Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.03010384 = product of:
  0.06020768 = sum of:
    0.04756769 = weight(_text_:description in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04756769 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.20547508 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
    0.012639986 = product of:
      0.025279973 = sum of:
        0.025279973 = weight(_text_:access in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025279973 = score(doc=4297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.14979297 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The relationship between a person with a question and a source of information is complex. Indexing and abstracting often fail because too much emphasis is put on the mechanics of description, and too little has been given as to what ought to be represented. Research literature suggests that inappropriate representation results in failed searches a significant number of times, perhaps even in a majority of cases. "Doing Things with Information" seeks to rectify this unfortunate situation by emphasizing methods of modeling and constructing appropriate representations of such questions and documents. Students in programs of information studies will find focal points for discussion about system design and refinement of existing systems. Librarians, scholars, and those who work within large document collections, whether paper or electronic, will find insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the access systems they use.

0.008576263 = product of:
  0.03430505 = sum of:
    0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03430505 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

16. 1.2018 18:54:26

0.005059587 = product of:
  0.020238347 = sum of:
    0.020238347 = product of:
      0.040476695 = sum of:
        0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040476695 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

24. 8.2016 14:03:22

0.0027930688 = product of:
  0.011172275 = sum of:
    0.011172275 = product of:
      0.02234455 = sum of:
        0.02234455 = weight(_text_:access in 986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02234455 = score(doc=986,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.13239953 = fieldWeight in 986, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=986)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

INFORMATION MINING / AUTOMATIC INDEXING Flávio Codeço Coelho, Renato Rocha Souza, Daniel Magalhães Chada and Pablo de Camargo Cerdeira. Information Mining and Visualization of Data from the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF): A Case Study - Carlos Alberto Correa and Nair Yumiko Kobashi. Automatic Indexing and Information Visualization: A Study Based on Paraconsistent Logics - Nalini A. Raja. Digitized Contents and Index Pages as Alternative Subject Access Fields USERS AND CONTEXT Carol L. Tilley and Kathryn A. La Barre. What if they build it and no one comes? Balancing Full-Text Access and User Tasks - Sholeh Arastoopoor and Rahmatollah Fattahi. Users. perception of Aboutness and Ofness in Images: An Approach to Subject Indexing Based on Ervin Panofsky's Theory and Users' View - Melodie J. Fox. Communities of Practice, Gender and Social Tagging - Radia Bernaoui and Mohmed Hassoun. User Expectations and Reality and Delineation of Agricultural Information Systems in the Maghreb ABSTRACTS OF POSTERS