sum of:
0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037919957 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Commercial search engines are now playing an increasingly important role in Web information dissemination and access. Of particular interest to business and national governments is whether the big engines have coverage biased towards the US or other countries. In our study we tested for national biases in three major search engines and found significant differences in their coverage of commercial Web sites. The US sites were much better covered than the others in the study: sites from China, Taiwan and Singapore. We then examined the possible technical causes of the differences and found that the language of a site does not affect its coverage by search engines. However, the visibility of a site, measured by the number of links to it, affects its chance to be covered by search engines. We conclude that the coverage bias does exist but this is due not to deliberate choices of the search engines but occurs as a natural result of cumulative advantage effects of US sites on the Web. Nevertheless, the bias remains a cause for international concern.
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.00
0.0042163227 = product of:
0.01686529 = sum of:
0.01686529 = product of:
0.03373058 = sum of:
0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373058 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.00
0.0042163227 = product of:
0.01686529 = sum of:
0.01686529 = product of:
0.03373058 = sum of:
0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373058 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.00
0.0042163227 = product of:
0.01686529 = sum of:
0.01686529 = product of:
0.03373058 = sum of:
0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373058 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
