Search (52 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.03 
    0.030702204 = product of:
  0.061404407 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
    0.020238347 = product of:
      0.040476695 = sum of:
        0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040476695 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
    Date
    26. 1.2003 19:12:19
  2. Magri, M.; Solari, A.: ¬The SCI Journal Citation Reports : a potential tool for studying journals? (1996) 0.02 
    0.020810865 = product of:
  0.08324346 = sum of:
    0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08324346 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Issue
    1. Description of the JCR journal population based on the number of citations received, number of source items, impact factor, immediacy index and cited half life
  3. Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997) 0.02 
    0.020810865 = product of:
  0.08324346 = sum of:
    0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08324346 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Investigates the characteristics of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) through the study of the Science Citation Index (SCI). Other criteria for evaluating a journal are also discussed. The compilation process of SCI data, and the characteristics, applications and limitations of SCI are studied. A detailed description of JCR is provided including: journal ranking listing, citing journal listing, cited journal listing, subject category listing, source data, impact factor, immediacy index, cited half-life and citing half-life. The applications and limitations of JCR are also explored. In addition to the criteria listed in JCR, the size, circulation and influence of journals are also considered significant criteria fir evaluation purposes
  4. Octavio, A.: ¬The '¬indexed' theorem (1996) 0.02 
    0.02058303 = product of:
  0.08233212 = sum of:
    0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08233212 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    15. 2.1997 14:26:33
  5. Moed, H.F.; Bruin, R.E.D.; Leeuwen, T.N.V.: New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance : database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995) 0.02 
    0.017837884 = product of:
  0.071351536 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Riviera, E.: Scientific communities as autopoietic systems : the reproductive function of citations (2013) 0.02 
    0.017837884 = product of:
  0.071351536 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=970,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 970, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=970)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The increasing employment of bibliometric measures for assessing, describing, and mapping science inevitably leads to the increasing need for a citation theory constituting a theoretical frame for both citation analysis and the description of citers' behavior. In this article a theoretical model, encompassing both normative and constructivist approaches, is suggested. The conceptualization of scientific communities as autopoietic systems, the components of which are communicative events, allows us to observe the reproductive function of citations conceived as codes and media of scientific communication. Citations, thanks to their constraining and enabling properties, constitute the engine of the structuration process ensuring the reproduction of scientific communities. By referring to Giddens' structuration theory, Luhmann's theory about social systems as communicative networks, Merton's "sociology of science" and his conceptualizations about the functions of citations, as well as Small's proposal about citations as concept-symbols, a sociologically integrated approach to scientometrics is proposed.
  7. Daquino, M.; Peroni, S.; Shotton, D.; Colavizza, G.; Ghavimi, B.; Lauscher, A.; Mayr, P.; Romanello, M.; Zumstein, P.: ¬The OpenCitations Data Model (2020) 0.02 
    0.017837884 = product of:
  0.071351536 = sum of:
    0.071351536 = weight(_text_:description in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.071351536 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    A variety of schemas and ontologies are currently used for the machine-readable description of bibliographic entities and citations. This diversity, and the reuse of the same ontology terms with different nuances, generates inconsistencies in data. Adoption of a single data model would facilitate data integration tasks regardless of the data supplier or context application. In this paper we present the OpenCitations Data Model (OCDM), a generic data model for describing bibliographic entities and citations, developed using Semantic Web technologies. We also evaluate the effective reusability of OCDM according to ontology evaluation practices, mention existing users of OCDM, and discuss the use and impact of OCDM in the wider open science community.
  8. Göbel, S.: What the Citation Index is good for (1997) 0.02 
    0.017152525 = product of:
  0.0686101 = sum of:
    0.0686101 = weight(_text_:26 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0686101 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    15. 2.1997 14:26:33
  9. Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004) 0.02 
    0.017152525 = product of:
  0.0686101 = sum of:
    0.0686101 = weight(_text_:26 in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0686101 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Castro, R. de; Grossmann, J.W.: Famous trails to Paul Erdös (1999) 0.01 
    0.01372202 = product of:
  0.05488808 = sum of:
    0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05488808 = score(doc=3991,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    15. 2.1997 14:26:33
  11. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01 
    0.013492232 = product of:
  0.05396893 = sum of:
    0.05396893 = product of:
      0.10793786 = sum of:
        0.10793786 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10793786 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  12. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.01 
    0.013492232 = product of:
  0.05396893 = sum of:
    0.05396893 = product of:
      0.10793786 = sum of:
        0.10793786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10793786 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  13. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.01 
    0.012006768 = product of:
  0.048027072 = sum of:
    0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048027072 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    17. 1.1997 17:19:26
  14. Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996) 0.01 
    0.012006768 = product of:
  0.048027072 = sum of:
    0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048027072 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Towards a worldwide library: a ten year forecast. Proceedings of the 19th International Essen Symposium, 23-26 Sept 1996. Ed.: A.H. Helal u. J.W. Weiss
  15. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.011925561 = product of:
  0.047702245 = sum of:
    0.047702245 = product of:
      0.09540449 = sum of:
        0.09540449 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09540449 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  16. ISI offers intranet access to its citation index databases (1997) 0.01 
    0.011172275 = product of:
  0.0446891 = sum of:
    0.0446891 = product of:
      0.0893782 = sum of:
        0.0893782 = weight(_text_:access in 554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0893782 = score(doc=554,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5295981 = fieldWeight in 554, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=554)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Announces the availability of the Web of Science, a proprietary Web browser providing intranet access to the Citation Index databases from ISI. The new browser interface will allow researcher to browse indexed information and perform further research. Describes search options
  17. MacCain, K.W.: Descriptor and citation retrieval in the medical behavioral sciences literature : retrieval overlaps and novelty distribution (1989) 0.01 
    0.010291515 = product of:
  0.04116606 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Search results for nine topics in the medical behavioral sciences are reanalyzed to compare the overall perfor-mance of descriptor and citation search strategies in identifying relevant and novel documents. Overlap per- centages between an aggregate "descriptor-based" database (MEDLINE, EXERPTA MEDICA, PSYCINFO) and an aggregate "citation-based" database (SCISEARCH, SOCIAL SCISEARCH) ranged from 1% to 26%, with a median overlap of 8% relevant retrievals found using both search strategies. For seven topics in which both descriptor and citation strategies produced reasonably substantial retrievals, two patterns of search performance and novelty distribution were observed: (1) where descriptor and citation retrieval showed little overlap, novelty retrieval percentages differed by 17-23% between the two strategies; (2) topics with a relatively high percentage retrieval overlap shoed little difference (1-4%) in descriptor and citation novelty retrieval percentages. These results reflect the varying partial congruence of two literature networks and represent two different types of subject relevance
  18. Meho, L.I.; Sonnenwald, D.H.: Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance : a case study of Kurdish scholarship (2000) 0.01 
    0.010291515 = product of:
  0.04116606 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=4382,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    30. 1.2000 12:31:26
  19. Steele, T.W.; Stier, J.C.: ¬The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences : a forestry case study (2000) 0.01 
    0.010291515 = product of:
  0.04116606 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 4592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=4592,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 4592, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4592)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    5. 4.2000 9:26:40
  20. Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002) 0.01 
    0.010291515 = product of:
  0.04116606 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26. 5.2002 15:33:02

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 9
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 52
  • el 4
  • More… Less…

Themes