Search (791 results, page 1 of 40)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. McEathron, S.R.: ¬The cataloging of globes (1999) 0.17
    0.16888584 = product of:
      0.22518112 = sum of:
        0.13454175 = weight(_text_:description in 5321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13454175 = score(doc=5321,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5811713 = fieldWeight in 5321, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5321)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 5321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=5321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 5321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5321)
        0.03575128 = product of:
          0.07150256 = sum of:
            0.07150256 = weight(_text_:access in 5321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07150256 = score(doc=5321,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 5321, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5321)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Globes are a unique cartographic format with special characteristics that need to be considered when providing bibliographic description and access. This article describes the challenges and characteristics of cataloging globes. It provides practical assistance in applying specific MARC 21 fields for globes. Special consideration is given to those fields that are unique to cataloging globes including: physical description areas, title, and subject access.
    Date
    26. 7.2006 10:20:20
  2. Danskin, A.: Linked and open data : RDA and bibliographic control (2012) 0.14
    0.14337601 = product of:
      0.19116801 = sum of:
        0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090631 = score(doc=304,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
        0.07130171 = weight(_text_:26 in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07130171 = score(doc=304,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.40548897 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
        0.018959979 = product of:
          0.037919957 = sum of:
            0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037919957 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    RDA: Resource Description and Access is a new cataloguing standard which will replace the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, which has been widely used in libraries since 1981. RDA, like AACR2, is a content standard providing guidance and instruction on how to identify and record attributes or properties of resources which are significant for discovery. However, RDA is also an implementation of the FRBR and FRAD models. The RDA element set and vocabularies are being published on the Open Metadata Registry as linked open data. RDA provides a rich vocabulary for the description of resources and for expressing relationships between them. This paper describes what RDA offers and considers the challenges and potential of linked open data in the broader framework of bibliographic control.
    Date
    26. 6.2012 20:18:37
    26. 6.2012 20:26:43
  3. McBride, J.L.: Faceted subject access for music through USMARC : a case for linked fields (2000) 0.13
    0.13499425 = product of:
      0.17999233 = sum of:
        0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090631 = score(doc=5403,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
        0.037919957 = product of:
          0.075839914 = sum of:
            0.075839914 = weight(_text_:access in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075839914 = score(doc=5403,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The USMARC Format for Bibliographic Description contains three fields (045, 047, and 048) designed to facilitate subject access to music materials. The fields cover three of the main aspects of subject description for music: date of composition, form or genre, and number of instruments or voices, respectively. The codes are rarely used for subject access, because of the difficulty of coding them and because false drops would result in retrieval of bibliographic records where more than one musical work is present, a situation that occurs frequently with sound recordings. It is proposed that the values of the fields be converted to natural language and that subfield 8 be used to link all access fields in a bibliographic record for greater precision in retrieval. This proposal has implications beyond music cataloging, especially for metadata and any bibliographic records describing materials containing many works and subjects.
    Date
    27. 7.2006 19:26:55
  4. Tillett, B.: Report on the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, held October 23-25, 1997 in Toronto, Canada (1998) 0.13
    0.13147756 = product of:
      0.17530343 = sum of:
        0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09513538 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
        0.025279973 = product of:
          0.050559945 = sum of:
            0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050559945 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Report of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, 23-25 Oct 1997, Toronto. This conference examined cataloguing principles and rules in light of both description and access within the framework of library catalogues. In particular it focused on bibliographic and authority records and the usability of the library catalogue
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.2, S.31-55
  5. Prescott, D.F.: Early maps with or in printed publications : description and access (1999) 0.13
    0.1271876 = product of:
      0.16958345 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
        0.038312923 = product of:
          0.07662585 = sum of:
            0.07662585 = weight(_text_:access in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07662585 = score(doc=5332,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article identifies the types of publications containing maps and the need for access to maps contained in them. The emphasis is on older maps; the comments are opposite for cataloging of current maps. The needs of map users are discussed, identifying the points of access that are critical to successful map retrieval. Main entry for maps is discussed. Various categories of associated map and book items are identified, and suggestions made, with USMARC examples, as to how these maps might be treated by the cataloger
    Date
    26. 7.2006 12:06:19
  6. O'Dell, A.J.: Maker metadata : problems and possibilities (2015) 0.13
    0.1271876 = product of:
      0.16958345 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
        0.038312923 = product of:
          0.07662585 = sum of:
            0.07662585 = weight(_text_:access in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07662585 = score(doc=2618,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information about makers is critical to bibliographic research, and special collections cataloging norms provide maker metadata. Still, access to maker metadata is hampered in online library catalogs. This article investigates the betterment of maker metadata in (or alongside) library catalogs using existing content guidelines, encoding schemas, and data models. Discussion finds that libraries have appropriate tools for improving access to maker metadata. This article thus encourages the profession to coordinate access to maker metadata. Cooperative maker description and the merger and/or linking of datasets generated by the research community are suggested areas for future investigation.
    Date
    19. 1.2016 15:45:26
  7. Armstrong, H.; Lundgren, J.: Cataloging aerial photograpbs and other remote-sensing materials (1999) 0.12
    0.12191467 = product of:
      0.1625529 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5326)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5326)
        0.03128237 = product of:
          0.06256474 = sum of:
            0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 5326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06256474 = score(doc=5326,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 5326, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5326)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Remote-sensing images are valuable library resources, which provide highly useful information to a variety of library patrons. They are graphic representations of spatial relationships recorded by a device that was not in physical contact with the geographic entity being studied. Effective access and description in the library catalog is necessary so that these images may be found and used. This article discusses characteristics of remote-sensing images and maps: how to identify them; and how to catalog, classify and provide subject access for them. A variety of remote-sensing items and their catalog records are reproduced and discussed, including application of the new Remote-sensing 007 field.
    Date
    26. 7.2006 10:19:12
  8. Resource Description & Access (RDA) (o.J.) 0.12
    0.11702848 = product of:
      0.23405696 = sum of:
        0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19027077 = score(doc=2438,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
        0.043786198 = product of:
          0.087572396 = sum of:
            0.087572396 = weight(_text_:access in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087572396 = score(doc=2438,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.51889807 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    RDA Blog or Resource Description & Access Blog is a blog on Resource Description and Access (RDA), a new library cataloging standard that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery, organized based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations replacing Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2). Free for everyone Forever.
  9. Parker, V.: Cataloguing map series and serials (1999) 0.12
    0.11616145 = product of:
      0.15488194 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
        0.023611406 = product of:
          0.04722281 = sum of:
            0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04722281 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article defines and outlines the characteristics of map series, map sets, map serials, maps in multiple editions and multi-sheet single maps. Brief instructions on sources of information and general methodology used in gathering information prior to creating the entry are presented. The different methods which may be used for cataloguing series and serials are explored. There is also a brief section on cataloguing bi- and multi-lingual works in a bilingual environment. For each relevant area of description, instructions and examples are given to illustrate problems. Sections on analysis (including multi-level cataloguing).
    Date
    26. 7.2006 10:44:22
  10. Kandoian, N.A.: Cataloging early printed maps (1999) 0.12
    0.11504287 = product of:
      0.1533905 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5331)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5331)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 5331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=5331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 5331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the context of machine readable cataloging for national bibliographic databases, this paper describes the cataloging of monographic early printed maps whether published separately or extracted from other publications. It deals with description and access to capture the essence of a rare or ''antique'' map to create a useful surrogate. The step-by-step approach, rather than breaking new ground, integrates rules and guidance from multiple sources, both cataloging tools and supplementary materials, in a narrative fashion, with reference to the sources, their specific rules, and stated policies. Reference is made throughout the text to ten sample catalog records, with MARC 21 tagging, that are appended to the article.
    Date
    26. 7.2006 12:06:12
  11. Taniguchi, S.: User tasks in the RDA-based model (2013) 0.12
    0.11504287 = product of:
      0.1533905 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    I examine user tasks and their related issues in the model that reflects Resource Description and Access (RDA) directly, which complements prior studies that dealt mainly with entities and their attributes and relationships. First, the definitions of user tasks in Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and RDA, respectively, are reviewed. Then, mappings between attributes and relationships of the RDA entities to the user tasks are proposed for the RDA-based model; the mapping covering Group 1 and 2 entities, and that for the other entities. The resultant RDA mappings and those shown in FRBR and FRAD are compared, which reveals the superiority of the former mappings.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:14:26
  12. Gorman, M.: ¬The origins and making of the ISBD : a personal history, 1966-1978 (2014) 0.12
    0.11504287 = product of:
      0.1533905 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=1995,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    What follows are my memories of the events, starting almost five decades ago, that led to the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD)-still the most successful and widely used international cataloging standard in history. Many of the documents of the time were little more than ephemera (working papers and the like) and some are not now available to me. I have checked my recollections in all the documents to which I have access and apologize in advance for any errors of time or place. I also apologize for the, alas, unavoidable, given the nature of the essay, many repetitions of the words "I" and "me."
    Date
    30. 5.2015 17:59:26
  13. Taniguchi, S.: Modeling resource description tasks in RDA (2015) 0.11
    0.113011986 = product of:
      0.22602397 = sum of:
        0.203904 = weight(_text_:description in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.203904 = score(doc=2013,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8807909 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study aims to model the resource description tasks that are performed by catalogers. First, a model of authority data creator tasks is derived from Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), since FRAD partially includes such task modeling. Second, modeling of resource description tasks in line with Resource Description and Access (RDA) is conducted to cover the whole resource description tasks including those on descriptive data as well as those on authority data, and also to reflect RDA instructions as much as possible. Third, the modeling of resource description tasks is compared with that of user tasks in order to understand their differences.
  14. Nasatir, M.: ¬The cataloging and classification of machine-readable data files : Pt.3: Subject description of machine-readable data files (1982) 0.11
    0.112517595 = product of:
      0.22503519 = sum of:
        0.14270307 = weight(_text_:description in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14270307 = score(doc=3921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
        0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08233212 = score(doc=3921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:26:53
  15. Maxwell, R.L.: Handbook for RDA : Maxwell's handbook for RDA ; explaining and illustrating RDA: resource description and access using MARC 21 (2013) 0.11
    0.10858533 = product of:
      0.21717066 = sum of:
        0.17477486 = weight(_text_:description in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17477486 = score(doc=2085,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.75496364 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
        0.042395804 = product of:
          0.08479161 = sum of:
            0.08479161 = weight(_text_:access in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08479161 = score(doc=2085,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5024209 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    IntroductionDescribing manifestations and items -- Describing persons -- Describing families -- Describing corporate bodies -- Describing geographic entities -- Describing works -- Describing expressions -- Recording relationships -- Appendix A. Printed books and sheets -- Appendix B. Cartographic resources -- Appendix C. Unpublished manuscripts and manuscript collections -- Appendix D. Notated music -- Appendix E. Audio recordings -- Appendix F. Moving image resources -- Appendix G. Two-dimensional graphic resources -- Appendix H. Three-dimensional resources and objects -- Appendix I. Digital resources -- Appendix J. Microform resources -- Appendix K. Bibliographic records serials and integrating resources -- Appendix L. Analytical description.
    LCSH
    Resource description and access
    RSWK
    Resource description and access / MARC 21 / Einführung
    Subject
    Resource description and access / MARC 21 / Einführung
    Resource description and access
  16. Montviloff, N.: ¬An overview of the Anglo-American cataloging code and comparison between the code and Russian bibliographic standards (1997) 0.11
    0.10797428 = product of:
      0.21594857 = sum of:
        0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 7906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11891922 = score(doc=7906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 7906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7906)
        0.09702934 = weight(_text_:26 in 7906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09702934 = score(doc=7906,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5518006 = fieldWeight in 7906, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7906)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief overview of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Code discussing its development, organisation, underlying concepts, and similarities and differences between the Code and the Russian Rules for Bibliographic Description
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 26(1997) no.1, S.17-19
  17. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.11
    0.10555364 = product of:
      0.14073819 = sum of:
        0.08408859 = weight(_text_:description in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08408859 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.36323205 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
        0.02234455 = product of:
          0.0446891 = sum of:
            0.0446891 = weight(_text_:access in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0446891 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
    Date
    23. 3.2013 12:26:02
  18. RDA: Ressource Description and Access : Draft of RDA; pt.1 (2005) 0.11
    0.105363436 = product of:
      0.21072687 = sum of:
        0.16648692 = weight(_text_:description in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16648692 = score(doc=1070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.71916276 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
        0.044239953 = product of:
          0.08847991 = sum of:
            0.08847991 = weight(_text_:access in 1070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08847991 = score(doc=1070,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 1070, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1070)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  19. Cook, M.: ¬The international description standards : an interim report (1995) 0.10
    0.104129 = product of:
      0.208258 = sum of:
        0.18613803 = weight(_text_:description in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18613803 = score(doc=1551,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8040484 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=1551,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the progress amde to date towards the designing and accepting of international standards for archival description. The International Council on Archives (ICA) set up the Ad Hoc Commission on Archival Description (ICA/DDS) in 1990 and its Statement of Principles regarding Archival Description (the Madrid Principles) was received by the ICA at the International Congress on Archives in Montreal in 1992. Discusses these principles and their implications. Describes the General International Standard Archival Description, ISAD(G) and considers access points and authorities. Indicates future developments in the international dascription standards
  20. Bianchini, C.; Willer, M.: ISBD resource and Its description in the context of the Semantic Web (2014) 0.10
    0.104129 = product of:
      0.208258 = sum of:
        0.18613803 = weight(_text_:description in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18613803 = score(doc=1998,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8040484 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
        0.022119977 = product of:
          0.044239953 = sum of:
            0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044239953 = score(doc=1998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the question "What is an International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) resource in the context of the Semantic Web, and what is the relationship of its description to the linked data?" This question is discussed against the background of the dichotomy between the description and access using the Semantic Web differentiation of the three logical layers: real-world objects, web of data, and special purpose (bibliographic) data. The representation of bibliographic data as linked data is discussed, distinguishing the description of a resource from the iconic/objective and the informational/subjective viewpoints. In the conclusion, the authors give views on possible directions of future development of the ISBD.

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 701
  • m 52
  • el 47
  • b 15
  • s 14
  • r 6
  • n 5
  • x 5
  • p 3
  • ag 2
  • ? 1
  • i 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects